Purpose: This study aimed to develop an animal model suitable for coronectomy research. Materials and Methods: Eighteen Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into six groups: incisor control (InC), incisor flap (InF), incisor non-flap (InNF), molar control (MC), molar flap (MF), and molar non-flap (MNF). Coronectomy was not performed in the control groups (InC and MC). In the incisor (In) groups, coronectomy was performed on the mandibular incisors, with flap elevation in the InF group and without flap elevation in the InNF group. In the molar (M) groups, coronectomy was performed on the maxillary first molar, with flap elevation in the MF group and without flap elevation in the MNF group. The incisor groups were sacrificed on day 7, and the molar groups on days 7 and 14. Clinical healing, tooth movement, and histological and immunohistochemical analyses were performed. Results: InF and InNF groups showed tooth eruption similar to or the same as that before coronectomy, whereas the MF and MNF groups’ roots moved slowly. In InF and InNF groups, the pulp at the maturation zone was mineralized, but apical pulp vitality was maintained. MF and MNF groups showed bacterial infection and inflammation on day 7, with mineralization on day 14; however, apical pulp vitality was maintained. The MF group showed varied healing patterns, whereas the MNF group had consistent results across individuals. Conclusion Both incisors and molars are meaningful models for coronectomy. However, for consistent experimental results, coronectomy without flap elevation on the maxillary first molar is recommended.

Purpose: This study aimed to develop an animal model suitable for coronectomy research. Materials and Methods: Eighteen Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into six groups: incisor control (InC), incisor flap (InF), incisor non-flap (InNF), molar control (MC), molar flap (MF), and molar non-flap (MNF). Coronectomy was not performed in the control groups (InC and MC). In the incisor (In) groups, coronectomy was performed on the mandibular incisors, with flap elevation in the InF group and without flap elevation in the InNF group. In the molar (M) groups, coronectomy was performed on the maxillary first molar, with flap elevation in the MF group and without flap elevation in the MNF group. The incisor groups were sacrificed on day 7, and the molar groups on days 7 and 14. Clinical healing, tooth movement, and histological and immunohistochemical analyses were performed. Results: InF and InNF groups showed tooth eruption similar to or the same as that before coronectomy, whereas the MF and MNF groups’ roots moved slowly. In InF and InNF groups, the pulp at the maturation zone was mineralized, but apical pulp vitality was maintained. MF and MNF groups showed bacterial infection and inflammation on day 7, with mineralization on day 14; however, apical pulp vitality was maintained. The MF group showed varied healing patterns, whereas the MNF group had consistent results across individuals. Conclusion Both incisors and molars are meaningful models for coronectomy. However, for consistent experimental results, coronectomy without flap elevation on the maxillary first molar is recommended.

Purpose: This study aimed to develop an animal model suitable for coronectomy research. Materials and Methods: Eighteen Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into six groups: incisor control (InC), incisor flap (InF), incisor non-flap (InNF), molar control (MC), molar flap (MF), and molar non-flap (MNF). Coronectomy was not performed in the control groups (InC and MC). In the incisor (In) groups, coronectomy was performed on the mandibular incisors, with flap elevation in the InF group and without flap elevation in the InNF group. In the molar (M) groups, coronectomy was performed on the maxillary first molar, with flap elevation in the MF group and without flap elevation in the MNF group. The incisor groups were sacrificed on day 7, and the molar groups on days 7 and 14. Clinical healing, tooth movement, and histological and immunohistochemical analyses were performed. Results: InF and InNF groups showed tooth eruption similar to or the same as that before coronectomy, whereas the MF and MNF groups’ roots moved slowly. In InF and InNF groups, the pulp at the maturation zone was mineralized, but apical pulp vitality was maintained. MF and MNF groups showed bacterial infection and inflammation on day 7, with mineralization on day 14; however, apical pulp vitality was maintained. The MF group showed varied healing patterns, whereas the MNF group had consistent results across individuals. Conclusion Both incisors and molars are meaningful models for coronectomy. However, for consistent experimental results, coronectomy without flap elevation on the maxillary first molar is recommended.

Purpose: This study aimed to develop an animal model suitable for coronectomy research. Materials and Methods: Eighteen Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into six groups: incisor control (InC), incisor flap (InF), incisor non-flap (InNF), molar control (MC), molar flap (MF), and molar non-flap (MNF). Coronectomy was not performed in the control groups (InC and MC). In the incisor (In) groups, coronectomy was performed on the mandibular incisors, with flap elevation in the InF group and without flap elevation in the InNF group. In the molar (M) groups, coronectomy was performed on the maxillary first molar, with flap elevation in the MF group and without flap elevation in the MNF group. The incisor groups were sacrificed on day 7, and the molar groups on days 7 and 14. Clinical healing, tooth movement, and histological and immunohistochemical analyses were performed. Results: InF and InNF groups showed tooth eruption similar to or the same as that before coronectomy, whereas the MF and MNF groups’ roots moved slowly. In InF and InNF groups, the pulp at the maturation zone was mineralized, but apical pulp vitality was maintained. MF and MNF groups showed bacterial infection and inflammation on day 7, with mineralization on day 14; however, apical pulp vitality was maintained. The MF group showed varied healing patterns, whereas the MNF group had consistent results across individuals. Conclusion Both incisors and molars are meaningful models for coronectomy. However, for consistent experimental results, coronectomy without flap elevation on the maxillary first molar is recommended.

Purpose: Assessing the metastasis status of the sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) for hematoxylin and eosin–stained frozen tissue sections by pathologists is an essential but tedious and time-consuming task that contributes to accurate breast cancer staging. This study aimed to review a challenge competition (HeLP 2019) for the development of automated solutions for classifying the metastasis status of breast cancer patients. Materials and Methods: A total of 524 digital slides were obtained from frozen SLN sections: 297 (56.7%) from Asan Medical Center (AMC) and 227 (43.4%) from Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (SNUBH), South Korea. The slides were divided into training, development, and validation sets, where the development set comprised slides from both institutions and training and validation set included slides from only AMC and SNUBH, respectively. The algorithms were assessed for area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and measurement of the longest metastatic tumor diameter. The final total scores were calculated as the mean of the two metrics, and the three teams with AUC values greater than 0.500 were selected for review and analysis in this study. Results: The top three teams showed AUC values of 0.891, 0.809, and 0.736 and major axis prediction scores of 0.525, 0.459, and 0.387 for the validation set. The major factor that lowered the diagnostic accuracy was micro-metastasis. Conclusion In this challenge competition, accurate deep learning algorithms were developed that can be helpful for making a diagnosis on intraoperative SLN biopsy. The clinical utility of this approach was evaluated by including an external validation set from SNUBH.