1.Biblometric Study of English Expressions on Kampo Medicine in English Articles
Ichiro ARAI ; Kiichiro TSUTANI ;
Kampo Medicine 2011;62(2):161-171
We investigated the correlation between search terms in electronic databases and descriptors of Kampo medicine in English articles to consider what may the best expressions to search for Kampo medicine in English literature. First, we selected Kampo articles from CENTRAL of the Cochrane Library that were originally identified in Pubmed. “Medicine, Kampo” has been used as a Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) in PubMed since 2000. However, among the 53 Kampo articles published there since 2000, only 13 have been indexed with the MeSH descriptor “Medicine, Kampo”. Second, we searched for the keywords “Kampo” and “Japanese (medicine)” in the literature, and investigated the correlation between these terms and the same “Medicine, Kampo” descriptor. As a result, a literature search with “Medicine, Kampo” was highly correlated with the concurrent use of “Kampo” and “Japanese” in the articles. Hence, we advocate the use of terms such as “Kampo medicine (traditional Japanese medicine)” to include both the words “Kampo” and “Japanese” in future English literatures on Kampo medicine.
2.A Trial Study of Kikyo-to on Abdominal Symptoms in Chronic Pancreatitis Patient.
Ichiro ARAI ; Yasuhiro KOMATSU ; Hisashi YAMAURA ; Susumu TAGUCHI
Kampo Medicine 1997;48(1):31-36
The authors investigated the activity of Kikyo-to on the intestinal hormones, cholecystokinin (CCK) and secretin, released in healthy humans. The clinical efficacy of Kikyo-to on the abdominal symptoms associated with chronic pancreatitis was also investigated. In healthy volunteers, Kikyo-to (5g) significantly increased plasma CCK and secretin concentrations 30 minutes after treatment. In chronic pancreatitis patients, abdominal pain, abdominal tenderness, nausea and diarrhea were decreased by treatment with Kikyo-to (7.5g/day; divided into three doses). In conclusion, Kikyo-to improved the complaints of chronic pancreatitis, especially abdominal pain. The presumed mechanism was that Kikyo-to stimulated pancreatic exocrine secretion by the release of intestinal hormones, CCK and secretin.
3.Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Golimumab for Ulcerative Colitis in a Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center in Japan
Kazuhide TOKITA ; Hirotaka SHIMIZU ; Ichiro TAKEUCHI ; Toshiaki SHIMIZU ; Katsuhiro ARAI
Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition 2022;25(6):461-472
Purpose:
Golimumab (GLM) is an anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α antibody preparation known to be less immunogenic than infliximab (IFX) or adalimumab. Few reports on GLM in pediatric patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) are available. This study aimed to review the long-term durability and safety of GLM in a pediatric center.
Methods:
The medical records of 17 pediatric patients (eight boys and nine girls) who received GLM at the National Center for Child Health and Development were retrospectively reviewed.
Results:
The median age at GLM initiation was 13.9 (interquartile range 12.0–16.3) years.Fourteen patients had pancolitis, and 11 had severe disease (pediatric ulcerative colitis activity index ≥65). Ten patients were biologic-naïve, and 50% achieved corticosteroid-free remission at week 54. Two patients discontinued prior anti-TNF-α agents because of adverse events during remission. Both showed responses to GLM without unfavorable events through week 54. However, the efficacy of GLM in patients who showed primary nonresponse or loss of response to IFX was limited. Four of the five patients showed non-response at week 54. Patients with severe disease had significantly lower corticosteroid-free remission rate at week 54 than those without severe disease. No severe adverse events were observed during the study period.
Conclusion
GLM appears to be safe and useful for pediatric patients with UC. Patients with mild to moderate disease who responded to but had some adverse events with prior biologics may be good candidates for GLM. Its safety and low immunogenicity profile serve as favorable options for selected children with UC.
4.Predictors of Small Bowel Transit Time for Capsule Endoscopy in Children with Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Itsuhiro OKA ; Rie FUNAYAMA ; Hirotaka SHIMIZU ; Ichiro TAKEUCHI ; Shuko NOJIRI ; Toshiaki SHIMIZU ; Katsuhiro ARAI
Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition 2023;26(4):181-192
Purpose:
The development of assistive devices has allowed for the performance of capsule endoscopy in children. Anticipating the capsule’s transit time could affect the efficacy of the investigation and potentially minimize the fasting period. This study determined the predictors of small bowel transit time for small-bowel capsule endoscopy in children and adolescents with inflammatory bowel disease.
