Purpose: Ankle sprains are among the most common musculoskeletal injuries, and many videos have been shared with patients through YouTube. YouTube allows the easy sharing of information, but there are accuracy and reliability issues due to the lack of verification processes for video producers. This study evaluated ankle sprain videos on YouTube and the correlation between the video scores and viewer preferences using “the number of likes and views”. Materials and Methods: For analysis, the words “ankle sprains”, “ankle exercise”, and “ankle rehabilitation” were searched on YouTube. Only videos taken in Korean were analyzed, and videos with less than 10,000 views and for commercial purposes were excluded. For 31 videos, two orthopedic surgeons and one orthopedic resident used one evaluation tool to evaluate the video quality with up to 30 points for subcategories. The scores between each evaluator were then averaged to evaluate the video quality. To reflect the viewer preferences, “the number of likes and views” were analyzed, and the relationship between the video score and “the number of likes and views” of the video was analyzed statistically. Results: The average score for the video was 9.33. The average scores for subcategories were anatomy and symptoms, 0.90; biomechanics and trauma-mechanism, 0.61; imaging quality, 0.95; clinical evaluation and physical examination, 0.61; treatment, 1.41; rehabilitation, 2.39; prevention and after effects, 0.89; and overall video quality, 1.61. The average of “the number of views” was 50,218.35 times, and “the number of likes” was 893.77 times. No correlation was observed between the video scores and “the number of likes and views”. Conclusion Most videos posted on YouTube did not provide high-quality medical information on ankle sprain, and there was no correlation between the video scores and viewer preferences. This suggests that incorrect medical information is being transmitted to patients, which can be harmful. Therefore, it is necessary to present the latest trend treatment and rehabilitation protocols for ankle sprains in an expert council and promote it through various channels.

Purpose: This study investigated the dose perturbation according to the size of the sensitive volume in the dosimeter in small-field dosimetry. Methods: The dose profiles with different field sizes were measured using three different dosimeters: the CC13, Razor ion chamber, and Edge solid-state detector. Both the open and wedged beams with different field sizes were employed in the measurement. The profiles were measured in a water phantom at maximum dose depths of 5, 10, and 20 cm. The penumbra and width of the open-beam profiles were compared according to the types of the dosimeters and beam. The dose fall-off between the peak and 20% dose was evaluated for the wedged beam profiles. Results: In the open-beam measurement, the fall-off of the profile was steeper with the Edge detector, which has the smallest sensitive volume. Meanwhile, the dose in the out-of-field region was the smallest with the Edge detector. The widths of the penumbra were 6.10, 4.47, and 4.03 mm for the profile of the 3×3 cm 2 field measured by the CC13 chamber, Razor chamber, and Edge detector, respectively. The width of the profile was not changed even if different dosimeters were used in the measurement. The wedged beam profiles showed more clear peaks at the field edge when a smaller dosimeter was used. Conclusions The results demonstrate the necessity of dosimeters with a small sensitive volume for measuring a small-field beam or a steep dose gradient.

Purpose: This study investigated the dose perturbation according to the size of the sensitive volume in the dosimeter in small-field dosimetry. Methods: The dose profiles with different field sizes were measured using three different dosimeters: the CC13, Razor ion chamber, and Edge solid-state detector. Both the open and wedged beams with different field sizes were employed in the measurement. The profiles were measured in a water phantom at maximum dose depths of 5, 10, and 20 cm. The penumbra and width of the open-beam profiles were compared according to the types of the dosimeters and beam. The dose fall-off between the peak and 20% dose was evaluated for the wedged beam profiles. Results: In the open-beam measurement, the fall-off of the profile was steeper with the Edge detector, which has the smallest sensitive volume. Meanwhile, the dose in the out-of-field region was the smallest with the Edge detector. The widths of the penumbra were 6.10, 4.47, and 4.03 mm for the profile of the 3×3 cm 2 field measured by the CC13 chamber, Razor chamber, and Edge detector, respectively. The width of the profile was not changed even if different dosimeters were used in the measurement. The wedged beam profiles showed more clear peaks at the field edge when a smaller dosimeter was used. Conclusions The results demonstrate the necessity of dosimeters with a small sensitive volume for measuring a small-field beam or a steep dose gradient.

