Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated unparalleled clinical responses and revolutionized the paradigm of tumor treatment, while substantial patients remain unresponsive or develop resistance to ICIs as a single agent, which is traceable to cellular metabolic dysfunction. Although dysregulated metabolism has long been adjudged as a hallmark of tumor, it is now increasingly accepted that metabolic reprogramming is not exclusive to tumor cells but is also characteristic of immunocytes. Correspondingly, people used to pay more attention to the effect of tumor cell metabolism on immunocytes, but in practice immunocytes interact intimately with their own metabolic function in a way that has never been realized before during their activation and differentiation, which opens up a whole new frontier called immunometabolism. The metabolic intervention for tumor-infiltrating immunocytes could offer fresh opportunities to break the resistance and ameliorate existing ICI immunotherapy, whose crux might be to ascertain synergistic combinations of metabolic intervention with ICIs to reap synergic benefits and facilitate an adjusted anti-tumor immune response. Herein, we elaborate potential mechanisms underlying immunotherapy resistance from a novel dimension of metabolic reprogramming in diverse tumor-infiltrating immunocytes, and related metabolic intervention in the hope of offering a reference for targeting metabolic vulnerabilities to circumvent immunotherapeutic resistance.
Humans ; Neoplasms/pathology* ; Immunotherapy/methods* ; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use*

Humans ; Prognosis ; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use* ; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/genetics*

Metastases of uveal melanoma (UM) spread predominantly to the liver. Due to low response rates to systemic therapies, liver-directed therapies (LDT) are commonly used for tumor control. The impact of LDT on the response to systemic treatment is unknown. A total of 182 patients with metastatic UM treated with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) were included in this analysis. Patients were recruited from prospective skin cancer centers and the German national skin cancer registry (ADOReg) of the German Dermatologic Cooperative Oncology Group (DeCOG). Two cohorts were compared: patients with LDT (cohort A, n = 78) versus those without LDT (cohort B, n = 104). Data were analyzed for response to treatment, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). The median OS was significantly longer in cohort A than in cohort B (20.1 vs. 13.8 months; P = 0.0016) and a trend towards improved PFS was observed for cohort A (3.0 vs. 2.5 months; P = 0.054). The objective response rate to any ICB (16.7% vs. 3.8%, P = 0.0073) and combined ICB (14.1% vs. 4.5%, P = 0.017) was more favorable in cohort A. Our data suggest that the combination of LDT with ICB may be associated with a survival benefit and higher treatment response to ICB in patients with metastatic UM.
Humans ; CTLA-4 Antigen ; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use* ; Liver ; Prospective Studies ; Skin Neoplasms

The discovery of immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4, has played an important role in the development of cancer immunotherapy. However, immune-related adverse events often occur because of the enhanced immune response enabled by these agents. Antibiotics are widely applied in clinical treatment, and they are inevitably used in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Clinical practice has revealed that antibiotics can weaken the therapeutic response to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Studies have shown that the gut microbiota is essential for the interaction between immune checkpoint inhibitors and antibiotics, although the exact mechanisms remain unclear. This review focuses on the interactions between immune checkpoint inhibitors and antibiotics, with an in-depth discussion about the mechanisms and therapeutic potential of modulating gut microbiota, as well as other new combination strategies.
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use* ; Humans ; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use* ; Immunotherapy ; Neoplasms/drug therapy* ; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor

The inhibition of the host's natural immune response by tumor cells was widely reported in the early phases of the development of oncology therapy, and the concept of employing the host's immune system to treat cancer, i.e. tumor immunotherapy, is not new. However, as a result of early theoretical constraints, clinical application of immunotherapy did not go smoothly and lagged significantly behind radiation and chemotherapy. The path has been winding, but the future now seems promising. Immunotherapy research has advanced enormously as a result of the maturing of immuno-editing theory and the creation of numerous technologies, despite a number of unsuccessful endeavors and clinical studies. Since around 1998, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved a variety of tumor immunotherapies, including cytokines (interleukin-2, interferons), cancer vaccines (Provenge), immune checkpoint inhibitors (ipilimumab), and cellular therapies (chimeric antigen receptor-T (CAR-T)), signaling a boom in the field.
Cancer Vaccines/therapeutic use* ; Humans ; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ; Immunotherapy ; Interferons ; Interleukin-2/therapeutic use* ; Ipilimumab ; Neoplasms/pathology* ; Receptors, Chimeric Antigen

Humans ; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use* ; Prospective Studies ; HIV Infections/drug therapy* ; Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use* ; Comorbidity