Methods:
We retrospectively examined children and adolescents with inflammatory bowel disease who underwent capsule endoscopy by the age 18 at a Japanese tertiary care children’s hospital. Small bowel transit time predictors were analyzed using multiple regression with explanatory variables.
Results:
Overall, 92 patients, aged 1–17 years, with inflammatory bowel disease (63 Crohn’s disease and 29 ulcerative colitis cases) were examined for factors affecting small bowel transit time. In the simple regression analysis, diagnosis, age, height, weight, serum albumin, general anesthesia, and small intestine lesions were significantly associated with small bowel transit time. In the multiple regression analyses, serum albumin (partial regression coefficient: −58.9, p=0.008), general anesthesia (partial regression coefficient: 127, p<0.001), and small intestine lesions (partial regression coefficient: 30.1, p=0.037) showed significant associations with small bowel transit time.
Conclusion
Hypoalbuminemia, the use of general anesthesia for endoscopic delivery of the capsule, and small intestine lesions appeared to be predictors of prolonged small bowel transit time in children and adolescents with inflammatory bowel disease. Expecting the finishing time may improve examination with a fasting period reduction, which benefits both patients and caregivers.
5.Impact of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic on Pediatric Gastrointestinal Endoscopy:A Questionnaire-based Internet Survey of 162 Institutional Experiences in Asia Pacific
Andy DARMA ; Katsuhiro ARAI ; Jia-feng WU ; Nuthapong UKARAPOL ; Shin-ichiro HAGIWARA ; Seak Hee OH ; Suporn TREEPONGKARUNA ;
Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition 2023;26(6):291-300
Purpose:
The impact of coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) on gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy procedures in adults has been reported, with a drastic reduction in the number of procedures.However, there are no sufficient data regarding the impact on pediatric GI endoscopy. Here, we aimed to report that impact in the Asia-Pacific region.
Methods:
A questionnaire-based internet survey was conducted from June to November 2021 among pediatric endoscopy institutions in the Asia-Pacific region, with each institution providing a single response. Overall, 25 questions focused on the impact of the number of procedures conducted, the usage of personal protective equipment (PPE), and endoscopy training programs during the pandemic.
Results:
A total of 162 institutions across 13 countries in the Asia-Pacific region participated in the study, and 133 (82.1%) institutions underwent procedure changes since the emergence of COVID-19. The number of esophagogastroduodenoscopy and ileocolonoscopy procedures decreased in 118/133 (88.7%) and 112/133 (84.2%) institutions, respectively. Endoscopy for patient with positive COVID-19 in an emergency or urgent cases still carried out in 102/162 (62.9%) institutions. Screening of COVID-19 for all patients before endoscopy was done across 110/162 (67.9%) institutions. PPE recommendations varied among institutions.Pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopy training programs were discontinued in 127/162 (78.4%) institutions.
Conclusion
This study reports the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopy in the Asia-Pacific region. There has been a significant reduction in the number of endoscopic procedures and relevant training programs.
6.Anxiety, Depression, and Quality of Life in Parents of Adolescents with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Longitudinal Study
Satomi NOMURA ; Yuri HIRANO ; Ichiro TAKEUCHI ; Hirotaka SHIMIZU ; Katsuhiro ARAI
Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition 2023;26(5):239-248
Purpose:
The parents of adolescents with inflammatory bowel disease may experience impaired mental health and quality of life. This longitudinal study aimed to verify whether the mental health and quality of life of the parents of adolescents with inflammatory bowel disease declined when their children had active disease.
Methods:
Sociodemographic data, parental anxiety, depression, and quality of life were analyzed using validated questionnaires for each variable. After the baseline survey, the second and follow-up surveys were conducted at 3 and 12 months, respectively. The active disease group comprised eight parents whose children had active disease during the baseline and second surveys. The remission group comprised 14 parents whose children remained in remission during both surveys. The improved group comprised nine parents whose children experienced active disease at baseline and remission during the second survey. Parental mental health and quality of life were compared among the groups.
Results:
Significantly higher levels of anxiety were observed in the active disease group in all surveys (p<0.050). Although depression levels and quality of life did not differ significantly among the three groups, pairing the active disease group with other groups showed some large effect sizes.