Purpose: This study investigated the dose perturbation according to the size of the sensitive volume in the dosimeter in small-field dosimetry. Methods: The dose profiles with different field sizes were measured using three different dosimeters: the CC13, Razor ion chamber, and Edge solid-state detector. Both the open and wedged beams with different field sizes were employed in the measurement. The profiles were measured in a water phantom at maximum dose depths of 5, 10, and 20 cm. The penumbra and width of the open-beam profiles were compared according to the types of the dosimeters and beam. The dose fall-off between the peak and 20% dose was evaluated for the wedged beam profiles. Results: In the open-beam measurement, the fall-off of the profile was steeper with the Edge detector, which has the smallest sensitive volume. Meanwhile, the dose in the out-of-field region was the smallest with the Edge detector. The widths of the penumbra were 6.10, 4.47, and 4.03 mm for the profile of the 3×3 cm 2 field measured by the CC13 chamber, Razor chamber, and Edge detector, respectively. The width of the profile was not changed even if different dosimeters were used in the measurement. The wedged beam profiles showed more clear peaks at the field edge when a smaller dosimeter was used. Conclusions The results demonstrate the necessity of dosimeters with a small sensitive volume for measuring a small-field beam or a steep dose gradient.

Purpose: This study investigated the dose perturbation according to the size of the sensitive volume in the dosimeter in small-field dosimetry. Methods: The dose profiles with different field sizes were measured using three different dosimeters: the CC13, Razor ion chamber, and Edge solid-state detector. Both the open and wedged beams with different field sizes were employed in the measurement. The profiles were measured in a water phantom at maximum dose depths of 5, 10, and 20 cm. The penumbra and width of the open-beam profiles were compared according to the types of the dosimeters and beam. The dose fall-off between the peak and 20% dose was evaluated for the wedged beam profiles. Results: In the open-beam measurement, the fall-off of the profile was steeper with the Edge detector, which has the smallest sensitive volume. Meanwhile, the dose in the out-of-field region was the smallest with the Edge detector. The widths of the penumbra were 6.10, 4.47, and 4.03 mm for the profile of the 3×3 cm 2 field measured by the CC13 chamber, Razor chamber, and Edge detector, respectively. The width of the profile was not changed even if different dosimeters were used in the measurement. The wedged beam profiles showed more clear peaks at the field edge when a smaller dosimeter was used. Conclusions The results demonstrate the necessity of dosimeters with a small sensitive volume for measuring a small-field beam or a steep dose gradient.

Purpose: This study investigated the dose perturbation according to the size of the sensitive volume in the dosimeter in small-field dosimetry. Methods: The dose profiles with different field sizes were measured using three different dosimeters: the CC13, Razor ion chamber, and Edge solid-state detector. Both the open and wedged beams with different field sizes were employed in the measurement. The profiles were measured in a water phantom at maximum dose depths of 5, 10, and 20 cm. The penumbra and width of the open-beam profiles were compared according to the types of the dosimeters and beam. The dose fall-off between the peak and 20% dose was evaluated for the wedged beam profiles. Results: In the open-beam measurement, the fall-off of the profile was steeper with the Edge detector, which has the smallest sensitive volume. Meanwhile, the dose in the out-of-field region was the smallest with the Edge detector. The widths of the penumbra were 6.10, 4.47, and 4.03 mm for the profile of the 3×3 cm 2 field measured by the CC13 chamber, Razor chamber, and Edge detector, respectively. The width of the profile was not changed even if different dosimeters were used in the measurement. The wedged beam profiles showed more clear peaks at the field edge when a smaller dosimeter was used. Conclusions The results demonstrate the necessity of dosimeters with a small sensitive volume for measuring a small-field beam or a steep dose gradient.

