1.Disadvantages of Preoperative Chemoradiation in Rectal Cancer.
Seung Hyun LEE ; Byung Kwon AHN ; Sung Uhn BAEK
Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology 2007;23(4):250-256
PURPOSE: Preoperative chemoradiation therapy for rectal cancer seems to improve local control, anal sphincter preservation, resectability, and possibly survival in patients. However, there are several adverse effects, too. The aim of this study is to analyze the disadvantages of preoperative chemoradiation for rectal cancer. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 139 patients who were treated by using preoperative chemoradiation for an adenocarcinoma of the rectum between January 1995 and December 2004. All patients had fixed or locally advanced lesions, as determined by digital rectal examination. No distant metastasis was proven before preoperative chemoradiation. All of the patiedts received the full scheduled dose of radiation (range, 5,000~5,400 rad). Concurrent intravenous chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (425 mg/m2/day) and leucovorin (45 mg/day) was administered continuously on days 1~5 and 29~33. The mean interval between chemoradiation and surgery was 4~6 weeks. After preoperative chemoradiation, 117 patients underwent an operation. We reviewed the side effects of preoperative chemoradiation, postoperative complications, and distant metastases detected during the preoperative period after preoperative chemoradiation and during the operation. RESULTS: The side effects of preoperative chemoradiation were diarrhea (23%), radiation dermatitis (2.2%), fistula (0.7%), sepsis (0.7%), and rectal bleeding (0.7%). Two patients died from sepsis and rectal bleeding. The postoperative complications were bowel obstruction in 9 cases (7.7%), wound seroma in 8 cases (6.8%), wound infection in 5 cases (4.3%), anastomotic leakage in 5 cases (7.1%), rectovaginal fistula in 2 cases (2.8%), an enterocutaneous fistula in 2 cases (1.7%), and a vesicocutaneous fistula in 1 case (0.8%). Distant metastases were detected in 14 patients (10.1%) after preoperative chemoradiation. CONCLUSIONS: Although preoperative chemoradiation can be performed safely, careful management for the side effects of preoperative chemoradiation and for postoperative complications is necessary. We need a more sensitive study method for detecting distant metastasis of rectal cancer, especially during scheduled preoperative chemoradiation.
Adenocarcinoma
;
Anal Canal
;
Anastomotic Leak
;
Dermatitis
;
Diarrhea
;
Digital Rectal Examination
;
Drug Therapy
;
Fistula
;
Fluorouracil
;
Hemorrhage
;
Humans
;
Intestinal Fistula
;
Leucovorin
;
Neoplasm Metastasis
;
Postoperative Complications
;
Preoperative Period
;
Rectal Neoplasms*
;
Rectovaginal Fistula
;
Rectum
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Sepsis
;
Seroma
;
Wound Infection
;
Wounds and Injuries
2.Clinical analysis of enterocutaneous fistula.
Journal of the Korean Surgical Society 1993;45(4):503-509
No abstract available.
Intestinal Fistula*
3.Different Strategies for Treating a Colovesical Fistula.
Annals of Coloproctology 2015;31(2):45-45
No abstract available.
Intestinal Fistula*
4.A clinical review on post-operative enterocutaneous fistula.
Journal of the Korean Surgical Society 1992;43(6):847-854
No abstract available.
Intestinal Fistula*
5.The use of OverStitch™ for the treatment of intestinal perforation, fistulas and leaks.
Thiruvengadam MUNIRAJ ; Harry R ASLANIAN
Gastrointestinal Intervention 2017;6(3):151-156
Gastrointestinal perforations, leaks and fistulas may complicate endoscopic and surgical procedures. Surgical repair is associated with significant morbidity. Therapeutic endoscopic tools and techniques have included the application of tissue sealants, clip closure, and stent placement. Endoscopic suturing is a rapidly evolving minimally invasive technique. The OverStitchTM (Apollo Endosurgery, USA) is currently the only available endoscopic suturing system. Although technically more difficult than clip closure, endoscopic suturing allows closure of larger defects. In some settings, outcomes similar to surgical management with less morbidity may be achieved. This review describes the OverStitchTM endoscopic suturing system and the published literature regarding its use for perforations, leaks and fistulas.
Fistula*
;
Intestinal Perforation*
;
Stents
6.Application of adaptive iterative dose reduction technique in CT enterography in diagnosing Crohn disease.
Yanbang LIAN ; Wuteng CAO ; Shanshan ZHU ; Yanghao LIN ; Dechao LIU ; Xinhua WANG ; Jianping QIU ; Zhiyang ZHOU
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2014;17(7):683-686
OBJECTIVETo evaluate the application of low-dose CT enterography with adaptive iterative dose reduction(AIDR) technique in diagnosing Crohn's disease.
METHODSRetrospective analysis was performed on 26 patients diagnosed as Crohn's disease by the multidisciplinary team in our hospital. Low-dose CT enterography with 640-slice MDCT was performed on these 26 patients using adaptive iterative dose reduction(AIDR) technique. Characteristics of Crohn's disease in CT enterography images were independently analyzed by two radiologists who were experienced in Crohn's disease with calculating the total radiation dosage.
