No abstract available.
Environmental Monitoring* ; Health Promotion*

No abstract available.
Hemorrhoids*

The near point of accommodation of 500 normal Koreans aged 8 to 70 was measured for the monocular and binocular states. Push-up method with Slataper's one-two line card was used. Calculation for the near:point was measured by Prince rule with AD phoropter. The results were divided into 15 age groups as follows; 1. The age group of 8 to 11 ; The range:of monocular accommodative power was 17.2D. to 12.3D. The mean value was 15.2D. The range of binocular accommodative power was 19.2D. to 14.2D. The mean value was 17.4D. The excess of binocular accommodative power was 2.2D. 2. The age group of 12 to 15 ; The range of monocular accommodative power was 15.2D. to 10.4D. The mean value was 13.8D. The range of binocular accommodative power was 18.8D. to 13.9D. The mean value was 15.4D. The excess of binocular accommodative power was 1.6D. 3. The age group of 16 to 19 ; The range of monocular acocmmodative power was 14.8D. to 9.8D. The mean value was 12.3D. The range of binocular accommodative power was 17.6D. to 12.4D. The mean value was 13.7D. The eXcess of binocular accommodative power was 1.4D. 4. The age group of 20 to 23 ; The range of monocular accommodative power was 13.4D. to 8.8D. The mean value was 11.2D. The range of binocular accommodative power was 15.9D. to 10.8D. The mean value was 12.6D. The excess of binocular accommodative power was 1.4D. 5. The age group of 24 to 27 ; The range of monocular accommodative power was 12.8D. to 8.0D. The mean value was 10.4D. The range of binocular accommodative power was 13.7D. to 9.2D. The mean value was 11.8D. The excess of binocular accommodative power was 1.4D. 6. The age group of 28 to 31 ; The range of monocular accommodative power was 12.0D. to 7.4D. The mean value was 9.5D. The range of binocular accommodative power was 12.8D. to 8.6D. The mean value was 10.8D. The excess of binocular accommodative power was 1.3D. 7. The age group of 32 to 35 ; The range of monocular accommodative power was 11.4D. to 6.6D. The mean value was 8.8D. The range of binocular accommodative power was 11.9D. to 7.9D. The mean value was 10.0D. The excess of binocular accommodative power was 1.2D. 8. The age group of 36 to 39 ; The range of monocular accommodative power was 10.2D. to 5.3D. The mean value was 7.2D. The range of binocular accommodative power was 11.2D. to 6.8D. The mean value was 8.4D. The excess of binocular accommodative power was 1.2D. 9. The age group of 40 to 43 ; The range of monocular accommodative power was 8.2D. to 3.8D. The mean value was 5.4D. The range of binocular accommodative power was 9.7D. to 5.0D. The mean value was 6.4D. The excess of binocular accommodative power was 1.0D. 10. The age group of 44 to 47 ; The range of monocular accommodative power was 7.8D. to 2.3D. The mean value was 4.1D. The range of binocular accommodative power was 9.1D. to 3.4D. The mean value was 4.9D. The excess of binocular accommodative power was 0.8D. 11. The age group of 48 to 51 ; The range of monocular accommodative power was 4.0D. to 1.2D. The mean value was 2.0D. The range of binocular accommodative power was 6.2D. to 1.6D. The mean value was 2.8D. The excess of binocular accommodative power was 0.8D. 12. The age group of 52 to 55 ; The range of monocular accmmodative power was 2.7D. to 0.9D. The mean value was 1.8D. The ranie of binocular accommodative power was 4.3D. to 1.0D. The mean valae was 2.0D. The excess of binocular accommodative power was 0.5D. 13. The age group of 56 to 59 ; The range of monocular accomIllodative power was 1.8D. to 0.7D. The mean value was 1.0D. The range of binocular accommodative power was 2.8D. to 0.7D. The mean value was 1.5D. The excess of binocular accommodative power was 0.5D. 14. The age group of 60 to 63 ; The range of monocular accommodative power was 1.2D. to 0.4D. The mean value was 0.7D. The range of binocular accommodative power was 1.8D. to 0.5D. The mean value was 1.0D. The excess of binocular accommodative power was 0.3D. 15. The age group of 64 to 70 ; The range of monocular accommodative power was 1.0D. to 0.2D. The mean value was 0.6D. The range of binocular accommodative power was 1.6D. to 0.4D. The mean value was 0.8D. The excess of binocular accommodative power was 0.2D. The human ocular occommodative power was decreased according to the increasing age. The binocular accommodative power was larger than the monocular accommodative power. The excess between binocular and monocular accommodative power was also decreased according to the increasing age. In all age group, the mean excess between binocular and monocular accommodative power was about 1.0 diopter that was more or less larger than the Duane's. In the age group of 50 years below, these values were larger than the Duane's. In the age group of 50 years above, these values were similar to the Duane's.
Humans ; Telescopes

