1.Lowering Prostate-specific Antigen Threshold for Prostate Biopsy in Korean Men: Impact on the Number Needing Biopsy.
Jin Seon CHO ; Sun Il KIM ; Se Joong KIM ; Young Sig KIM ; Chun Il KIM ; Hong Sup KIM ; Do Hwan SEONG ; Yun Seob SONG ; Dong Hyeon LEE ; Won Jae YANG ; Sang Hyeon CHEON ; Kang Su CHO ; In Rae CHO ; Byung Ha CHUNG ; Young Deuk CHOI ; Hyoungjune IM ; Sung Joon HONG
Korean Journal of Urology 2008;49(2):118-121
PURPOSE: We examined the effect of lowering prostate-specific antigen (PSA) threshold on the number of Korean men requiring a prostate biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated men who had serum PSA levels tested at routine physical check-ups between 1999 and 2005 at 11 domestic hospitals. Men with PSA> or =10ng/ml or patients with prostate cancer were excluded. A total of 45,074 men(aged 50 to 79 years) were enrolled and split into three age groups: 50-59 years, 60-69 years, and 70-79 years. For each age group, we calculated the number and proportion of men whose PSA level exceeded potential biopsy thresholds: 2.5ng/ml, 3.0ng/ml, and 4.0ng/ml. Results were extrapolated to the 4.992 million men older than 50 years old, or 21.3% of the Korean male population in 2005. RESULTS: The number of biopsy candidates at the threshold of 4.0ng/ml, 3.0ng/ml, and 2.5ng/ml were 1,321(2.9%), 2,248(5.4%), and 3,577(7.9%), respectively. Extrapolating to the male population in Korea, lowering the PSA threshold from 4.0ng/ml to 3.0 or 2.5ng/ml would increase the number of men needing biopsy by 1.75 and 2.49 times, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Lowering the PSA threshold would increase the number of men receiving prostate biopsy despite the low reference age for PSA in Korea. Considering the low incidence of prostate cancer, physicians should be careful in altering the PSA threshold.
Biopsy
;
Humans
;
Incidence
;
Korea
;
Male
;
Prostate
;
Prostate-Specific Antigen
;
Prostatic Neoplasms
2.Current Status of Transurethral Prostatectomy: A Korean Multicenter Study.
Dong Gyu JANG ; Changhee YOO ; Cheol Young OH ; Se Joong KIM ; Sun Il KIM ; Chun Il KIM ; Hong Sup KIM ; Jong Yeon PARK ; Do Hwan SEONG ; Yun Seob SONG ; Won Jae YANG ; In Rae CHO ; Sung Yong CHO ; Sang Hyeon CHEON ; Hyoungjune IM ; Jin Seon CHO
Korean Journal of Urology 2011;52(6):406-409
PURPOSE: We aimed to verify the current status of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in Korea. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records of 1,341 men who underwent TURP in 9 Korean medical centers between 2004 and 2008 were reviewed. The patients were divided into two groups according to time periods: 2004-2005 (group 1) and 2006-2008 (group 2). To verify differences in the two patient groups, age, prostate volume, indications for TURP, preoperative International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), and resected tissue weight were evaluated. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 71.2 years and the mean IPSS was 22.7. The patients' characteristics were not significantly different between the two groups. The annual cases of TURP increased over the study period. The proportion of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) as an indication for TURP increased up to 58.3% in group 2 compared with 51.6% in group 1 (p=0.019). However, the proportion of patients who presented with acute urinary retention decreased from 35.5% to 30.3% with marginal statistical significance (p=0.051). Other indications such as hematuria, bladder stone, recurrent urinary tract infection, and hydronephrosis were not significantly different between the groups. The mean resected weights of the prostate were similar (17.5 g in group 1 and 18.3 g in group 2, respectively; p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: TURP has been steadily performed in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia and it is expected to remain constant. LUTS was the most common indication for TURP in recent years.
Hematuria
;
Humans
;
Hydronephrosis
;
Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms
;
Male
;
Medical Records
;
Prostate
;
Prostatic Hyperplasia
;
Transurethral Resection of Prostate
;
Urinary Bladder Calculi
;
Urinary Retention
;
Urinary Tract Infections
;
Weights and Measures
3.Prostate-Specific Antigen Test Interval according to Baseline Prostate-Specific Antigen and Age.
Moon Sik KWON ; Cheol Young OH ; Chang Hee YOO ; Sun Il KIM ; Se Joong KIM ; Dong Jun KIM ; Young Sik KIM ; Chun Il KIM ; Hong Sub KIM ; Do Hwan SEONG ; Ki Hak SONG ; Yun Seob SONG ; Won Jae YANG ; Dong Hyeon LEE ; Sang Hyeon CHEON ; In Rae CHO ; Byung Ha CHUNG ; Young Deuk CHOI ; Sung Joon HONG ; Hyoungjune IM ; Jin Seon CHO
Korean Journal of Urology 2009;50(11):1059-1065
PURPOSE: The optimal interval at which to repeat prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measurement is controversial. We evaluated the probability of the serum PSA value increasing above specific cutoff values (4.0 ng/ml, 3.0 ng/ml, and 2.5 ng/ml) on annual follow-up visits in men with a lower baseline PSA than each cutoff value. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2002 and 2006, a total of 14,459 men aged 40 to 79 years who underwent serum PSA determinations at least twice during health examinations at 11 medical centers were enrolled in this study. To reduce probable bias, we excluded men with pyuria, those with a baseline or follow-up PSA level of 10.0 ng/ml or more, and those with a history of medication with 5 alpha-reductase inhibitors. Serum PSA underwent logarithmic conversion to work out the normal distribution. The cumulative rate of freedom from increase in PSA above 4.0 ng/ml, 3.0 ng/ml, and 2.5 ng/ml was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method according to baseline PSA range and age. The significance level was 1%. RESULTS: The rate of increase in PSA was lower in men who had a baseline PSA value in the low range and whose age was in the 40s or 50s. However, the cumulative rate of freedom from increase in PSA decreased as the PSA cutoff value was lowered. The optimal screening interval for men in their 40s and 50s whose baseline serum PSA level was 1.0 ng/ml or lower was 3 years when the significance level for PSA rising above 4.0 ng/ml was 1%. It was 2 years and 1 year, respectively, when the cutoff value was lowered to 3.0 ng/ml or 2.5 ng/ml. An annual PSA screening interval was recommended in men older than their 60s. CONCLUSIONS: The PSA test interval should be individualized according to baseline PSA, age, and PSA cutoff value.
Aged
;
Bias (Epidemiology)
;
Cholestenone 5 alpha-Reductase
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Freedom
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Mass Screening
;
Prostate-Specific Antigen
;
Pyuria