OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the function of tubomanometry (TMM) in forcasting the progonosis of acute otitis media with effusion (OME). METHOD: We used the technique of TMM to quantify the degree of eustachian tube (ET) dysfunction in 65 patients with OME. The opening of the ET and the transportation of gas into the middle ear were registered by a pressure sensor in the occluded outer ear after applying the stimulus of a controlled gas bolus into the nasopharynx during swallowing. Three excess pressure values were tested subsequently (30, 40, and 50 mbar). If tube opening was registered, the time of opening in relation to pressure applied was measured. The TMM calculated the opening latency index or index R. An R value of < 1 indicated early opening of the tube at the start of application of the stimulus, which was considered optimal. A value > 1 indicated late opening of the tube occurring after the initial stimulus and was interpreted as suboptimal. Inability to calculate the index R value indicated that the tube was unable to actively open at all. The TMM results, were weighted as follows: no R with 0 points, R > 1 with 1 point and R < 1 with 2 points for the measurements at 30, 40, and 50 mbar, respectively. The points of these three tests were added so the ET score (ETS) ranges from 0 (worst value) to 6 (best value). According to the medical history, the patients were divided into two groups, chronic OME group (defined as positive control group), 30 cases with 38 ears; and acute OME group, 35 cases with 46 ears. The healthy ears of all patients were defined as normal control group, 46 cases with 46 ears. The same regular treatments, including classic medical treatments and intratympanic dexamethasone injections, were used to acute OME group in the following 1-2 months. On the basis of therapeutic effect, acute OME group was subdivided into valid group (26 cases with 33 ears) and invalid group (9 cases with 13 ears). RESULT: The ETS of normal control group was 5.11 ± 1.32 while it was 1.08 ± 1.32 in positive control group. It was found marked differences between the two groups (P < 0.01). The ETS of both valid and invalid subgroup of actue OME group were significantly lower than normal control group (P < 0.01), but in valid subgroup it was significantly higher than positive control group (P < 0.01), and no marked difference was found between the invalid subgroup and positive control group. After treatments, a significant improvement of the ETS was found in both valid and invalid subgroup (P < 0.05) there was no marked difference between valid subgroup and normal control group. But in invalid subgroup it was still significantly lower than normal cohtrol group (P < 0. 01). CONCLUSION TMM could forecast the prognosis of acute OME. Patients with acute OME suffered from ET dysfunction of varied degrees. Those with high ETS could be cured by classic medical treatments and intratympanic dexamethasone injections. But those with poor ETS could not be cured in short period, tube insertion should be considered. If ETS could not be improved by ventilation tube placement, more active treatment, for example, balloon Eustachian tuboplasty (BET), should be used to prevent transforming into chronic OME.
Acute Disease ; Ear, Middle ; Eustachian Tube ; physiopathology ; Humans ; Injection, Intratympanic ; Manometry ; Middle Ear Ventilation ; Otitis Media with Effusion ; diagnosis ; Pressure ; Prognosis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study is aimed to investigate the efficacy of dexamethasone and methylprednisolone when used for Intratympanic steroid injection (ITSI) concurrent with systemic steroid as primary therapy. SUBJECTS AND METHOD: We undertook a retrospective study of 106 patients diagnosed with Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss at our institution. These patients were divided into the following groups based on their intratympanic steroid medications: Group 1 (which received dexamethasone for ITSI) and Group 2 (which received methylprednisolone for ITSI). The severity of pain after ITSI was also compared using Visual Analogue Scale. RESULTS: The therapeutic results of both groups showed no significant difference. The improvement of pure tone audiometry average threshold were 18.3±19.5 dB for Group 1 and 22.4±25.8 dB for Group 2, with no significant differences (p=0.402). The recovery rate according to Siegel's criteria were 34/70 (48.6%) and 18/36 (50.0%) respectively, with no significant differences (p=0.889). The degree of pain after ITSI were 1.51±1.06 and 3.92±1.63 for Group 1 and 2, respectively, showing significant differences (p<0.001). Again, there were no significant differences even when accompanying symptoms or severity of initial hearing loss were considered. CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference between efficacy of dexamethasone and methylprednisolone when used as primary therapy. Methylprednisolne caused more severe pain after ITSI, suggesting the choice of dexamethasone. Further studies are needed about the concentration of injected steroid.
Audiometry ; Dexamethasone ; Hearing Loss ; Hearing Loss, Sensorineural* ; Hearing Loss, Sudden ; Humans ; Injection, Intratympanic ; Methods ; Methylprednisolone ; Retrospective Studies ; Steroids

