1.Comparison of Results of Total Knee Arthroplasty Performed using a Navigation System and the Conventional Technique.
Eun Kyoo SONG ; Jong Keun SEON ; Jae Yoon CHUNG ; Sang Gwon CHO ; Il Kyo KONG
The Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association 2006;41(6):1002-1007
PURPOSE: To compare the radiologic and clinical outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) performed using a navigation system with those obtained using the conventional technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-one TKAs were performed using a navigation system (navigation group) and forty-eight by conventional surgery (conventional group). Radiologic results outside the range defined by +/-3degrees of optimum were classified as outliers. Range of motion and HSS scores at final follow-up were also compared. RESULTS: Mean mechanical axes were 0.3degrees valgus for navigation and 0.5degrees varus for the conventional group, which were not statistically different. However, two outliers occurred in the navigation group, which was significantly less than the 14 that occurred in the conventional group. Mean coronal inclination of the femoral component was significantly different in the two groups as were the outlier numbers. Although outlier numbers significantly differed in sagittal inclination of the femoral or tibial components or coronal inclination of the tibial component, there were no statistical differences in terms of mean values. Differences in ROM and HSS scores were also not observed between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The navigation system helped increase alignment accuracy of the lower extremity, but no significant difference was observed in clinical results between the two study groups.
Arthroplasty*
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Knee*
;
Lower Extremity
;
Range of Motion, Articular
2.Experience of Advance Directives in a Hospice Center.
Bong Han KONG ; Ho Jung AN ; Hyun Seon KIM ; So Young HA ; Il Kyu KIM ; Jung Eun LEE ; Youn Jung PARK ; Yi Jin KANG ; Young Rye KIM ; Hoon Kyo KIM
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2015;30(2):151-154
To protect patient autonomy when confronting death, the importance of advance directives (ADs) has recently became an issue and gradually accepted in Korea. However, in real practice, ADs were not completed by patients but their families in most cases. To analyze the current situation of performing ADs, we reviewed medical charts of 214 terminal cancer patients admitted to the hospice center from October 2012 to September 2013. Seventy-six (35.5%) patients completed ADs. All ADs were completed by patients themselves. The most common reason for not completing ADs was poor physical and/or mental condition. As a proxy, the majority of patients preferred their spouses (55.3%). Few patients wanted life sustaining treatment (1.3%), however palliative sedation was accepted in 89.5%. The median timing of ADs after admission was three (0-90) days, and duration of survival since ADs was 22 (1-340) days. In conclusion, approximately one third of terminal cancer patients completed ADs by themselves. Considering that patient's poor condition is the main reason for not completing ADs, earlier discussion regarding ADs is necessary to enhance patients' participation.
Adolescent
;
Adult
;
Advance Directives/psychology/*statistics & numerical data
;
Aged
;
Aged, 80 and over
;
Female
;
Hospices/*statistics & numerical data
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Neoplasms/*mortality/psychology
;
*Palliative Care
;
Republic of Korea
;
*Terminal Care
;
Young Adult
3.Experience of Advance Directives in a Hospice Center.
Bong Han KONG ; Ho Jung AN ; Hyun Seon KIM ; So Young HA ; Il Kyu KIM ; Jung Eun LEE ; Youn Jung PARK ; Yi Jin KANG ; Young Rye KIM ; Hoon Kyo KIM
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2015;30(2):151-154
To protect patient autonomy when confronting death, the importance of advance directives (ADs) has recently became an issue and gradually accepted in Korea. However, in real practice, ADs were not completed by patients but their families in most cases. To analyze the current situation of performing ADs, we reviewed medical charts of 214 terminal cancer patients admitted to the hospice center from October 2012 to September 2013. Seventy-six (35.5%) patients completed ADs. All ADs were completed by patients themselves. The most common reason for not completing ADs was poor physical and/or mental condition. As a proxy, the majority of patients preferred their spouses (55.3%). Few patients wanted life sustaining treatment (1.3%), however palliative sedation was accepted in 89.5%. The median timing of ADs after admission was three (0-90) days, and duration of survival since ADs was 22 (1-340) days. In conclusion, approximately one third of terminal cancer patients completed ADs by themselves. Considering that patient's poor condition is the main reason for not completing ADs, earlier discussion regarding ADs is necessary to enhance patients' participation.
Adolescent
;
Adult
;
Advance Directives/psychology/*statistics & numerical data
;
Aged
;
Aged, 80 and over
;
Female
;
Hospices/*statistics & numerical data
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Neoplasms/*mortality/psychology
;
*Palliative Care
;
Republic of Korea
;
*Terminal Care
;
Young Adult
4.The pattern of postoperative quality of life following minimally invasive gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a prospective cohort from Korean multicenter robotic gastrectomy trial
Jong-Ho CHOI ; Sang-Uk HAN ; Han-Kwang YANG ; Young-Woo KIM ; Keun Won RYU ; Joong-Min PARK ; Ji Yeong AN ; Min-Chan KIM ; Sungsoo PARK ; Kyo Young SONG ; Sung Jin OH ; Seong-Ho KONG ; Byoung Jo SUH ; Dae Hyun YANG ; Tae Kyung HA ; Hyoung-Il KIM ; Woo Jin HYUNG ; Hyuk-Joon LEE
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research 2020;99(5):275-284
Purpose:
Quality of life (QOL) has become important in the trend of emphasizing patient satisfaction. This study aimed to evaluate the QOL in patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer.
Methods:
A prospective trial was performed involving patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic gastrectomy for primary gastric cancer at 11 hospitals in Korea. Within this comparative trial, QOL, postoperative pain, and long-term complications were exanimated. The quality-of-life questionnaire (QLQ)-C30 and QLQ-STO22 developed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer were used for the QOL survey. We compared the data after dividing it into several types of characteristics as follows; device (robotic or laparoscopic), operation type, pathological stage, and sex.Biased components were extracted by logistic regression analysis. Propensity score matching was applied to the data set with the biased components.
Results:
In total, 434 patients (211 for laparoscopic surgery and 223 for robotic surgery) were enrolled, out of which 321 patients who responded to both preoperative and postoperative surveys were selected for analysis. Robotic gastrectomy was not different from laparoscopic gastrectomy with respect to postoperative QOL. Distal gastrectomy showed better scores than total gastrectomy in terms of role functioning, social functioning, fatigue, nausea/vomiting, pain, dyspnea, constipation, financial difficulties, dysphagia, eating restrictions, anxiety, taste, and body image. Male patients showed better scores on the 19 scales compared to female patients.
Conclusion
Robotic and laparoscopic approaches for gastric cancer surgery did not differ from each other with respect to QOL. Distal gastrectomy resulted in better QOL than total gastrectomy.