PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of static computer-assisted implant surgery (s-CAIS) by comparing the planned and actual positions of implants placed in a partially edentulous model using surgical templates with different sleeve designs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-nine mandibular partially edentulous models were scanned using a model scanner to create standard tessellation language (STL) files. The models were divided into seven groups based on sleeve design: Group 1–4 (Open non-metal sleeves with varying heights (3 mm, 6 mm) and buccal widths (5 mm, 6 mm)), Group 5–6 (Closed non-metal sleeves with heights of 3 mm and 6 mm), and Group 7 (Closed metal sleeve). After implant placement at #45 and #47, STL files were generated and analyzed using 3D measurement software. Deviations were measured in terms of horizontal deviation (coronal and apical), vertical deviation, and angular deviation. Statistical significance was evaluated using the Wilcoxon rank sum test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and multiple generalized linear models. RESULTS: While height differences showed no significant deviations (P > .05), there was a tendency for larger apical deviation with increased sleeve height (P < .1). Closed metal and closed non-metal sleeves showed smaller deviations compared to open non-metal sleeves, except in vertical deviation. CONCLUSION Closed sleeves demonstrated greater accuracy in s-CAIS compared to open sleeves. Higher sleeves may improve implant placement accuracy, but buccal insertion width did not significantly affect accuracy.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of static computer-assisted implant surgery (s-CAIS) by comparing the planned and actual positions of implants placed in a partially edentulous model using surgical templates with different sleeve designs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-nine mandibular partially edentulous models were scanned using a model scanner to create standard tessellation language (STL) files. The models were divided into seven groups based on sleeve design: Group 1–4 (Open non-metal sleeves with varying heights (3 mm, 6 mm) and buccal widths (5 mm, 6 mm)), Group 5–6 (Closed non-metal sleeves with heights of 3 mm and 6 mm), and Group 7 (Closed metal sleeve). After implant placement at #45 and #47, STL files were generated and analyzed using 3D measurement software. Deviations were measured in terms of horizontal deviation (coronal and apical), vertical deviation, and angular deviation. Statistical significance was evaluated using the Wilcoxon rank sum test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and multiple generalized linear models. RESULTS: While height differences showed no significant deviations (P > .05), there was a tendency for larger apical deviation with increased sleeve height (P < .1). Closed metal and closed non-metal sleeves showed smaller deviations compared to open non-metal sleeves, except in vertical deviation. CONCLUSION Closed sleeves demonstrated greater accuracy in s-CAIS compared to open sleeves. Higher sleeves may improve implant placement accuracy, but buccal insertion width did not significantly affect accuracy.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of static computer-assisted implant surgery (s-CAIS) by comparing the planned and actual positions of implants placed in a partially edentulous model using surgical templates with different sleeve designs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-nine mandibular partially edentulous models were scanned using a model scanner to create standard tessellation language (STL) files. The models were divided into seven groups based on sleeve design: Group 1–4 (Open non-metal sleeves with varying heights (3 mm, 6 mm) and buccal widths (5 mm, 6 mm)), Group 5–6 (Closed non-metal sleeves with heights of 3 mm and 6 mm), and Group 7 (Closed metal sleeve). After implant placement at #45 and #47, STL files were generated and analyzed using 3D measurement software. Deviations were measured in terms of horizontal deviation (coronal and apical), vertical deviation, and angular deviation. Statistical significance was evaluated using the Wilcoxon rank sum test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and multiple generalized linear models. RESULTS: While height differences showed no significant deviations (P > .05), there was a tendency for larger apical deviation with increased sleeve height (P < .1). Closed metal and closed non-metal sleeves showed smaller deviations compared to open non-metal sleeves, except in vertical deviation. CONCLUSION Closed sleeves demonstrated greater accuracy in s-CAIS compared to open sleeves. Higher sleeves may improve implant placement accuracy, but buccal insertion width did not significantly affect accuracy.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of static computer-assisted implant surgery (s-CAIS) by comparing the planned and actual positions of implants placed in a partially edentulous model using surgical templates with different sleeve designs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-nine mandibular partially edentulous models were scanned using a model scanner to create standard tessellation language (STL) files. The models were divided into seven groups based on sleeve design: Group 1–4 (Open non-metal sleeves with varying heights (3 mm, 6 mm) and buccal widths (5 mm, 6 mm)), Group 5–6 (Closed non-metal sleeves with heights of 3 mm and 6 mm), and Group 7 (Closed metal sleeve). After implant placement at #45 and #47, STL files were generated and analyzed using 3D measurement software. Deviations were measured in terms of horizontal deviation (coronal and apical), vertical deviation, and angular deviation. Statistical significance was evaluated using the Wilcoxon rank sum test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and multiple generalized linear models. RESULTS: While height differences showed no significant deviations (P > .05), there was a tendency for larger apical deviation with increased sleeve height (P < .1). Closed metal and closed non-metal sleeves showed smaller deviations compared to open non-metal sleeves, except in vertical deviation. CONCLUSION Closed sleeves demonstrated greater accuracy in s-CAIS compared to open sleeves. Higher sleeves may improve implant placement accuracy, but buccal insertion width did not significantly affect accuracy.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of static computer-assisted implant surgery (s-CAIS) by comparing the planned and actual positions of implants placed in a partially edentulous model using surgical templates with different sleeve designs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-nine mandibular partially edentulous models were scanned using a model scanner to create standard tessellation language (STL) files. The models were divided into seven groups based on sleeve design: Group 1–4 (Open non-metal sleeves with varying heights (3 mm, 6 mm) and buccal widths (5 mm, 6 mm)), Group 5–6 (Closed non-metal sleeves with heights of 3 mm and 6 mm), and Group 7 (Closed metal sleeve). After implant placement at #45 and #47, STL files were generated and analyzed using 3D measurement software. Deviations were measured in terms of horizontal deviation (coronal and apical), vertical deviation, and angular deviation. Statistical significance was evaluated using the Wilcoxon rank sum test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and multiple generalized linear models. RESULTS: While height differences showed no significant deviations (P > .05), there was a tendency for larger apical deviation with increased sleeve height (P < .1). Closed metal and closed non-metal sleeves showed smaller deviations compared to open non-metal sleeves, except in vertical deviation. CONCLUSION Closed sleeves demonstrated greater accuracy in s-CAIS compared to open sleeves. Higher sleeves may improve implant placement accuracy, but buccal insertion width did not significantly affect accuracy.

