Humans ; Intervertebral Disc Displacement/surgery* ; Skull ; Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery* ; Blindness ; Treatment Outcome ; Intervertebral Disc Degeneration/surgery*

Anterior cervical fusion surgery is the first choice for spine surgeons in the treatment of cervical spine diseases. It has significant effects in treating cervical degenerative diseases, trauma and tumors and other cervical diseases. In anterior cervical fusion, it is necessary to use a distractor to properly distract the intervertebral space, so as to fully expose and relieve the compressive factors, restore the physiological height, curvature and stability of the lesion segment, and achieve the best surgical effect. However, there is currently no consensus on the standard distraction height for the intervertebral space during anterior cervical surgery. This article reviewsed the progress of intervertebral space height in anterior cervical fusion from three dimensions:the relationship between intervertebral space height and cervical disc degeneration mechanism, the selection of intervertebral space height during operation, the recovery of intervertebral space height and the postoperative effect, so as to provide theoretical basis and reference for spinal surgeons when performing intervertebral distraction during operation.
Cervical Vertebrae/surgery* ; Humans ; Intervertebral Disc/surgery* ; Intervertebral Disc Degeneration ; Neck ; Spinal Fusion ; Treatment Outcome

Female ; Humans ; Intervertebral Disc ; surgery ; Intervertebral Disc Displacement ; surgery ; Middle Aged

Humans ; Intervertebral Disc Displacement/therapy* ; Medicine, Chinese Traditional ; Intervertebral Disc ; Intervertebral Disc Degeneration ; Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery* ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Bone Resorption ; Cervical Vertebrae/surgery* ; Humans ; Incidence ; Intervertebral Disc/surgery* ; Intervertebral Disc Degeneration/surgery* ; Total Disc Replacement ; Treatment Outcome

Adult ; Female ; Humans ; Intervertebral Disc Chemolysis ; Intervertebral Disc Displacement ; surgery ; Lumbar Vertebrae ; surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Recurrence

The modern surgical treatment of cervical degenerative disc disease can be traced back to the advent of anterior cervical decompression and fusion.With the emergence of fusion-related complications,different scholars have promoted the gradual transformation of cervical degenerative disc diseases from "fusion fixation" to "non-fusion reconstruction" through in-depth fusion with materials science,engineering mechanics and other disciplines.The innovation of this treatment concept is consistent with the original intention of "structural remodeling,functional reconstruction,maximum repair and reconstruction of the morphology and function of skeletal muscle system" in orthopedic bionic treatment,which is essentially in line with the "bionic alternative therapy" in orthopedic bionic therapy.This paper focuses on the surgical treatment of cervical degenerative disc diseases,reviews the development history of artificial cervical disc replacement,analyzes the evolution from orthopedic biomimetic therapy,and explores a new direction for the design of artificial cervical disc prostheses and the treatment of cervical degenerative disc diseases in the future.
Bionics ; Cervical Vertebrae/surgery* ; Diskectomy ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Intervertebral Disc/surgery* ; Intervertebral Disc Degeneration/surgery* ; Spinal Fusion ; Total Disc Replacement ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVE: To explore the curative effect of surgical treatment for lumbar discogenic low back pain. METHODS: Forty-two patients with lumbar discogenic low back pain were treated with disc excision and lumbar interbody fusion: 12 of them were treated with posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), 30 with afront lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF). The clinical results were evaluated by pre- and post-operative visual analogue scale (VAS), and the fusion rates of the lumbosacral spine were evaluated by X-ray. RESULTS: The average follow-up period was 18 months, ranging from 6 to 36 months. Low back pain basically disappeared in 11 patients treated with PLIF, with mild back pain in one patient; VAS after the operation decreased significantly in comparison with that preoperatively (P<0.01). Low back pain basically disappeared in 28 patients treated with ALIF; VAS after the operation decreased significantly in comparison with that preoperatively (P<0.01). The fusion rate was 90% in patients treated with PLIF, and 93% in patients with ALIF. CONCLUSION Disc excision and interbody fusion is effective in the treatment of lumbar discogenic low back pain, but the operation indications should be paid attention to.
Adolescent ; Adult ; Female ; Humans ; Intervertebral Disc ; surgery ; Intervertebral Disc Displacement ; complications ; surgery ; Low Back Pain ; etiology ; surgery ; Lumbar Vertebrae ; surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Spinal Fusion ; methods ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVETo summarize the therapeutic experience of Bryan prosthetic cervical disc replacement at the 3rd years after operation and to analyze the clinical effect, incidence rate of heterotopic ossification, conditions of prosthetic fusion in order to investigate the countermeasures.

