No abstract available.
Diagnosis-Related Groups* ; Korea*

No abstract available.
Evidence-Based Medicine*

BACKGROUND: The major serious risk of blood transfusion is post-transfusion hepatitis. Currently HBsAg, anti-HCV and serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) assays are screened for potential blood donors to prevent transfusion associated hepatitis in Korea. But the effectiveness of serum ALT as a surrogate marker for the screening of non-A, non-B hepatitis is controversial. The present study was designed to evaluate the prevalence of hepatitis markers in Korean blood donors and the usefulness of ALT as a surrogate marker. METHODS: The prevalence rates of anti-HCV and HBsAg were analyzed by age, sex and ALT cut-off level in 405,931 blood donors. The current anti-HCV EIA (LG HCD 3.0 ) comparing to anti-HCV confirmatory immunoblot assay (LG HCD confirm ) and ALT test were evaluated. RESULTS: The positive rate of HBsAg was 3.32% and higher in male across all age group (p<0.01). The rate increased as age increases up to thirties and decreased thereafter. The positive rate of anti-HCV was 0.24% in EIA, and higher in female across all age group except for teenage group (p<0.01). The rate increased as age increases up to fifties (p<0.01). Results of immunoblot assay showed 64% disaccordance with that of EIA and the rate of disaccord was high in female and young age group. The rate of mixed infection of hepatitis B and C was 0.003%. ALT level was within normal range in 95.2% of donors, and the prevalences of HBsAg and anti-HCV were higher as ALT increased above normal level (p<0.01). The sensitivity of ALT in identifying hepatitis C was 34.5% at 45 IU/L, and 22.8% at 65 IU/L. The most accurate cut-off level of ALT for hepatitis C was 23 IU/L in Receiver-Operating Characteristic (ROC) plot and the sensitivity and specificity were 65.5% and 79.9% at that level. CONCLUSION: In contrast to HBsAg, the prevalence rate of anti-HCV showed different pattern in that it was higher in female and continuously increased up to fifties. Confirmatory assay for hepatitis C should be done for the high false positivity of current anti-HCV EIA. The sensitivity and positive predictive value of ALT was so poor that ALT was not found to be useful as a surrogate marker for hepatitis C, but the discontinuance of ALT testing of blood donors needs to be evaluated by further studies.
Alanine Transaminase ; Biomarkers* ; Blood Donors ; Blood Transfusion ; Coinfection ; Female ; Hepatitis B ; Hepatitis B Surface Antigens ; Hepatitis C ; Hepatitis* ; Humans ; Korea ; Male ; Mass Screening ; Prevalence* ; Reference Values ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Tissue Donors* ; Volunteers*

While overtreatment in medical services has for a long time been a topic of interest among the medical community, the concept of overdiagnosis has recently attracted interest because of the increasing scientific evidence supporting it; there are numerous academic papers investigating ‘overdiagnosis’ which have been published. Overdiagnosis is the phenomenon of a disease being diagnosed that will never progress to the point of causing symptoms or death. In certain individuals, even despite the detection of cancer cells, the person will die of other disease before the cancer can progress. It is known that overdiagnosis occurs in various diseases, such as high blood pressure, diabetes, and various psychiatric disorders. In cancer, there exist slow growing cancers in which symptoms and death often occur late and thus the patient will ultimately die of another cause before they are affected by the cancer. Through this, there is a potential of overdiagnosis due to early cancer screening. Overdiagnosed patients are harmed by the diagnosis and treatment which in no way benefit them. The general public as well as health care professionals should be informed of the balance between the benefits and harms. This article will analyze the problems related to overdiagnosis with a focus on early screening in cancer.
Breast Neoplasms ; Delivery of Health Care* ; Diagnosis ; Early Detection of Cancer* ; Humans ; Hypertension ; Mass Screening ; Medical Overuse* ; Prostatic Neoplasms ; Thyroid Neoplasms

No abstract available.
Delivery of Health Care

Documentation of unexplained geographic variations in medical practices and use of inappropriate interventions has led to the proliferation of clinical practice guidelines. With increased enthusiasm for guidelines, evidence exists that clinical practice guidelines often influence clinical practices or health outcomes. Their successful implementation may improve the quality of care by decreasing in appropriate variation and expediting the application of effective advances to healthcare practices. In Korea, physicians and healthcare professionals have begun to take interests in clinical practice guidelines. Currently, over 50 practice guidelines have been developed through professional academic organizations or via other routes; however, the quality of the guidelines is unsatisfactory, implementation in clinical settings is incomplete, and there is insufficient infrastructure to develop clinical practice guidelines. Korea must develop policies and invest resources to enhance the development and implementation of clinical practice guidelines.
Delivery of Health Care ; Evidence-Based Medicine ; Health Policy ; Humans ; Physicians/statistics & numerical data ; *Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Program Development ; Republic of Korea

