OBJECTIVEThe Chinese Children's Leukemia Group (CCLG)-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) 08 protocol for childhood ALL was established in 2008. This study aims to evaluate the drug-related toxicities of CCLG-ALL 08 protocol in the treatment of childhood ALL.

METHODSA total of 114 children with newly diagnosed ALL were treated with the CCLG-ALL 08 protocol. The protocol was divided into five phases: remission induction (VDLD), early reinforcement (CAM), consolidation therapy, delayed reinforcement (DIa & DIb) and maintenance treatment. Drug-related toxicities in each phase were evaluated according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0.

RESULTSToxicities were more frequent in phase VDLD than other treatment phases, including hepatotoxicity (87.7%), dental ulcer (20.2%), hyperglycemia (20.2%), prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time (21.1%) and decreased fibrinogen (34.2%), with the incidence rates of severe adverse events at 7%, 0, 1.3%, 0.8% and 2.7% respectively. The incidence of allergic reaction to L-ASP was significantly higher in phase DIa than in phase VDLD (28.0% vs 7.9%; P<0.01), and there were no longer any allergic reactions in 15 patients who received continuing treatment with pegaspargase instead. There was no severe arrhythmia, myocardial ischemia, decreased left ventricular function, osteonecrosis, myopathy, organ failure or treatment-related mortality.

CONCLUSIONSThe drug-related toxicities of CCLG-ALL 08 protocol are common in phase VDLD, but they are mild and reversible. There is no treatment-related mortality. The CCLG-ALL 08 protocol for childhood ALL is safe.

Adolescent ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; adverse effects ; Asparaginase ; adverse effects ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Female ; Humans ; Infant ; Male ; Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma ; drug therapy ; Remission Induction

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine combined with ifosfamide (GI regimen)in patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma after failure of platinum-based chemotherapy.

METHODSThe clinical data of 27 nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients, who received GI regimen between April 2005 and March 2014 after failure of prior platinum-based chemotherapy, were retrospectively reviewed,and relevant prognostic factors were explored.

RESULTSAll patients were evaluable for efficacy and toxicity. No patient achieved complete response (CR). Partial response (PR) was achieved in ten patients, stable disease (SD) in thirteen patients, progressive disease (PD) in four patients, with a response rate of 37.0% and an overall disease control rate (PR+SD) of 85.2%. For ten PR patients, the median duration of response was 5.5 months. The median progression-free survival of the whole group was 6.7 months, and the Kaplan-Meier estimate of median overall survival was 17.4 months. The 1-year survival rate was 72.6%. Toxicity was mainly hematological: Grade III or IV anemia, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were found in 3.7%, 37.0% and 18.5% of all patients, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses indicated that dose intensity of gemcitabine was a significant prognostic factor for PFS, whereas salvage treatment after failure of GI regimen was a significant prognostic factor for OS.

CONCLUSIONSGemcitabine and ifosfamide combination is effective and well tolerated by patients with advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma pretreated with platinum-based chemotherapy. Further clinical study is warranted.

Anemia ; chemically induced ; Antineoplastic Agents ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Carcinoma ; Deoxycytidine ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; analogs & derivatives ; Disease-Free Survival ; Humans ; Ifosfamide ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; Induction Chemotherapy ; Kaplan-Meier Estimate ; Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; mortality ; pathology ; Neutropenia ; chemically induced ; Platinum ; therapeutic use ; Remission Induction ; Salvage Therapy ; Survival Rate ; Thrombocytopenia ; chemically induced ; Treatment Failure