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We investigated whether the intratympanic steroid injections might be an effective initial treatment for sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). SUBJECTS AND METHOD: We assessed a total of 167 patients with DM and SSNHL who visited a tertiary referral otolaryngology department between January 2010 and April 2018. Forty-two patients with DM and SSNHL received intratympanic steroid injections; 48 patients with DM and SSNHL received systemic steroid treatment; and 77 patients with DM and SSNHL received a combination of systemic and intratympanic treatment. Initial and post treatment hearing levels and fasting blood sugar (FBS) were assessed, and correlations between hearing gain and the duration of DM, HbA1c, FBS were investigated. RESULTS: After steroid treatment, hearing levels were 38.87±25.35 dB in the intratympanic injection group, 41.09±28.49 dB in the systemic steroid treatment group, and 47.81±27.12 dB in the combined treatment group. Final hearing levels and hearing gain in the three groups did not differ significantly. FBS after treatment in the systemic steroid treatment and combined steroid treatment group worsened relative to the intratympanic injection group (202.00±9.40 mg/dL to 326.63±7.85 mg/dL). FBS, duration of DM, and HbA1c levels did not affect the hearing gain in patients with DM and SSNHL. CONCLUSION: Intratympanic steroid injections are comparable to the systemic steroid treatment modality for SSNHL in patients with DM. Thus, intratympanic steroid injections may serve as an effective initial treatment modality for SSNHL in patients with DM.
Blood Glucose ; Diabetes Mellitus ; Fasting ; Hearing ; Hearing Loss, Sensorineural ; Humans ; Injection, Intratympanic ; Methods ; Otolaryngology ; Referral and Consultation ; Steroids

OBJECTIVETo analyze the efficacy of Methylprednisolone hemisuccinate intratympanic injection for refractory noise induced deafness.

METHODSOne hundred and twenty cases (215 ears) of noise induced deafness were treated with either hormone group (107 ears) or with non hormone group (108 ears). Following prior interventions, 145 ears went on to receive intratympanic Methylprednisolone hemisuccinate injection twice a week.

RESULTSAfter Intratympanic therapy, the total effective rate was 46.2%. 32 of 71 ears (45.1%) demonstrated hearing improvement in hormone group and 35 of 74 ears (47.3%) in non hormone group. The difference was statistically insignificant (P = 0.788).

CONCLUSIONIntratympanic therapy appears to provide additional treatment benefits for patients with refractory noise induced deafness who have been treated with prior interventions. The outcome is not affected by pretreatment with hormone.

Glucocorticoids ; therapeutic use ; Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced ; drug therapy ; Hearing Tests ; Humans ; Injection, Intratympanic ; Methylprednisolone Hemisuccinate ; therapeutic use ; Noise ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVE: To observe the efficacy of intratympanic steroid injection as supplementary or initial treatment for sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL). METHOD: A total of 68 patients diagnosed with SSNHL were randomized into group A (45 cases including systemic steroid for 33 cases and systemic steroid + intratympanic steroid as supplementary treatment for 12 cases) and group B (23 cases, initial intratympanic steroid). Then observe the therapeutic effect in two groups. RESULT: The total effective rate was 55.6% in group A and 56.5% in group B. No statistical difference was detected between these two groups (P > 0.05). There was statistical difference after therapy of intratympanic steroid as supplementary treatment for 12 patients due to poor hearing improvement after systemic steroid in group A (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION Both systemic and intratympanic steroid injection for SSNHL are effective. The efficiency of intratympanic steroid injection as supplementary or initial treatment for SSNHL is similar to that of systemic steroid. The intratympanic steroid injection for SSNHL as initial protocol or as supplementary treatment when poor hearing improvement after systemic steroid is recommended.
Hearing Loss, Sensorineural ; drug therapy ; Hearing Loss, Sudden ; drug therapy ; Humans ; Injection, Intratympanic ; Steroids ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Treatment Outcome ; Tympanic Membrane

OBJECTIVE: To explore the best time of intratympanic dexamethasone injection to treat sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) as salvage therapy so that to improve the curative efficacy on sudden deafness at the utmost. METHOD: A total of 192 patients with SSNHL were included in this study, among whom 63 cases received the systemic steroid therapy throughout the study, while the other ones were treated with systemic steroid as initial treatment and were given intratympanic steroid administration as salvage treatment starting at different time point. The salvage treatment started on the 3rd day after the beginning of the initial treatment for 29 cases, on the 7th day for 38 cases, on the 14th day for 43 cases, and 1 month later for 19 cases. All the patients were followed up for 2 months. RESULT: The recovery rates and total effective rates showed no statistically significant difference between the patients received only systemic steroid therapy and the ones received intratympanic steroid administration on the 3rd, 7th day and 1 month later after the initial treatment. The recovery rate and total effective rate exhibited statistically significant difference between the patients received intratympanic steroid administration since the 14th day after the initial treatment and the ones received only systemic steroid therapy, with the numerical value of P 0. 037 and 0. 034, respectively. CONCLUSION (1) As an initial management plan, the curative effects. between the intratympanic steroid administration and the systemic steroid therapy were not significantly different. (2) As a salvage treatment, intratympanic steroid was a better choice for patients who have not completely recover from ISSNHL after failure of initial management with systemic steroid only. (3) The best time point of salvage treatment with intratympanic steroid was about 2 weeks after initial management with systemic steroid.
Hearing Loss, Sensorineural ; drug therapy ; Hearing Loss, Sudden ; drug therapy ; Humans ; Injection, Intratympanic ; Salvage Therapy ; Steroids ; therapeutic use ; Treatment Outcome ; Tympanic Membrane