Conclusion
Parents tended to experience decreased mental health and quality of life when their adolescents experienced active inflammatory bowel disease. Consequently, our hypothesis was partially verified. Therefore, parents need support when their children have active disease; this finding highlights the need for parental support systems.
7.Pediatric Endoscopy in Asia Pacific:Report from the Asian Pan-Pacific Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition
Andy DARMA ; Katsuhiro ARAI ; Jia-feng WU ; Nuthapong UKARAPOL ; Shin-ichiro HAGIWARA ; Seak Hee OH ; Suporn TREEPONGKARUNA ;
Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition 2025;28(2):76-85
Purpose:
Pediatric gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy significantly contributes to the diagnosis and management of GI diseases in children. Global data on pediatric GI endoscopy in the Asia-Pacific region are limited. We aimed to report the findings of a regional survey on pediatric endoscopy in the Asia-Pacific region.
Methods:
A questionnaire-based survey involving GI endoscopy centers in 13 Asia-Pacific countries (June to November 2021). The questionnaires included annual procedure volumes (from basic diagnostics to advanced therapeutic endoscopy), endoscopists, sedation procedures, and national training programs.
Results:
A total of 162 GI endoscopy centers completed the survey. All centers performed basic endoscopies (esophagogastroduodenoscopy and ileocolonoscopy); however, 45.1% and 59.1% of the centers performed less than 50 esophagogastroduodenoscopies and ileocolonoscopies per year, respectively. Small bowel evaluation (capsule endoscopy or balloon-assisted enteroscopy) was performed in 59.3% of the centers. Foreign body removal, polypectomy, and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy were performed in 89.5%, 85.8%, and 52.5% of centers, respectively. Endoscopic hemostatic interventions, which are lifesaving procedures, included glue injection (30.9%), hemostasis of nonvariceal bleeding (65.4%), and endoscopic variceal ligation (70.4%). Pediatric GI endoscopy is performed not only by pediatric gastroenterologists but also by adult gastroenterologists in 21–50% of centers for many kinds of procedures. Sedation was provided by anesthesiologists in 65.4% of the centers. Most centers offer both adult and pediatric endoscopy training.
Conclusion
The study highlights regional disparities in pediatric GI endoscopy services. It emphasizes the need for expanded pediatric GI training and improved access to therapeutic endoscopy, particularly for life-saving procedures.
8.Pediatric Endoscopy in Asia Pacific:Report from the Asian Pan-Pacific Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition
Andy DARMA ; Katsuhiro ARAI ; Jia-feng WU ; Nuthapong UKARAPOL ; Shin-ichiro HAGIWARA ; Seak Hee OH ; Suporn TREEPONGKARUNA ;
Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition 2025;28(2):76-85
Purpose:
Pediatric gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy significantly contributes to the diagnosis and management of GI diseases in children. Global data on pediatric GI endoscopy in the Asia-Pacific region are limited. We aimed to report the findings of a regional survey on pediatric endoscopy in the Asia-Pacific region.
Methods:
A questionnaire-based survey involving GI endoscopy centers in 13 Asia-Pacific countries (June to November 2021). The questionnaires included annual procedure volumes (from basic diagnostics to advanced therapeutic endoscopy), endoscopists, sedation procedures, and national training programs.
Results:
A total of 162 GI endoscopy centers completed the survey. All centers performed basic endoscopies (esophagogastroduodenoscopy and ileocolonoscopy); however, 45.1% and 59.1% of the centers performed less than 50 esophagogastroduodenoscopies and ileocolonoscopies per year, respectively. Small bowel evaluation (capsule endoscopy or balloon-assisted enteroscopy) was performed in 59.3% of the centers. Foreign body removal, polypectomy, and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy were performed in 89.5%, 85.8%, and 52.5% of centers, respectively. Endoscopic hemostatic interventions, which are lifesaving procedures, included glue injection (30.9%), hemostasis of nonvariceal bleeding (65.4%), and endoscopic variceal ligation (70.4%). Pediatric GI endoscopy is performed not only by pediatric gastroenterologists but also by adult gastroenterologists in 21–50% of centers for many kinds of procedures. Sedation was provided by anesthesiologists in 65.4% of the centers. Most centers offer both adult and pediatric endoscopy training.
