Objectives To learn the echocardiography skills of intensivists after receiving a basic critical care echocardiography training course, and investigate factors that may influence their performance. Methods We completed a web-based questionnaire that assessed the skills in ultrasound scanning techniques of intensivists who took a training course on basic critical care echocardiography held in 2019 and 2020. Mann-Whitney test was used to analyze the factors which might affect their performance on image acquisition, recognizing clinical syndrome, and measuring the diameter of inferior vena cava, left ventricular ejection fraction and left ventricular outflow tract velocity-time integral.Results We enrolled 554 physicians from 412 intensive care units across China. Among them, 185 (33.4%) reported that they had 10%-30% chance of being misled by critical care echocardiography when making therapeutic decision, and 34 (6.1%) reported that the chance was greater than 30%. Intensivists who performed echocardiography under the guidance of a mentor and finished ultrasound scanning more than 10 times per week reported significant higher scores in image acquisition, clinical syndrome recognition, and quantitative measurement of inferior vena cava diameter, left ventricular ejection fraction and left ventricular outflow tract velocity-time integral than those without mentor and performing echocardiography 10 times or less per week respectively (all P < 0.05).Conclusion The skills in diagnostic medical echocardiography of Chinese intensivists after a basic echocardiographic training course remain low, and further quality assurance training program is clearly warranted.
Humans ; Clinical Competence ; East Asian People ; Echocardiography/standards* ; Stroke Volume ; Ventricular Function, Left ; Self-Assessment ; Physicians/standards* ; Internal Medicine/standards*

The American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) sets standards and certifies and recertifies physicians to practise internal medicine and its subspecialties in America. The ABIM was established in 1936 as a non-profit corporation, one of many specialty boards, such as the American Board of Family Medicine, the American Board of Pediatrics, the American Board of Surgery, etc. The umbrella organisation for these groups is the American Board of Medical Specialties. Members of the American College of Physicians take certifying and recertifying examinations produced by ABIM. Beginning in 1990, ABIM certificates were valid for 10 years. To maintain certification, physicians were required to participate in ABIM maintenance of certification (MOC) programme. The goals are to improve quality of care, to set standards for clinical competency, to foster continuing scholarship, and lead to medical quality improvement. The MOC programme involves verification of credentials, completion of self-evaluation, and completion of a secure exam. The self-evaluation component is the most complex and has been the most controversial due to the diversity of internal medicine careers and continued learning patterns. ABIM continually introduces new options for evaluation of practice performance. In addition to recertification in General Internal Medicine, ABIM has subspecialty examinations. MOC has been well received by professional organisations, but there are areas of controversy. It has been accepted as an important way for internists to assure quality of practice and currency of medical information.
Certification ; history ; organization & administration ; Clinical Competence ; standards ; History, 20th Century ; Humans ; Internal Medicine ; standards ; Societies, Medical ; United States

INTRODUCTIONThe purpose of this study was to understand the learning of internal medicine of 7th year medical students through records of the "Learning Passport".

MATERIALS AND METHODSBetween June 2005 and June 2006, data from the learning passport (a type of logbook) of 207 7th year medical students at the Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital (NTUH) were collected.

RESULTSAmong the 19 symptoms/signs listed in the logbook, a large number of students did not learn well on low back pain, skin rash, oedema, oliguria and anxiety/depression; only a few students rated themselves as knowledgeable about anxiety/depression, malaise, skin rash, headache and anorexia. Among the 16 diseases listed, a large number of students did not learn well on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, stroke, hypertension, coronary artery disease and cirrhosis; only a few students rated themselves as knowledgeable about shock, respiratory failure, consciousness disturbance, sepsis and renal failure. Among the 21 physical examination skills listed, a large number of students did not learn well on the male genitalia, eyes, cognitive status, mental state and the digital rectal examination; only a few students rated themselves as fully competent about cognitive status, mental state, eyes, neurology examination and ENT examination. Among the 11 laboratory skills and image interpretation skills listed, a large number of students did not learn well on blood smear, Gram's stain and specimen sampling; only a few students rated themselves as fully competent about the interpretation of brain computed tomographic (CT) scan, blood smear and Gram's stain. Among the 12 procedures and therapeutic skills listed, a large number of students did not learn well on observation of lumbar puncture, basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and aseptic procedure; only a few students rated themselves as fully competent about basic CPR and transfusion management.

CONCLUSIONSThe weak points of intern training conducted by the Department of Internal Medicine, NTUH were revealed by analysis obtained from their logbooks. Thus, we need to strengthen the learning of the interns in these specific parts and assess their performance based on the use of portfolios.

Clinical Competence ; Education, Medical, Graduate ; standards ; Educational Measurement ; methods ; Hospitals, University ; Internal Medicine ; education ; Self Efficacy ; Taiwan