1.Hypotension after induction of anesthesia with remimazolam or etomidate: a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting
Jeong-Jin MIN ; Eun Jung OH ; Hyun Ji HWANG ; Sungwoo JO ; Hyunsung CHO ; Chungsu KIM ; Jong-Hwan LEE
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology 2025;78(2):139-147
Background:
Remimazolam is a novel ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine known for its hemodynamic stability over propofol. However, its hemodynamic effects compared to those of etomidate are not well established. This study aimed to determine whether the use of remimazolam is non-inferior to etomidate with regard to the occurrence of post-induction hypotension in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.
Methods:
Patients were randomly assigned to either the remimazolam group (6 mg/kg/h) or the etomidate group (0.3 mg/kg) for induction of anesthesia. Anesthetic depth was adjusted based on the bispectral index. Primary outcome was the incidence of post-induction hypotension, defined as a mean arterial pressure less than 65 mmHg within 15 min after endotracheal intubation, with a non-inferiority margin of 12%.
Results:
A total of 144 patients were finally analyzed. Incidence of post-induction hypotension was 36/71 (50.7%) in the remimazolam group and 25/73 (34.2%) in the etomidate group, with a rate difference of 16.5% (95% CI [3.0–32.6]) between the two groups that was beyond the prespecified non-inferiority margin of 12.0%. The number of patients who needed vasopressors was similar in the two groups.
Conclusions
In this non-inferiority trial, remimazolam failed to show non-inferiority to etomidate in terms of post-induction hypotension when used as an induction drug for general anesthesia in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. However, different doses or infusion techniques of remimazolam should be compared with etomidate in various patient groups to fully assess its hemodynamic non-inferiority during induction of anesthesia.
2.Hypotension after induction of anesthesia with remimazolam or etomidate: a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting
Jeong-Jin MIN ; Eun Jung OH ; Hyun Ji HWANG ; Sungwoo JO ; Hyunsung CHO ; Chungsu KIM ; Jong-Hwan LEE
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology 2025;78(3):295-295
3.Hypotension after induction of anesthesia with remimazolam or etomidate: a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting
Jeong-Jin MIN ; Eun Jung OH ; Hyun Ji HWANG ; Sungwoo JO ; Hyunsung CHO ; Chungsu KIM ; Jong-Hwan LEE
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology 2025;78(2):139-147
Background:
Remimazolam is a novel ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine known for its hemodynamic stability over propofol. However, its hemodynamic effects compared to those of etomidate are not well established. This study aimed to determine whether the use of remimazolam is non-inferior to etomidate with regard to the occurrence of post-induction hypotension in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.
Methods:
Patients were randomly assigned to either the remimazolam group (6 mg/kg/h) or the etomidate group (0.3 mg/kg) for induction of anesthesia. Anesthetic depth was adjusted based on the bispectral index. Primary outcome was the incidence of post-induction hypotension, defined as a mean arterial pressure less than 65 mmHg within 15 min after endotracheal intubation, with a non-inferiority margin of 12%.
Results:
A total of 144 patients were finally analyzed. Incidence of post-induction hypotension was 36/71 (50.7%) in the remimazolam group and 25/73 (34.2%) in the etomidate group, with a rate difference of 16.5% (95% CI [3.0–32.6]) between the two groups that was beyond the prespecified non-inferiority margin of 12.0%. The number of patients who needed vasopressors was similar in the two groups.
Conclusions
In this non-inferiority trial, remimazolam failed to show non-inferiority to etomidate in terms of post-induction hypotension when used as an induction drug for general anesthesia in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. However, different doses or infusion techniques of remimazolam should be compared with etomidate in various patient groups to fully assess its hemodynamic non-inferiority during induction of anesthesia.
4.Hypotension after induction of anesthesia with remimazolam or etomidate: a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting
Jeong-Jin MIN ; Eun Jung OH ; Hyun Ji HWANG ; Sungwoo JO ; Hyunsung CHO ; Chungsu KIM ; Jong-Hwan LEE
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology 2025;78(3):295-295
5.Hypotension after induction of anesthesia with remimazolam or etomidate: a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting
Jeong-Jin MIN ; Eun Jung OH ; Hyun Ji HWANG ; Sungwoo JO ; Hyunsung CHO ; Chungsu KIM ; Jong-Hwan LEE
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology 2025;78(2):139-147
Background:
Remimazolam is a novel ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine known for its hemodynamic stability over propofol. However, its hemodynamic effects compared to those of etomidate are not well established. This study aimed to determine whether the use of remimazolam is non-inferior to etomidate with regard to the occurrence of post-induction hypotension in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.
Methods:
Patients were randomly assigned to either the remimazolam group (6 mg/kg/h) or the etomidate group (0.3 mg/kg) for induction of anesthesia. Anesthetic depth was adjusted based on the bispectral index. Primary outcome was the incidence of post-induction hypotension, defined as a mean arterial pressure less than 65 mmHg within 15 min after endotracheal intubation, with a non-inferiority margin of 12%.
