BACKGROUND: Careful sedation is needed for cataract operation that requires absolute cooperation of elderly patients. Patient-controlled sedation (PCS) allows patients themselves change the dose of sedatives along with their need. The goal of this study was to find out midazolam PCS could achieve an adequate sedation without complications during cataract surgery and the differences of patients who needed PCS or not. METHODS: PCS with midazolam was applied to 33 patients undergoing cataract surgery using retrobulbar block (midazolam, bolus 0.5 mg, lock out interval 3 minutes, 1 hour limit 4.5 mg). PCS pump was given to patients 30 min before retrobular block. And patients themselves decided to use or not to use PCS after full explanation on PCS. Sedation score, visual analogue scale of anxiety, cognitive function, side effects and satisfaction of PCS were measured. RESULTS: PCS users were 22 (67%). Mean midazolam dosage of PCS users was 2.03 mg. Preoperative and intraoperative anxiety score were 40.2 mm and 13.0 mm in PCS users and 15.5 mm and 21.8 mm in non-users. The difference between PCS users and non-users was only preoperative anxiety levels. Age, sex, weight, education levels, previous cataract surgery, preoperative desired sedation levels did not influence on the PCS using. There was positive correlation of midazolam doses with only preoperative anxiety levels. 76% of surgeons and 85% of patients were satisfied with PCS but 7 patients showed involuntary movement. Cognitive functions and discharge time were not influenced by PCS. CONCLUSIONS: Although patients and surgeons were satisfied with the midazolam PCS, 33% of patients did not need PCS and deep sedation with involuntary movement that could bring surgical complications was resulted in some PCS users. We conclude that PCS for cataract surgery would be safer when it is administered under careful supervision of anesthesiologist.
Aged ; Anxiety ; Cataract* ; Deep Sedation ; Dyskinesias ; Education ; Humans ; Hypnotics and Sedatives ; Midazolam* ; Organization and Administration

A case of toxic epidermal necrolysis(TEN) in 20 years old female was presente d. The characteristic skin lesions of toxic epidermal necrolyais developed after oral administration of Aspirin for common cold. The cause of the disease. was probably due to Aspirin, but on the microscopic pathologic findings intraepithelial and subcorneal bullae which is characteristic in the staphylococcal induced TEN were noticed. She was treated with a massive systemic corticosteroids(Dexamethasone 12mg/d), antibiotics(Lincocin l.5grn/d), Fluids with electrolytes, sedatives and topical measures. So she was discharged with excellent results in a week of admission.
Administration, Oral ; Aspirin ; Common Cold ; Electrolytes ; Female ; Humans ; Hypnotics and Sedatives ; Skin ; Young Adult

BACKGROUND: Dexmedemomidine, a highly selective alpha-2 adrenoreceptor agonist has an analgesic and sedative effect without causing respiratory depression. In this study, we compared the duration of brachial plexus block (BPB), the time at which the patient first feels pain after performing BPB, the need for use of analgesics, and the occurrence rate of complications while continuous infusion with dexmedetomidine was used for sedation in patients undergoing BPB, to a control group, who were only infused with normal saline. METHODS: BPB was performed in 48 patients scheduled for upper limb surgery. Infraclavicular approach was provided with 40 ml of 1.5% mepivacaine and 200 microg of epinephrine using nerve stimulator. After verification of successful block, dexmedetomidine group received dexmedetomidine (loading dose 0.1 microg/kg/min for the first 10 minutes followed by a maintenance dose of 0.005 microg/kg/min as required to maintain bispectral index 60-80). In the control group, normal saline was infused at a rate of 10 ml/hr. The duration of BPB, the time at which the patient first feels pain after performing BPB, frequency of complication, and the use of analgesics of the both groups were checked. RESULTS: The motor and sensory block duration, and the time at which the patient first feels pain after BPB were longer in the dexmedetomidine group compared to the control group. And the need for analgesics were less in the dexmedetomidine group. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous administration of dexmedetomidine prolongs the duration of BPB.
Administration, Intravenous ; Analgesics ; Brachial Plexus ; Dexmedetomidine ; Epinephrine ; Humans ; Hypnotics and Sedatives ; Mepivacaine ; Respiratory Insufficiency ; Upper Extremity

3-Carene, a bicyclic monoterpene, is one of the major components of the pine tree essential oils. It has been reported that, in addition to its known properties as a phytoncide, 3-carene has anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, and anxiolytic effects. We have previously demonstrated that α-pinene, the major component of pine tree, has a hypnotic effect through GABA(A)-benzodiazepine (BZD) receptors. However, a hypnotic effect of 3-carene has not been studied yet. Here, we report that oral administration of 3-carene increases the sleep duration and reduces sleep latency in pentobarbital-induced sleep test. 3-Carene potentiates the GABA(A) receptor-mediated synaptic responses by prolonging the decay time constant of inhibitory synaptic responses. These enhancing effects of 3-carene are reproduced by zolpidem, a modulator for GABA(A)-BZD receptor, and fully inhibited by flumazenil, an antagonist for GABA(A)-BZD receptor. The molecular docking of 3-carene to the BZD site of GABA(A) protein structure, suggests that 3-carene binds to the BZD site of α1 and ϒ2 subunits of GABA(A)-BZD receptor. These results indicate that, similar to α-pinene, 3-carene shows a sleep-enhancing effect by acting as a positive modulator for GABA(A)-BZD receptor.
Administration, Oral ; Anti-Anxiety Agents ; Flumazenil ; Hypnotics and Sedatives ; Oils, Volatile ; Pinus