RESULTSThe radiation dosage of 26 patients ranged from 5.58 to 12.90 [mean (9.00±2.00)] mSv, which was lower than conventional scan (around 15 mSv) known from the literatures. According to the images of CT enterography of 26 cases, bowel wall thickening with abnormal enhancement and lymphadenectasis were found in 25 cases with total 109 segmental bowel wall thickening. Among 25 thickening cases, enterostenosis was found in 16 cases, stratification enhancement in 12 cases and comb sign in 14 cases. Besides, it was found that 8 cases with hyperdense fat on the mesenteric side, 7 cases with intestinal fistula, 6 cases with abdominal cavity abscess, and 3 cases with anal fistula.
CONCLUSIONCT enterography of Crohn's disease with adaptive iterative dose reduction technique is an effective method to evaluate Crohn's disease without compromising image quality with reduced radiation dosage.
Crohn Disease ; diagnostic imaging ; Humans ; Intestinal Fistula ; Radiation Dosage ; Rectal Fistula ; Retrospective Studies ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; methods
7.Treatment of complications after laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer.
Bin ZHANG ; Ke ZHAO ; Quanlong LIU ; Shuhui YIN ; Yujuan ZHAO ; Guangzuan ZHUO ; Yingying FENG ; Jun ZHU ; Jianhua DING
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2017;20(4):432-438
OBJECTIVETo summarize the perioperative and postoperative complications follow laparoscopic intersphincteric resection (LapISR) in the treatment of low rectal cancer and their management.
METHODSAn observational study was conducted in 73 consecutive patients who underwent LapISR for low rectal cancer between June 2011 and February 2016 in our hospital. The clinicopathological parameters, perioperative and postoperative complications, and clinical outcomes were collected from a prospectively maintained database. Perioperative and postoperative complications were defined as any complication occurring within or more than 3 months after the primary operation, respectively.
RESULTSForty-nine(67.1%) cases were male and 24(32.9%) were female with a median age of 61(25 to 79) years. The median distance from distal tumor margin to anal verge was 4.0(1.0 to 5.5) cm. The median operative time was 195 (120 to 360) min, median intra operative blood loss was 100 (20 to 300) ml, median number of harvested lymph nodes was 14(3 to 31) per case. All the patients underwent preventive terminal ileum loop stoma. No conversion or hospital mortality was presented. The R0 resection rate was 98.6% with totally negative distal resection margin. A total of 34 complication episodes were recorded in 21(28.8%) patients during perioperative period, and among which 20.6%(7/34) was grade III(-IIII( according to Dindo system. Anastomosis-associated morbidity (16.4%,12/73) was the most common after LapISR, including mucosa ischemia in 9 cases(12.3%), stricture in 7 cases (9.6%, 4 cases secondary to mucosa necrosis receiving anal dilation), grade A fistula in 3 cases (4.1%) receiving conservative treatment and necrosis in 1 case (1.4%) receiving permanent stoma. After a median follow up of 21(3 to 60) months, postoperative complications were recorded in 12 patients (16.4%) with 16 episodes, including anastomotic stenosis (8.2%), rectum segmental stricture (5.5%), ileus (2.7%), partial anastomotic dehiscence (1.4%), anastomotic fistula (1.4%), rectovaginal fistula (1.4%) and mucosal prolapse (1.4%). These patients received corresponding treatments, such as endoscopic transanal resection, anal dilation, enema, purgative, permanent stoma, etc. according to the lesions. Six patients (8.2%) required re-operation intervention due to postoperative complications.
CONCLUSIONAnastomosis-associated morbidity is the most common after LapISR in the treatment of low rectal cancer in perioperative and postoperative periods, which must be strictly managed with suitable methods.
Adult ; Aged ; Anal Canal ; surgery ; Anastomosis, Surgical ; adverse effects ; Blood Loss, Surgical ; statistics & numerical data ; Colectomy ; adverse effects ; Constriction, Pathologic ; etiology ; therapy ; Digestive System Surgical Procedures ; adverse effects ; Female ; Humans ; Ileostomy ; adverse effects ; Intestinal Mucosa ; pathology ; Ischemia ; etiology ; Laparoscopy ; adverse effects ; Lymph Node Excision ; statistics & numerical data ; Male ; Margins of Excision ; Middle Aged ; Necrosis ; etiology ; Operative Time ; Postoperative Complications ; etiology ; therapy ; Rectal Neoplasms ; complications ; surgery ; Rectovaginal Fistula ; etiology ; therapy ; Surgical Stomas ; Treatment Outcome
8.Re-optimized technology of protective ileostomy with no need of reversal.
Bu-jun GE ; Qi HUANG ; Quan-ning CHEN ; Zhong-yan LIU ; Hai-bo ZHAO
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2013;16(10):981-984
OBJECTIVETo explore the clinical application of aoptimizedtechniquebased onpreviouslyreported protecting stoma with no need forreversal.
