Bronchogenic cyst has been recognized as remnants of foregut which abnormally were developed tracheobronchial tree during embryonic period. The anomaly was found in the lung or mediastinum but rarely in the neck. Histologic diagnosis can be made by the identification of the airway tissue lined by ciliated pseudostratified columnar or cuboid epithelium. A 4-year-old patient was admitted due to increase in the size of right neck mass which was incidentally found 2 years ago. In anterior triangle of neck, soft, non-tender and movable mass was presented in right lymph node measured by 1.2X0.7 cm in size. On admission, soft and non-tender mass was palpated at the right neck between right thyroid gland and right sternocleidomastoid muscle measured by 2.0x1.0 cm in size. After the excisional operation, histopathologic examination revealed the smooth muscle and muco-serous gland lined by ciliated pseudostratified columnar epithelium, and was diagnosed of bronchogenic cyst surrounded by enlarged lymph nodes which were reflecting reactive hyperplasia. We are reporting a case of bronchogenic cyst presenting as neck mass with brief review of the literature.
Bronchogenic Cyst* ; Child ; Child, Preschool* ; Diagnosis ; Epithelium ; Humans ; Hyperplasia ; Lung ; Lymph Nodes ; Male* ; Mediastinum ; Muscle, Smooth ; Neck* ; Thyroid Gland

The aim of this study was to evaluate the evolution of lupus activity in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients due to lupus nephritis and to determine the long-term prognosis. We reviewed the clinical courses of 45 patients with ESRD due to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We analyzed the course of SLE following the onset of ESRD, with special attention to the clinical and serological manifestations, survival time on dialysis, and renal transplantation outcome. Disease activity was measured using the SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI). Of the 45 patients, 21 patients were being treated with hemodialysis (HD), 11 were undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD), and 13 underwent transplantation. Duration of follow- up was 53 +/- 29 months. The SLEDAI score on commencement of renal replacement therapy was not significantly different among the 3 groups (HD: 4.2 +/- 4.2, PD: 4.3 +/- 2.3, Transplant: 3.2 +/- 1.9). However, disease activity scored by follow-up maximal SLEDAI during dialysis or transplantation showed a significant increase after peritoneal dialysis (HD: 5.0 +/- 3.6, PD: 7.4 +/- 3.7, Transplant: 2.2 +/- 1.7, p < 0.05). When the individual changes in the maximal SLEDAI score were considered, a significant increase was apparent after peritoneal dialysis (p < 0.05), but not after either hemodialysis or renal transplantation. There was no significant difference in cumulative survival rate, and also in technique or graft survival rates of the 3 groups. Among the variables tested, follow-up maximal SLEDAI score was the only significant factor associated with patient survival (odds ratio: 1.15, p < 0.05). The incidence (36% versus 19%) of high disease activity was greater, but not significantly, in the peritoneal dialysis group, as compared to the hemodialysis group. Clinical activity of SLE was apparent in 65% of patients in the first year of dialysis, but none showed any activity after the third year of dialysis. We found that although lupus disease activity declined after patients progressed to ESRD, lupus disease activity still affected patients' survival. An incremental increase in postdialysis lupus activity was not uncommon, especially during the first one year of dialysis. During the follow-up period, maximal SLEDAI score increased significantly after peritoneal dialysis. However, the long-term prognosis was not significantly different according to the treatment modality.
Adult ; Disease Progression ; Female ; Human ; Kidney Failure, Chronic/*mortality/*physiopathology ; Lupus Nephritis/*mortality/*physiopathology ; Male ; Survival Analysis

Background/Aims: Although many studies have reported the promising effect of neoadjuvant treatment for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) to increase resectability, only a few studies have recommended the use of first-line chemotherapeutic agents as neoadjuvant treatment for BRPC. The current study compared clinical outcomes between gemcitabine and FOLFIRINOX (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan) in patients with BRPC. Methods: In this single-center retrospective study, 100 BRPC patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and resection from 2008 to 2018 were reviewed. Clinical outcomes included overall survival, resectability, and recurrence patterns after gemcitabine or FOLFIRINOX treatment. Results: For neoadjuvant chemotherapy, gemcitabine was administered to 34 patients and FOLFIRINOX to 66. Neoadjuvant radiotherapy was administered to 27 patients (79.4%) treated with gemcitabine and 19 (28.8%) treated with FOLFIRINOX (p<0.001). The 2- and 5-year survival rates (YSRs) were significantly higher after FOLFIRINOX (2YSR, 72.2%; 5YSR, 46.0%) than after gemcitabine (2YSR, 58.4%; 5YSR, 19.1%; p=0.041). The margin negative rate was comparable (gemcitabine, 94.1%; FOLFIRINOX, 92.4%; p=0.753), and the tumor size change in percentage showed only a marginal difference (gemcitabine, 20.5%; FOLFIRINOX, 29.0%; p=0.069). Notably, the metastatic recurrence rate was significantly lower in the FOLFIRINOX group (n=20, 52.6%) than in the gemcitabine group (n=22, 78.6%; p=0.001). The rate of adverse events after chemotherapy was significantly higher with FOLFIRINOX than with gemcitabine (43.9%, 20.6%, respectively; p=0.037). Conclusions FOLFIRINOX provided more clinical and oncological benefit than gemcitabine, with significantly higher overall survival and lower cumulative recurrence rates in BRPC. However, since FOLFIRINOX causes more adverse effects, the regimen should be individualized based on patient’s general condition and clinical status.

Background/Aims: Although many studies have reported the promising effect of neoadjuvant treatment for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) to increase resectability, only a few studies have recommended the use of first-line chemotherapeutic agents as neoadjuvant treatment for BRPC. The current study compared clinical outcomes between gemcitabine and FOLFIRINOX (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan) in patients with BRPC. Methods: In this single-center retrospective study, 100 BRPC patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and resection from 2008 to 2018 were reviewed. Clinical outcomes included overall survival, resectability, and recurrence patterns after gemcitabine or FOLFIRINOX treatment. Results: For neoadjuvant chemotherapy, gemcitabine was administered to 34 patients and FOLFIRINOX to 66. Neoadjuvant radiotherapy was administered to 27 patients (79.4%) treated with gemcitabine and 19 (28.8%) treated with FOLFIRINOX (p<0.001). The 2- and 5-year survival rates (YSRs) were significantly higher after FOLFIRINOX (2YSR, 72.2%; 5YSR, 46.0%) than after gemcitabine (2YSR, 58.4%; 5YSR, 19.1%; p=0.041). The margin negative rate was comparable (gemcitabine, 94.1%; FOLFIRINOX, 92.4%; p=0.753), and the tumor size change in percentage showed only a marginal difference (gemcitabine, 20.5%; FOLFIRINOX, 29.0%; p=0.069). Notably, the metastatic recurrence rate was significantly lower in the FOLFIRINOX group (n=20, 52.6%) than in the gemcitabine group (n=22, 78.6%; p=0.001). The rate of adverse events after chemotherapy was significantly higher with FOLFIRINOX than with gemcitabine (43.9%, 20.6%, respectively; p=0.037). Conclusions FOLFIRINOX provided more clinical and oncological benefit than gemcitabine, with significantly higher overall survival and lower cumulative recurrence rates in BRPC. However, since FOLFIRINOX causes more adverse effects, the regimen should be individualized based on patient’s general condition and clinical status.