Background: Complete revascularization has demonstrated better outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and multivessel disease. However, in the case of left main (LM) culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease, there is limited evidence to suggest that complete revascularization is better. Methods: We reviewed 16,831 patients in the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry who were treated from July 2016 to June 2020, and 399 patients were enrolled with LM culprit lesion AMI treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. We categorized the patients as those treated with complete revascularization (n=295) or incomplete revascularization (n=104). The study endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven revascularization, stent thrombosis, and stroke. We performed propensity score matching (PSM) and analyzed the incidence of MACCE at 1 year. Results: After PSM, the two groups were well balanced. There was no significant difference between the two groups in MACCE at 1 year (12.1% vs. 15.2%; hazard ratio, 1.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.60–2.74; p=0.524) after PSM. The components of MACCE and major bleeding were also not significantly different. Conclusion There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between the groups treated with complete or incomplete revascularization for LM culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease.

Background: Complete revascularization has demonstrated better outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and multivessel disease. However, in the case of left main (LM) culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease, there is limited evidence to suggest that complete revascularization is better. Methods: We reviewed 16,831 patients in the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry who were treated from July 2016 to June 2020, and 399 patients were enrolled with LM culprit lesion AMI treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. We categorized the patients as those treated with complete revascularization (n=295) or incomplete revascularization (n=104). The study endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven revascularization, stent thrombosis, and stroke. We performed propensity score matching (PSM) and analyzed the incidence of MACCE at 1 year. Results: After PSM, the two groups were well balanced. There was no significant difference between the two groups in MACCE at 1 year (12.1% vs. 15.2%; hazard ratio, 1.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.60–2.74; p=0.524) after PSM. The components of MACCE and major bleeding were also not significantly different. Conclusion There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between the groups treated with complete or incomplete revascularization for LM culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease.

Purpose: To investigate the clinical efficacy of rebamipide eyedrops in patients with meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) associated with Sjögren’s syndrome. Methods: The study included 50 patients with Sjögren’s syndrome accompanied by MGD treated with 0.05% (w/v) cyclosporine and 0.15% (w/v) sodium hyaluronate eyedrops. They were divided into two groups: 25 who added rebamipide eyedrops to their existing treatments and a control group of 25 whose treatments did not change. We evaluated the tear breakup time, the Schirmer test and conjunctival staining scores, meibomian gland quality and function, and eyelid margin irregularity before prescribing rebamipide eyedrops and 1 and 3 months after prescription. Additionally, before eyedrops use and 3 months later, meibographic scores were assessed via imaging of the meibomian gland and ocular surface disease index values also were assessed. Results: The rebamipide group exhibited significant improvements in the tear breakup time, conjunctival staining score, and ocular surface disease index compared to before treatment (all p < 0.05). However, the Schirmer test result, meibomian gland quality and function, and eyelid margin irregularity did not differ between either groups before or after treatment. After 3 months of eyedrop use, the rebamipide group exhibited a significantly higher tear breakup time (p < 0.01) and Schirmer test score (p < 0.01) than the control group (p = 0.01), and significantly lower ocular surface disease index and conjunctival staining scores (p < 0.01). Conclusions Addition of rebamipide eyedrops to the conventional treatment of patients with Sjögren’s syndrome accompanied by MGD effectively improves dry eye symptoms and the ocular surface parameters.

Purpose: To investigate the clinical efficacy of rebamipide eyedrops in patients with meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) associated with Sjögren’s syndrome. Methods: The study included 50 patients with Sjögren’s syndrome accompanied by MGD treated with 0.05% (w/v) cyclosporine and 0.15% (w/v) sodium hyaluronate eyedrops. They were divided into two groups: 25 who added rebamipide eyedrops to their existing treatments and a control group of 25 whose treatments did not change. We evaluated the tear breakup time, the Schirmer test and conjunctival staining scores, meibomian gland quality and function, and eyelid margin irregularity before prescribing rebamipide eyedrops and 1 and 3 months after prescription. Additionally, before eyedrops use and 3 months later, meibographic scores were assessed via imaging of the meibomian gland and ocular surface disease index values also were assessed. Results: The rebamipide group exhibited significant improvements in the tear breakup time, conjunctival staining score, and ocular surface disease index compared to before treatment (all p < 0.05). However, the Schirmer test result, meibomian gland quality and function, and eyelid margin irregularity did not differ between either groups before or after treatment. After 3 months of eyedrop use, the rebamipide group exhibited a significantly higher tear breakup time (p < 0.01) and Schirmer test score (p < 0.01) than the control group (p = 0.01), and significantly lower ocular surface disease index and conjunctival staining scores (p < 0.01). Conclusions Addition of rebamipide eyedrops to the conventional treatment of patients with Sjögren’s syndrome accompanied by MGD effectively improves dry eye symptoms and the ocular surface parameters.

Background: Complete revascularization has demonstrated better outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and multivessel disease. However, in the case of left main (LM) culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease, there is limited evidence to suggest that complete revascularization is better. Methods: We reviewed 16,831 patients in the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry who were treated from July 2016 to June 2020, and 399 patients were enrolled with LM culprit lesion AMI treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. We categorized the patients as those treated with complete revascularization (n=295) or incomplete revascularization (n=104). The study endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven revascularization, stent thrombosis, and stroke. We performed propensity score matching (PSM) and analyzed the incidence of MACCE at 1 year. Results: After PSM, the two groups were well balanced. There was no significant difference between the two groups in MACCE at 1 year (12.1% vs. 15.2%; hazard ratio, 1.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.60–2.74; p=0.524) after PSM. The components of MACCE and major bleeding were also not significantly different. Conclusion There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between the groups treated with complete or incomplete revascularization for LM culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease.

Purpose: To investigate the clinical efficacy of rebamipide eyedrops in patients with meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) associated with Sjögren’s syndrome. Methods: The study included 50 patients with Sjögren’s syndrome accompanied by MGD treated with 0.05% (w/v) cyclosporine and 0.15% (w/v) sodium hyaluronate eyedrops. They were divided into two groups: 25 who added rebamipide eyedrops to their existing treatments and a control group of 25 whose treatments did not change. We evaluated the tear breakup time, the Schirmer test and conjunctival staining scores, meibomian gland quality and function, and eyelid margin irregularity before prescribing rebamipide eyedrops and 1 and 3 months after prescription. Additionally, before eyedrops use and 3 months later, meibographic scores were assessed via imaging of the meibomian gland and ocular surface disease index values also were assessed. Results: The rebamipide group exhibited significant improvements in the tear breakup time, conjunctival staining score, and ocular surface disease index compared to before treatment (all p < 0.05). However, the Schirmer test result, meibomian gland quality and function, and eyelid margin irregularity did not differ between either groups before or after treatment. After 3 months of eyedrop use, the rebamipide group exhibited a significantly higher tear breakup time (p < 0.01) and Schirmer test score (p < 0.01) than the control group (p = 0.01), and significantly lower ocular surface disease index and conjunctival staining scores (p < 0.01). Conclusions Addition of rebamipide eyedrops to the conventional treatment of patients with Sjögren’s syndrome accompanied by MGD effectively improves dry eye symptoms and the ocular surface parameters.