Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in both Korea and worldwide. Since 2004, the Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer have been regularly updated, with the 4th edition published in 2022. The 4th edition was the result of a collaborative work by an interdisciplinary team, including experts in gastric surgery, gastroenterology, endoscopy, medical oncology, abdominal radiology, pathology, nuclear medicine, radiation oncology, and guideline development methodology. The current guideline is the 5th version, an updated version of the 4th edition. In this guideline, 6 key questions (KQs) were updated or proposed after a collaborative review by the working group, and 7 statements were developed, or revised, or discussed based on a systematic review using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed database. Over the past 2 years, there have been significant changes in systemic treatment, leading to major updates and revisions focused on this area.Additionally, minor modifications have been made in other sections, incorporating recent research findings. The level of evidence and grading of recommendations were categorized according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Key factors for recommendation included the level of evidence, benefit, harm, and clinical applicability. The working group reviewed and discussed the recommendations to reach a consensus. The structure of this guideline remains similar to the 2022 version.Earlier sections cover general considerations, such as screening, diagnosis, and staging of endoscopy, pathology, radiology, and nuclear medicine. In the latter sections, statements are provided for each KQ based on clinical evidence, with flowcharts supporting these statements through meta-analysis and references. This multidisciplinary, evidence-based gastric cancer guideline aims to support clinicians in providing optimal care for gastric cancer patients.

Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in both Korea and worldwide. Since 2004, the Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer have been regularly updated, with the 4th edition published in 2022. The 4th edition was the result of a collaborative work by an interdisciplinary team, including experts in gastric surgery, gastroenterology, endoscopy, medical oncology, abdominal radiology, pathology, nuclear medicine, radiation oncology, and guideline development methodology. The current guideline is the 5th version, an updated version of the 4th edition. In this guideline, 6 key questions (KQs) were updated or proposed after a collaborative review by the working group, and 7 statements were developed, or revised, or discussed based on a systematic review using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed database. Over the past 2 years, there have been significant changes in systemic treatment, leading to major updates and revisions focused on this area.Additionally, minor modifications have been made in other sections, incorporating recent research findings. The level of evidence and grading of recommendations were categorized according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Key factors for recommendation included the level of evidence, benefit, harm, and clinical applicability. The working group reviewed and discussed the recommendations to reach a consensus. The structure of this guideline remains similar to the 2022 version.Earlier sections cover general considerations, such as screening, diagnosis, and staging of endoscopy, pathology, radiology, and nuclear medicine. In the latter sections, statements are provided for each KQ based on clinical evidence, with flowcharts supporting these statements through meta-analysis and references. This multidisciplinary, evidence-based gastric cancer guideline aims to support clinicians in providing optimal care for gastric cancer patients.

Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in both Korea and worldwide. Since 2004, the Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer have been regularly updated, with the 4th edition published in 2022. The 4th edition was the result of a collaborative work by an interdisciplinary team, including experts in gastric surgery, gastroenterology, endoscopy, medical oncology, abdominal radiology, pathology, nuclear medicine, radiation oncology, and guideline development methodology. The current guideline is the 5th version, an updated version of the 4th edition. In this guideline, 6 key questions (KQs) were updated or proposed after a collaborative review by the working group, and 7 statements were developed, or revised, or discussed based on a systematic review using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed database. Over the past 2 years, there have been significant changes in systemic treatment, leading to major updates and revisions focused on this area.Additionally, minor modifications have been made in other sections, incorporating recent research findings. The level of evidence and grading of recommendations were categorized according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Key factors for recommendation included the level of evidence, benefit, harm, and clinical applicability. The working group reviewed and discussed the recommendations to reach a consensus. The structure of this guideline remains similar to the 2022 version.Earlier sections cover general considerations, such as screening, diagnosis, and staging of endoscopy, pathology, radiology, and nuclear medicine. In the latter sections, statements are provided for each KQ based on clinical evidence, with flowcharts supporting these statements through meta-analysis and references. This multidisciplinary, evidence-based gastric cancer guideline aims to support clinicians in providing optimal care for gastric cancer patients.

Background: The 2023 Obesity Fact Sheet aims to present an updated overview of obesity prevalence across all age groups, including children and adolescents. Methods: This study included individuals aged ≥20 years (n=16,941,423 in 2021) who underwent health checkups provided by the Korean National Health Insurance Service between 2012 and 2021. The prevalence of obesity and abdominal obesity was standardized by age and sex using data from the 2010 population and housing census. For children and adolescents (6 to 18 years) (n= 884 in 2021), we used the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2012 to 2021), and obesity was defined by the corresponding sex- and agespecific body mass index percentile of 95th or greater based on the 2017 Korean National Growth Chart for Children and Adolescents. Results: The overall prevalence of obesity in 2021 is 38.4% (49.2% in men and 27.8% in women), which is a 1.27-fold increase from 30.2% in 2012. The prevalence of obesity has increased across all age groups, particularly among those aged 20, 30, and 80 years. The prevalence of class III obesity substantially increased from 0.35% (men) and 0.42% (women) in 2012 to 1.21% and 0.97% in 2021, with 3.46- and 2.31-fold increases, respectively.This increase was particularly pronounced in young adults. The prevalence of obesity in children and adolescents has surged from 9.7% in 2012 to 19.3% in 2021, with a greater increase among boys. Conclusion Our study provides information on the current status of obesity prevalence based on the 2023 Obesity Fact Sheet, emphasizing the urgency of implementing timely strategies to reverse this increasing trend.

