Degenerative disc disease is a multifaceted progressive irreversible condition and an inevitable part of aging, which has been found to be a contributing factor for low back pain and might cause radiculopathy, myelopathy, spinal stenosis, degenerative spondylolisthesis, and herniations. Its etiology is complex and multifactorial. Although genetics influence more dominant, the occupational and mechanical influences still persist as a major risk factor. This review emphasizes up-to-date knowledge regarding etiology of disc degeneration with special consideration on occupational, lifestyle factors, and genetic polymorphisms.
Humans ; Intervertebral Disc Degeneration ; etiology ; genetics ; Life Style ; Occupational Diseases ; etiology

Degenerative disc disease is not only a common disease in the area of spinal surgery, but also one of the main reasons for the low back pain of the adults and disability. Conventionally it was considered be affirmative for the effect of the lumbar spinal fusion. But the way retained the physiological motor function. The lumbar motion segment fusion accelerated degeneration of adjacent segment disc and facet joint. Further study of lumbar functional anatomy and biomechanics made development of modern artificial disc device of different structures and materials possible. Besides the lumbar fusion, artificial lumbar disc replacement has become another choice in treating the lumbar degenerative diseases. The purpose is to release the pain which caused by the degenerative disc for a long period and to reconstruct the height of intervertebral disc in order to protect the nerve tissue. Retaining the spinal movement was in order to avoid degeneration of facet joints and adjacent segments, then, restore the spinal characteristic of kinematics and load at last. This review aims to explain the type of artificial lumbar intervertebral disc, the field of research and its clinical application advancement and prospects.
Adult ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Humans ; Intervertebral Disc ; pathology ; Intervertebral Disc Degeneration ; pathology ; Low Back Pain ; etiology ; Lumbar Vertebrae ; pathology ; Neurodegenerative Diseases ; surgery ; Prostheses and Implants ; utilization

OBJECTIVE: To explore the relationship between spinous process deviation and lumbar disc herniation in young patients. METHODS: From March 2015 to January 2022, 30 treated young (under the age of 30) patients with lumbar disc herniation were included as the young group. In addition 30 middle-aged patients (quinquagenarian group) with lumbar disc herniation and 30 patients with non-degenerative spinal diseases (young non-degenerative group) were selected as control groups. The angle of the spinous process deviation was measured on CT and statistically analyzed by various groups. All the data were measured twice and the average value was taken and recorded. RESULTS: The average angle of spinous process deviation in the degenerative lumbar vertebra of young patients were (3.89±3.77) degrees, similar to the (3.72±2.98) degrees of quinquagenarian patients(P=0.851). The average angle of s spinous process deviation young non-degenerative group were (2.20±2.28) degrees, significantly less than young group(P=0.040). The spinous process deviation angle of the superior vertebral of the degenerative lumbar in the young group was (4.10±3.44) degrees, which similar to the (3.47±2.87) degrees in the quinquagenarian group (P=0.447). A total of 19 young patients had the opposite deviation direction of the spinous process of the degenerative lumbar vertebra and upper vertebra, while only 7 quinquagenarian patients had this condition(P=0.02). The type of lumbar disc herniation in young patients had no significant relationship with the direction of spinous process deflection of the degenerative or upper lumbar vertebra (P>0.05). CONCLUSION Spinous process deviation is a risk factor of young lumbar disc herniation patients. If the deviation directions of adjacent lumbar spinous processes are opposite, it will increase the incidence of lumbar disc herniation in young patients. There was no significant correlation between the type of disc herniation and the deviation direction of the spinous process of the degenerative or upper lumbar vertebra. People with such anatomical variation can strengthen the stability of spine and prevent lumbar disc herniation through reasonable exercise.
Middle Aged ; Humans ; Intervertebral Disc Displacement/complications* ; Vertebral Body ; Spinal Diseases ; Spinal Fusion/adverse effects* ; Lumbar Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging* ; Intervertebral Disc Degeneration/etiology*

Animals ; Extracellular Matrix Proteins ; antagonists & inhibitors ; chemistry ; genetics ; physiology ; Humans ; Intervertebral Disc Degeneration ; etiology ; therapy ; Repetitive Sequences, Amino Acid

Animals ; Humans ; Intervertebral Disc Degeneration ; physiopathology ; Low Back Pain ; etiology ; pathology ; Lumbar Vertebrae ; blood supply ; Risk Factors ; Smoking ; adverse effects

OBJECTIVETo observe degenerative intervertebral disc and to examine innervation of degenerative discs in the rabbit anular-injury model.

METHODSTwo different magnitudes of anular injury at 5 mm depth were performed by 11 blade or 16 gauge needle at the L3-L4 or L5-L6 discs in New Zealand white rabbits (n=48, 2.5-3.0 kg). Disc degeneration was evaluated by radiographic, MRI and histological examination at different time points after surgery. To identify nerve ingrowth into disc, two general markers PGP 9.5 and GAP 43, for nerve fibers were examined by immunohistochemistry.