To investigate the clinical efficacy of consolidation chemotherapy with docetaxel and cisplatin (DP) in elderly patients of esophageal cancer.
 Methods: Seventy-nine elderly patients of esophageal cancer were randomly divided into the treatment group (38 patients) and the control group (41 patients). Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) was applied in both groups and prescribed dose was set to 56 to 59.4 Gy in 28 to 33 fractions. The concurrent chemotherapy regime for both groups was as follow: docetaxel 25 mg/m2 plus cisplatin 25 mg/m2, per week. After concurrent chemoradiotherapy, consolidated chemotherapy was applied to the treatment group with docetaxel 60 mg/m2 and cisplatin 75 mg/m2 
for 3 weeks in one cycle. There was no subsequent treatment for the control group.
 Results: The clinical efficacy was assessed in 76 patients. For the treatment group, 31 patients (response rate, 89.2%) obtained effective response, including 10 cases with complete response (CR) and 21 cases with partial response (PR), both of which were significantly more than that in the control group (response rate, 61.5%), with 9 cases of CR and 15 cases of PR. The median progression-free survival was 19.7 months in the treatment group, clearly longer than that in the control group (10.8 months, P=0.04). The overall survival for 1-year, 2-year and 3-year were 78.5%, 57.9% and 37.8% in the treatment group versus 61.2%, 42.3% and 22.7% in the control group (P>0.05), respectively. Grade 1 and 2 adverse effects were commonly observed in both groups, such as hematologic toxicity and radiation-induced esophagitis, but there was no significant difference between the two groups. 
 Conclusion: For elderly patients with esophageal carcinoma, the overall response rate can be significantly improved by concurrent chemoradiotherapy with subsequently consolidated chemotherapy based on docetaxel and cisplatin..
Adult ; Aged ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; adverse effects ; Chemoradiotherapy ; adverse effects ; Cisplatin ; adverse effects ; Consolidation Chemotherapy ; adverse effects ; Disease-Free Survival ; Docetaxel ; Esophageal Neoplasms ; mortality ; Esophagitis ; epidemiology ; Female ; Hematologic Diseases ; epidemiology ; Humans ; Male ; Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated ; adverse effects ; Remission Induction ; Taxoids ; adverse effects

OBJECTIVETo investigate the effects of Huangqi injection on the infection factors in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) during remission induction chemotherapy.

METHODSNinety-one children with ALL were divided into treatment (n=47) and control groups (n=44) by a randomized double-blind method. During remission induction chemotherapy, the treatment group was given Huangqi injection (0.5 mL/kg·d) for 35 days, while an equal volume of normal saline was used instead in the control group; the other supportive care was the same for the two groups. After remission induction chemotherapy, the incidence of infection, duration of infection, white blood cell and neutrophil counts, site of infection, and positive rate of pathogenic bacteria in secretion were compared between the two groups.

RESULTSFour cases in the treatment group dropped out of the study due to allergic reaction. After remission induction chemotherapy, compared with the control group, the treatment group had a significantly lower incidence of infection (P<0.05), a shorter duration of infection at any site (P<0.05), a higher neutrophil count after chemotherapy (P<0.05), and lower incidence rates of respiratory tract infection, urinary tract infection, blood infection, and skin and soft tissue infections (P<0.05). Gram-negative bacteria were the main pathogens. Among the infected children, the positive rate of pathogenic bacteria in secretion was significantly lower in the treatment group than in the control group (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONSHuangqi injection may reduce bone marrow suppression caused by chemotherapy drugs and increase neutrophil count during remission induction chemotherapy to reduce the incidence and duration of infection in children with ALL.

Adolescent ; Astragalus Plant ; adverse effects ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Double-Blind Method ; Drugs, Chinese Herbal ; adverse effects ; pharmacology ; therapeutic use ; Female ; Humans ; Induction Chemotherapy ; adverse effects ; Infant ; Infection ; epidemiology ; Injections ; Male ; Neutrophils ; immunology ; Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma ; drug therapy ; immunology

OBJECTIVETo analyze the duration of preventive filgrastim administration as support for chemotherapy and its affecting factors.

METHODSSingle institutional data from a phase Ⅱ clinical trial and a phase Ⅲ clinical trial of pegylated filgrastim were combined. In the two randomized cross-over trials, patients with previously untreated cancer received two cycles of chemotherapy of the same regimen. In the study group, the patients received a single subcutaneous injection of 100 μg/kg pegylated filgrastim, and in the control group, they received daily subcutaneous injections of 5 μg/kg filgrastim.