Prolonged immunosuppressive therapy in liver transplantation (LT) is associated with significant adverse effects, such as nephrotoxicity, metabolic complications, and heightened risk of infection or malignancy. Regulatory T cells (Tregs) represent a promising target for inducing immune tolerance in LT, with the potential to reduce or eliminate the need for life-long immunosuppression. This review summarizes current knowledge on the roles of Tregs in LT, highlighting their mechanisms and the impact of various immunosuppressive agents on Treg stability and function. The liver’s distinct immunological microenvironment, characterized by tolerogenic antigen-presentingcells and high levels of interleukin (IL)-10 and transforming growth factor-β, positionsthis organ as an ideal setting for Treg-mediated tolerance. We discuss Treg dynamics in LT, their association with rejection risk, and their utility as biomarkers of transplant outcomes. Emerging strategies, including the use of low-dose calcineurin inhibitors with mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors, adoptive Treg therapy, and low-dose IL-2, aim to enhance Treg function while providing sufficient immunosuppression. Thus, the future of LT involves precision medicine approaches that integrate Treg monitoring with tailored immunosuppressive protocols to optimize long-term outcomes for LT recipients.

Background: Renal replacement therapy (RRT) is an important treatment option for sepsisassociated acute kidney injury (AKI); however, the optimal timing for its initiation remains controversial. Herein, we investigated the clinical outcomes of early continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT), defined as CKRT initiation within 6 hours of sepsis-associated AKI onset, which was earlier than the initiation time defined in previous studies. Methods: We used clinical data sourced from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database. This study included patients aged ≥ 18 years who met the sepsis diagnostic criteria and received CKRT because of stage 2 or 3 AKI. Early and late CKRTs were defined as CKRT initiation within 6 hours and after 6 hours of the development of sepsisassociated AKI, respectively. Results: Of the 33,236 patients diagnosed with sepsis, 553 underwent CKRT for sepsisassociated AKI. After excluding cases of early mortality and patients with a dialysis history, 45 and 334 patients were included in the early and late CKRT groups, respectively. After propensity score matching, the 28-day mortality rate was significantly lower in the early CKRT group than in the late CKRT group (26.7% vs. 43.9%, P = 0.035). The early CKRT group also had a significantly greater number of days free of mechanical ventilation (median, 19; interquartile range [IQR], 3–25) and vasopressor administration (median, 21; IQR, 5–26) than the late CKRT group did (median, 10.5; IQR, 0–23; P = 0.037 and median, 13.5;IQR, 0–25; P = 0.028, respectively). The Kaplan–Meier curve also showed that early CKRT initiation was associated with an improved 28-day mortality rate (log-rank test, P = 0.040).In contrast, there was no significant difference in the 28-day mortality between patients who started CKRT within 12 hours and those who did not (log-rank test, P = 0.237). Conclusion Early CKRT initiation improved the survival of patients with sepsis-associated AKI. Initiation of CKRT should be considered as early as possible after sepsis-associated AKI onset, preferably within 6 hours.

Background: Renal replacement therapy (RRT) is an important treatment option for sepsisassociated acute kidney injury (AKI); however, the optimal timing for its initiation remains controversial. Herein, we investigated the clinical outcomes of early continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT), defined as CKRT initiation within 6 hours of sepsis-associated AKI onset, which was earlier than the initiation time defined in previous studies. Methods: We used clinical data sourced from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database. This study included patients aged ≥ 18 years who met the sepsis diagnostic criteria and received CKRT because of stage 2 or 3 AKI. Early and late CKRTs were defined as CKRT initiation within 6 hours and after 6 hours of the development of sepsisassociated AKI, respectively. Results: Of the 33,236 patients diagnosed with sepsis, 553 underwent CKRT for sepsisassociated AKI. After excluding cases of early mortality and patients with a dialysis history, 45 and 334 patients were included in the early and late CKRT groups, respectively. After propensity score matching, the 28-day mortality rate was significantly lower in the early CKRT group than in the late CKRT group (26.7% vs. 43.9%, P = 0.035). The early CKRT group also had a significantly greater number of days free of mechanical ventilation (median, 19; interquartile range [IQR], 3–25) and vasopressor administration (median, 21; IQR, 5–26) than the late CKRT group did (median, 10.5; IQR, 0–23; P = 0.037 and median, 13.5;IQR, 0–25; P = 0.028, respectively). The Kaplan–Meier curve also showed that early CKRT initiation was associated with an improved 28-day mortality rate (log-rank test, P = 0.040).In contrast, there was no significant difference in the 28-day mortality between patients who started CKRT within 12 hours and those who did not (log-rank test, P = 0.237). Conclusion Early CKRT initiation improved the survival of patients with sepsis-associated AKI. Initiation of CKRT should be considered as early as possible after sepsis-associated AKI onset, preferably within 6 hours.

