PURPOSE: The modified Hanley technique, which is used for treatment of a deep horseshoe fistula, has reduced damage to the external anal sphincter compared to the classic Hanley technique, but its shortcoming is that it causes inconvenience to the patient due to the fact that a drainage tube must be left in place for a long time. To solve this problem, the authors devised a self-pulsed washable seton and then compared the results of its use to determine its clinical usefulness. METHODS: The subjects of this study were 34 patients who were diagnosed with a deep posterior complex anal fistula and who were operated on by using the modified Hanley technique between January 1999 and December 2004. Twelve patients who were treated with the self-pulsed washable seton were classified as Group A, and 12 patients who were treated by using a conventional loose seton were placed in Group B. These two groups were compared for period of purulent discharge, period of leaving the seton alone, and recurrence rate. RESULTS: The period of purulent discharge was 18.75 days (15~24) for group Aand 29.75 days (24~37) for group B. The period of leaving the seton was 21.58 days (18~29) for group A and 32.58 days (28~39) for group B. The recurrence rate after surgery was 8.3% in group A and 16.7% in group B. CONCLUSIONS: The self-pulsed washable seton devised by the authors shortened the treatment period through more effective wound management, so we propose using it as a new method for treating a deep posterior horseshoe fistula.
Anal Canal ; Drainage ; Fistula ; Humans ; Hypogonadism ; Mitochondrial Diseases ; Ophthalmoplegia ; Rectal Fistula ; Recurrence

BACKGROUND: Developing predictive markers for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is important, because many patients experience recurrence and metastasis. Epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a developmental process that plays an important role during embryogenesis and also during cancer metastasis. Paired-related homeobox protein 1 (Prrx-1) is an EMT inducer that has recently been introduced, and its prognostic significance in HCC is largely unknown. METHODS: Tissue microarray was constructed using surgically resected primary HCCs from 244 cases. Immunohistochemical staining of E-cadherin and Prrx-1 was performed. The correlation between E-cadherin loss and Prrx-1 expression, as well as other clinicopathologic factors, was evaluated. RESULTS: E-cadherin expression was decreased in 96 cases (39.4%). Loss of E-cadherin correlated with a higher recurrence rate (p < .001) but was not correlated with patient's survival. Thirty-two cases (13.3%) showed at least focal nuclear Prrx-1 immunoreactivity while all non-neoplastic livers (n = 22) were negative. Prrx-1 expression was not associated with E-cadherin loss, survival or recurrence rates, pathologic factors, or the Ki-67 labeling index. Twenty tumors that were positive for E-cadherin and Prrx-1 had significantly higher nuclear grades than the rest of the cohort (p = .037). In Cox proportional hazard models, E-cadherin loss and large vessel invasion were independent prognostic factors for shorter disease-free survival. Cirrhosis and high Ki-67 index (> 40%) were independent prognostic factors for shorter overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Prrx-1 was expressed in small portions of HCCs but not in normal livers. Additional studies with a large number of Prrx-1-positive cases are required to confirm the results of this study.
Cadherins* ; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular* ; Cohort Studies ; Disease-Free Survival ; Embryonic Development ; Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition ; Female ; Fibrosis ; Genes, Homeobox ; Humans ; Liver ; Neoplasm Metastasis ; Pregnancy ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Recurrence

Background/Aims: We aimed to define an optimal target population and drug-specific biomarkers that may predict dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP)-4 inhibitor responses in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Methods: An exploration study (study I) was performed using three different NAFLD models (basket study design; high-fat diet [HFD], methionine choline-deficient diet [MCD], and high-cholesterol Western diet [WD] models). RNA transcriptome analysis was performed on pre-studied liver tissues to identify biomarkers that could predict the response to DPP-4 inhibitors. In the validation study (study II), the HFD-induced NAFLD model was divided into high and low hepatic insulin-like growth factor binding protein 1 (Igfbp-1) groups based on the pre-study liver biopsy. Results: DPP-4 inhibitor attenuated the NAFLD activity score and fibrosis stage in the HFD model but not in the WD and MCD models. The overall response rate was 19% across the modified basket NAFLD trial and 42%, 25%, and 0% in the HFD, WD, and MCD models. Hepatic Igfbp-1 expression was higher in the responder group than in the non-responder group in pre-study biopsy samples. In contrast, hepatic Igfbp-1 expression was lower in the responder group than in the non-responder group in the end-study biopsy samples. DPP-4 inhibitor response rates were 83% and 17% in the baseline hepatic high Igfbp-1 and low Igfbp-1 groups, respectively. Hepatic messenger RNA Igfbp-1 expression was positively correlated with serum IGFBP-1 levels. Conclusions The DPP-4 inhibitor response was higher in the HFD phenotype and pre-treatment levels of hepatic or serum IGFBP-1 were high.

