No abstract available.
Female ; Humans ; Hysterectomy/*methods ; *Time-to-Treatment ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/*surgery

Operative laparoscopy was initially developed in the field of gynecology earlier on and the advent of laparoscopic surgery led to advances in general surgery as well. In the last few years, a number of articles have been published on the performance of surgical procedures using the robot-assisted laparoscopy. The shortcomings of conventional laparoscopy have led to the development of robotic surgical system and future of telerobotic surgery is not far away, enabling a surgeon to operate at a distance from the operating table. The complete loss of tactile sensation is often quoted as a big disadvantage of working with robotic systems. Although the first generation da Vinci robotic surgical system provides improved imaging and instrumentation, the absence of tactile feedback and the high cost of the technology remain as limitations. New generations of the robotic surgical systems have been developed, allowing visualization of preoperative imaging during the operation. Though the introduction of robotics is very recent, the potential for robotics in several specialties is significant. However, the benefit to patients must be carefully evaluated and proven before this technology can become widely accepted in the gynecologic surgery.
Female ; Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/instrumentation/*methods ; Humans ; Hysterectomy/instrumentation/methods ; Robotics/instrumentation/*methods

OBJECTIVETo compare the clinical characteristics of three subcategories of laparoscopic hysterectomy: total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) and two subcategories of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH): LAVHs and LAVHb.

METHODSWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 393 patients underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy, including TLH (n=178), LAVHa (n=177), and LAVHb (n=38), in our hospital from September 2002 to September 2005.

RESULTSMyoma and adenomyosis of uterus were the most common diseases in this study, accounting for 66.9%, 38.4%, and 52.6% in TLH group, LAVHa group, and LAVHb group, respectively. The mean surgery duration and blood loss were not significantly different between TLH group and LAVHa group (P > 0.05), but were significantly less in TLH group than in LAVHb group (P < 0.05). The bulk of uterus in TLH group was significantly bigger than in other two groups (P < 0.05). The incidence of major complications in the TLH group (9. 0%) was lower than in LAVHa group (14.1%) and in LAVHb group (18.4%), but without statistical significance. Conclusion Compared with LAVH, TLH is feasible to deal with bigger uterus with less blood loss and shorter surgery duration and without more frequent complications.

Endometriosis ; surgery ; Female ; Humans ; Hysterectomy ; adverse effects ; methods ; Hysterectomy, Vaginal ; adverse effects ; methods ; Laparoscopy ; adverse effects ; methods ; Myoma ; surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Uterine Neoplasms ; surgery

BACKGROUNDHysterectomy is a very common surgery in gynecology. Ideal surgery for hysterectomy is microinvasive with few complications. There are three major routes of hysterectomy that are currently used. The aim of this study was to identify the differences of peri-operative outcome among the patients who underwent the three different approaches.

METHODSOne hundred and one women undergoing hysterectomy for myoma had the procedure performed by laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH), total vaginal hysterectomy (TVH) or total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) in a randomized study. We compared the course of peri-operative and post-operative outcome for the three different approaches.

RESULTSwere evaluated by linear regression analysis, Fisher's exact test and Student's t test for independent samples.

RESULTSThe operation time among the three procedures was not significantly different (P > 0.05). The amount of blood loss in the TVH group was less than in the LAVH and TAH groups (P < 0.05). The pain score 3 hours after operation in the LAVH group was significantly lower than in the TAH and TVH groups (P < 0.001). The pain scores in the LAVH and TVH groups were lower than in the TAH group at 24 and 48 hours after operation (P < 0.01). The women who underwent LAVH and TVH had a shorter hospitalization stay (P < 0.001). The highest body temperature after operation in the TAH group was higher than that in LAVH and TVH groups (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONSLAVH and TVH are better procedures for women requiring hysterectomy. The peri-operative and post-operative courses of TVH are better than LAVH, excluding the pain score 3 hours after operation. Vaginal hysterectomy is the most cost-effective approach but the final choice for the route of hysterectomy can depend on many factors such as gynecological disease, patients' health status and experiences of the gynecologist.

Blood Loss, Surgical ; Female ; Humans ; Hysterectomy ; methods ; standards ; Hysterectomy, Vaginal ; methods ; Laparoscopy ; methods ; Length of Stay ; Myoma ; surgery ; Pain, Postoperative ; Regression Analysis ; Treatment Outcome

No abstract available.
Female ; Humans ; Hysterectomy/*methods ; Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/*pathology/*surgery ; Ovarian Neoplasms/*pathology/*surgery ; Pelvic Exenteration/*methods

OBJECTIVETo report the first case of transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery-assisted vaginal hysterectomy in South China, and discuss its feasibility and safety.

METHODSA 42-year-old woman with multiple myoma of the uterus underwent laparoendoscopic single-site surgery-assisted vaginal hysterectomy performed using a single multiple-channel port inserted through a solitary 2 cm upper umbilicus incision.

RESULTSThe total operative time was 3 h, and duration of the laparoendoscopic procedure was 2 h. The surgery was completed uneventfully without an additional port incision or transfer to open surgery. The intraoperative blood loss was 100 ml. Bowel peristalsis was recovered 3 days after the operation. The vaginal stump and abdominal incision healed smoothly without occurrence of vaginal bleeding.

CONCLUSIONWith the development of surgical instruments and improvement of the surgeons' skills, laparoendoscopic single-site surgery, due to its invasiveness, can be a promising approach to the management of gynecological disease including gynecological malignant tumors.