RESULTSIn 53 chemotherapy cycles, the median duration of filgrastim administration was (9.57±2.10)d. 83.0% (44/53) of them received filgrastim for 7-11 days. Patients with baseline absolute neutrophil count of <4×10(9)/L or body mass index less than 22 received a longer filgrastim prophylaxis(P<0.05). RESULTS of multivariate analysis showed that the baseline absolute neutrophil count is associated with the time of filgrastim administration(P=0.019). The most common adverse event of rhG-CSF was skeletal pain, generally mild and no treatment-related death occurred.

CONCLUSIONSThe median duration of filgrastim support for chemotherapy was 10 days. Patients with lower baseline neutrophil count require a longer filgrastim prophylaxis.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT01285219.

Antineoplastic Agents ; adverse effects ; Cross-Over Studies ; Filgrastim ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Hematologic Agents ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Humans ; Induction Chemotherapy ; Injections, Subcutaneous ; Multivariate Analysis ; Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; Neutropenia ; chemically induced ; prevention & control ; Time Factors

Objective: To compare the time of the recovery of neutrophils or leukocytes by pegylated recombinant human granulocyte stimulating factor (PEG-rhG-CSF) or common recombinant human granulocyte stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) in the myelosuppressive phase after induction chemotherapy in newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. At the same time, the incidences of infection and hospitalization were compared. Methods: A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted in patients with newly diagnosed AML who met the enrollment criteria from August 2014 to December 2017. The patients were randomly divided into two groups according to a 1:1 ratio: PEG-rhG-CSF group and rhG-CSF group. The time of neutrophil or leukocyte recovery, infection rate and hospitalization interval were compared between the two groups. Results: 60 patients with newly diagnosed AML were enrolled: 30 patients in the PEG-rhG-CSF group and 30 patients in the rhG-CSF group. There were no significant differences in age, chemotherapy regimen, pre-chemotherapy ANC, WBC, and induction efficacy between the two groups (P>0.05) . The median time (range) of ANC or WBC recovery in patients with PEG-rhG-CSF and rhG-CSF were 19 (14-35) d and 19 (15-26) d, respectively, with no statistical difference (P=0.566) . The incidences of infection in the PEG-rhG-CSF group and the rhG-CSF group were 90.0%and 93.3%, respectively, and there was no statistical difference (P=1.000) . The median days of hospitalization (range) was 20.5 (17-49) days and 21 (19-43) days, respectively, with no statistical difference (P=0.530) . Conclusions: In AML patients after induction therapy, there was no significant difference between the application of PEG-rhG-CSF and daily rhG-CSF in ANC or WBC recovery time, infection incidence and hospitalization time.
Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor/therapeutic use* ; Humans ; Induction Chemotherapy/adverse effects* ; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/drug therapy* ; Neutropenia ; Neutrophils ; Prospective Studies ; Recombinant Proteins

OBJECTIVES: To study the efficacy and safety of rituximab combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of children and adolescents with mature B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (B-NHL) through a Meta analysis. METHODS: The databases including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data, and Weipu were searched to obtain 10 articles on rituximab in the treatment of mature B-NHL in children and adolescents published up to June 2022, with 886 children in total. With 3-year event-free survival (EFS) rate, 3-year overall survival (OS) rate, complete remission rate, mortality rate, and incidence rate of adverse reactions as outcome measures, RevMan 5.4 software was used for Meta analysis, subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias analysis. RESULTS: The rituximab+chemotherapy group showed significant increases in the 3-year EFS rate (HR=0.38, 95%CI: 0.25-0.59, P<0.001), 3-year OS rate (HR=0.29, 95%CI: 0.14-0.61, P=0.001), and complete remission rate (OR=3.72, 95%CI: 1.89-7.33, P<0.001) as well as a significant reduction in the mortality rate (OR=0.31, 95%CI: 0.17-0.57, P<0.001), as compared with the chemotherapy group without rituximab. There was no significant difference in the incidence rate of adverse reactions between the two groups (OR=1.28, 95%CI: 0.85-1.92, P=0.24). CONCLUSIONS The addition of rituximab to the treatment regimen for children and adolescents with mature B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma can bring significant survival benefits without increasing the incidence of adverse reactions.
Child ; Adolescent ; Humans ; Rituximab/adverse effects* ; Lymphoma, B-Cell/drug therapy* ; Progression-Free Survival ; Remission Induction ; China ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use*