METHODSFrom December 2005 to December 2008, 54 patients with cervical syndrome (34 males and 20 females, the age was from 39 to 69 years with an average of 50.5) were treated with single level Bryan prosthetic cervical disc replacement. The patients were followed for 24-36 months with an average of 30 months. The symptoms and nerve function were evaluated according to JOA and Odom's scoring. The anterior-posterior and lateral cervical X-ray films were also taken regularly every three months for the observation of heterotopic ossification and prosthetic fusion. Meanwhile, the X-ray films of the forward bending, extending, left and right lateriflection were taken before operation and at the 1st years after operation for the measurement of the stability and rang (ROM) of replaced levels.

RESULTSThe pain symptom and neurological function of all 54 patients were improved obviously. JOA score increased with an average of 76.1%, and ROM of replaced levels also improved obviously. The incidence rate of heterotopic ossification and prosthetic fusion went up year by year, 3.7% (2/54) for the first year, 16.7% (9/54) for the second year and 22.2% (12/54) for the nearly third year.

CONCLUSIONBryan prosthetic cervical disc replacement has better mid-stage results than conventional methods. Modified surgical methods and early rehabilitation exercise may reduce the relatively high incidence rate of heterotopic ossification and prosthetic fusion.

Adult ; Aged ; Cervical Vertebrae ; surgery ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Intervertebral Disc ; surgery ; Intervertebral Disc Displacement ; physiopathology ; surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Complications ; epidemiology ; Prostheses and Implants ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVE: To investigate clinical efficacy and safety of single and double segmental percutaneous lumbar discectomy for young and middle-aged patients with double-segment disc herniation. METHODS: Retrospective analysis was undertaken for 32 young and middle-aged patients with percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) in the treatment of double-segment lumbar disc herniation from January 2015 to October 2018 in Peking University First Hospital. In the study, 18 cases were treated with single-segment treatment and 14 cases with double-segment treatment. Visual analogue score (VAS) and oswestry disability index (ODI) assessment were used to compare clinical symptom outcomes before surgery, 3 months after surgery and at the last follow-up. Macnab criteria were used to assess the patients' overall satisfaction after surgery. Imaging parameters included lumbar lordosis, intervertebral height at each segment and endplate angle of lesion segment on the X-ray. And Michigan State University(MSU) rating and Pfirrmann scoring system were used to evaluate the grade of disc herniation and disc degeneration respectively on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The perioperative parameters included the surgeon, anesthesia method, operation time, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative bracing time and perioperative complications. RESULTS: The mean follow-up time was (26.78±10.64) months. There was no significant difference in the follow-up time and baseline information between the two groups(P > 0.05). ODI scores 3 months post-operatively and at the last follow-up were lower in the double segment (P < 0.05). The ODI improvement was also more significant in the double-segment group at the last follow-up (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in radiographic parameters at baseline (P>0.05). MSU scale for the primary segment was significantly lowered after both operations (P < 0.05). MSU scale for secondary segment was significantly lowered in double segment group but not in single segment group. Other imaging parameters were similar between the two groups (P > 0.05). The operation time of the single-segment group was significantly shorter than that of the double-segment group(P < 0.001). No perioperative complications were found in either group, but three patients underwent secondary lumbar surgery during the postoperative follow-up period in the single-segment group. CONCLUSION For young and middle-aged patients with double-segment disc herniation, this study suggests double-segment PELD may be more advantageous than single-segment PELD in terms of asuring clinical efficacy without increasing perioperative risks.
Diskectomy ; Diskectomy, Percutaneous ; Endoscopy ; Humans ; Intervertebral Disc Degeneration/surgery* ; Intervertebral Disc Displacement/surgery* ; Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery* ; Middle Aged ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome