1.Clinical Approach to Dysmorphic Syndromes.
Journal of the Korean Pediatric Society 1987;30(7):707-711
No abstract available.
2.Acromesomelic Dysplasia Syndrome.
Journal of the Korean Pediatric Society 1984;27(1):98-104
No abstract available.
3.Aediatrics and Pediatrician's Commitment.
Journal of the Korean Pediatric Society 1994;37(3):295-299
No abstract available.
4.Clinical Observation on Pediatric In-Patients Subjected for EEG.
Seung Kie CHEONG ; Hyung Ro MOON
Journal of the Korean Pediatric Society 1983;26(9):891-898
No abstract available.
Electroencephalography*
5.Observation on Chief Complaints of Pediatric Outpatients.
Sang Wook CHOI ; Hyung Ro MOON
Journal of the Korean Pediatric Society 1983;26(9):843-849
No abstract available.
Humans
;
Outpatients*
6.Russell-Silver Syndrome.
Journal of the Korean Pediatric Society 1986;29(7):17-24
No abstract available.
Silver-Russell Syndrome*
8.Four Cases of Attempted Suicide in Childhood.
Journal of the Korean Pediatric Society 1990;33(5):666-670
No abstract available.
Suicide, Attempted*
9.Statistical Assessment on Chromosomal Aberrations Observed in Childhood.
Journal of the Korean Pediatric Society 1983;26(3):220-227
No abstract available.
Chromosome Aberrations*
10.The variability of growth hormone(GH) response to growth hormone-releasing hormone(GHRH) according to the intrinsic growth hormone secretory rhythm in children with normal growth hormone reserve.
Journal of the Korean Pediatric Society 1993;36(3):312-319
The diagnostic value of GHRH in assessing GH secretion in biochemical GH sufficient short children was examined. GHRH (1microgram/kg i.v bolus) was given to three groups (upslope, trough, downslope) arbitrarily classified according to the basal pulsatile GH secretory pattern before GHRH administration. Cmax following GHRH administration were variable and overlapping. Two children in downslope group, three children in trough group, and one child in upslope group showed subnormal GH responses to GHRH administration despite of normal GH response to more than two classical GH provocative tests (Fig.1). The time of maximal GH response after GHRH administration (Tmax) in upslope group was significantly faster than those in other two groups (Fig.2). There was a highly significant correlation between AUC and Cmax (p<0.001) after GHRH administration (Fig.3) which suggests that AUC or Cmax can be used for parameters of GH response to GHRH each other. The AUC and Cmax after GHRH administration between three groups were significantly different (2764+/-579.1ng/ml min, 52.6 ng/ml, respectively in upslope group; 1645+/-383.9ng/ml min, 37.7+/-9.4ng/ml, respectively in downslope group; 1098+/-150.2ng/ml min, 26.3+/-4.5ng/ml, respectively in trough group)(p<0.005) (Fig.4, Table 1). In conclusion, GH responses to GHRH adminstration could be variable according to the basal GH secretory rhythm. Therefore, we should be cautious in interpreting the GH response to GHRH to evaluate the GH secretory capacity because subnormal GH response to GHRH administration could be observed even if normal GH response to classical GH provocative tests. In addition, the classification of these arbitary three groups (upslope, trough, and downslope) is remained to defined so as to promote the diagnostic value of GHRH in GH deficiency.
Area Under Curve
;
Child*
;
Classification
;
Growth Hormone*
;
Humans