OBJECTIVE: To compare the median effective dose (ED) of intranasal dexmedetomidine for procedural sedation in uncooperative pediatric patients with acyanotic congenital heart disease before and after cardiac surgery. METHODS: We prospectively recruited 47 children (22 in preoperative group and 25 in postoperative group) who needed sedation for transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). A modified up-and-down sequential study design was employed to determine dexmedetomidine dose for each patient with a starting dose of 2 μg/kg in both groups; dexmedetomidine doses for subsequent subjects were determined according to the responses from the previous subject using the up-and-down method at a 0.25 μg/kg interval. The ED was determined using probit regression. The onset time, examination time, wake-up time and adverse effects were measured, and the safety was evaluated in terms of changes in vital signs every 5 min. RESULTS: The ED value of intranasal dexmedetomidine for sedation was 1.84 μg/kg (95% : 1.68-2.00 μg/kg) in children with congenital heart disease before cardiac surgery, and 3.38 μg/kg (95% : 3.21-3.54 μg/kg) after the surgery. No significant difference was found between the two groups in the demographic variables, onset time, examination time, wake-up time, or adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS In children with acyanotic congenital heart disease, the ED of intranasal dexmedetomidine for TTE sedation increases to 3.38 μg/ kg after cardiac surgery from the preoperative value of 1.84 μg/kg.
Administration, Intranasal ; Cardiac Surgical Procedures ; Child ; Dexmedetomidine ; Heart Defects, Congenital ; surgery ; Humans ; Hypnotics and Sedatives

OBJECTIVE: To explore the safety and the efficacy of two-stage administration sedation method (with propofol plus midazolam) in the analgesia gastroscopy for hypoxia predisposed patients. METHODS: Sixty-four hypoxia predisposed patients (with snore or expectoration) were divided into two groups and received sedation respectively with two-stage administration method and routine continuum administration method before gastroscopy. We analyzed the alteration of SBP, DBP, SpO2, sedation level, the degree of pharyngeal malaise, recovery time, dose of propofol,the lethe degree of upset, and procedure of gastroscopy to evaluate the safety and the efficacy of the two methods in the analgesia gastroscopy for hypoxia predisposed patients. RESULTS: Compared with routine continuum administration sedation method, two-stage administration sedation method had little influence on SpO2, so it reduced the accident of respiratory arrest (P < 0.01). The gastroscopy could be achieved at the lower sedation level with two stage administration method (P <0.01), so that the recovery time was shortened (P < 0.01). The degree of pharyngeal malaise in the patients with two-stage administration sedation method was higher than that of patients with routine continuum administrationsedation method (P < 0.01), and the dose of propofol used for sedation decreased (P < 0.01). While the lethe degree of gastroscopy upset and alteration of SBP, DBP were rated similarly in both groups (P > 0.05), and the lethe degree of gastroscopy procedure in two-stage administration method group was significantly lower than that of routine continuum adminis- tration method group (P <0.01). CONCLUSION The two-stage administration sedation method is a new effective and safe sedation method for gastroscopy in the hypoxia predisposed patients.
Adult ; Analgesia ; Female ; Gastroscopy ; methods ; Humans ; Hypnotics and Sedatives ; administration & dosage ; Male ; Midazolam ; administration & dosage ; Middle Aged ; Propofol ; administration & dosage

Objective To compare two spray administration of intranasal dexmedetomidine (DEX) doses for premedication in children. Methods In this prospective,randomized,double-blind study,41 children aged 3-6 years were enrolled. Children were assigned to receive either spray administration of intranasal DEX 1 μg/kg (Group D1) or 2 μg/kg (Group D2). The Ramsay Sedation Scale scores were evaluated at 5 min intervals. Sedation status at separation from patient was also evaluated. Heart rate (HR) and saturation of peripheral oxygen (SpO) were recorded before and every 15 min after drug administration. Results The median sedation onset time was 30 min and 20 min in group D1 and group D2,respectively. Compared with the children in group D1,those in group D2 were significantly more sedated when they were separated from their parents (61.9% vs. 95.0%,respectively)(χ=5.549,P=0.010). In Group D2,the HR decreased by 15.8% (t=2.415,P=0.021) 30 min after the spray administration of intranasal DEX. Compared with the baseline values,there was no significant difference in both groups in terms of SpO(t=-1.426,P=0.162;t=-1.096,P=0.280)and HR in group D1 (t=-0.299,P=0.767) 30 min after the spray administration of intranasal DEX. Conclusion Spray administration of intranasal DEX 2 μg/kg provides superior sedation in children.
Administration, Intranasal ; Anesthesia ; methods ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Dexmedetomidine ; administration & dosage ; Double-Blind Method ; Female ; Heart Rate ; Humans ; Hypnotics and Sedatives ; administration & dosage ; Male ; Oxygen ; analysis ; Prospective Studies

OBJECTIVETo summarize the effect of oral midazolam sedation in a group of uncooperative patients in pediatric dentistry and analyze the influence of age on treatment results and safety.

