BACKGROUND: Workers in pesticide manufacturing industries are constantly exposed to pesticides. Genetic biomonitoring provides an early identification of potential cancer and genetic diseases in exposed populations. The objectives of this biomonitoring study were to assess DNA damage through comet assay in blood samples collected from industry workers and compare these results with those of classical analytical techniques used for complete blood count analysis. METHODS: Samples from controls (n = 20) and exposed workers (n = 38) from an industrial area in Multan, Pakistan, were subjected to various tests. Malathion residues in blood samples were measured by gas chromatography. RESULTS: The exposed workers who were employed in the pesticide manufacturing industry for a longer period (i.e., 13-25 years) had significantly higher DNA tail length (7.04 μm) than the controls (0.94 μm). Workers in the exposed group also had higher white blood cell and red blood cell counts, and lower levels of mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH), MCH concentration, and mean corpuscular volume in comparison with normal levels for these parameters. Malathion was not detected in the control group. However, in the exposed group, 72% of whole blood samples had malathion with a mean value of 0.14 mg/L (range 0.01-0.31 mg/L). CONCLUSION: We found a strong correlation (R2 = 0.91) between DNA damage in terms of tail length and malathion concentration in blood. Intensive efforts and trainings are thus required to build awareness about safety practices and to change industrial workers' attitude to prevent harmful environmental and anthropogenic effects.
Blood Cell Count ; Chromatography, Gas ; Comet Assay ; DNA ; DNA Damage ; Environmental Monitoring* ; Erythrocyte Count ; Erythrocyte Indices ; Hematologic Tests ; Leukocytes ; Malathion ; Occupations* ; Pakistan ; Pesticides* ; Tail

Objectives: Postmenopausal females often experience genitourinary symptoms like vulvovaginal dryness due to estrogen decline.Hormone replacement therapy is effective in alleviating vaginal atrophy and genitourinary syndrome in this population. Evaluate local estrogen’s safety and effectiveness for alleviating postmenopausal vaginal symptoms, including endometrial thickness, dyspareunia, vaginal pH, and dryness. Methods: We searched Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrial.Gov, PubMed, and ScienceDirect databases until July 2023. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) linking intravaginal estrogen supplementation to vaginal atrophy or vaginitis were included. The risk of bias was evaluated with RoB 2, and publication bias was assessed using Egger and Beggs analysis. Results: All evidence pertains to females. Eighteen studies (n = 4,723) compared estrogen with placebo. Patients using estrogen showed a significant increase in superficial cells (mean differences [MD]: 19.28; 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 13.40 to 25.16; I2 = 90%; P < 0.00001) and a decrease in parabasal cells (MD: –24.85; 95% CI: –32.96 to –16.73; I2 = 92%; P < 0.00001). Vaginal pH and dyspareunia significantly reduced in estrogen users (MD: –0.94; 95% CI: –1.05 to –0.84; I2 = 96%) and (MD: –0.52; 95% CI: –0.63 to –0.41; I2 = 99%), respectively. Estrogen did not significantly affect vaginal dryness (MD: –0.04; 95% CI: –0.18 to 0.11; I2 = 88%). Adverse events like vulvovaginal pruritis, mycotic infection, and urinary tract infection were reported, but the association was insignificant (risk ratio: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.88 to 1.02; I2 = 0%). Conclusions Our meta-analysis of 18 RCTs suggests promising potential for intravaginal estrogen therapy in alleviating vaginal atrophy and vaginitis in postmenopausal females.

Objectives: Postmenopausal females often experience genitourinary symptoms like vulvovaginal dryness due to estrogen decline.Hormone replacement therapy is effective in alleviating vaginal atrophy and genitourinary syndrome in this population. Evaluate local estrogen’s safety and effectiveness for alleviating postmenopausal vaginal symptoms, including endometrial thickness, dyspareunia, vaginal pH, and dryness. Methods: We searched Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrial.Gov, PubMed, and ScienceDirect databases until July 2023. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) linking intravaginal estrogen supplementation to vaginal atrophy or vaginitis were included. The risk of bias was evaluated with RoB 2, and publication bias was assessed using Egger and Beggs analysis. Results: All evidence pertains to females. Eighteen studies (n = 4,723) compared estrogen with placebo. Patients using estrogen showed a significant increase in superficial cells (mean differences [MD]: 19.28; 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 13.40 to 25.16; I2 = 90%; P < 0.00001) and a decrease in parabasal cells (MD: –24.85; 95% CI: –32.96 to –16.73; I2 = 92%; P < 0.00001). Vaginal pH and dyspareunia significantly reduced in estrogen users (MD: –0.94; 95% CI: –1.05 to –0.84; I2 = 96%) and (MD: –0.52; 95% CI: –0.63 to –0.41; I2 = 99%), respectively. Estrogen did not significantly affect vaginal dryness (MD: –0.04; 95% CI: –0.18 to 0.11; I2 = 88%). Adverse events like vulvovaginal pruritis, mycotic infection, and urinary tract infection were reported, but the association was insignificant (risk ratio: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.88 to 1.02; I2 = 0%). Conclusions Our meta-analysis of 18 RCTs suggests promising potential for intravaginal estrogen therapy in alleviating vaginal atrophy and vaginitis in postmenopausal females.