Targeted and immunotherapy drugs for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have been rapidly developed. Atezolizumab in combination with bevacizumab has been recommended as the first-line standard of care for unresectable or advanced HCC in several national and international guidelines. The combination therapies with sindilizumab and bevacizumab biosimilar, apatinib and carrilizumab, dulvalizumab and tremelimumab are also recommended as first-line standard regimens for advanced HCC in the guideline of Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology. Local therapy combined with targeted drugs (such as sorafenib and lenvatinib) or immune checkpoint inhibitors can significantly improve outcomes. Therefore, some progress has also been made in the study of single-agent or combination regimens as perioperative neoadjuvant therapy.
Humans ; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/pathology* ; Sorafenib/therapeutic use* ; Liver Neoplasms/pathology* ; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use* ; Bevacizumab/therapeutic use* ; Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals/therapeutic use*

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is a negative regulatory factor antibody, which activates T cells to play an anti-tumor effect in immunotherapy, and can also cause immune-related adverse responses, thereby inducing a series of immune related adverse events (irAEs). Among these irAEs, although the incidence of ICIs-related myocarditis is very low, the fatality rate is significantly higher than other adverse reactions, close to 50%. Clinicians should be vigilant when applying ICIs, but the pathogenesis of ICIs-related myocarditis is still unclear. This article combines the recent research results of ICIs to summarize the mechanism and clinical manifestations of ICIs-related myocarditis, so as to improve clinicians' understanding of the adverse reactions.
.
Biomedical Research/trends* ; Cardiotoxicity/physiopathology* ; Humans ; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use* ; Immunotherapy/adverse effects* ; Myocarditis/physiopathology* ; Neoplasms/drug therapy*

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are increasingly used as first-line therapy for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring no actionable mutations; however, data on their efficacy among patients presenting with intracranial lesions are limited. This study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of ICIs combined with chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC patients with measurable brain metastasis at initial diagnosis. METHODS: Our study retrospectively analyzed clinical data of a total of 211 patients diagnosed with driver gene mutation-negative advanced NSCLC with measurable, asymptomatic brain metastasis at baseline from Hunan Cancer Hospital between January 1, 2019 and September 30, 2021. The patients were stratified into two groups according to the first-line treatment regimen received: ICI combined with chemotherapy ( n = 102) or chemotherapy ( n = 109). Systemic and intracranial objective response rates (ORRs) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed. Adverse events were also compared between the groups. RESULTS: Compared with the chemotherapy-based regimen, the ICI-containing regimen was associated with a significantly higher intracranial (44.1% [45/102] vs . 28.4% [31/109], χ2 = 5.620, P = 0.013) and systemic (49.0% [50/102] vs . 33.9% [37/109], χ2 = 4.942, P = 0.019) ORRs and longer intracranial (11.0 months vs . 7.0 months, P <0.001) and systemic (9.0 months vs . 5.0 months, P <0.001) PFS. Multivariable analysis consistently revealed an independent association between receiving ICI plus platinum-based chemotherapy as a first-line regimen and prolonged intracranial PFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.37-0.73, P <0.001) and systemic PFS (HR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.35-0.66, P <0.001). No unexpected serious adverse effects were observed. CONCLUSION: Our study provides real-world clinical evidence that ICI combined with chemotherapy is a promising first-line treatment option for driver gene mutation-negative advanced NSCLC patients who present with brain metastasis at initial diagnosis. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ , OMESIA, NCT05129202.
Humans ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/genetics* ; Lung Neoplasms/genetics* ; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use* ; Retrospective Studies ; Brain Neoplasms/genetics*

Management and treatment of terminal metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) remains heavily debated. We sought to investigate the efficacy of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor plus anlotinib as a potential solution for terminal mCRPC and further evaluate the association of genomic characteristics with efficacy outcomes. We conducted a retrospective real-world study of 25 mCRPC patients who received PD-1 inhibitor plus anlotinib after the progression to standard treatments. The clinical information was extracted from the electronic medical records and 22 patients had targeted circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) next-generation sequencing. Statistical analysis showed that 6 (24.0%) patients experienced prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response and 11 (44.0%) patients experienced PSA reduction. The relationship between ctDNA findings and outcomes was also analyzed. DNA-damage repair (DDR) pathways and homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathway defects indicated a comparatively longer PSA-progression-free survival (PSA-PFS; 2.5 months vs 1.2 months, P = 0.027; 3.3 months vs 1.2 months, P = 0.017; respectively). This study introduces the PD-1 inhibitor plus anlotinib as a late-line therapeutic strategy for terminal mCRPC. PD-1 inhibitor plus anlotinib may be a new treatment choice for terminal mCRPC patients with DDR or HRR pathway defects and requires further investigation.
Male ; Humans ; Prostate-Specific Antigen ; Treatment Outcome ; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/drug therapy* ; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use* ; Retrospective Studies