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of glucocorticoid in initial treatment of sudden hearing loss with intratympanic (IT) and systemic ways. METHOD: We searched the database of PubMed, Cochrane, Embase,CBM, CNKI, VIP, Wanfang systematically. Literatures were screened according to the preestablished inclusion and exclusion standards,and all the RCT literatures associated with intratympanic and systemic glucocorticoid in the initial treatment of sudden hearing loss before may 2015 were collected. All the data, which meet the inclusion standards, were analyzed by using Meta-analysis software. RESULT: Among all the qualified literatures, 11 randomized controlled trials were included. A total of 1298 cases were involved, including 521 cases with intratympanic administration, 410 with IV-therapy, and 201 with oral therapy. Meta analysis results showed that there was significant difference of the total effective rate and improvement rate between the intratympanic and systemic administration. Intratympanic injection (P > 0.05) was more effective than systemic administration. There was no significant difference between intratympanic group and oral group (RR = 1.15, 95% CI: 0.92-1.42, P > 0.05). A significant difference of the effective rate occurred between intratympanic group and IV therapy group (RR = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.02-1.34, P < 0.05). The major complications of intratympanic were pain, dizziness/vertigo, which occurred more frequently than systemic therapy group; The major complications of systemic therapy group were hyperglycaemia, loss of appetite and insomnia. CONCLUSION This study shows that the intratympanic (IT) glucocorticoid for sudden deafness is more effective than the systemic administration. But it was not the first choice in clinical treatment. Further studies are warranted.
Administration, Oral ; Glucocorticoids ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Hearing Loss, Sudden ; drug therapy ; Humans ; Hyperglycemia ; Injection, Intratympanic ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Steroids ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of intratympanic dexamethasone injection for the moderate and severe sudden deafness with BPPV. METHOD: A total of 63 patients diagnosed with sudden sensorineural hearing loss with BPPV were treated through OPD. Patients were divided into three groups: 20 cases in intratympanic dexamethasone injection as initial treatment (group A); 18 cases in systemic hormone therapy group (group B); 25 cases in intratympanic dexamethasone injection as salvage treatment (group C). In addition, routine drugs were used to all patients. RESULT: The overall effective rate of group A, B and C in hearing recovery was 60.0%, 38.9% and 48.0%, respectively: (1) No significant difference of hearing recovery was observed among three groups (P > 0.05); (2) A significant difference of hearing recovery was evidenced between group A and C (P < 0.05); (3) A significant difference of hearing recovery was evidenced between group A and C (P < 0.05); (4) No statistically significant difference was found in the hearing recovery between group B and C (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION Our data showed that intratympanic dexamethasone should be used as initial therapy for treating the moderate and severe sudden deafness with BPPV.
Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo ; complications ; Dexamethasone ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Hearing Loss, Sensorineural ; complications ; drug therapy ; Hearing Loss, Sudden ; complications ; drug therapy ; Hearing Tests ; Humans ; Injection, Intratympanic ; Salvage Therapy ; Treatment Outcome

This study looked into the efficacy of a modified titration protocol of intratympanic gentamicin injection (ITG) in the patients with unilateral intractable Ménière's disease (MD). Modified titration protocol of ITG at a low dose (20 mg/mL) was administered to 10 patients with definite unilateral intractable MD. After initial first two fixed ITGs on weekly basis, the patients might or might not be given any more injections, depending on the appearance of unilateral vestibular loss (UVL). ITG was terminated if the patients satisfied the criteria of UVL. All patients were followed-up for at least two years. The effects of ITG on the vertigo attack, functional level scores and postural balance were evaluated. Of the 10 cases, 8 showed the sign of UVL after receiving initial two ITGs and were not given any more intratympanic injections, and the other 2 patients were administered three ITGs. A two-year follow-up revealed that complete and substantial vertigo control was achieved in 9 cases, and limited vertigo control in 1 patient. Hearing level was lowered in 2 patients. The posture stability and functional level scores were improved. Our study showed that the modified titration protocol of ITG at a low dose could effectively control vertigo in patients with unilateral intractable MD.
Adult ; Drug Administration Schedule ; Ear, Inner ; drug effects ; microbiology ; pathology ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gentamicins ; therapeutic use ; Hearing ; drug effects ; physiology ; Humans ; Injection, Intratympanic ; Male ; Meniere Disease ; drug therapy ; microbiology ; pathology ; Middle Aged ; Postural Balance ; drug effects ; physiology ; Protein Synthesis Inhibitors ; therapeutic use ; Vertigo ; drug therapy ; microbiology ; pathology