Purpose: Giant cell tumor (GCT) of the proximal femur is relatively rare, with only a few case series reported thus far. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of GCT of the proximal femur treated with intralesional curettage and expand the understanding of their characteristics and treatment considerations. Materials and Methods: Fifteen cases treated with curettage for GCT of the proximal femur between 2007 and 2020 were reviewed. The median follow-up was 46 months (25–150 months). There were 10 males and 5 females with a median age of 26 years (17–71 years). After curettage, the bone defect was filled with either an allograft (7 cases) or bone cement (8 cases). Results: The postoperative complications were local recurrences in three cases (20.0%), including malignant transformation in one case and a femur neck fracture in one case (6.7%) following curettage and strut allograft. Among the 15 cases, 13 (86.7%) retained their native joint at the last follow-up. No patients developed degenerative changes or osteonecrosis. Conclusion The results of proximal femoral GCT with curettage were acceptable despite local recurrences in three cases (20.0%), and femur neck fracture in one case. An appropriate surgical approach and reconstruction according to the extent of the lesion are necessary for successful treatment.

Background/Aims: Tegoprazan, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, is expected to overcome the limitations of proton pump inhibitors and effectively control nocturnal acid breakthrough. To evaluate the pharmacodynamics of tegoprazan versus dexlansoprazole regarding nocturnal acid breakthrough in healthy subjects. Methods: In a randomized, open-label, single-dose, balanced incomplete block crossover study, 24 healthy male volunteers were enrolled and randomized to receive oral tegoprazan (50, 100, or 200 mg) or dexlansoprazole (60 mg) during each of two administration periods, separated by a 7- to 10-day washout period. Blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic parameter analysis; gastric monitoring was performed for pharmacodynamic parameter evaluation. Results: All 24 subjects completed the study. Average maximum plasma concentration, area under the plasma concentration–time curve, and mean time with gastric pH >4 and pH >6 for tegoprazan demonstrated dose-dependent incremental increases. All the tegoprazan groups reached mean pH ≥4 within 2 hours, whereas the dexlansoprazole group required 7 hours after drug administration. Based on pharmacodynamic parameters up to 12 hours after evening dosing, 50, 100, and 200 mg of tegoprazan presented a stronger acid-suppressive effect than 60 mg of dexlansoprazole. Moreover, the dexlansoprazole group presented a comparable acid-suppressive effect with the tegoprazan groups 12 hours after dosing. Conclusions All the tegoprazan groups demonstrated a significantly faster onset of gastric pH increase and longer holding times above pH >4 and pH >6 up to 12 hours after evening dosing than the dexlansoprazole group.

Background: Mechanical failures of tumor endoprosthesis in the distal femur usually require revision surgery. We investigated if the proximal femur host bone can be salvaged by onlay and overlapping allograft in revision surgeries due to aseptic loosening and stem fractures. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 18 patients (7 men and 11 women) with osteosarcoma around the knee. The entire cohort was classified into three subgroups (no bone graft: 6, onlay allograft: 7, and overlapping allograft: 5) according to our treatment strategy. Results: The median interval from the initial surgery to the revision was 94.5 months (range, 21–219 months), and the median follow-up period from the revision surgery was 88.0 months (range, 24–179 months). At the last follow-up, 9 of the 18 patients maintained their endoprostheses, and the 5-year prosthesis survival rate was 57.9%. Limb survival was 100%. Five-year prosthesis survival rate was 66.7% in the no bone graft group, 85.7% in the onlay allograft group while 30.0% in the overlapping allograft group. In the no bone graft group and onlay allograft group, 66.7% (4/6) and 57.1% (4/7) maintained their revision prostheses while no prostheses survived in the overlapping allograft group. Recurrent stem loosening was observed in 14.2% (1/7) and 60.0% (3/5) of the onlay allograft and overlapping allograft groups, respectively, despite allograft bone union. The complication rate was 66.7% (12/18) in the entire cohort. The most common type of complication was infection (n = 6), followed by aseptic loosening (n = 4) and mechanical failure (n = 2). Conclusions This study indicates that onlay allograft can be used as a supportive method in revising failed endoprosthesis if the extent of host bone destruction is extensive. However, applying overlapping allograft to secure bone stock showed a high rate of mechanical failures and infection in the long term. Future studies with a larger cohort are necessary to assess the prognostic factors for the higher complication rate in overlapping allograft and the need for overlapping allograft. Surveillance with consideration of the risk of anteromedial osteolysis in allograft and efforts for prevention of periprosthetic infection are essential.