RESULTSignificant decreases in disc height and signal intensity in magnetic resonance imaging were observed in 11 blade group and 16 G puncture group (P<0.01). 16 G puncture group induced slower and more progressive disc degeneration companed with the stab group and control group. At the 12-week time point, nucleus pulposus tissues were extruded and scar tissues formed outside the disc. In stab discs, nerve ingrowth was scattered on the surface of injury site and in the deeper part of the scar tissues, more than 1 mm from the surface. However, in punctured discs, PGP 9.5 and GAP 43-immunoreative fibers were only observed in the outmost part of the scar tissues and superficial area. More nerve fibers were observed in stab group.

CONCLUSIONInnervation may act as a source of discogenic pain which is associated with intervertebral disc degeneration caused by disc anular injury.

Animals ; GAP-43 Protein ; metabolism ; Intervertebral Disc ; injuries ; innervation ; pathology ; Intervertebral Disc Degeneration ; diagnosis ; diagnostic imaging ; etiology ; Low Back Pain ; etiology ; Lumbar Vertebrae ; Male ; Nerve Fibers ; pathology ; Rabbits ; Radiography ; Random Allocation ; Ubiquitin Thiolesterase ; metabolism

OBJECTIVE: To observe the cage subsidence after oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) for lumbar spondylosis, summarize the characteristics of the cage subsidence, analyze causes, and propose preventive measures. METHODS: The data of 144 patients of lumbar spine lesions admitted to our hospital from October 2015 to December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 43 males and 101 females, and the age ranged from 20 to 81 years old, with an average of (60.90±10.06) years old. Disease types:17 patients of lumbar intervertebral disc degenerative disease, 12 patients of giant lumbar disc herniation, 5 patients of discogenic low back pain, 33 patients of lumbar spinal stenosis, 26 patients of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis, 28 patients of lumbar spondylolisthesis with spondylolisthesis, 11 patients of adjacent vertebral disease after lumbar internal fixation, 7 patients of primary spondylitis in the inflammatory outcome stage, and 5 patients of lumbar degenerative scoliosis. Preoperative dual-energy X-ray bone mineral density examination showed 57 patients of osteopenia or osteoporosis, and 87 patients of normal bone density. The number of fusion segments:124 patients of single-segment, 11 patients of two-segment, 8 patients of three-segment, four-segment 1 patient. There were 40 patients treated by stand-alone OLIF, and 104 patients by OLIF combined with posterior pedicle screw. Observed the occurrence of fusion cage settlement after operation, conducted monofactor analysis on possible risk factors, and observed the influence of fusion cage settlement on clinical results. RESULTS: All operations were successfully completed, the median operation time was 99 min, and the median intraoperative blood loss was 106 ml. Intraoperative endplate injury occurred in 30 patients and vertebral fracture occurred in 5 patients. The mean follow-up was (14.57±7.14) months from 6 to 30 months. During the follow-up, except for the patients of primary lumbar interstitial inflammation and some patients of lumbar spondylolisthesis with spondylolisthesis, the others all had different degrees of cage subsidence. Cage subsidence classification:119 patients were normal subsidence, and 25 patients were abnormal subsidence (23 patients were gradeⅠ, and 2 patients were gradeⅡ). There was no loosening or rupture of the pedicle screw system. The height of the intervertebral space recovered from the preoperative average (9.48±1.84) mm to the postoperative average (12.65±2.03) mm, and the average (10.51±1.81) mm at the last follow-up. There were statistical differences between postoperative and preoperative, and between the last follow-up and postoperative. The interbody fusion rate was 94.4%. The low back pain VAS decreased from the preoperative average (6.55±2.2 9) to the last follow-up (1.40±0.82), and there was statistically significant different. The leg pain VAS decreased from the preoperative average (4.72±1.49) to the final follow-up (0.60±0.03), and the difference was statistically significant (t=9.13, P<0.000 1). The ODI index recovered from the preoperative average (38.50±6.98)% to the latest follow-up (11.30±3.27)%, and there was statistically significant different. The complication rate was 31.3%(45/144), and the reoperation rate was 9.72%(14/144). Among them, 8 patients were reoperated due to fusion cage subsidence or displacement, accounting for 57.14%(8/14) of reoperation. The fusion cage subsidence in this group had obvious characteristics. The monofactor analysis showed that the number of abnormal subsidence patients in the osteopenia or osteoporosis group, Stand-alone OLIF group, 2 or more segments fusion group, and endplate injury group was higher than that in the normal bone mass group, OLIF combined with pedicle screw fixation group, single segment fusion group, and no endplate injury group, and the comparison had statistical differences. CONCLUSION Cage subsidence is a common phenomenon after OLIF surgery. Preoperative osteopenia or osteoporosis, Stand-alone OLIF, 2 or more segments of fusion and intraoperative endplate injury may be important factors for postoperative fusion cage subsidence. Although there is no significant correlation between the degree of cage subsidence and clinical symptoms, there is a risk of cage migration, and prevention needs to be strengthened to reduce serious complications caused by fusion of cage subsidence, including reoperation.
Male ; Female ; Humans ; Young Adult ; Adult ; Middle Aged ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Spondylolisthesis/surgery* ; Retrospective Studies ; Low Back Pain/etiology* ; Scoliosis ; Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery* ; Spinal Fusion/methods* ; Bone Diseases, Metabolic ; Osteoporosis/etiology* ; Treatment Outcome ; Intervertebral Disc Displacement ; Intervertebral Disc Degeneration