To investigate the association between hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) and infection of hepatitis B virus(HBV) and hepatitis C virus(HCV) in an HBV endemic area , a case-control study of 254 patients with HCC and of 1,270 age and sex matched health control subjects was done. Among the 254 HCC patients 166(65.4%) were positive for hepatitis B surface antigen(HBsAg), 49(19.3%) were positive for HCV antibody(anti-HCV Ab). The crude odd ratio of patients with HBsAg was 36.1(95% CI :22.4-58.2) and with anti-HCV Ab was 9.0(95% CI :5.5-14.6). In an analysis, which HBsAg(-), HBcAb(-), anti-HCV Ab(-) group was chosen as referent group, odd ratio of HBsAg(+) group was 14.4(95% CI: 7.2-28.9) and of anti- HCV Ab(+) was 10.7(95% CI: 2.9-40.0). Odd ratio of anti-HCV Ab(+), HBsAg(+) group and anti-HCV Ab(+), HBsAg(-), HBcAb(+) group for HCC were elevated to 27.3(95% CI : 9.0-82.9) , 15.9(95% CI:7.1-35.8) respectly. The odd ratio of anti-HCV Ab(-), HBsAg(-), HBcAb(+) group was 2.4(95% CI : 1.1-5.0). These result suggested that HBV and HCV were associated with HCC. In HBV endemic area patients with HBcAb alone should be considered risk group for HCC.
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular* ; Case-Control Studies* ; Hepacivirus* ; Hepatitis B Surface Antigens ; Hepatitis B* ; Hepatitis C* ; Hepatitis* ; Humans

In recent years, the number of systematic review and meta-analysis literatures has markedly increased. Systematic reviews can give important information about clinical decision making when studies show different or even contradictory results. By utilizing systematic reviews, clinicians can get unbiased summaries of the estimates, which are a reliable source of clinical information. Contrary to the narrative review, the systematic review conducts a comprehensive research of relevant studies on a defined clinical question, and critically appraises the risk of bias in included studies. The systematic review usually includes meta-analysis which summarizes the quantitative estimates by using statistical methods. Most meta-analyses aggregate data from primary studies, but individual data are also commonly used. Explaining heterogeneity among included studies and subsequent subgroup analysis are often required. Systematic review and meta-analysis depend on the quality of included studies, and subsequently cannot overcome the limitations of primary studies. Also, meta-analysis is prone to publication biases and methodological flaws. Despite these limitations, systematic review has definitive strengths. Maximizing these strengths require reliable second-hand data and a comprehensive analysis.
Bias (Epidemiology) ; Decision Making ; Evidence-Based Medicine ; Population Characteristics ; Publication Bias ; Review Literature as Topic

Systematic review had become one of the important research area in medicine. Systematic review can be demonstrating benefit or harm of an intervention when results of individual studies are inconclusive. While narrative reviews can often include an element of selection bias, systematic reviews typically involve a comprehensive plan and search strategy with the goal of reducing bias by identifying, appraising, and synthesizing all relevant studies on a particular topic and investigation of heterogeneity among included studies. Systematic reviews typically include a meta-analysis component which involves using statistical techniques to synthesize the data from several studies into a single quantitative estimate or summary effect size. Systematic review overcomes the limitation of small sample sizes by pooling results from a number of individual studies to generate a single best estimate. Although systematic reviews are published in academic forums, the Cochrane Collaboration is a widely recognized international and not-for-profit organization that promotes, supports, and disseminates systematic reviews and meta-analyses on the efficacy of interventions in the health care field. Systematic review has become a popular and powerful tool. If rigorously conducted, it is essential for evidence-based decision making in clinical practice as well as on the health policy level.
Bias (Epidemiology) ; Cooperative Behavior ; Decision Making ; Delivery of Health Care ; Evidence-Based Medicine ; Health Policy ; Meta-Analysis as Topic ; Population Characteristics ; Publication Bias ; Sample Size ; Selection Bias