Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of anlotinib plus irinotecan in the second-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Methods: This prospective phase 1/2 study was conducted in 2 centers in China (Cancer Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Jiangsu Province Hospital). We enrolled patients with mCRC whose disease had progressed after first-line systemic therapy and had not previously treated with irinotecan to receive anlotinib plus irinotecan. In the phase 1 of the trial, patients received anlotinib (8 mg, 10 mg or 12 mg, po, 2 weeks on/1 week off) in combination with fixed-dose irinotecan (180 mg/m(2), iv, q2w) to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). In the phase 2, patients were treated with the RP2D of anlotinib and irinotecan. The primary endpoints were MTD and objective response rate (ORR). Results: From May 2018 to January 2020, a total of 31 patients with mCRC were enrolled. Anlotinib was well tolerated in combination with irinotecan with no MTD identified in the phase 1, and the RP2D was 12 mg. Thirty patients were evaluable for efficacy analysis. Eight patients achieved partial response, and 21 had stable disease, 1 had progressive disease. The ORR was 25.8% and the disease control rate was 93.5%. With a median follow-up duration of 29.5 months, the median progression-free survival and overall survival were 6.9 months (95% CI: 3.7, 9.3) and 17.6 months (95% CI: 12.4, not evaluated), respectively. The most common grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (≥10%) were neutropenia (25.8%) and diarrhea (16.1%). There was no treatment-related death. Conclusion: The combination of anlotinib and irinotecan has promising anti-tumor activity in the second-line treatment of mCRC with a manageable safety profile.
Humans ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects* ; Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology* ; Indoles/therapeutic use* ; Irinotecan/therapeutic use* ; Prospective Studies

ObjectiveTo investigate the therapeutic effects of commonly used selective α-adrenergic receptor antagonists (α-ARA) on benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

METHODSPubMed, Embase and CNKI databases were searched for the literature about selective α-ARAs for the treatment of BPH and the information was extracted on the common adverse reactions in the course of treatment. Multivariate meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the therapeutic effects of different α-ARAs.

RESULTSThe total rates of adverse effects of silodosin and tamsulosin were the highest, 51.9% and 34.0% respectively, with the highest incidences of headache (38.3%), weakness (23.6%) and dizziness (17.5%). Besides, tamsulosin ranked the first in inducing sexual dysfunction of the male patients with BPH (70.4%).

CONCLUSIONSDoxazosin is preferable as the first-choice treatment of BPH for its therapeutic effect and improvement of the patient's quality of life. Silodosin and tamsulosin, however, can be selectively used according to the patient's specific tolerance to different adverse effects.

Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Doxazosin ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Humans ; Indoles ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Male ; Network Meta-Analysis ; Prostatic Hyperplasia ; drug therapy ; Quality of Life ; Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological ; chemically induced ; Tamsulosin ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use

OBJECTIVETo compare the efficacy of different 5-hydroxytryptamine 3 receptor antagonists in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in patients undergoing general anesthesia.

METHODSTotally 360 patients, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I - II, aged 18-75 years, and having received elective operation with endotracheal intubation general anesthesia, were randomly divided into three double-blind groups: ondansetron group, tropisetron group, and granisetron group, with 120 patients in each group. Before anesthesia induction, patients were intravenously given ondansetron (4 mg), tropisetron (5 mg), or granisetron (3 mg), respectively. The episodes of nausea and vomiting were recorded for 24 hours after operation.

RESULTSNo significant differences were observed in the terms of complete inhibition rate of PONV among ondansetron group (70.0%), tropisetron group (68.6%), and granisetron group (72.9%) within 24 hours postoperatively (P >0.05), and so did postoperative nausea incidences (22.5%, 25.4%, and 20.3%, respectively), and postoperative vomiting incidences (10.0%, 13.6%, and 8.5%, respectively) (P > 0.05). No remarked antiemetic-related adverse effects were observed within 24 hours postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONIntravenous ondansetron (4 mg), tropisetron (5 mg), or granisetron (3 mg) before anesthesia induction can prevent PONV with similar efficacy and safety.

Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Anesthesia, General ; adverse effects ; Antiemetics ; therapeutic use ; Double-Blind Method ; Female ; Granisetron ; therapeutic use ; Humans ; Indoles ; therapeutic use ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Ondansetron ; therapeutic use ; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting ; etiology ; prevention & control ; Young Adult

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of palonosetron for prevention of vomiting induced by high dose cisplatin-based chemotherapy.

METHODSOne-hundred and twenty-eight patients received tropisetron 5 mg plus dexamethasone 10 mg at the first cycle or palonosetron 0.25 mg plus dexamethasone 10 mg, respectively, each administered 30 min before the initiation of high dose cisplatin-based chemotherapy. To observe the remission rate of acute emetic episodes and delayed emetic episodes, adverse effects and daily food-intake in the patients after the chemotherapy.