Advancements in CAD-CAM technology have allowed for a variety of options in implant-supported fixed prosthesis restorations for completely edentulous patients. For patients with severe alveolar bone resorption, zirconia prosthetic restorations that include the gingival portion, such as implant-supported hybrid dentures, are possible, as well as monolithic zirconia prosthetic restorations in the form of crowns. The integration of digital technology in fixed prosthetic restoration using implants enables predictable treatment through diagnosis and virtual surgery by integrating the patient’s clinical and radiological information. In this case, the utilization of digital software allowed for the establishment of implants in appropriate positions, considering both the remaining alveolar bone and the final prosthesis. By designing both the maxillary removable prosthesis and the mandibular fixed prosthesis simultaneously in CAD software, bilateral balanced occlusion could be easily achieved. Furthermore, maintaining the initial interocclusal relationship from provisional restorations to final prostheses allowed for convenient transition while ensuring functional and aesthetic satisfaction.

Advancements in CAD-CAM technology have allowed for a variety of options in implant-supported fixed prosthesis restorations for completely edentulous patients. For patients with severe alveolar bone resorption, zirconia prosthetic restorations that include the gingival portion, such as implant-supported hybrid dentures, are possible, as well as monolithic zirconia prosthetic restorations in the form of crowns. The integration of digital technology in fixed prosthetic restoration using implants enables predictable treatment through diagnosis and virtual surgery by integrating the patient’s clinical and radiological information. In this case, the utilization of digital software allowed for the establishment of implants in appropriate positions, considering both the remaining alveolar bone and the final prosthesis. By designing both the maxillary removable prosthesis and the mandibular fixed prosthesis simultaneously in CAD software, bilateral balanced occlusion could be easily achieved. Furthermore, maintaining the initial interocclusal relationship from provisional restorations to final prostheses allowed for convenient transition while ensuring functional and aesthetic satisfaction.

Advancements in CAD-CAM technology have allowed for a variety of options in implant-supported fixed prosthesis restorations for completely edentulous patients. For patients with severe alveolar bone resorption, zirconia prosthetic restorations that include the gingival portion, such as implant-supported hybrid dentures, are possible, as well as monolithic zirconia prosthetic restorations in the form of crowns. The integration of digital technology in fixed prosthetic restoration using implants enables predictable treatment through diagnosis and virtual surgery by integrating the patient’s clinical and radiological information. In this case, the utilization of digital software allowed for the establishment of implants in appropriate positions, considering both the remaining alveolar bone and the final prosthesis. By designing both the maxillary removable prosthesis and the mandibular fixed prosthesis simultaneously in CAD software, bilateral balanced occlusion could be easily achieved. Furthermore, maintaining the initial interocclusal relationship from provisional restorations to final prostheses allowed for convenient transition while ensuring functional and aesthetic satisfaction.

Advancements in CAD-CAM technology have allowed for a variety of options in implant-supported fixed prosthesis restorations for completely edentulous patients. For patients with severe alveolar bone resorption, zirconia prosthetic restorations that include the gingival portion, such as implant-supported hybrid dentures, are possible, as well as monolithic zirconia prosthetic restorations in the form of crowns. The integration of digital technology in fixed prosthetic restoration using implants enables predictable treatment through diagnosis and virtual surgery by integrating the patient’s clinical and radiological information. In this case, the utilization of digital software allowed for the establishment of implants in appropriate positions, considering both the remaining alveolar bone and the final prosthesis. By designing both the maxillary removable prosthesis and the mandibular fixed prosthesis simultaneously in CAD software, bilateral balanced occlusion could be easily achieved. Furthermore, maintaining the initial interocclusal relationship from provisional restorations to final prostheses allowed for convenient transition while ensuring functional and aesthetic satisfaction.

Advancements in CAD-CAM technology have allowed for a variety of options in implant-supported fixed prosthesis restorations for completely edentulous patients. For patients with severe alveolar bone resorption, zirconia prosthetic restorations that include the gingival portion, such as implant-supported hybrid dentures, are possible, as well as monolithic zirconia prosthetic restorations in the form of crowns. The integration of digital technology in fixed prosthetic restoration using implants enables predictable treatment through diagnosis and virtual surgery by integrating the patient’s clinical and radiological information. In this case, the utilization of digital software allowed for the establishment of implants in appropriate positions, considering both the remaining alveolar bone and the final prosthesis. By designing both the maxillary removable prosthesis and the mandibular fixed prosthesis simultaneously in CAD software, bilateral balanced occlusion could be easily achieved. Furthermore, maintaining the initial interocclusal relationship from provisional restorations to final prostheses allowed for convenient transition while ensuring functional and aesthetic satisfaction.