Results:
A total of 144 patients were finally analyzed. Incidence of post-induction hypotension was 36/71 (50.7%) in the remimazolam group and 25/73 (34.2%) in the etomidate group, with a rate difference of 16.5% (95% CI [3.0–32.6]) between the two groups that was beyond the prespecified non-inferiority margin of 12.0%. The number of patients who needed vasopressors was similar in the two groups.
Conclusions
In this non-inferiority trial, remimazolam failed to show non-inferiority to etomidate in terms of post-induction hypotension when used as an induction drug for general anesthesia in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. However, different doses or infusion techniques of remimazolam should be compared with etomidate in various patient groups to fully assess its hemodynamic non-inferiority during induction of anesthesia.
6.Hypotension after induction of anesthesia with remimazolam or etomidate: a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting
Jeong-Jin MIN ; Eun Jung OH ; Hyun Ji HWANG ; Sungwoo JO ; Hyunsung CHO ; Chungsu KIM ; Jong-Hwan LEE
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology 2025;78(3):295-295
7.Hypotension after induction of anesthesia with remimazolam or etomidate: a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting
Jeong-Jin MIN ; Eun Jung OH ; Hyun Ji HWANG ; Sungwoo JO ; Hyunsung CHO ; Chungsu KIM ; Jong-Hwan LEE
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology 2025;78(2):139-147
Background:
Remimazolam is a novel ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine known for its hemodynamic stability over propofol. However, its hemodynamic effects compared to those of etomidate are not well established. This study aimed to determine whether the use of remimazolam is non-inferior to etomidate with regard to the occurrence of post-induction hypotension in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.
Methods:
Patients were randomly assigned to either the remimazolam group (6 mg/kg/h) or the etomidate group (0.3 mg/kg) for induction of anesthesia. Anesthetic depth was adjusted based on the bispectral index. Primary outcome was the incidence of post-induction hypotension, defined as a mean arterial pressure less than 65 mmHg within 15 min after endotracheal intubation, with a non-inferiority margin of 12%.
Results:
A total of 144 patients were finally analyzed. Incidence of post-induction hypotension was 36/71 (50.7%) in the remimazolam group and 25/73 (34.2%) in the etomidate group, with a rate difference of 16.5% (95% CI [3.0–32.6]) between the two groups that was beyond the prespecified non-inferiority margin of 12.0%. The number of patients who needed vasopressors was similar in the two groups.
Conclusions
In this non-inferiority trial, remimazolam failed to show non-inferiority to etomidate in terms of post-induction hypotension when used as an induction drug for general anesthesia in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. However, different doses or infusion techniques of remimazolam should be compared with etomidate in various patient groups to fully assess its hemodynamic non-inferiority during induction of anesthesia.
8.Hypotension after induction of anesthesia with remimazolam or etomidate: a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting
Jeong-Jin MIN ; Eun Jung OH ; Hyun Ji HWANG ; Sungwoo JO ; Hyunsung CHO ; Chungsu KIM ; Jong-Hwan LEE
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology 2025;78(3):295-295
9.HBsAg-Negative, Anti-HBc–Negative Patients Still Have a Risk of Hepatitis B Virus–Related Hepatitis after Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma or Malignant Lymphoma.
Hyunsung PARK ; Do Young KIM ; Soo Jeong KIM ; Haerim CHUNG ; Hyunsoo CHO ; Ji Eun JANG ; June Won CHEONG ; Yoo Hong MIN ; Jae Woo SONG ; Jin Seok KIM
Cancer Research and Treatment 2018;50(4):1121-1129
PURPOSE: Although hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)–negative, hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc)–negative patients are not considered to be at risk for hepatitis B virus (HBV)–related hepatitis, the actual risk remains to be elucidated. This study aimed to evaluate the risk of HBV-related hepatitis in HBsAg-negative, anti-HBc–negative patients receiving autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for multiple myeloma (MM) or malignant lymphoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data from 271 HBsAg-negative patients (161 anti-HBc–negative and 110 anti-HBc–positive at the time of ASCT) who received ASCT for MM or lymphoma. The risk of HBV-related hepatitis was analyzed according to the presence of anti-HBc. HBV serology results at the time of ASCT were compared with those at the time of diagnosis of MM or lymphoma. RESULTS: Three patients (two anti-HBc–negative MMs and one anti-HBc–positive MM) developed HBV-related hepatitis after ASCT. The rate of HBV-related hepatitis did not differ among patients with or without anti-HBc status (p=0.843). HBV-related hepatitis more frequently occurred in MM patients than in lymphoma patients (p=0.041). Overall, 9.1% of patients (16.7% with MM and 5.4% with lymphoma) who were HBsAg–negative and anti-HBc–positive at the time of diagnosis had lost anti-HBc positivity during chemotherapy prior to ASCT. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that HBsAg-negative, anti-HBc–negative patients at the time of ASCT for MM or lymphoma still might be at a risk for HBV-related hepatitis.
Diagnosis
;
Drug Therapy
;
Hepatitis B Surface Antigens
;
Hepatitis B virus
;
Hepatitis B*
;
Hepatitis*
;
Humans
;
Lymphoma*
;
Multiple Myeloma*
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Stem Cell Transplantation*
;
Stem Cells*