Objectives: Postmenopausal females often experience genitourinary symptoms like vulvovaginal dryness due to estrogen decline.Hormone replacement therapy is effective in alleviating vaginal atrophy and genitourinary syndrome in this population. Evaluate local estrogen’s safety and effectiveness for alleviating postmenopausal vaginal symptoms, including endometrial thickness, dyspareunia, vaginal pH, and dryness. Methods: We searched Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrial.Gov, PubMed, and ScienceDirect databases until July 2023. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) linking intravaginal estrogen supplementation to vaginal atrophy or vaginitis were included. The risk of bias was evaluated with RoB 2, and publication bias was assessed using Egger and Beggs analysis. Results: All evidence pertains to females. Eighteen studies (n = 4,723) compared estrogen with placebo. Patients using estrogen showed a significant increase in superficial cells (mean differences [MD]: 19.28; 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 13.40 to 25.16; I2 = 90%; P < 0.00001) and a decrease in parabasal cells (MD: –24.85; 95% CI: –32.96 to –16.73; I2 = 92%; P < 0.00001). Vaginal pH and dyspareunia significantly reduced in estrogen users (MD: –0.94; 95% CI: –1.05 to –0.84; I2 = 96%) and (MD: –0.52; 95% CI: –0.63 to –0.41; I2 = 99%), respectively. Estrogen did not significantly affect vaginal dryness (MD: –0.04; 95% CI: –0.18 to 0.11; I2 = 88%). Adverse events like vulvovaginal pruritis, mycotic infection, and urinary tract infection were reported, but the association was insignificant (risk ratio: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.88 to 1.02; I2 = 0%). Conclusions Our meta-analysis of 18 RCTs suggests promising potential for intravaginal estrogen therapy in alleviating vaginal atrophy and vaginitis in postmenopausal females.

Objectives: Postmenopausal females often experience genitourinary symptoms like vulvovaginal dryness due to estrogen decline.Hormone replacement therapy is effective in alleviating vaginal atrophy and genitourinary syndrome in this population. Evaluate local estrogen’s safety and effectiveness for alleviating postmenopausal vaginal symptoms, including endometrial thickness, dyspareunia, vaginal pH, and dryness. Methods: We searched Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrial.Gov, PubMed, and ScienceDirect databases until July 2023. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) linking intravaginal estrogen supplementation to vaginal atrophy or vaginitis were included. The risk of bias was evaluated with RoB 2, and publication bias was assessed using Egger and Beggs analysis. Results: All evidence pertains to females. Eighteen studies (n = 4,723) compared estrogen with placebo. Patients using estrogen showed a significant increase in superficial cells (mean differences [MD]: 19.28; 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 13.40 to 25.16; I2 = 90%; P < 0.00001) and a decrease in parabasal cells (MD: –24.85; 95% CI: –32.96 to –16.73; I2 = 92%; P < 0.00001). Vaginal pH and dyspareunia significantly reduced in estrogen users (MD: –0.94; 95% CI: –1.05 to –0.84; I2 = 96%) and (MD: –0.52; 95% CI: –0.63 to –0.41; I2 = 99%), respectively. Estrogen did not significantly affect vaginal dryness (MD: –0.04; 95% CI: –0.18 to 0.11; I2 = 88%). Adverse events like vulvovaginal pruritis, mycotic infection, and urinary tract infection were reported, but the association was insignificant (risk ratio: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.88 to 1.02; I2 = 0%). Conclusions Our meta-analysis of 18 RCTs suggests promising potential for intravaginal estrogen therapy in alleviating vaginal atrophy and vaginitis in postmenopausal females.