Hypoglycemia is a common finding in both daily clinical practice and acute care settings. The causes of severe hypoglycemia (SH) are multi-factorial and the major etiologies are iatrogenic, infectious diseases with sepsis and tumor or autoimmune diseases. With the advent of aggressive lowering of HbA1c values to achieve optimal glycemic control, patients are at increased risk of hypoglycemic episodes. Iatrogenic hypoglycemia can cause recurrent morbidity, sometime irreversible neurologic complications and even death, and further preclude maintenance of euglycemia over a lifetime of diabetes. Recent studies have shown that hypoglycemia is associated with adverse outcomes in many acute illnesses. In addition, hypoglycemia is associated with increased mortality among elderly and non-diabetic hospitalized patients. Clinicians should have high clinical suspicion of subtle symptoms of hypoglycemia and provide prompt treatment. Clinicians should know that hypoglycemia is associated with considerable adverse outcomes in many acute critical illnesses. In order to reduce hypoglycemia-associated morbidity and mortality, timely health education programs and close monitoring should be applied to those diabetic patients presenting to the Emergency Department with SH. ED disposition strategies should be further validated and justified to achieve balance between the benefits of euglycemia and the risks of SH. We discuss relevant issues regarding hypoglycemia in emergency and critical care settings.
Diabetes Mellitus/drug therapy ; Humans ; Hypoglycemia/blood/*chemically induced/*complications/epidemiology ; Hypoglycemic Agents/adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Insulin/adverse effects/therapeutic use

BACKGROUNDHyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance are present in the majority of women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Both metformin and rosiglitazone can improve the ovulation and endocrine disorders of the patients. How about the combination of the two? It is rarely reported. This study aimed to compare the therapeutic efficacy of metformin versus metformin plus rosiglitazone in patients with PCOS.

METHODSFifty-eight women with PCOS were randomly assigned to two groups. Metformin group (29) was treated with metformin mono-therapy and metformin plus rosiglitazone group (29) was treated with metformin plus rosiglitazone for 6 months. Treatment was discontinued once pregnancy was diagnosed.

RESULTSFasting insulin, postprandial insulin, the homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), luteinizing hormone (LH), triglyceride, lower density cholesterol and testosterone level decreased significantly in both groups (P < 0.05). Metformin plus rosiglitazone had a better effect than metformin mono-therapy. Body mass index decreased by 7.8% in metformin group while no significant change in metformin plus rosiglitazone group. There were eight pregnancies, six in metformin plus rosiglitazone group (one abortion) and two in metformin group. There was no congenital anomaly at birth and seven infants developed well at one year's follow-up.

CONCLUSIONSMetformin can improve insulin resistance and imbalance of endocrine hormones. Metformin plus rosiglitazone has a more pronounced therapeutic effect and achieved more pregnancies than mono-therapy with metformin. The use of metformin and rosiglitazone before pregnancy has no obvious side effect on the development of the infants. Our study might suggest that metformin is the better choice in PCOS patients with serious obese and rosiglitazone plus metformin would be more effective in patients with severe insulin resistance or those do not respond to metformin.

Adolescent ; Adult ; Female ; Humans ; Hypoglycemic Agents ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Insulin Resistance ; physiology ; Luteinizing Hormone ; blood ; Metformin ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Polycystic Ovary Syndrome ; blood ; drug therapy ; Testosterone ; blood ; Thiazolidinediones ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Triglycerides ; blood ; Young Adult

OBJECTIVETo investigate the feasibility of perioperative glycemic control with insulin glargine in type 2 diabetic patients.

METHODSWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 16 type 2 diabetic inpatients treated with insulin glargine (research group) and 16 type 2 diabetic inpatients treated with the traditional intensified insulin therapy (control group) for perioperative glycemic control.

RESULTSThe fasting blood glucose values of the diabetic patients in the research group on the day of surgery and the first 3 postoperative days were (7.5 +/- 1.8), (8.2 +/- 1.8), (7.6 +/- 1.6), and (7.2 +/- 1.1) mmol/L, respectively, and were (9.0 +/- 2.8), (10.4 +/- 2.4), (8.8 +/- 2.7), (9.0 +/- 2.0) mmol/L in the control group, respectively. The fasting blood glucose values in the research group were significantly lower than the control group on the first and third postoperative day (P = 0.02 and 0.01, respectively). No hypoglycemic events were observed and all wounds were healed well in both groups.