Conclusion
The study highlights regional disparities in pediatric GI endoscopy services. It emphasizes the need for expanded pediatric GI training and improved access to therapeutic endoscopy, particularly for life-saving procedures.
9.Pediatric Endoscopy in Asia Pacific:Report from the Asian Pan-Pacific Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition
Andy DARMA ; Katsuhiro ARAI ; Jia-feng WU ; Nuthapong UKARAPOL ; Shin-ichiro HAGIWARA ; Seak Hee OH ; Suporn TREEPONGKARUNA ;
Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition 2025;28(2):76-85
Purpose:
Pediatric gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy significantly contributes to the diagnosis and management of GI diseases in children. Global data on pediatric GI endoscopy in the Asia-Pacific region are limited. We aimed to report the findings of a regional survey on pediatric endoscopy in the Asia-Pacific region.
Methods:
A questionnaire-based survey involving GI endoscopy centers in 13 Asia-Pacific countries (June to November 2021). The questionnaires included annual procedure volumes (from basic diagnostics to advanced therapeutic endoscopy), endoscopists, sedation procedures, and national training programs.
Results:
A total of 162 GI endoscopy centers completed the survey. All centers performed basic endoscopies (esophagogastroduodenoscopy and ileocolonoscopy); however, 45.1% and 59.1% of the centers performed less than 50 esophagogastroduodenoscopies and ileocolonoscopies per year, respectively. Small bowel evaluation (capsule endoscopy or balloon-assisted enteroscopy) was performed in 59.3% of the centers. Foreign body removal, polypectomy, and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy were performed in 89.5%, 85.8%, and 52.5% of centers, respectively. Endoscopic hemostatic interventions, which are lifesaving procedures, included glue injection (30.9%), hemostasis of nonvariceal bleeding (65.4%), and endoscopic variceal ligation (70.4%). Pediatric GI endoscopy is performed not only by pediatric gastroenterologists but also by adult gastroenterologists in 21–50% of centers for many kinds of procedures. Sedation was provided by anesthesiologists in 65.4% of the centers. Most centers offer both adult and pediatric endoscopy training.
Conclusion
The study highlights regional disparities in pediatric GI endoscopy services. It emphasizes the need for expanded pediatric GI training and improved access to therapeutic endoscopy, particularly for life-saving procedures.
10.Pediatric Endoscopy in Asia Pacific:Report from the Asian Pan-Pacific Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition
Andy DARMA ; Katsuhiro ARAI ; Jia-feng WU ; Nuthapong UKARAPOL ; Shin-ichiro HAGIWARA ; Seak Hee OH ; Suporn TREEPONGKARUNA ;
Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition 2025;28(2):76-85
Purpose:
Pediatric gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy significantly contributes to the diagnosis and management of GI diseases in children. Global data on pediatric GI endoscopy in the Asia-Pacific region are limited. We aimed to report the findings of a regional survey on pediatric endoscopy in the Asia-Pacific region.
Methods:
A questionnaire-based survey involving GI endoscopy centers in 13 Asia-Pacific countries (June to November 2021). The questionnaires included annual procedure volumes (from basic diagnostics to advanced therapeutic endoscopy), endoscopists, sedation procedures, and national training programs.
Results:
A total of 162 GI endoscopy centers completed the survey. All centers performed basic endoscopies (esophagogastroduodenoscopy and ileocolonoscopy); however, 45.1% and 59.1% of the centers performed less than 50 esophagogastroduodenoscopies and ileocolonoscopies per year, respectively. Small bowel evaluation (capsule endoscopy or balloon-assisted enteroscopy) was performed in 59.3% of the centers. Foreign body removal, polypectomy, and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy were performed in 89.5%, 85.8%, and 52.5% of centers, respectively. Endoscopic hemostatic interventions, which are lifesaving procedures, included glue injection (30.9%), hemostasis of nonvariceal bleeding (65.4%), and endoscopic variceal ligation (70.4%). Pediatric GI endoscopy is performed not only by pediatric gastroenterologists but also by adult gastroenterologists in 21–50% of centers for many kinds of procedures. Sedation was provided by anesthesiologists in 65.4% of the centers. Most centers offer both adult and pediatric endoscopy training.
Conclusion
The study highlights regional disparities in pediatric GI endoscopy services. It emphasizes the need for expanded pediatric GI training and improved access to therapeutic endoscopy, particularly for life-saving procedures.