1.Association between optic nerve sheath diameter/eyeball transverse diameter ratio and neurological outcomes in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage
Jinsung KIM ; Hyungoo SHIN ; Heekyung LEE
Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society 2023;66(6):664-671
Objective:
: The optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD)/eyeball transverse diameter (ETD) ratio is a more reliable marker of intracranial pressure than the ONSD alone. We aimed to investigate the predictive value of the ONSD/ETD ratio (OER) for neurological outcomes in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH).
Methods:
: Adult patients with aSAH who visited the emergency department of a tertiary hospital connected to a South Korean university between January 2015 and December 2021 were included. Data on patient characteristics and brain computed tomography scan findings, including the ONSD and ETD, were collected using a predefined protocol. According to the neurological outcome at hospital discharge, the patients were divided into the unfavorable neurological outcome (UNO; cerebral performance category [CPC] score 3–5) and the favorable neurological outcome (FNO; CPC score 1–2) groups. The primary outcome was the association between the OER and neurological outcomes in patients with aSAH.
Results:
: A total of 171 patients were included in the study, of whom 118 patients (69%) had UNO. Neither the ONSD (p=0.075) nor ETD (p=0.403) showed significant differences between the two groups. However, the OER was significantly higher in the UNO group in the univariate analysis (p=0.045). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the OER for predicting UNO was 0.603 (p=0.031). There was no independent relationship between the OER and UNO in the multivariate logistic regression analysis (adjusted odds ratio, 0.010; p=0.576).
Conclusion
: The OER was significantly higher in patients with UNO than in those with FNO, and the OER was more reliable than the ONSD alone. However, the OER had limited utility in predicting UNO in patients with aSAH.
2.Is the bedside on-site ultrasonography for elderly patients with chest pain sufficiently performed?: focused on non-traumatic patients who visited EDs
Jeesang JU ; Bossng KANG ; Changsun KIM ; Hyungoo SHIN ; Yongil CHO ; Joonkee LEE
Journal of the Korean Society of Emergency Medicine 2021;32(4):344-352
Objective:
The bedside on-site ultrasound examination is a very useful diagnostic test for medically ill elderly emergency patients. However, it is not known whether it is being sufficiently used in the real world scenario. We investigated this aspect in patients with chest pain in two emergency departments in the Seoul metropolitan area.
Methods:
Elderly patients with chest pain who visited the two emergency departments from January 2019 to December 2019 were recruited using the ‘cardiogenic pain’ code, which is the third step classification of the Korean Triage and Acuity Scale, and their medical records were reviewed to confirm whether an emergency physician-performed ultrasound prescription code was entered.
Results:
Of the 744 elderly patients with chest pain, 66 were given bedside on-site ultrasound examinations. The rate of examination was 8.8%. Among the emergency departments, the local emergency departments accounted for 33 out of 389 patients (8.5%), and the regional emergency department accounted for 33 out of 355 (9.3%).
Conclusion
These results raise the need to check the extent of bedside on-site ultrasound examinations that are conducted in the initial care of medically ill emergency elderly patients nationwide.
3.Is the bedside on-site ultrasonography for elderly patients with chest pain sufficiently performed?: focused on non-traumatic patients who visited EDs
Jeesang JU ; Bossng KANG ; Changsun KIM ; Hyungoo SHIN ; Yongil CHO ; Joonkee LEE
Journal of the Korean Society of Emergency Medicine 2021;32(4):344-352
Objective:
The bedside on-site ultrasound examination is a very useful diagnostic test for medically ill elderly emergency patients. However, it is not known whether it is being sufficiently used in the real world scenario. We investigated this aspect in patients with chest pain in two emergency departments in the Seoul metropolitan area.
Methods:
Elderly patients with chest pain who visited the two emergency departments from January 2019 to December 2019 were recruited using the ‘cardiogenic pain’ code, which is the third step classification of the Korean Triage and Acuity Scale, and their medical records were reviewed to confirm whether an emergency physician-performed ultrasound prescription code was entered.
Results:
Of the 744 elderly patients with chest pain, 66 were given bedside on-site ultrasound examinations. The rate of examination was 8.8%. Among the emergency departments, the local emergency departments accounted for 33 out of 389 patients (8.5%), and the regional emergency department accounted for 33 out of 355 (9.3%).
Conclusion
These results raise the need to check the extent of bedside on-site ultrasound examinations that are conducted in the initial care of medically ill emergency elderly patients nationwide.
4.Expert opinion on evidence after 2020 Korean Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Guidelines
Sung Phil CHUNG ; Youdong SOHN ; Jisook LEE ; Youngsuk CHO ; Kyoung-Chul CHA ; Ju Sun HEO ; Ai-Rhan Ellen KIM ; Jae Guk KIM ; Han-Suk KIM ; Hyungoo SHIN ; Chiwon AHN ; Ho Geol WOO ; Byung Kook LEE ; Yong Soo JANG ; Yu Hyeon CHOI ; Sung Oh HWANG ;
Journal of the Korean Society of Emergency Medicine 2023;34(4):287-296
Considerable evidence has been published since the 2020 Korean Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Guidelines were reported. The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) also publishes the Consensus on CPR and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations (CoSTR) summary annually. This review provides expert opinions by reviewing the recent evidence on CPR and ILCOR treatment recommendations. The authors reviewed the CoSTR summary published by ILCOR in 2021 and 2022. PICO (population, intervention, comparator, outcome) questions for each topic were reviewed using a systemic or scoping review methodology. Two experts were appointed for each question and reviewed the topic independently. Topics suggested by the reviewers for revision or additional description of the guidelines were discussed at a consensus conference. Forty-three questions were reviewed, including 15 on basic life support, seven on advanced life support, two on pediatric life support, 11 on neonatal life support, six on education and teams, one on first aid, and one related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Finally, the current Korean CPR Guideline was maintained for 28 questions, and expert opinions were suggested for 15 questions.