CONCLUSIONWith satisfied fasting blood glucose level and fewer episode of hypoglycemia, perioperative glycemic control by insulin glargine in type 2 diabetic patients is safe, effective, and convenient.

Blood Glucose ; analysis ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 ; blood ; drug therapy ; Humans ; Hypoglycemic Agents ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Insulin ; adverse effects ; analogs & derivatives ; therapeutic use ; Insulin Glargine ; Insulin, Long-Acting ; Perioperative Care ; Retrospective Studies

We studied the efficacy and safety of acarbose in comparison with voglibose in type 2 diabetes patients whose blood glucose levels were inadequately controlled with basal insulin alone or in combination with metformin (or a sulfonylurea). This study was a 24-week prospective, open-label, randomized, active-controlled multi-center study. Participants were randomized to receive either acarbose (n=59, 300 mg/day) or voglibose (n=62, 0.9 mg/day). The mean HbA1c at week 24 was significantly decreased approximately 0.7% from baseline in both acarbose (from 8.43% +/- 0.71% to 7.71% +/- 0.93%) and voglibose groups (from 8.38% +/- 0.73% to 7.68% +/- 0.94%). The mean fasting plasma glucose level and self-monitoring of blood glucose data from 1 hr before and after each meal were significantly decreased at week 24 in comparison to baseline in both groups. The levels 1 hr after dinner at week 24 were significantly decreased in the acarbose group (from 233.54 +/- 69.38 to 176.80 +/- 46.63 mg/dL) compared with the voglibose group (from 224.18 +/- 70.07 to 193.01 +/- 55.39 mg/dL). In conclusion, both acarbose and voglibose are efficacious and safe in patients with type 2 diabetes who are inadequately controlled with basal insulin. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00970528)
Acarbose/adverse effects/*therapeutic use ; Blood Glucose ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/blood/*drug therapy ; Enzyme Inhibitors/adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Female ; Hemoglobin A, Glycosylated/analysis ; Humans ; Hypoglycemic Agents/adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Inositol/adverse effects/*analogs & derivatives/therapeutic use ; Insulin/*blood/therapeutic use ; Male ; Metformin/therapeutic use ; Middle Aged ; Prospective Studies ; alpha-Glucosidases/antagonists & inhibitors

Combined pegylated interferon and ribavirin therapy for chronic hepatitis C infection cause a wide range of side effects, including flu-like syndrome, hematological abnormalities, cardiovascular symptoms, gastrointestinal symptoms, pulmonary dysfunction, depression, and retinopathy. Interferon-alpha has been shown to be related to the development of various autoimmune diseases, including systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, autoimmune thyroid disease, and type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM). Type 1 DM and thyroid disease respectively develop in 0.08~2.61% and 10~15% of patients treated with combined interferon-alpha and ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C. The coexistence of type 1 DM and autoimmune thyroiditis was rarely reported. We report a case of a 33-year-old female patient with chronic hepatitis C who simultaneously developed diabetic ketoacidosis and autoimmune thyroiditis after treatment with pegylated interferon-alpha 2b and ribavirin.
Adult ; Antiviral Agents/*adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Diabetic Ketoacidosis/drug therapy/*etiology ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Female ; Hepatitis C, Chronic/*drug therapy ; Humans ; Insulin/therapeutic use ; Interferon Alfa-2b/*adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Polyethylene Glycols/*adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Ribavirin/*adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Thyroiditis, Autoimmune/drug therapy/*etiology ; Thyroxine/therapeutic use

BACKGROUNDThe effectiveness and safety of initiating biphasic insulin aspart 30 in patients who were poorly controlled on oral glucose-lowering drugs were studied in randomized controlled trials, while results from clinical practice remain limited. This subgroup analysis was to provide such findings from a large-scale non-interventional study.

METHODSA1chieve was a multinational, prospective, open-label, non-interventional, 24-week study in patients with type 2 diabetes initiating insulin analogues in 28 countries across Asia, Africa, Europe, and Latin America. After physician had taken the decision to use this insulin, any patient with type 2 diabetes who was not treated with or who had started the study insulin within 4 weeks before inclusion was eligible. Patients were treated with study insulin alone or in combination with oral glucose-lowering drugs. Data on adverse drug reactions, hypoglycemia and glycemic control were collected at baseline, week 12 and 24. This is a report of a Chinese subgroup analysis from the A1chieve study.