METHODSOral midazolam conscious sedation (dosages range: 0.50 - 0.75 mg/kg) was applied to 109 uncooperative pediatric patients in outpatient department. The patients were divided into two age groups: group A (under 3 years) and group B (over 3 years). Treatment results and safety were statistically analyzed.

RESULTSThe mean success rate was 71% (77/109), which was higher in group B [78% (54/69)] than in group A [58% (23/40)]. The incidence of adverse reactions was 17% (19/109), which was higher in group A [28% (11/40)] than in group B [12% (8/69)].

CONCLUSIONSOral midazolam conscious sedation at a dosage range of 0.50 - 0.75 mg/kg is more effective and safe in pediatric dental patients over 3 years of age.

Administration, Oral ; Anesthesia, Dental ; Child ; Conscious Sedation ; Dentists ; Humans ; Hypnotics and Sedatives ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; Midazolam ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; Pediatric Dentistry

OBJECTIVE: To observe the preoperative sedation, the status of separation from parents, compliance with the mask, hemodynamic parameters and postoperative agitation of intranasal dexmedetomidine (DEX) premedication on children undergoing dental rehabilitation under general anesthesia. METHODS: In the study, 60 children of American Society of Anesthesiology classification (ASA I-II), aged 2-9 years, were randomly assigned to one of two equal groups. Thirty minutes before operation, control group received intranasal placebo (0.9% saline) 0.02 mL/kg, and DEX group received intranasal DEX 2 μg/kg. The preoperative sedation score, the status of separation from parents, compliance with the mask and hemodynamic parameters were recorded by an anesthesiologists until anesthesia induction. Recovery conditions, postoperative agitation were also recorded. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the two groups in patient characteristics, operation time, extubation time and recovery time. Compared with the children in control group, those in DEX group were significantly more sedated when they were separated from their parents (56.7% vs. 26.7%, P<0.05). Satisfactory compliance with mask application was 40% in control group vs. 73.3% in DEX group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding the incidences of postoperative agitation and oxygen saturation (SpO₂). Compared with control group, the heart rate (HR) of DEX group was decreased after 20 minutes of drug administration [(97.13±12.93) beats/min vs.(104.53±11.97) beats/min, P<0.05]. The changes of the HR and SpO2 in the two groups were within the normal range. There were no incidences of bradycardia and hypoxemia in either of the groups during study observation. CONCLUSION Premedication with intranasal DEX 2 μg/kg for children undergoing dental rehabilitation under general anesthesia produces good preoperative sedation. The levels of sedation, scores of parental separation and compliance with the mask were satisfied. The children have good recovery conditions, and no obvious postoperative agitation and respiratory depression after DEX administration. Intranasal DEX 2 μg/kg is an effective and safe alternative for premedication in children.
Administration, Intranasal ; Anesthesia, General ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Dental Restoration, Permanent/methods* ; Dexmedetomidine/administration & dosage* ; Double-Blind Method ; Heart Rate ; Humans ; Hypnotics and Sedatives/administration & dosage*

In pediatric dentistry, chloral hydrate is habitually selected for sedation of uncooperative children. Although chloral hydrate has been used for decades, various adverse effects are reported and necessity for new alternative drugs has increased. Dexmedetomidine was approved by FDA for sedation at intensive care units (ICU) in 1999. Compared to conventional sedative drugs, dexmedetomidine has not only analgesic and sedative effects but also it barely suppresses the respiratory system. Due to these characteristics, dexmedetomidine is known as safe sedative drug for children and elderly patients. Furthermore, approved by KFDA in 2010 in Korea, the frequency of sedation using dexmedetomidine is increasing. However, due to its intravenous administration method, it was difficult to apply in pediatric dentistry. Recently, intranasal administration method was introduced which might be a new possible alternative of oral sedation. In this study, we compare the mechanisms, pros and cons of chloral hydrate and dexmedetomidine, introducing new possibilities.
Administration, Intranasal ; Administration, Intravenous ; Aged ; Child ; Chloral Hydrate ; Dental Care* ; Dexmedetomidine ; Humans ; Hypnotics and Sedatives ; Intensive Care Units ; Korea ; Methods ; Pediatric Dentistry ; Respiratory System