BACKGROUND: Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) may cause bladder dysfunction, urinary tract infection, and catheter-related complications. It is important to be aware and to be able to identify patients at risk of developing POUR. However, there has been no study that has investigated the incidence and risk factors for the development of POUR following anterior cervical spine surgery for degenerative cervical disc disease. METHODS: We included 325 patients (164 male and 161 female), who underwent anterior cervical spine surgery for cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy due to primary cervical disc herniation and/or spondylosis, in the study. We did not perform en bloc catheterization in our patients before the operation. RESULTS: There were 36 patients (27 male and 9 female) that developed POUR with an overall incidence of 11.1%. The mean numbers of postoperative in-and-out catheterizations was 1.6 times and mean urine output was 717.7 mL. Thirteen out of 36 POUR patients (36%) underwent indwelling catheterization for a mean 4.3 days after catheterization for in-and-out surgery, because of persisting POUR. Seven out of 36 POUR patients (19%) were treated for voiding difficulty, urinary tract irritation, or infection. Chi-square test showed that patients who were male, had diabetes mellitus, benign prostate hypertrophy or myelopathy, or used Demerol were at higher risk of developing POUR. The mean age of POUR patients was higher than non-POUR patients (68.5 years vs. 50.8 years, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: To avoid POUR and related complications as a result of anterior cervical spine surgery for degenerative cervical disc disease, we recommend that a catheter be placed selectively before the operation in at-risk patients, the elderly in particular, male gender, diabetes mellitus, benign prostate hypertrophy, and myelopathy. We recommend that Demerol not be used for postoperative pain control.
Adult ; Aged ; Cervical Vertebrae/*surgery ; Chi-Square Distribution ; Diabetes Mellitus ; Female ; Humans ; Intervertebral Disc Degeneration/*surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Complications/etiology ; Risk Factors ; Urinary Catheterization ; Urinary Retention/*etiology

OBJECTIVETo analyze the factors affecting the occurrence of adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) after lumbar internal fixation.

METHODSThe clinical data of 147 surgical patients with lumbar disc herniation, lumbar spinal stenosis and lumbar spodylolisthesis undergoing surgeries between January 2002 and July 2007 in our hospital were reviewed. The correlations of gender, range of fixation, position of fixation, and characteristic of the adjacent disc to the occurrence of ASD were analyzed.

RESULTSThe patients were followed up for a mean of 30-/+10 months (18-84 months). The incidence of ASD was 13.6% in these patients, occurring all at the cephalad adjacent segment. The presence of preoperative degeneration of the adjacent disc gave rise to increased risk of ASD following the surgery (chi(2)=6.272, P=0.012), and multivariate analysis indicated that preoperative adjacent disc degeneration was a risk factor for postoperative ASD (P=0.046), but gender, range of fusion and site of fusion were not the risk factors.

CONCLUSIONPresence of adjacent segment degeneration before the operation is associated with a significantly increased risk of postoperative ASD.

Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Female ; Humans ; Intervertebral Disc Degeneration ; etiology ; Lumbar Vertebrae ; surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate Analysis ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Spinal Diseases ; etiology ; Spinal Fusion ; adverse effects ; Spinal Stenosis ; pathology ; surgery ; Spondylolisthesis ; pathology ; surgery ; Young Adult

BACKGROUNDAdjacent segment disease (ASD) is common after cervical fusion. The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk factors for ASD on X-ray and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODSPatients included in this study had received revision surgeries after developing symptomatic ASD following anterior decompression and fusion. A control group that had not developed ASD was matched 1:1 by follow-up time and fusion segments. Plate-to-disc distances (PDDs), developmental cervical canal stenosis on X-ray, cervical disc degeneration grading, and cervical disc bulge impingements on preoperative MRI were measured and compared between the ASD group and the control group.

RESULTSThirty-four patients with complete radiographic data were included in the ASD group. The causative segments of ASD included nine cases of C3-4, 18 cases of C4-5, three cases of C5-6, and four cases of C6-7. The ASD occurred at the upper adjacent segments in 26 patients and at the lower adjacent segments in eight patients. PDD distributions were similar between the ASD group and the control group. Developmental cervical canal stenosis was a risk factor for ASD, with an odd ratio value of 2.88. Preoperative cervical disc degenerations on MRI were similar between the ASD group and the control group. In the upper-level ASD group, the disc bulge impingement was (19.7±9.7)%, which was significantly higher than that of the control group of (11.8±4.8)%.

CONCLUSIONSASD was more likely to develop above the index level of fusion. Developmental cervical canal stenosis and greater disc bulge impingement may be risk factors for the development of ASD.

Cervical Vertebrae ; pathology ; surgery ; Decompression, Surgical ; adverse effects ; Humans ; Intervertebral Disc Degeneration ; diagnosis ; etiology ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Radiography ; Risk Factors ; Spinal Fusion ; adverse effects ; Spinal Stenosis ; diagnostic imaging