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVEConcurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) is the standard treatment for patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). The effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by CCRT has not been determined. Therefore, we conducted 2 phase II studies to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with a regimen of docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5 fluorouracil (5-Fu) (TPF) followed by radiotherapy and concurrent cisplatin in patients with stage III and IV(A - B) NPC. This article is the preliminary report on treatment related toxicities and response.

METHODSGraded according to the 2002 American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging criteria, only patients with stage III or IV(A-B) poorly differentiated or undifferentiated NPC (World Health Organization type II/III) were included. We planned to recruit 52 patients with stage III disease and 64 patients with stage IV(A - B) disease. All patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with TPF (docetaxel 75 mg/m(2), day 1; cisplatin 75 mg/m(2), day 1; 5 Fu 500 mg/(m2 x day), continuous intravenous infusion for 120 h), every 3 weeks for 3 cycles, followed by weekly cisplatin (40 mg/m(2)) concurrent with radiotherapy. Three dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D CRT) and intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) were used. Gross disease planning target volume (PTV), high risk and low risk subclinical PTV doses were prescribed at 70-76 Gy, 66-70 Gy, and 60-61.25 Gy at 1.75-2.0 Gy per fraction. The lower neck or supraclavicular fields may be treated with conventional AP/PA fields for a total of 54 Gy at 1.8 Gy per fraction. Patients were evaluated for tumor response after the completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and at 3 months after radiation according to the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST). The latest version of the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE 3.0) was used for grading all adverse events.

RESULTSFifty nine patients were evaluable for treatment response. Thirty patients had stage III disease and 29 patients had stage IV(A-B). All patients completed RT to the prescribed dose and 2 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with 51 patients (86.4%) completing 3 cycles. A total of 50 (84.7%) and 39 patients (66.1%) completed 4 weeks and 5 weeks of cisplatin during CCRT, respectively. The overall response rate in the primary site and the neck region were 94.9% [complete response (CR) in 25.4%] and 100% (CR in 19.6%) after completing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. At 3 months after RT, the CR rates increased to 96.6% and 90.2%, respectively. After a median follow up of 14.3 months, we observed 5 treatment failures and 2 deaths. The 1 year overall survival, distant metastasis free survival, and locoregional relapse free survival rates were 100%, 95.7%, and 97.7%, respectively. The rates of grade 3/4 myelosuppression and anorexia/nausea/vomiting during neoadjuvant chemotherapy were 55.9% and 16.9%, respectively. The corresponding rates were 11.9% and 23.7% during CCRT. Grade 3/4 mucositis, skin desquamation, and xerostomia occurred in 6.8%, 44.1%, and 27.1% of patients, respectively. There were no treatment related deaths.

CONCLUSIONSNeoadjuvant chemotherapy with TPF followed by CCRT was well tolerated with a manageable toxicity profile. Preliminary results are encouraging and warrant further investigation.

Adult ; Aged ; Anemia ; chemically induced ; etiology ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Chemoradiotherapy ; adverse effects ; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant ; adverse effects ; Cisplatin ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Female ; Fluorouracil ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Leukopenia ; chemically induced ; etiology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms ; pathology ; therapy ; Nausea ; chemically induced ; etiology ; Neoadjuvant Therapy ; adverse effects ; Neoplasm Staging ; Neutropenia ; chemically induced ; etiology ; Radiotherapy, Conformal ; Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated ; Remission Induction ; Survival Rate ; Taxoids ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Young Adult

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVEConcurrent chemoradiotherapy for cervical carcinoma develops rapidly and has become a common and standard therapy in recent years. Both the local control rate and survival rate of patients were increased and the risk of death fell by 30%-50%. This study aimed to explore the efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy plus adjuvant chemotherapy on and the treatment compliance of the patients with advanced cervical squamous cell carcinoma.