Background: Remimazolam is a novel ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine known for its hemodynamic stability over propofol. However, its hemodynamic effects compared to those of etomidate are not well established. This study aimed to determine whether the use of remimazolam is non-inferior to etomidate with regard to the occurrence of post-induction hypotension in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to either the remimazolam group (6 mg/kg/h) or the etomidate group (0.3 mg/kg) for induction of anesthesia. Anesthetic depth was adjusted based on the bispectral index. Primary outcome was the incidence of post-induction hypotension, defined as a mean arterial pressure less than 65 mmHg within 15 min after endotracheal intubation, with a non-inferiority margin of 12%. Results: A total of 144 patients were finally analyzed. Incidence of post-induction hypotension was 36/71 (50.7%) in the remimazolam group and 25/73 (34.2%) in the etomidate group, with a rate difference of 16.5% (95% CI [3.0–32.6]) between the two groups that was beyond the prespecified non-inferiority margin of 12.0%. The number of patients who needed vasopressors was similar in the two groups. Conclusions In this non-inferiority trial, remimazolam failed to show non-inferiority to etomidate in terms of post-induction hypotension when used as an induction drug for general anesthesia in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. However, different doses or infusion techniques of remimazolam should be compared with etomidate in various patient groups to fully assess its hemodynamic non-inferiority during induction of anesthesia.

Background: Remimazolam is a novel ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine known for its hemodynamic stability over propofol. However, its hemodynamic effects compared to those of etomidate are not well established. This study aimed to determine whether the use of remimazolam is non-inferior to etomidate with regard to the occurrence of post-induction hypotension in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to either the remimazolam group (6 mg/kg/h) or the etomidate group (0.3 mg/kg) for induction of anesthesia. Anesthetic depth was adjusted based on the bispectral index. Primary outcome was the incidence of post-induction hypotension, defined as a mean arterial pressure less than 65 mmHg within 15 min after endotracheal intubation, with a non-inferiority margin of 12%. Results: A total of 144 patients were finally analyzed. Incidence of post-induction hypotension was 36/71 (50.7%) in the remimazolam group and 25/73 (34.2%) in the etomidate group, with a rate difference of 16.5% (95% CI [3.0–32.6]) between the two groups that was beyond the prespecified non-inferiority margin of 12.0%. The number of patients who needed vasopressors was similar in the two groups. Conclusions In this non-inferiority trial, remimazolam failed to show non-inferiority to etomidate in terms of post-induction hypotension when used as an induction drug for general anesthesia in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. However, different doses or infusion techniques of remimazolam should be compared with etomidate in various patient groups to fully assess its hemodynamic non-inferiority during induction of anesthesia.

Background: Remimazolam is a novel ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine known for its hemodynamic stability over propofol. However, its hemodynamic effects compared to those of etomidate are not well established. This study aimed to determine whether the use of remimazolam is non-inferior to etomidate with regard to the occurrence of post-induction hypotension in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to either the remimazolam group (6 mg/kg/h) or the etomidate group (0.3 mg/kg) for induction of anesthesia. Anesthetic depth was adjusted based on the bispectral index. Primary outcome was the incidence of post-induction hypotension, defined as a mean arterial pressure less than 65 mmHg within 15 min after endotracheal intubation, with a non-inferiority margin of 12%. Results: A total of 144 patients were finally analyzed. Incidence of post-induction hypotension was 36/71 (50.7%) in the remimazolam group and 25/73 (34.2%) in the etomidate group, with a rate difference of 16.5% (95% CI [3.0–32.6]) between the two groups that was beyond the prespecified non-inferiority margin of 12.0%. The number of patients who needed vasopressors was similar in the two groups. Conclusions In this non-inferiority trial, remimazolam failed to show non-inferiority to etomidate in terms of post-induction hypotension when used as an induction drug for general anesthesia in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. However, different doses or infusion techniques of remimazolam should be compared with etomidate in various patient groups to fully assess its hemodynamic non-inferiority during induction of anesthesia.