RESULTSThe complete response (CR) rates for acute vomiting were not significantly different between the tropisetron and palonosetron cycles (75.8% vs. 79.7%, P>0.05). The complete control rate of delayed vomiting in the palonosetron cycle was significantly higher than that in the tropisetron cycle (70.3% vs. 50.8%, P<0.01). The food-intake decrease rate of palonosetron cycle was 18.8%, significantly lower than the 53.1% of the tropisetron cycle (P<0.05). The toxicity in the two cycles was similar and no grade 3-4 toxicity was observed.

CONCLUSIONSPalonosetron is superior to tropisetron with a lower remission rate of delayed emesis induced by high dose cisplatin-based chemotherapy and with tolerable toxicity. Moreover, the apparent emesis control of palonosetron treatment seems to provide an adequate food-intake in these patients.

Aged ; Antiemetics ; therapeutic use ; Antineoplastic Agents ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Cisplatin ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Eating ; drug effects ; Female ; Humans ; Indoles ; therapeutic use ; Isoquinolines ; therapeutic use ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; Quinuclidines ; therapeutic use ; Vomiting ; chemically induced ; prevention & control

BACKGROUNDFamitinib is a novel and potent multitargeting receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor. The phase I clinical study showed that famitinib was well tolerated and had a broad anti-tumor spectrum. The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy and safety of famitinib for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

METHODSThe data of famitinib in treating patients with mRCC from the single-center phases I and II clinical trials were analyzed. Famitinib was administered orally at the dose of 13-30 mg once daily until tumor progression, occurrence of intolerable adverse reactions or withdrawal of the informed consent.

RESULTSA total of 24 patients with mRCC were treated including 17 patients at a dose of 25 mg once daily, 4 patients at a dose of 27 mg and 1 patient each at a dose of 13 mg, 20 mg and 30 mg, respectively. Twelve (50.0%) patients achieved partial response (PR) and 9 patients achieved stable disease (SD). Progressive disease was found in 3 (12.5%) patients. The disease control rate was 87.5%. The median follow-up time was 17.6 months; the median progression free survival (PFS) was 10.7 (95% CI 7.0-14.4) months; and the estimated median overall survival (OS) time was 33.0 (95% CI 8.7-57.3) months. The adverse drug reactions mainly included hypertension (54.1%), hand-foot skin reactions (45.8%), diarrhea (33.3%), mucositis (29.2%), neutropenia (45.8%), thrombocytopenia (29.2%), hyperlipidemia (41.7%) and proteinuria (41.7%). The incidence rate of grades 3 and 4 adverse events was low, mainly including hypertension 12.5%, hand-foot skin reactions 4.2%, neutropenia 4.2%, thrombocytopenia 4.2%, hyperlipidemia 4.2% and proteinuria 12.5%.

CONCLUSIONSFamitinib has significant anti-tumor activity in mRCC. The common adverse reactions are generally manageable.

Adult ; Aged ; Carcinoma, Renal Cell ; drug therapy ; Female ; Humans ; Indoles ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Kidney Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; Male ; Protein Kinase Inhibitors ; Pyrroles ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult

HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) are widely used to treat hypercholesterolemia. Among the adverse effects associated with these drugs are statin-associated myopathies, ranging from asymptomatic elevation of serum creatine kinase to fatal rhabdomyolysis. Fluvastatin-induced fatal rhabdomyolysis has not been previously reported. We describe here a patient with liver cirrhosis who experienced fluvastatin-induced fatal rhabdomyolysis. This patient had been treated with simvastatin (20 mg/day) for coronary artery disease and was switched to fluvastatin (20 mg/day) 10 days before admission. He was also taking aspirin, betaxolol, candesartan, lactulose, and entecavir. Rhabdomyolysis was complicated and continued to progress. He was treated with massive hydration, urine alkalization, intravenous furosemide, and continuous renal replacement therapy for acute renal failure, but eventually died due to rhabdomyolysis complicated by hepatic failure. In conclusion, fluvastatin should be used with caution in patients with liver cirrhosis, especially with other medications metabolized with CYP2C9.
Coronary Artery Disease/complications/*drug therapy ; Fatal Outcome ; Fatty Acids, Monounsaturated/administration & dosage/*adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Humans ; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/administration & dosage/*adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Indoles/administration & dosage/*adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Liver Cirrhosis/*complications ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Rhabdomyolysis/*chemically induced ; Simvastatin/administration & dosage/therapeutic use

There is still a need for better protection against or mitigation of the effects of ionizing radiation following conventional radiotherapy or accidental exposure. The objective of our current study was to investigate the possible roles of matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor, ilomastat, in the protection of mice from total body radiation (TBI), and the underlying protective mechanisms. Ilomastat treatment increased the survival of mice after TBI. Ilomastat pretreatment promoted recovery of hematological and immunological cells in mice after 6 Gy γ-ray TBI. Our findings suggest the potential of ilomastat to protect against or mitigate the effects of radiation.
Acute Radiation Syndrome ; blood ; immunology ; prevention & control ; Animals ; Blood Cells ; drug effects ; radiation effects ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Gamma Rays ; adverse effects ; Hydroxamic Acids ; therapeutic use ; Indoles ; therapeutic use ; Matrix Metalloproteinase Inhibitors ; therapeutic use ; Mice ; Radiation Injuries, Experimental ; blood ; immunology ; prevention & control ; Radiation-Protective Agents ; therapeutic use ; Spleen ; drug effects ; immunology ; radiation effects ; Survival Analysis ; Whole-Body Irradiation