METHODSThetechniquealso used "the assembly of drainage device" to performprotecting ileostomy. The original method includes enterotomy at the terminal ileum to placedrainage device, which was optimized as follows: two intestinal pursestring with 0.5 cm distance were placed 5 cm away from the ileocecal valve. Transverse enterotomy was performed in the anti-mesenteric side. The assembly was placed at the root of the appendix between two pursestring, and then the intestine purse suture was tighten. Ligation of the small intestine anastomosis between the anastomosis ring at both ends was carried out, and theanastomosis ring was deployed. From the root of the appendix in the cecum wall, the assembly was embedded about 2 cm and pulled out of abdominal cavitythough the Trocar hole.
RESULTSSeventeen cases of ultra-low rectal cancer completed protecting stoma, including 11 cases through ileocecal protective stoma. All the anastomosis healed well. Defecation drainage tube was removed 3-5 weeks after anastomosis ring degradation. Drainage nozzle healed after 3 to 5 days, and no complications occurred.
CONCLUSIONThe optimized ileocecal protective ileostomy has the following advantages: (1)wound healing time is significantly shorter. (2)secondary intestinal fistula can be prevented. (3)no need to fix ileum and less chance of subsequent volvulus, intestinal obstruction.
Anastomosis, Surgical ; Defecation ; Drainage ; Humans ; Ileostomy ; methods ; Ileum ; surgery ; Intestinal Fistula ; Rectal Neoplasms ; Surgical Stomas
9.Efficacy observation of partial stapled transanal rectal resection combined with Bresler procedure in the treatment of rectocele and internal rectal intussusception.
Zhiyong LIU ; Guangen YANG ; Qun DENG ; Qingyan YANG
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2016;19(5):566-570
OBJECTIVETo evaluate the efficacy of partial stapled transanal rectal resection (part-STARR) combined with Bresler procedure in the treatment of obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) associated with rectocele and internal rectal intussusception(IRI), and compare with STARR.
METHODSA randomized controlled study from January 2013 to December 2014 was undertaken. Sixty female patients with ODS caused by rectocele and IRI were prospectively enrolled and randomly divided into trial group (29 cases) receiving part-STARR combined with Bresler procedure, and control group (31 cases) undergoing STARR only. For patients in trial group, two thirds of posterior rectal wall were stapled with STARR methods and one third of anterior with Bresler procedure, while for those in control group, only STARR was performed. Intra-operational status, postoperative complications, Wexner constipation score and patient satisfaction 3 months and 6 months after operation, and rectocele defecography 6 months after operation were compared between the two groups.
RESULTSThe average operation time of trial group was longer than that of control group [(31.2±5.4) minutes vs. (28.7±4.0) minutes, t=2.127, P=0.038]. There were no significant differences in intra-operative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay and complications(pain, postoperative bleeding, rectovaginal fistula, feeling of tenesmus and swelling) between the two methods(all P>0.05). There were no significant differences in the Wexner score of constipation between the two groups before operation and 3 months after operation (6.72±1.19 vs. 7.32±1.25, t=-1.896, P=0.063), while the Wexner score of trial group was significantly lower 6 months after operation (6.90±1.42 vs. 7.74±1.26, t=-2.463, P=0.018). Patient satisfaction between two groups was not significantly different 3 months after operation(χ(2)=5.743, P=0.125), while trial group had better satisfaction 6 months after operation[93.1%(27/29) vs. 67.7%(21/31), χ(2)=8.247, P=0.041]. There was no difference in depth of rectocele on defecography between the two groups before operation, while rectocele was significantly improved 6 months after operation [(0.7±0.2) cm vs. (0.9±0.2) cm, t=2.527, P=0.014].
CONCLUSIONPartial STARR combined with Bresler procedure in the treatment of ODS associated with rectocele and IRI has better efficacy than STARR only.
Blood Loss, Surgical ; Constipation ; Defecography ; Digestive System Surgical Procedures ; methods ; Female ; Humans ; Intestinal Obstruction ; surgery ; Intussusception ; surgery ; Length of Stay ; Operative Time ; Postoperative Complications ; Rectocele ; surgery ; Rectovaginal Fistula ; Surgical Stapling
10.Mirizzi Syndrome Type II with Cholecystoduodenal Fistula: An Infrequent Combination
Mohammad Shazib Faridi ; Anshuman Pandey
Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences 2014;21(1):69-71
We report a case of Mirizzi syndrome type II associated with biliary enteric fistula. It is important to identify this combination early, as it is associated with high morbidity. In our case, intraoperative findings were cholecystoduodenal fistula and communication of Hartmann’s pouch with common bile duct (CBD). A subtotal cholecystectomy with excision of cholecystoduodenal fistula was performed. A minimal surgical maneuver of Calot’s Triangle with repair of cholecystoduodenal fistula is required during the intraoperative period.
Intestinal Fistula
;
Gallstones
;
Mirizzi Syndrome