Background: This study was conducted to evaluate the analytical performance of the SelexOnTM B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) assay (Osang Healthcare Inc., Korea), a new rapid lateral flow immunoassay for point of care (POC) testing using whole blood. Methods: The imprecision, linearity, and method comparison of SelexOnTM BNP assay were evaluated. Two commercial BNP assays, the ADVIA Centaur® BNP (Siemens Health Care diagnostics Inc., USA) and the Triage® BNP assays (Alere, USA), were included for method comparison using 100 whole blood samples from patients. The reference interval was verified using 120 residual samples from health examination participants. Results: The SelexOn BNP had total CVs of 20.3%, 13.3%, and 10.3% in BNP concentrations of 89.44 pg/mL, 480.71 pg/mL, and 1,201.84 pg/mL of control materials, respectively. Linearity was observed from 56 pg/mL to 1544 pg/mL. The SelexOn BNP (y) regression equation was y=0.9706x-21.68 with Centaur BNP (x) (r=0.930) and y=0.7600x+0.0506 with Triage BNP (x) (r=0.845), respectively. The predicted mean difference (%) of the SelexOn BNP at the clinical decision levels (100 pg/mL) was up to 25% lower than the two comparative methods. The SelexOn BNP levels were below 50 pg/mL in 114 (95%) of the 120 samples. Conclusions The SelexOn BNP using EDTA was developed as a POC test for differential diagnosis or treatment monitoring for acute heart failure. However, clinical decision values must be improved to be compatible with other BNP methods.

BACKGROUND: An automated immunohematology analyzer, DAYMATE M (DAY Medical, Switzerland), has been recently developed. The potential of this analyzer to improve test results has been evaluated. METHODS: A total of 300 blood samples from Seoul St. Mary's hospital and Incheon St. Mary's hospital were tested for ABO and RhD typing. In addition, 336 antibody screening test (AST) samples and 82 patients treated with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) were included. AST results by DAYMATE M were compared with those obtained by a manual method using DS-Screening II (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Switzerland) and red blood cells from Selectogen (Ortho-Clinical diagnostics Inc., USA). RESULTS: Of the 300 patients enrolled, 87, 73, 79, and 61 had type A, B, O, and AB blood, respectively. The concordance rate was 99.9% for cell typing and 97.0% for serum typing. One discordant case was classified as type B instead of AB, and six discordant serum-typing cases were type A, but classified as type AB. Among the 336 AST samples, the concordance rate was 93.2%. From 136 positive cases, six were discordant. Within the 82 HSCT-treated patients, the concordance rate for ABO blood typing was 92.2%. Among the six discordant cases, DAYMATE M typed four cases as donor type where the standard method typed them as the recipient blood type. CONCLUSIONS: The DAYMATE M automated immunohematology analyzer performs reliably for ABO and RhD typing, as well as for ASTs and on samples from patients treated with HSCT.
Blood Grouping and Crossmatching ; Erythrocytes ; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ; Humans ; Incheon ; Mass Screening ; Methods ; Seoul ; Tissue Donors

BACKGROUND: Wisteria floribunda agglutinin-positive Mac-2 binding protein (WFA-M2BP) is a protein with altered glycosylation that reacts with lectin, and was recently identified as a useful non-invasive biomarker for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis in patients with hepatitis C virus infection.This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of WFA-M2BP for liver fibrosis in the context of hepatitis B virus (HBV). METHODS: We enrolled 151 patients infected with HBV. Liver biopsy and elastography (Fibroscan) were performed during the initial visit. Fibrosis was graded according to the Knodell histologic activity index (F0–3). WFA-M2BP levels were determined with an automated immunoassay analyzer (M2BPGi, HISCL-5000, Sysmex, Japan). The diagnostic efficacy of WFA-M2BP was compared with those of various conventional or composite biomarkers, including enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF) score, Fibroscan, aspartate transaminase (AST)-to-platelet ratio index (APRI), and FIB-4, based on the area under the ROC curve (AUC) value. RESULTS: The majority of patients were at fibrosis stages F1 and F2. The F2 and F3 AUC values for WFA-M2BP were similar to those for FIB-4, APRI, ELF, and Fibroscan, although the latter showed the best diagnostic efficacy. The diagnostic accuracy of all tested biomarkers for F2 and F3 was 60–70%. In multivariate analysis, WFA-M2BP, ELF, and platelet count significantly predicted stage ≥F2, whereas only platelet count significantly predicted F3. CONCLUSIONS: WFA-M2BP can support a diagnosis of liver fibrosis with similar diagnostic efficacy to other biomarkers, and predicted liver fibrosis stage ≥2 among patients with chronic hepatitis B.
Area Under Curve ; Aspartate Aminotransferases ; Biomarkers ; Biopsy ; Carrier Proteins* ; Diagnosis* ; Elasticity Imaging Techniques ; Fibrosis ; Glycosylation ; Hepacivirus ; Hepatitis B ; Hepatitis B virus ; Hepatitis B, Chronic* ; Hepatitis, Chronic* ; Humans ; Immunoassay ; Liver Cirrhosis* ; Liver* ; Multivariate Analysis ; Platelet Count ; ROC Curve ; Wisteria*

Evaluation of diagnostic tests requires reference standards, which are often unavailable. Latent class analysis (LCA) can be used to evaluate diagnostic tests without reference standards, using a combination of observed and estimated results. Conditionally independent diagnostic tests for Helicobacter pylori infection are required. We used LCA to construct a reference standard and evaluate the capability of non-invasive tests (stool antigen test and serum antibody test) to diagnose H. pylori infection compared with the conventional method, where histology is the reference standard. A total of 96 healthy subjects with endoscopy histology results were enrolled from January to July 2016. Sensitivity and specificity were determined for the LCA approach (i.e., using a combination of three tests as the reference standard) and the conventional method. When LCA was used, sensitivity and specificity were 83.8% and 99.4% for histology, 80.0% and 81.9% for the stool antigen test, and 63.6% and 89.3% for the serum antibody test, respectively. When the conventional method was used, sensitivity and specificity were 75.8% and 71.1% for the stool antigen test and 77.7% and 60.7% for the serum antibody test, respectively. LCA can be applied to evaluate diagnostic tests that lack a reference standard.