1.Are we ready for conservative treatment in ovarian cancer?.
Jesus UTRILLA-LAYNA ; Ignacio ZAPARDIEL
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2015;26(1):75-76
No abstract available.
Female
;
Fertility Preservation/*methods
;
Humans
;
Neoplasm Staging
;
Ovarian Neoplasms/*surgery
2.Prognostic factors associated with local recurrence in squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva.
Sara IACOPONI ; Ignacio ZAPARDIEL ; Maria Dolores DIESTRO ; Alicia HERNANDEZ ; Javier DE SANTIAGO
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2013;24(3):242-248
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the prognostic factors related to the recurrence rate of vulvar cancer. METHODS: Retrospective study of 87 patients diagnosed of vulvar squamous cell carcinoma diagnosed at a tertiary hospital in Madrid between January 2000 and December 2010. RESULTS: The pathological mean tumor size was 35.1+/-22.8 mm, with stromal invasion of 7.7+/-6.6 mm. The mean free margin after surgery was 16.8+/-10.5 mm. Among all patients, 31 (35.6%) presented local recurrence (mean time 10 months; range, 1 to 114 months) and 7 (8%) had distant metastases (mean time, 5 months; range, 1 to 114 months). We found significant differences in the mean tumor size between patients who presented a relapse and those who did not (37.6+/-21.3 mm vs. 28.9+/-12.1 mm; p=0.05). Patients with free margins equal or less than 8 mm presented a relapse rate of 52.6% vs. 43.5% of those with free margin greater than 8 mm (p=0.50). However, with a cut-off of 15 mm, we observed a local recurrence rate of 55.6% vs. 34.5%, respectively (p=0.09). When the stromal invasion cut-off was >4 mm, local recurrence rate increased up to 52.9% compared to 37.5% when the stromal invasion was < or =4 mm (p=0.20). CONCLUSION: Tumor size, pathologic margin distance and stromal invasion seem to be the most important predictors of local vulvar recurrence. We consider the cut-off of 35 mm of tumor size, 15 mm tumor-free surgical margin and stromal invasion >4 mm, high risk predictors of local recurrence rate.
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
;
Humans
;
Neoplasm Metastasis
;
Recurrence
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Tertiary Care Centers
;
Vulva
3.Effect of tumor burden and radical surgery on survival difference between upfront, early interval or delayed cytoreductive surgery in ovarian cancer
Martina Aida ANGELES ; Bastien CABARROU ; Antonio GIL-MORENO ; Asunción PÉREZ-BENAVENTE ; Emanuela SPAGNOLO ; Agnieszka RYCHLIK ; Carlos MARTÍNEZ-GÓMEZ ; Frédéric GUYON ; Ignacio ZAPARDIEL ; Denis QUERLEU ; Claire ILLAC ; Federico MIGLIORELLI ; Sarah BÉTRIAN ; Gwénaël FERRON ; Alicia HERNÁNDEZ ; Alejandra MARTINEZ
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2021;32(6):e78-
Objective:
We sought to evaluate the impact on survival of tumor burden and surgical complexity in relation to the number of cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in patients with advanced ovarian cancer (OC) with minimal (CC-1) or no residual disease (CC-0).
Methods:
This retrospective study included patients with International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics IIIC–IV stage OC who underwent debulking surgery at 4 high-volume institutions between January 2008 and December 2015. We assessed the overall survival (OS) of primary debulking surgery (PDS group), early interval debulking surgery after 3–4 cycles of NACT (early IDS group) and delayed debulking surgery after 6 cycles (DDS group) with CC-0 or CC-1 according to peritoneal cancer index (PCI) and Aletti score.
Results:
Five hundred forty-nine women were included: 175 (31.9%) had PDS, 224 (40.8%) early IDS and 150 (27.3%) DDS. Regardless of Aletti score, median OS after PDS was significantly higher than after early IDS or DDS, but the survival difference was higher in women with an Aletti score <8. Among patients with PCI ≤10, median OS after PDS was significantly higher than after early IDS or DDS. In women with PCI >10, there were no differences between PDS and early IDS, but DDS was associated with decreased OS.
Conclusion
The benefit of complete PDS compared with NACT was maximal in patients with a low complexity score. In patients with low tumor burden, there was a survival benefit of PDS over early IDS or DDS. In women with high tumor load, DDS impaired the oncological outcome.