Purpose: This study examined the prevalence of osteoarthritis of the knee after curettage and polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) application for giant cell tumor of the bone (GCTB) and factors affecting the development of osteoarthritis of the knee. Materials and Methods: Fifty-five patients with GCTB of the distal femur who were treated with curettage and PMMA filling between June 2001 and June 2016 were reviewed retrospectively. The development of osteoarthritis of the knee, as Kellgren–Lawrence grade 3 or 4, was determined by radiography of the latest follow-up data. This study evaluated the influence of the factors on the development of osteoarthritic changes. Only patients followed up for more than five years were included and the median follow-up was 77 months (range, 60–237 months). Results: Osteoarthritis of the knee was observed in 10 patients (18%) of whom three showed preoperative arthritic changes and did not progress. Seven (13%) patients experienced progression of the arthritic changes after surgery at a median of five years (range, 4–12 years). On the other hand, none of them received total knee arthroplasty. Among seven patients who showed progression of arthritis, four patients presented with a pathologic fracture initially and showed arthritic changes at a median of 4.5 years after surgery. The other three patients showed arthritic changes after ten years or more. Pathologic fractures (p=0.0001) and subchondral bone involvement (p=0.011) were significant risk factors for the development of osteoarthritis. Conclusion The incidence of development of osteoarthritis of the knee after curettage and PMMA application at distal femoral GCTB was 13%, but none of these patients received further surgery, such as total knee arthroplasty. The pathologic fracture and subchondral bone involvement are risk factors for arthritic changes in the midterm follow-up.

Objective: To investigate the therapeutic efficacy of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) as consolidation treatment after completing first-line treatment in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients treated at the Comprehensive Gynecologic Cancer Center between January 2014 and 2019. Based on the inclusion criteria, 24 eligible patients who received HIPEC (paclitaxel 175 mg/m2, for 90 minutes, at 42°C) (HIPEC group) as consolidation treatment after terminating the adjuvant chemotherapy were identified. Another 24 patients who met the inclusion criteria and did not receive HIPEC were matched, representing the non-HIPEC group. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were examined between the two groups. Results: The median DFS was 28.7 and 24.2 months in the HIPEC and non-HIPEC groups, respectively (P=0.688). The 3-year DFS rates in the HIPEC and non-HPEC groups were 39.5% and 32.6%, respectively. However, the median OS was not determined. The 5-year OS rates in the HIPEC and non-HIPEC groups were 86.2% and 81.3%, respectively (P=0.850). One patient developed grade 3 neutropenia. Other patients experienced mild adverse events after HIPEC. Conclusion This study suggests that consolidation HIPEC could not support the survival benefit after completing the first-line treatment for patients with advanced ovarian cancer, although no severe specific safety issues were found. Therefore, randomized trials evaluating consolidation HIPEC for the management of ovarian cancer are warranted.

Objective: To investigate the therapeutic efficacy of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) as consolidation treatment after completing first-line treatment in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients treated at the Comprehensive Gynecologic Cancer Center between January 2014 and 2019. Based on the inclusion criteria, 24 eligible patients who received HIPEC (paclitaxel 175 mg/m2, for 90 minutes, at 42°C) (HIPEC group) as consolidation treatment after terminating the adjuvant chemotherapy were identified. Another 24 patients who met the inclusion criteria and did not receive HIPEC were matched, representing the non-HIPEC group. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were examined between the two groups. Results: The median DFS was 28.7 and 24.2 months in the HIPEC and non-HIPEC groups, respectively (P=0.688). The 3-year DFS rates in the HIPEC and non-HPEC groups were 39.5% and 32.6%, respectively. However, the median OS was not determined. The 5-year OS rates in the HIPEC and non-HIPEC groups were 86.2% and 81.3%, respectively (P=0.850). One patient developed grade 3 neutropenia. Other patients experienced mild adverse events after HIPEC. Conclusion This study suggests that consolidation HIPEC could not support the survival benefit after completing the first-line treatment for patients with advanced ovarian cancer, although no severe specific safety issues were found. Therefore, randomized trials evaluating consolidation HIPEC for the management of ovarian cancer are warranted.