RESULTSTotally, 4 100 patients constituted this subgroup. No serious adverse drug reactions were reported. Rates of total, major, nocturnal hypoglycemic events (events/patient per year) were 1.47, 0.10, 0.31 at baseline and 1.35, 0.00, 0.22 at week 24, respectively. Glycemic control was improved as measured by hemoglobin A1c (mean 9.3% to 7.0%, reduction -2.3%), fasting plasma glucose (mean 10.2 to 6.8 mmol/L, reduction -3.5 mmol/L) and postprandial plasma glucose (mean 14.4 to 8.8 mmol/L, reduction -5.6 mmol/L), all P < 0.001. Change in mean body weight was +0.3 kg (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONIn this subgroup analysis of the A1chieve study, biphasic insulin aspart 30 improved glycemic control with low risk of hypoglycemia.

Administration, Oral ; Adult ; Aged ; Biphasic Insulins ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Blood Glucose ; drug effects ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 ; blood ; drug therapy ; Female ; Glycated Hemoglobin A ; metabolism ; Humans ; Hypoglycemic Agents ; therapeutic use ; Insulin Aspart ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Insulin, Isophane ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prospective Studies

BACKGROUNDIncretin-based therapies provide additional options for treating type 2 diabetes. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of exenatide monotherapy in obese patients with type 2 diabetes.

METHODSA 26-week, metformin controlled, parallel-group study was conducted among antidiabetic drug-naive obese patients aged > 18 years, and with type 2 diabetes. Participating patients were randomly assigned to receive exenatide or metformin treatments.

RESULTSFifty-nine patients (age (50.5 ± 8.6) years, body mass index (BMI) (30.2 ± 1.6) kg/m(2), and hemoglobin A1C (HbA(1C) (8.2 ± 1.2)%) were enrolled in the study. Glucose control and weight reduction improved in both groups receiving treatment. HbA(1C) and oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) 2 hour glycemia reduction with exenatide was superior to that obtained with metformin ((-2.10 ± 1.79)% vs. (-1.66 ± 1.38)%, (-5.11 ± 2.68) mmol/L vs. (-2.80 ± 2.70) mmol/L, P < 0.05). Fast plasma glucose (FPG) reduction was not significantly different between the two groups ((-1.8 ± 2.0) mmol/L vs. (-1.6 ± 1.7) mmol/L, P > 0.05). Patients treated with exenatide achieved HbA(1C) of < 7% (97% of patients) and < 6.5% (79%) at end-point, vs. 93% and 73% with metformin (P > 0.05). Greater weight reduction was also achieved with exenatide ((-5.80 ± 3.66) kg) than with metformin ((-3.81 ± 1.38) kg, P < 0.01). Homeostasis model assessment of beta-cell function (HOMA-B) was not significantly increased, but the insulinogenic index and HOMA for insulin sensitivity (HOMA-S) were greatly improved in the exenatide group (P < 0.05). Nausea was the most common adverse effect in exenatide treatment (30% vs. 8%; P < 0.05), but most cases were of mild to moderate intensity. One case in the exenatide group was withdrawn early because of severe nausea. Hypoglycemia events were often observed during the first 4 weeks, with 12% of patients in the exenatide and 3.2% in metformin groups, respectively (P < 0.05). No incidents of severe hypoglycemia were reported.

CONCLUSIONSExenatide demonstrated more beneficial effects on HbA(1C), weight reduction and insulin resistance during 26 weeks of treatment, but there were more hypoglycemic events and mild-to-moderate nausea compared with metformin. These results suggested that exenatide monotherapy may provide a viable treatment option in newly developed type 2 diabetes.

Adult ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 ; blood ; drug therapy ; Female ; Glycated Hemoglobin A ; metabolism ; Humans ; Hypoglycemia ; chemically induced ; Hypoglycemic Agents ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Insulin Resistance ; Male ; Metformin ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Middle Aged ; Nausea ; chemically induced ; Obesity ; blood ; drug therapy ; Peptides ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Venoms ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Weight Loss ; drug effects