Sunitinib as a multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor is one of the anti-tumor agents, approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration to use treat gastrointestinal stromal tumor and metastatic renal cell carcinoma. The agent is known to commonly induce adverse reactions such as fatigue, nausea, diarrhea, stomatitis, esophagitis, hypertension, skin toxicity, reduciton in cardiac output of left ventricle, and hypothyroidism. However, it has been reported to rarely induce adverse reactions such as nephrotic syndrome and irreversible reduction in renal functions, and cases of intestinal perforation or pneumatosis interstinalis as such reactions have been consistently reported. In this report, a 66-year old man showing abdominal pain had renal cell carcinoma and history of sunitinib at a dosage of 50 mg/day on a 4-weeks-on, 2-weeks-off schedule. Seven days after the third cycle he was referred to the hospital because of abdominal pain. Computed tomography showed pneumoperitoneum with linear pneumatosis intestinalis in his small bowel. The patient underwent surgical exploration that confirmed the pneumatosis intestinalis at 100 cm distal to Treitz's ligament. We report a rare case of intestinal perforation with pneumatosis intestinalis after administration of sunitinib to a patient with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
Aged ; Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects/*therapeutic use ; Carcinoma, Renal Cell/*drug therapy ; Drug Administration Schedule ; Humans ; Indoles/adverse effects/*therapeutic use ; Intestinal Perforation/*diagnosis/etiology/surgery ; Kidney Neoplasms/*drug therapy ; Lung/radiography ; Male ; Pneumatosis Cystoides Intestinalis/*diagnosis/etiology ; Positron-Emission Tomography ; Pyrroles/adverse effects/*therapeutic use ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed

BACKGROUNDThe tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) sunitinib, the first targeted agent for the first line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), targets the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway. The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of sunitinib in treating metastatic clear-cell RCC and to confirm if hypertension is an effective predictive factor.

METHODSA total of 36 patients with metastatic RCC were enrolled between June 2008 and December 2010. Among them 29 cases were first line therapy and 7 cases were in progression on first-line cytokine or sorafinib therapy. The pathology of all patients was confirmed predominant in clear cell type. Sunitinib mono-therapy was administered in repeated 6-week cycles of daily oral therapy for 4 weeks, followed by 2 weeks off in 34 patients; and 3 patients were administered with 37.5 mg/d continuously until disease progression or unacceptable toxicities occurred. Overall response rate and safety were evaluated. We divided patients into Group A and Group B according to the blood pressure level.

RESULTSThe median follow-up was 15 months (10 cycles, range 1.5 - 30.0 months (1 - 20 cycles)). Ten patients (29.4%) achieved partial responses (PR); 23 patients (67.6%) demonstrated stable disease (SD) lasting ≥ 2 cycles. Seventeen patients (50%) developed progressive disease (PD) during follow-up. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 15 months (range 3.0 - 28.5) months. A total of 9 patients died; the overall survival has not been reached; the median survival time of the deceased patients was 13 months (range 7 - 24) months. The most common adverse events were hand-foot syndrome (77.8%), thrombocytopenia (75.0%), hypertension (61.1%) and diarrhea (46.0%). Most adverse events were reversible by treatment interruption. Twenty-two patients (61.1%) developed hypertension; and hypertension was associated with a long time to disease progression and long overall survival (P = 0.004, 0.000, respectively).

CONCLUSIONSThe results of this study demonstrate the efficacy and manageable adverse event profile of sunitinib as a single agent in first- or second-line therapy for patients with metastatic clear cell RCC. Further, sunitinib-associated hypertension may be a strong predictive marker for treatment efficacy in metastatic RCC.

Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Antineoplastic Agents ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Carcinoma, Renal Cell ; drug therapy ; mortality ; Drug Administration Schedule ; Female ; Humans ; Indoles ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pyrroles ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult

Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis is a rare severe pustular cutaneous adverse reaction characterized by a rapid clinical course with typical histological findings. It is accompanied by fever and acute eruption of non-follicular pustules overlying erythrodermic skin. The causative agents are most frequently antibacterial drugs. We present a patient with acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis caused by methylene blue and indigotin dyes.
Acute Generalized Exanthematous Pustulosis/*chemically induced/drug therapy/pathology ; Administration, Oral ; Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use ; Aged ; Biopsy ; Coloring Agents/administration & dosage/*adverse effects ; Humans ; Indoles/administration & dosage/*adverse effects ; Intradermal Tests ; Male ; Methylene Blue/administration & dosage/*adverse effects ; Skin/*drug effects/pathology ; Treatment Outcome