METHODSA total of 156 patients with stage IIa-IIIb cervical squamous cell carcinoma were randomly divided into the concurrent chemoradiotherapy group (experimental group) and radiotherapy group (control group). Intracavity and external beam radiation therapy were administered. At point A, 40-48 Gy were given by 10-12 fractions; at point B, 46-50 Gy were given by 23-25 fractions. In the same time, experimental group was treated by cisplatin (DDP, 40 mg) on day 1, repeated every week. Ten days after radiation therapy, TP regimen was administered as adjuvant chemotherapy.

RESULTSFor the experimental and control groups, the objective response rates were 88.61% and 75.32%, 1-year survival rates were 88.57% and 70.77%, 1-year local control rates were 81.43% and 64.62%, 3-year survival rates were 82.14% and 57.69%, and 3-year local control rates were 75.00% and 46.15%, with significant differences (P<0.05). Quality of life of all patients were significantly improved after treatment (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONConcurrent chemoradiotherapy plus adjuvant chemotherapy for advanced cervical cancer can improve short-term and long-term survival and local control rates of patients, improve the quality of life, and the toxicity can be tolerated.

Adult ; Aged ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell ; pathology ; therapy ; Chemoradiotherapy ; adverse effects ; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant ; Cisplatin ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Diarrhea ; chemically induced ; etiology ; Dose Fractionation ; Female ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Staging ; Paclitaxel ; Quality of Life ; Remission Induction ; Survival Rate ; Taxoids ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms ; pathology ; therapy ; Vomiting ; chemically induced ; etiology

OBJECTIVETo observe the efficacy of polyethylene glycol conjugated asparaginase (peg-asp) for induction treatment of children with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).

METHODA total of 268 newly diagnosed children with ALL enrolled in CCLG-2008 from January, 2010 to August, 2012 were analyzed. Patients received either native Escherichia coli asparaginase or pegaspargase along with multiagent chemotherapy during remission induction treatment. Status of bone marrow aspiration was assessed on day 15, day 33 (M1, M2, M3).

RESULTOf the 268 patients stratified, 37.3% (n = 100) were SR, 32.1% (n = 86) were IR, and 31.6% (n = 82) were HR; 159 patients received native Escherichia coli asparaginase and 109 patients received pegaspargase. Characteristics of two groups in age, sex, blood count at diagnosis, immunophenotype and response to prednisolone had no significant difference (P > 0.05). Bone marrow status on day 15 in pegaspargase group was M1 in 70 (64.2%) cases, M2 in 23 (21.1%) and M3 in 16 (14.7%), while in native Escherichia coli asparaginase group, M1 in 112 (70.4%) cases, M2 in 21 (13.2%) and M3 in 26 (16.4%), respectively (χ(2) = 2.938, P = 0.230). Bone marrow status on day 33 was M1 in 105 (96.3%), M2 in 3 (2.8%) and M3 in 1 (0.9%) in pegaspargase group, while it was M1 in 154 (96.9%) cases, M2 in 5 (3.1%) and M3 in native Escherichia coli asparaginase group, respectively (χ(2) = 1.494, P = 0.474).

CONCLUSIONDomestic pegaspargase of our country can achieve the similar efficacy in induction treatment for ALL patients as compared with native Escherichia coli asparaginase. The drug could be considered as not only the choice for allergic patients but also a first-line alternative for new patients.

Adolescent ; Antineoplastic Agents ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Asparaginase ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; Bone Marrow Cells ; drug effects ; pathology ; Case-Control Studies ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Female ; Humans ; Infant ; Male ; Polyethylene Glycols ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma ; drug therapy ; pathology ; Prednisone ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; Remission Induction ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome