1.Evaluation of User Experience of New Defense Medical Information System
Healthcare Informatics Research 2019;25(2):73-81
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate the user experience (UX) of the New Defense Medical Information System (N-DEMIS), which was introduced in 2012 as part of an effort to improve the old system of armed forces hospitals and ultimately bring their standards up to those of civilian hospitals. METHODS: In this study, the dependent variable was the UX of N-DEMIS and was composed of usability, affect, and user value. The questionnaire comprised 41 questions: nine on general characteristics, 20 on usability, four on affect, and eight on user value. The data collection period was from April 15 to April 30, 2018. Overall, 85 responses were received; of these, three insincere responses were excluded, and the remaining 82 responses were used in the analysis. RESULTS: The overall value of Cronbach's alpha was 0.917, indicating an overall high-reliability. There was a significant difference between user value and usability, but there was no significant differences between the other pairs. We observed a significant effect on UX for length of time working in an armed forces hospital and employment type. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our survey showed an even distribution of scores across the three elements of UX, showing that no particular aspect of N-DEMIS is superior to the others in terms of user satisfaction. However, the overall UX score of around 60% indicates the need for future improvements. Rather than focusing improvements on a specific area, improvements should be spread across usability, affect, and user value.
Arm
;
Data Collection
;
Electronic Health Records
;
Employment
;
Hospital Information Systems
;
Information Systems
;
Personal Satisfaction
;
User-Computer Interface
2.Development and Usability Evaluation of a Healthy Lifestyle Coaching Chatbot Using a Habit Formation Model
Meihua PIAO ; Jeongeun KIM ; Hyeongju RYU ; Hyeongsuk LEE
Healthcare Informatics Research 2020;26(4):255-264
Objectives:
It is crucial to find ways to fit regular exercise into the daily lives of office workers. Non-exercise activity thermogenesis has been introduced as an effective form of daily exercise. This study aimed to develop a healthy lifestyle coaching program for office workers, to be delivered using a messenger application.
Methods:
The interface was developed using KakaoTalk and Plus Friend. Performance feedback was developed using the IBM Watson conversation program. Twenty office workers used the application for three weeks. Afterward, a survey was conducted to assess the usability of and participants’ satisfaction with the application.
Results:
The application delivered customized push alarms, provided information related to habit formation, allowed for one-on-one chats, and delivered rewards. The satisfaction measurement results for the application showed that extrinsic reward factors contributed the most to the performance of the activity, followed by reminders and intrinsic rewards. Regarding the usability test, the perceived usefulness of the Healthy Lifestyle Coaching Chatbot was highest, followed by the usage intent and the perceived ease of use.
Conclusions
This study found that coaching programs using chatbots can improve the effectiveness of performing simple, repetitive exercises.
3.Lessons from a multicenter clinical trial with an approved wearable electrocardiogram: issues and practical considerations
Ki Young HUH ; Sae Im JEONG ; Hyounggyoon YOO ; Meihua PIAO ; Hyeongju RYU ; Heejin KIM ; Young-Ran YOON ; Sook Jin SEONG ; SeungHwan LEE ; Kyung Hwan KIM
Translational and Clinical Pharmacology 2022;30(2):87-98
Although wearable electrocardiograms (ECGs) are being increasingly applied in clinical settings, validation methods have not been standardized. As an exploratory evaluation, we performed a multicenter clinical trial implementing an approved wearable patch ECG. Healthy male adults were enrolled in 2 study centers. The approved ECGs were deployed for 6 hours, and pulse rates were measured independently with conventional pulse oximetry at selected time points for correlation analyses. The transmission status of the data was evaluated by heart rates and classified into valid, invalid, and missing. A total of 55 subjects (40 in center 1 and 15 in center 2) completed the study. Overall, 77.40% of heart rates were within the valid range. Invalid and missing data accounted for 1.42% and 21.23%, respectively. There were significant differences in valid and missing data between centers. The proportion of missing data in center 1 (24.77%) was more than twice center 2 (11.77%). Heart rates measured by the wearable ECG and conventional pulse oximetry showed a poor correlation (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.0454). In conclusion, we evaluated the multicenter feasibility of implementing wearable ECGs. The results suggest that systems to mitigate multicenter discrepancies and remove artifacts should be implemented prior to performing a clinical trial.