Authors evaluated the accuracy of preoperative pelvic CT scan staging and its effects on management in 12 biopsy proved rectal cancer patients. Authors also studied postoperative CT in 5 patients to detect disease recurrence and metastasis. Preoperative CT staging was identical to surgical and/or pathological staging in 9 patients (75%), but it was underestimated in two cases and overestimated in one instance than in surgical stagings. In 7 cases, CT scan did not alter original choice of procedures. However, preoperative CT staging gave definitive informations to change management plans in 5 cases otherwise the treatment would be difficult and inadequate. Postoperative CT showed local recurrence in one and liver metastases in 2 cases. One of them was not detected at exploratory laparotomy.
Biopsy ; Humans ; Laparotomy ; Liver ; Neoplasm Metastasis ; Rectal Neoplasms* ; Recurrence ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed*

No abstract available.
Nifedipine* ; Vasopressins*

No abstract available.
Breast* ; Humans*

OBJECTIVES: Sleep problems has been consistently reported as a suicidal risk factor in adults and, recently, also in adolescents. In this study, dividing study subjects by the previous suicidal behaviors (suicidal vs non-suicidal), we compared the group differences of suicidal risk factors, and examined the possibility of sleep as a suicidal risk factor. METHODS: Study subjects were 561 (271 boys and 290 girls) from a community sample of high school students. Suicidal Risk Behavior Checklist, Center for Epidemiological Study-Depression (CES-D), Symptom Checklist-90-Revision (SCL-90-R) Anxiety and Aggression subscale, Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) were done. RESULTS: Forty six students (8.1%) reported previous actual self-harm behavior as a suicidal attempt, 181 students (32.4%) reported having suicidal thought only. Three hundred thirty four students (59.5%) reported no previous suicidal behavior (thought and attempt, both). Suicidal behavior group showed higher score on risk behaviors such as school violence, substance use and internet addiction. CES-D, SCL-90-R, PSQI showed significant group difference. Logistic regression analysis showed suicidal risk were significantly associated with depression, stress in suicidal risk factors and sleep latency, daytime dysfunction in PSQI. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) shows the most prolonged sleep latency and increased index of all PSQI components except sleep efficiency in suicidal attempt group. CONCLUSIONS: Sleep Problems had a strong association with the suicidal risk behavior in adolescents. Sleep problems, especially, prolonged sleep latency, daytime dysfunction might be important markers for suicidal behavior. Screening for sleep problems in adolescents are encouraged for the parents, school teachers, and related medical physicians.
Adolescent ; Adult ; Aggression ; Anxiety ; Checklist ; Depression ; Humans ; Internet ; Logistic Models ; Mass Screening ; Parents ; Risk Factors ; Risk-Taking ; Suicide ; Violence

No abstract available.
Stomach Neoplasms*

Two kinds or intraprostatic stent (Prostakath and Nissenkorn catheter) were inserted under local anesthesia in 17 patients for 20 times who had benign prostatic hyperplasia. Within 1 month after insertion of the stents. the results are good in 10 of 17 patients. fair in 4 and poor in 3 from the view points of improvements in urine flow and voiding symptoms. Of 9 patients in whom the stents have been inserted longer than 6 months. 4 are good. 2 are fair and 3 are poor in the results of long term insertion. It seems that this method is applicable as s definitive method for benign prostatic hyperplasia if there is a few progressions in the location where this stent is inserted. in the quality or stent material and in the easy way to change the stent.
Anesthesia, Local ; Humans ; Prostatic Hyperplasia* ; Stents

OBJECTIVES: The present study investigates the status of inpatient psychiatric consultations at a general hospital in order to find factors that contribute to treatment compliance related to psychiatric consultations. METHODS: The subjects were 333 patients who were hospitalized at Korea University Medical Center Ansan Hospital from 1 September 2009 to 31 July 2010.The patients were referred for psychiatric consultation during hospitalization. This study investigates demographic data, request department, referral causes, requestor, psychiatric history and diagnosis, andpsychiatric treatment compliance. Treatment compliance was defined as whether or not the patient had accepted psychiatric treatment during hospitalization or outpatient department(OPD) follow-up. This study ascertains the factors that have impact on compliance, by taking binary logistic regression with compliance and other variables. RESULTS: Among the patients that were offered psychiatric treatment during hospitalization(N=310), treatment compliance was 82.9%. Among the patients that were offered OPD treatment(N=111), compliance was 55.8%. Elderly group(>65 years) showed better compliance to treatment during hospitalization than the younger patient group(OR=4.838, p=0.004). Patients with secondary psychiatric disorders showed better OPD follow-up compliance than patients with secondary psychiatric disorders(OR=8.520, p=.008). CONCLUSION: Elderly patients showed better compliance for psychiatric treatment during hospitalization. However they commonly have disorders such as delirium and mood disorders that have impact on the patient's physical state, hence further active measures should be carried out. Patients referred due to primary psychiatric disorders showed poor OPD compliance. Therefore clinicians have to suggest multidisciplinary interventions that will improve treatment compliance of such patients.
Academic Medical Centers ; Aged ; Compliance ; Delirium ; Follow-Up Studies ; Hospitalization ; Hospitals, General ; Humans ; Inpatients ; Korea ; Logistic Models ; Mood Disorders ; Outpatients ; Referral and Consultation