Pancreatic cystic lesions are being recognized with increasing frequency because of the widespread use of cross-sectional imaging. Although most pancreatic cysts are incidentally detected, pancreatic cysts represent a wide spectrum of histopathology, and neoplastic cysts are more prevalent than previously estimated. Some histologic types have malignant potential. Considering the incidence of perioperative morbidity in patients undergoing surgical resection, deciding whether to operate on or observe an indeterminate pancreatic cyst is challenging. This clinical dilemma has created the need to develop a minimally invasive approach for treating pancreatic cysts. EUS-guided pancreatic cyst ablation has been investigated in several clinical trials and has the potential to become an alternative to surgical resection.
Endosonography ; Humans ; Incidence ; Pancreatic Cyst*

Preprints are preliminary research reports that have not yet been peer-reviewed. They have been widely adopted to promote the timely dissemination of research across many scientific fields. In August 1991, Paul Ginsparg launched an electronic bulletin board intended to serve a few hundred colleagues working in a subfield of theoretical high-energy physics, thus launching arXiv, the first and largest preprint platform. Additional preprint servers have since been implemented in different academic fields, such as BioRxiv (2013, Biology; www.biorxiv.org) and medRxiv (2019, Health Science; www.medrxiv.org). While preprint availability has made valuable research resources accessible to the general public, thus bridging the gap between academic and non-academic audiences, it has also facilitated the spread of unsupported conclusions through various media channels. Issues surrounding the preprint policies of a journal must be addressed, ultimately, by editors and include the acceptance of preprint manuscripts, allowing the citation of preprints, maintaining a double-blind peer review process, changes to the preprint’s content and authors’ list, scoop priorities, commenting on preprints, and preventing the influence of social media. Editors must be able to deal with these issues adequately, to maintain the scientific integrity of their journal. In this review, the history, current status, and strengths and weaknesses of preprints as well as ongoing concerns regarding journal articles with preprints are discussed. An optimal approach to preprints is suggested for editorial board members, authors, and researchers.

Preprints are preliminary research reports that have not yet been peer-reviewed. They have been widely adopted to promote the timely dissemination of research across many scientific fields. In August 1991, Paul Ginsparg launched an electronic bulletin board intended to serve a few hundred colleagues working in a subfield of theoretical high-energy physics, thus launching arXiv, the first and largest preprint platform. Additional preprint servers have since been implemented in different academic fields, such as BioRxiv (2013, Biology; www.biorxiv.org) and medRxiv (2019, Health Science; www.medrxiv.org). While preprint availability has made valuable research resources accessible to the general public, thus bridging the gap between academic and non-academic audiences, it has also facilitated the spread of unsupported conclusions through various media channels. Issues surrounding the preprint policies of a journal must be addressed, ultimately, by editors and include the acceptance of preprint manuscripts, allowing the citation of preprints, maintaining a double-blind peer review process, changes to the preprint’s content and authors’ list, scoop priorities, commenting on preprints, and preventing the influence of social media. Editors must be able to deal with these issues adequately, to maintain the scientific integrity of their journal. In this review, the history, current status, and strengths and weaknesses of preprints as well as ongoing concerns regarding journal articles with preprints are discussed. An optimal approach to preprints is suggested for editorial board members, authors, and researchers.

PURPOSE: Cytokines, hormones and growth factors use signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT) signaling pathways to control various biological responses, including development, differentiation, cell proliferation and survival. STAT3 and 5 help promote cell cycle progression and cellular transformation and prevent apoptosis. In this research, the presence of STAT3 and STAT5 activation and their association with pathological features and clinical outcome in renal cell carcinoma cases were studied. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using immunohistochemistry with rabbit polyclonal anti-STAT3 and STAT5 antibodies, forty-eight paraffin-embedded renal cell carcinoma specimens were examined for the activation status of STAT3 and STAT5. Cells of which 10% or more were left with a dark brown stains in the nucleus were regarded as positive tumor cells. The activation status of STAT3 and STAT5 were compared with the clinicopathological variables. RESULTS: Significant associations of STAT3 activation with tumor size, T-stage, distant metastases and low survival rate were observed (p<0.05); and in STAT5, significant associations with distant metastases and low survival rate were observed (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study strongly suggest that the activation of STAT3 and STAT5 contribute to the development and progression of the renal cell carcinoma.
Antibodies ; Apoptosis ; Carcinoma, Renal Cell* ; Cell Cycle ; Cell Differentiation ; Coloring Agents ; Cytokines ; Immunohistochemistry ; Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins ; Neoplasm Metastasis ; STAT3 Transcription Factor ; STAT5 Transcription Factor ; Survival Rate ; Transducers