Prolonged immunosuppressive therapy in liver transplantation (LT) is associated with significant adverse effects, such as nephrotoxicity, metabolic complications, and heightened risk of infection or malignancy. Regulatory T cells (Tregs) represent a promising target for inducing immune tolerance in LT, with the potential to reduce or eliminate the need for life-long immunosuppression. This review summarizes current knowledge on the roles of Tregs in LT, highlighting their mechanisms and the impact of various immunosuppressive agents on Treg stability and function. The liver’s distinct immunological microenvironment, characterized by tolerogenic antigen-presentingcells and high levels of interleukin (IL)-10 and transforming growth factor-β, positionsthis organ as an ideal setting for Treg-mediated tolerance. We discuss Treg dynamics in LT, their association with rejection risk, and their utility as biomarkers of transplant outcomes. Emerging strategies, including the use of low-dose calcineurin inhibitors with mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors, adoptive Treg therapy, and low-dose IL-2, aim to enhance Treg function while providing sufficient immunosuppression. Thus, the future of LT involves precision medicine approaches that integrate Treg monitoring with tailored immunosuppressive protocols to optimize long-term outcomes for LT recipients.

Prolonged immunosuppressive therapy in liver transplantation (LT) is associated with significant adverse effects, such as nephrotoxicity, metabolic complications, and heightened risk of infection or malignancy. Regulatory T cells (Tregs) represent a promising target for inducing immune tolerance in LT, with the potential to reduce or eliminate the need for life-long immunosuppression. This review summarizes current knowledge on the roles of Tregs in LT, highlighting their mechanisms and the impact of various immunosuppressive agents on Treg stability and function. The liver’s distinct immunological microenvironment, characterized by tolerogenic antigen-presentingcells and high levels of interleukin (IL)-10 and transforming growth factor-β, positionsthis organ as an ideal setting for Treg-mediated tolerance. We discuss Treg dynamics in LT, their association with rejection risk, and their utility as biomarkers of transplant outcomes. Emerging strategies, including the use of low-dose calcineurin inhibitors with mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors, adoptive Treg therapy, and low-dose IL-2, aim to enhance Treg function while providing sufficient immunosuppression. Thus, the future of LT involves precision medicine approaches that integrate Treg monitoring with tailored immunosuppressive protocols to optimize long-term outcomes for LT recipients.

Background: Renal replacement therapy (RRT) is an important treatment option for sepsisassociated acute kidney injury (AKI); however, the optimal timing for its initiation remains controversial. Herein, we investigated the clinical outcomes of early continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT), defined as CKRT initiation within 6 hours of sepsis-associated AKI onset, which was earlier than the initiation time defined in previous studies. Methods: We used clinical data sourced from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database. This study included patients aged ≥ 18 years who met the sepsis diagnostic criteria and received CKRT because of stage 2 or 3 AKI. Early and late CKRTs were defined as CKRT initiation within 6 hours and after 6 hours of the development of sepsisassociated AKI, respectively. Results: Of the 33,236 patients diagnosed with sepsis, 553 underwent CKRT for sepsisassociated AKI. After excluding cases of early mortality and patients with a dialysis history, 45 and 334 patients were included in the early and late CKRT groups, respectively. After propensity score matching, the 28-day mortality rate was significantly lower in the early CKRT group than in the late CKRT group (26.7% vs. 43.9%, P = 0.035). The early CKRT group also had a significantly greater number of days free of mechanical ventilation (median, 19; interquartile range [IQR], 3–25) and vasopressor administration (median, 21; IQR, 5–26) than the late CKRT group did (median, 10.5; IQR, 0–23; P = 0.037 and median, 13.5;IQR, 0–25; P = 0.028, respectively). The Kaplan–Meier curve also showed that early CKRT initiation was associated with an improved 28-day mortality rate (log-rank test, P = 0.040).In contrast, there was no significant difference in the 28-day mortality between patients who started CKRT within 12 hours and those who did not (log-rank test, P = 0.237). Conclusion Early CKRT initiation improved the survival of patients with sepsis-associated AKI. Initiation of CKRT should be considered as early as possible after sepsis-associated AKI onset, preferably within 6 hours.