PURPOSE: Although the presence of cannabinoid type 1 (CB1) receptor in islets has been reported, the major contributor to the protective effect of rimonabant on islet morphology is unknown. We determined whether the protective effect of rimonabant on pancreatic islet morphology is valid in established diabetes and also whether any effect was independent of decreased food intake. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After diabetes was confirmed, Otsuka Long-Evans Tokushima Fatty rats, aged 32 weeks, were treated with rimonabant (30 mg/kg/d, rimonabant group) for 6 weeks. Metabolic profiles and islet morphology of rats treated with rimonabant were compared with those of controls without treatment (control group), a pair-fed control group, and rats treated with rosiglitazone (4 mg/kg/d, rosiglitazone group). RESULTS: Compared to the control group, rats treated with rimonabant exhibited reduced glycated albumin levels (p<0.001), islet fibrosis (p<0.01), and improved glucose tolerance (p<0.05), with no differences from the pair-fed control group. The retroperitoneal adipose tissue mass was lower in the rimonabant group than those of the pair-fed control and rosiglitazone groups (p<0.05). Rimonabant, pair-fed control, and rosiglitazone groups showed decreased insulin resistance and increased adiponectin, with no differences between the rimonabant and pair-fed control groups. CONCLUSION: Rimonabant had a protective effect on islet morphology in vivo even in established diabetes. However, the protective effect was also reproduced by pair-feeding. Thus, the results of this study did not support the significance of islet CB1 receptors in islet protection with rimonabant in established obesity-associated type 2 diabetes.
Adiponectin/metabolism ; Adiposity/drug effects ; Animals ; Cell Proliferation/drug effects ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/diet therapy/*drug therapy ; Eating/*drug effects ; Glucose Intolerance/diet therapy/*drug therapy ; Insulin Resistance ; Insulin-Secreting Cells/*drug effects/pathology ; Male ; Piperidines/adverse effects/*therapeutic use ; Pyrazoles/adverse effects/*therapeutic use ; Rats ; Rats, Inbred OLETF ; Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1/physiology ; Thiazolidinediones/*therapeutic use

Berberine is the major component of Coptidis Rhizoma and it has been used as anti-infection, anti-inflammation drug for gastrointestinal diseases. In recent years, evidence showed that it could regulate glucose and lipid metabolism. Moreover, its activity had been tested by clinical trials and animal researches. The mechanisms of berberine in diabetes include: improving the function of beta-cell; prompting insulin secretion and islets regeneration, lowing lipid level, regulating glucose and lipid metabolic by influence transcriptional factors expression such as PPARgamma, C/EBPalpha, SREBP-1c, LXR, having the activities of anti-oxidation and inhibiting reductase to repress oxidative stress state and regulate metabolic signal pathway. Although numbers of data supported that berberine could improving insulin resistance by clinical trials and animal studies, the large scale, multicenter clinical trials are needed to evaluate the effects of berberine for diabetes and its complications in the time of evidence-based medicine.
Animals ; Berberine ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 ; drug therapy ; genetics ; metabolism ; Glucose ; metabolism ; Humans ; Hypoglycemic Agents ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Insulin ; metabolism ; Lipid Metabolism ; drug effects

BACKGROUNDThe clinical importance of glycaemic control in patients with diabetes has been well established. This study aimed to explore twice-daily biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) for insulin initiation in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who had poor glycaemic control with human insulins (HIs). We use data from a Chinese cohort of the PRESENT study.

METHODSIn the 3-month study, Chinese subjects with T2DM started insulin therapy with BIAsp 30 in routine care. Glycaemic control was measured by glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA(1C)), fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and posting plasma glucose (PPG). The safety assessment included hypoglycaemia and other adverse events.

RESULTSA total of 1989 subjects previously treated with His were switched to BIAsp 30 for 3-month treatment. Mean HbA(1C), FPG and PPG were significantly improved after the therapy. The overall rate of hypoglycaemia decreased at the end of the trial except for the patients previously treated with long-acting insulin. Most of the events were minor and diurnal hypoglycaemia. Only one serious adverse drug reaction (SADR), a local hypersensitivity, was reported. The majority of the patients (> or = 96.7%) and physicians (> or = 84.7%) were either satisfied or very satisfied with the treatment using BIAsp 30 compared with previous HI therapy.

CONCLUSIONThe BIAsp 30 treatment improved both glycaemic control and patients' satisfaction without increasing hypoglycaemia in T2DM subjects inadequately controlled by His.

Adult ; Biphasic Insulins ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 ; drug therapy ; metabolism ; Female ; Glycated Hemoglobin A ; drug effects ; Humans ; Insulin ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; analogs & derivatives ; pharmacology ; therapeutic use ; Insulin Aspart ; Insulin, Isophane ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome