No abstract available.
Environmental Monitoring* ; Health Promotion*

No abstract available.
Hemorrhoids*

The near point of accommodation of 500 normal Koreans aged 8 to 70 was measured for the monocular and binocular states. Push-up method with Slataper's one-two line card was used. Calculation for the near:point was measured by Prince rule with AD phoropter. The results were divided into 15 age groups as follows; 1. The age group of 8 to 11 ; The range:of monocular accommodative power was 17.2D. to 12.3D. The mean value was 15.2D. The range of binocular accommodative power was 19.2D. to 14.2D. The mean value was 17.4D. The excess of binocular accommodative power was 2.2D. 2. The age group of 12 to 15 ; The range of monocular accommodative power was 15.2D. to 10.4D. The mean value was 13.8D. The range of binocular accommodative power was 18.8D. to 13.9D. The mean value was 15.4D. The excess of binocular accommodative power was 1.6D. 3. The age group of 16 to 19 ; The range of monocular acocmmodative power was 14.8D. to 9.8D. The mean value was 12.3D. The range of binocular accommodative power was 17.6D. to 12.4D. The mean value was 13.7D. The eXcess of binocular accommodative power was 1.4D. 4. The age group of 20 to 23 ; The range of monocular accommodative power was 13.4D. to 8.8D. The mean value was 11.2D. The range of binocular accommodative power was 15.9D. to 10.8D. The mean value was 12.6D. The excess of binocular accommodative power was 1.4D. 5. The age group of 24 to 27 ; The range of monocular accommodative power was 12.8D. to 8.0D. The mean value was 10.4D. The range of binocular accommodative power was 13.7D. to 9.2D. The mean value was 11.8D. The excess of binocular accommodative power was 1.4D. 6. The age group of 28 to 31 ; The range of monocular accommodative power was 12.0D. to 7.4D. The mean value was 9.5D. The range of binocular accommodative power was 12.8D. to 8.6D. The mean value was 10.8D. The excess of binocular accommodative power was 1.3D. 7. The age group of 32 to 35 ; The range of monocular accommodative power was 11.4D. to 6.6D. The mean value was 8.8D. The range of binocular accommodative power was 11.9D. to 7.9D. The mean value was 10.0D. The excess of binocular accommodative power was 1.2D. 8. The age group of 36 to 39 ; The range of monocular accommodative power was 10.2D. to 5.3D. The mean value was 7.2D. The range of binocular accommodative power was 11.2D. to 6.8D. The mean value was 8.4D. The excess of binocular accommodative power was 1.2D. 9. The age group of 40 to 43 ; The range of monocular accommodative power was 8.2D. to 3.8D. The mean value was 5.4D. The range of binocular accommodative power was 9.7D. to 5.0D. The mean value was 6.4D. The excess of binocular accommodative power was 1.0D. 10. The age group of 44 to 47 ; The range of monocular accommodative power was 7.8D. to 2.3D. The mean value was 4.1D. The range of binocular accommodative power was 9.1D. to 3.4D. The mean value was 4.9D. The excess of binocular accommodative power was 0.8D. 11. The age group of 48 to 51 ; The range of monocular accommodative power was 4.0D. to 1.2D. The mean value was 2.0D. The range of binocular accommodative power was 6.2D. to 1.6D. The mean value was 2.8D. The excess of binocular accommodative power was 0.8D. 12. The age group of 52 to 55 ; The range of monocular accmmodative power was 2.7D. to 0.9D. The mean value was 1.8D. The ranie of binocular accommodative power was 4.3D. to 1.0D. The mean valae was 2.0D. The excess of binocular accommodative power was 0.5D. 13. The age group of 56 to 59 ; The range of monocular accomIllodative power was 1.8D. to 0.7D. The mean value was 1.0D. The range of binocular accommodative power was 2.8D. to 0.7D. The mean value was 1.5D. The excess of binocular accommodative power was 0.5D. 14. The age group of 60 to 63 ; The range of monocular accommodative power was 1.2D. to 0.4D. The mean value was 0.7D. The range of binocular accommodative power was 1.8D. to 0.5D. The mean value was 1.0D. The excess of binocular accommodative power was 0.3D. 15. The age group of 64 to 70 ; The range of monocular accommodative power was 1.0D. to 0.2D. The mean value was 0.6D. The range of binocular accommodative power was 1.6D. to 0.4D. The mean value was 0.8D. The excess of binocular accommodative power was 0.2D. The human ocular occommodative power was decreased according to the increasing age. The binocular accommodative power was larger than the monocular accommodative power. The excess between binocular and monocular accommodative power was also decreased according to the increasing age. In all age group, the mean excess between binocular and monocular accommodative power was about 1.0 diopter that was more or less larger than the Duane's. In the age group of 50 years below, these values were larger than the Duane's. In the age group of 50 years above, these values were similar to the Duane's.
Humans ; Telescopes