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) is a demyelinating syndrome of the central nervous system. This case report describes a 31-year-old woman whose electromyography revealed radiculopathy in the left L5-S1 spinal segment without anatomical abnormalities on lumbosacral magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). She was diagnosed with NMOSD based on gadolinium contrast whole spine and brain MRI and anti-aquaporin-4 antibody findings. Her peripheral nervous system might have been damaged during the early course of NMOSD. Therefore, it is necessary to consider NMOSD for patients who have radiculopathy in electromyography if lumbosacral MRI shows no abnormalities.
Adult ; Brain ; Central Nervous System ; Electromyography ; Female ; Gadolinium ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Neuromyelitis Optica* ; Peripheral Nervous System ; Peripheral Nervous System Diseases ; Radiculopathy* ; Spine

Surgical approaches for leiomyosarcoma of the inferior vena cava (IVC) are based on tumor location. Radical resection for the IVC leiomyosarcoma involving the renal vein has traditionally included nephrectomy with renal vein ligation or kidney autotransplantation. A 51-year-old woman was admitted for elective surgery for the tumor of IVC. At surgery, the tumor was located in front of IVC, abutted with right renal vein. After the tumor resection, IVC reconstruction involved the patch cavoplasty with cryopreserved cadaveric vein graft and the implantation of the right renal vein into the inferior IVC. The patient recovered fully without any postoperative complications including kidney function change. This technique could be adopted for tumors located in front of IVC involving renal veins, provided complete resection of the tumor with a comfortable resection margin is possible.
Autografts ; Cadaver ; Female ; Humans ; Kidney ; Leiomyosarcoma ; Ligation ; Middle Aged ; Nephrectomy ; Postoperative Complications ; Renal Veins ; Replantation ; Transplantation, Autologous ; Transplants ; Veins ; Vena Cava, Inferior

Purpose: This study evaluated various methods for determining the half-value layer (HVL) of kilovoltage (kV) beams produced by the Varian TrueBeam STx on-board imager. By comparing these methods with the standard ionization chamber approach, the study aimed to identify practical solutions for HVL determination and dosimetric characterization of kV beams, particularly in resource-limited settings. Methods: HVLs for kV beams (40–140 kVp) were measured using an Exradin A12 ionization chamber and a Piranha MULTI meter. The ionization chamber measurements adhered to American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group 61 guidelines and served as the reference standard. Additionally, HVL values were calculated using two model-based approaches: SpekPy (a Python-based tool) and Monte Carlo (MC) simulations using Geant4 and GATE. The results from these methods were compared to assess consistency and reliability. Results: Deviations across all methods were generally below 4%. At 40 kV, the most significant discrepancies were attributed to lower signal levels from the ionization chamber. The consistency between the model-based methods and experimental measurements demonstrates the reliability of these alternative approaches for HVL determination. Conclusions Although the ionization chamber remains the gold standard, the Piranha MULTI meter and model-based methods, i.e., SpekPy and MC simulations, have shown promise as viable alternatives, especially in resource-constrained settings. These in silico approaches also offer advantages in convenience and accuracy, supporting their potential for broader future applications.

Purpose: Brachytherapy is essential for treating gynecological cancers as it offers precise radiation delivery to tumors while minimizing radiation exposure to surrounding healthy tissues. The Geneva applicator, introduced in 2020 as a replacement for older models like the Utrecht applicator, enhances MRI-based brachytherapy with improved imaging capabilities and more accurate applicator placement. In 2021, updates to non-reimbursement policies in Korea for MRI-based 3D brachytherapy planning further promoted the adoption of advanced techniques such as the Geneva applicator. This study aims to commission the Geneva applicator, focusing on wall thickness, dummy marker positions, and source dwell positions to ensure accurate dose delivery and safety. Methods: The commissioning process involved measuring wall thickness in both the longitudinal and transverse directions for the tandem and lunar-shaped ovoid tubes and comparing thesemeasurements with the manufacturer’s specifications. Dummy marker positions were verifiedusing CT imaging, with a focus on alignment tolerances of ±1 mm. Source dwell positions were planned using the Oncentra treatment planning system, with measurements taken using EBT4 film and analyzed with RIT software. Results: Wall thickness measurements and dummy marker positions were within the specified tolerance ranges, confirming their accuracy. The source dwell positions, measured and analyzedthrough multiple tests, were all within the ±1 mm tolerance, ensuring the applicator’s reliability. Conclusions The Geneva applicator met all standards for safe and effective use in brachytherapy.The use of a 3D-printed holder was crucial for precise alignment and measurement. With updated reimbursement policies in Korea for MRI-based brachytherapy, the Geneva applicator is expected to significantly impact the future of advanced brachytherapy treatments and research.