Adult ; Female ; Humans ; Hysterectomy, Vaginal ; methods ; Laparoscopy ; methods ; Leiomyoma ; surgery ; Uterine Neoplasms ; surgery

OBJECTIVEThe aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic nerve plane-sparing radical hysterectomy (NPSRH) and compare with that of open NPSRH.

METHODSOne hundred and thirty-four patients with FIGO stage Ib1-IIa2 cervical cancer were enrolled in the study. Thirty-three patients underwent laparoscopic NPSRH. During the operation, the pelvic autonomic nerve plane which is directly underneath the ureter was integrally preserved by dissecting the pelvic spaces laparoscopically. The vessels around the nerve plane were controlled by Hem-o-lok polymer clips. One hundred and one patients underwent open NPSRH without special instruments. The clinical, pathological and surgery-related parameters were compared between the two groups. Moreover, postoperative short-term bladder function of these patients was also analyzed.

RESULTSThere was no significant difference between the laparoscopic group and open group in terms of age, body mass index, previous surgery, FIGO stage, pathologic type, etc. (P > 0.05). The mean duration of surgery in the laparoscopic group was significantly longer [(303.8 ± 67.5) min vs. (272.4 ± 57.5) min] (P < 0.01). But, the laparoscopic group had less blood loss [177.0 ml vs. 474.5 ml, P < 0.01] and blood transfusion rate [ 6.1% (2/33 cases) vs. 49.5% (50/101 cases), P < 0.001]. There was no significant difference regarding the proportion of patients who firstly passed the post-void residual urine volume (PVR) test (P > 0.05). The median time of catheterization between the two groups were also comparable (P > 0.05). However, the postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the laparoscopic group [median postoperative hospital stay 9.2 days vs. 11.0 days, P < 0.001].

CONCLUSIONSLaparoscopic NPSRH is feasible. It seems to be comparable with open NPSRH in terms of preserving pelvic nerve function, but is more favorable in terms of blood loss and postoperative recovery.

Female ; Humans ; Hysterectomy ; methods ; Laparoscopy ; methods ; Length of Stay ; Postoperative Complications ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms ; surgery

The development of robotic technology has facilitated the application of minimally invasive techniques for the treatment and evaluation of patients with early, advanced, and recurrent cervical cancer. The application of robotic technology for selected patients with cervical cancer and the data available in the literature are addressed in the present review paper. The robotic radical hysterectomy technique developed at the Mayo Clinic Arizona is presented with data comparing 27 patients who underwent the robotic procedure with 2 matched groups of patients treated by laparoscopic (N = 31), and laparotomic radical hysterectomy (N = 35). A few other studies confirmed the feasibility and safety of robotic radical hysterectomy and comparisons to either to the laparoscopic or open approach were discussed. Based on data from the literature, minimally invasive techniques including laparoscopy and robotics are preferable to laparotomy for patients requiring radical hysterectomy, with some advantages noted for robotics over laparoscopy. A prospective randomised trial is currently being perfomred under the auspices of the American Association of Gyneoclogic Laparoscopists comparing minimally invasive radical hysterectomy (laparoscopy or robotics) with laparotomy. For early cervical cancer radical parametrectomy and fertility preserving trachelectomy have been performed using robotic technology and been shown to be feasible, safe, and easier to perform when compared to the laparoscopic approach. Similar benefits have been noted in the treatment of advanced and recurrent cervical cancer where complex procedures such as extraperitoneal paraortic lymphadenectomy and pelvic exenteration have been required. CONCLUSION: Robotic technology better facilitates the surgical approach as compared to laparoscopy for technically challenging operations performed to treat primary, early or advanced, and recurrent cervical cancer. Although patient advantages are similar or slightly improved with robotics, there are multiple advantages for surgeons.
Female ; Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/*methods ; Humans ; Hysterectomy/methods ; Lymph Node Excision/methods ; Pelvic Exenteration/methods ; Robotics/*methods ; Surgical Procedures, Minimally Invasive/methods ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/*surgery

Endoscopic hysterectomy is increasingly selected as a current trend to minimize invasion, tissue trauma and early recovery. However it has disadvantages of the difficulty to learn and needs expensive equipments. So we developed a new minimally invasive method of vaginal hysterectomy-minilaparotomically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (MAVH) in order to complement the current laparoscopic surgery. The principle of MAVH is based on suprapubic minilaparotomical incision and uterine elevator that allows access and maximal exposure of the pelvic anatomy and an easy approach to the surrounding anatomy enabling division of round ligaments, Fallopian tubes, tuboovarian ligaments, and dissection of bladder peritoneum. After then, the vaginal phase of MAVH is done by the traditional vaginal hysterectomy. We enrolled 75 consecutive cases and in 73 cases thereof MAVH was accomplished successfully. The technique of MAVH is simple and easy to learn and it involves a small incision causing less pain and complications. This practice does not require expensive equipments. MAVH is considered as a safe and effective alternative method for abdominal hysterectomy in most cases.
Adult ; Aged ; Blood Loss, Surgical ; Human ; Hysterectomy, Vaginal/*methods ; *Laparotomy ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Complications ; Treatment Outcome

No abstract available.
Female ; Humans ; Hysterectomy/adverse effects/*methods ; Postoperative Complications/*prevention & control ; Urinary Bladder/*innervation/physiopathology ; Urodynamics/*physiology