Authors evaluated the accuracy of preoperative pelvic CT scan staging and its effects on management in 12 biopsy proved rectal cancer patients. Authors also studied postoperative CT in 5 patients to detect disease recurrence and metastasis. Preoperative CT staging was identical to surgical and/or pathological staging in 9 patients (75%), but it was underestimated in two cases and overestimated in one instance than in surgical stagings. In 7 cases, CT scan did not alter original choice of procedures. However, preoperative CT staging gave definitive informations to change management plans in 5 cases otherwise the treatment would be difficult and inadequate. Postoperative CT showed local recurrence in one and liver metastases in 2 cases. One of them was not detected at exploratory laparotomy.
Biopsy ; Humans ; Laparotomy ; Liver ; Neoplasm Metastasis ; Rectal Neoplasms* ; Recurrence ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed*

No abstract available.
Breast* ; Humans*

No abstract available.
Nifedipine* ; Vasopressins*

OBJECTIVES: Sleep problems has been consistently reported as a suicidal risk factor in adults and, recently, also in adolescents. In this study, dividing study subjects by the previous suicidal behaviors (suicidal vs non-suicidal), we compared the group differences of suicidal risk factors, and examined the possibility of sleep as a suicidal risk factor. METHODS: Study subjects were 561 (271 boys and 290 girls) from a community sample of high school students. Suicidal Risk Behavior Checklist, Center for Epidemiological Study-Depression (CES-D), Symptom Checklist-90-Revision (SCL-90-R) Anxiety and Aggression subscale, Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) were done. RESULTS: Forty six students (8.1%) reported previous actual self-harm behavior as a suicidal attempt, 181 students (32.4%) reported having suicidal thought only. Three hundred thirty four students (59.5%) reported no previous suicidal behavior (thought and attempt, both). Suicidal behavior group showed higher score on risk behaviors such as school violence, substance use and internet addiction. CES-D, SCL-90-R, PSQI showed significant group difference. Logistic regression analysis showed suicidal risk were significantly associated with depression, stress in suicidal risk factors and sleep latency, daytime dysfunction in PSQI. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) shows the most prolonged sleep latency and increased index of all PSQI components except sleep efficiency in suicidal attempt group. CONCLUSIONS: Sleep Problems had a strong association with the suicidal risk behavior in adolescents. Sleep problems, especially, prolonged sleep latency, daytime dysfunction might be important markers for suicidal behavior. Screening for sleep problems in adolescents are encouraged for the parents, school teachers, and related medical physicians.
Adolescent ; Adult ; Aggression ; Anxiety ; Checklist ; Depression ; Humans ; Internet ; Logistic Models ; Mass Screening ; Parents ; Risk Factors ; Risk-Taking ; Suicide ; Violence

OBJECTIVES: We surveyed this study for knowing the relation within stress, depression and medical comorbidities, and finding the risk factors of major depression. METHODS: 1764 subjects were enrolled from Jan. 2009 to Dec. 2009 who visit Korea University Guro hospital healthcare center. The subjects answered the questionnaire of PSS(Perceived Stress Scale), PHQ-9(Patient Health Questionnaire-9) and the demographic data. We categorized them as the stress group, depressive group, medical comorbidity group and analyzed the correlation analyses and logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: 198 of 1764 subjects(11.8%) were applied to major depression, and the depressive group showed the higher mean stress score(23.19) and mean depression score(12.95) than the normal group. The total PHQ-9 score was increased by perceiving more stress, having more medical comorbidities. The subjects with female, visiting due to recent health problems, irregular exercise, current smoking, history of angina and cerebrovascular disease showed the increased risk of major depression. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we find the PSS, PHQ-9 were valuable for mental health screening in healthcare center. As perceiving more stress and having more medical comorbidity, risk of major depression were increased. Accordingly the individuals with medical diseases or unhealthy lifestyle would need the mental health screen.
Comorbidity ; Delivery of Health Care ; Depression ; Female ; Humans ; Korea ; Life Style ; Logistic Models ; Mass Screening ; Mental Health ; Questionnaires ; Risk Factors ; Smoke ; Smoking

No abstract available.
Stomach Neoplasms*

Splenic abscess is an uncommon lesion and may be present either as a localized area of infection in the spleen or as a part of generalized sepsis. The diagnosis is difficult because of the rather nonspecific clinical picture. Hence, splenic abscess has a high mortality rate and is after diagnosed only at autopsy. Computerized tomography (CT) offers the clinician a reliable tool for the diagnosis of intra-abdominal abscess. A successful outcome is dependent on an early diagnosis and prompt treatment by splenectomy with antibiotic cover. We experienced a care of splenic abscess which was diagnosed by CT and treated by splenectomy with antibiotics. Postoperative course was relatively uneventful.
Abdominal Abscess ; Abscess* ; Anti-Bacterial Agents ; Autopsy ; Diagnosis ; Early Diagnosis ; Mortality ; Sepsis ; Spleen ; Splenectomy