Purpose: Periprosthetic fractures of a tumor prosthesis are rare but have difficulties in achieving sound fixation because of the poor bone quality, which increases the risk of loosening or re-fracture, even after bone union. A cortical strut onlay allograft was adopted for peri-prosthetic fractures after hip arthroplasty into the periprosthetic fracture of a tumor prosthesis, assuming that it would assist in firm fixation, shorten the time to union, and increase the bone stock, thereby, lower the chance of loosening and re-fracture. Materials and Methods: This study reviewed 27 patients (30 cases) of periprosthetic fracture of tumor prosthesis. Sixteen cases (allograft group) had augmentation with an onlay allograft, while 14 cases (conventional group) had internal fixation or conservative treatment.The following were assessed; mode of periprosthetic fracture, difference in the time to union between a strut cortical onlay allograft and without it, and survival of prosthesis, complication, and functional outcome between the two groups. Results: According to the unified classification system (UCS), 21 cases were type B (70.0%; B1, 14; B2, 1; B3, 6) and 9 cases were type C.The five-, 10-year survival of the 30 reconstructions by Kaplan–Meier plot was 84.5%±4.18% and 42.2%±7.83%, respectively. The average time to bone union of the entire cohort was 5.1 months (range, 2.0–11.2 months). The allograft group (3.5 months) showed a shorter period for union than the conventional group (7.2 months) (p<0.0001). All four cases of major complications occurred in the conventional group. Two cases with loosening and anterior angulation were treated with a change of prosthesis, and another with infection underwent amputation. The remaining case with loosening had conservative management. At the final follow-up, the average Musculosketal Tumor Society score of the allograft group (26.1) was better than that of the conventional group (20.9). Conclusion Bone union in periprosthetic fractures of a tumor prosthesis can be achieved, but the minimization of complications is important. An onlay allograft facilitates firm fixation and increases the bone stock with a shortened time to union. This simple method can minimize the risk of loosening, joint contracture, and re-fracture.

Purpose: Total femoral replacement (TFR) is an extreme form of limb salvage. Considering the rarity of this procedure, reports have focused on the complications and a proper indication is unclear. This study analyzed 36 patients with TFR who were asked the following: 1) prognostic factors related to survival in patients who underwent TFR with a tumoral cause; 2) overall implant and limb survival; 3) complications, functional outcome, and limb status for patients surviving for more than 3 years. Materials and Methods: According to the causes for TFR, 36 patients were categorized into three groups: extensive primary tumoral involvement (group 1, 15 cases), tumoral contamination by an inadvertent procedure or local recurrence (group 2, 16 cases), and salvage of a failed reconstruction (group 3, 5 cases). The factors that may affect the survival of patients included age, sex, cause of TFR, and tumor volume change after chemotherapy. Results: The overall five-year survival of the 36 patients was 31.5%±16.2%. The five-year survival of 31 patients with tumoral causes was 21.1%±15.6%. The five-year survival of 50.0%±31.0% in patients with a decreased tumor volume after chemotherapy was higher than that of increased tumor volume (p=0.02). The five-year survival of 12 cases with a wide margin was 41.7%±27.9%, whereas that of the marginal margin was 0.0%±0.0% (p=0.03). The ten-year overall implant survival of 36 patients was 85.9%±14.1%. The five-year revisionfree survival was 16.6%±18.2%. At the final follow-up, 12 maintained tumor prosthesis, three underwent amputation (rotationplasty, 2; above knee amputation, 1), and the remaining one had knee fusion. Among 16 patients with a follow-up of more than three years, 14 patients underwent surgical intervention and two patients had conservative management. Complications included infection in 10 cases, local recurrences in two cases, and one case each of hip dislocation, bushing fracture, and femoral artery occlusion. Conclusion Patients showing an increased tumor volume after chemotherapy and having an inadequate surgical margin showed a high chance of early death. In the long-term follow-up, TFR showed a high infection rate and the functional outcome was unsatisfactory. Nevertheless, this procedure is an inevitable option of limb preservation in selected patients.

PURPOSE: A dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma is a rare lethal tumor characterized by a low grade chondrosarcoma juxtaposed with a high grade dedifferentiated sarcoma, such as osteosarcoma, fibrosarcoma. The aim of our study was to document the clinical manifestation and oncologic outcomes of a dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study identified 11 patients who were diagnosed and treated for dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma between January 2007 and December 2016. The identified cohort was then reviewed regarding age, sex, symptom onset, tumor location, magnetic resonance imagings (MRIs), surgical margin, and pathologic diagnosis. The time to local recurrence and/or metastasis, follow-up duration, and the patients' final status were analyzed. RESULTS: The patients were comprised of 7 males and 4 females with a mean age of 54 years (range, 33–80 years). The location of the tumor was in the femur in 6 cases, pelvis in 4 cases, and metatarsal in 1 case. The average tumor diameter was 12.7 cm (range, 6.0–26.1 cm). At the time of diagnosis, 2 patients showed pathologic fracture; 1 patient was Enecking stage IIA, 9 patients were stage IIB, and 1 patient was stage III. Eight patients were classified as a primary dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma and 3 patients were secondary. One of the primary lesions was misinterpreted initially as a low grade chondroid lesion by MRI and underwent curettage. Local recurrence occurred in 8 cases and distant metastasis occurred in 10 cases with a mean duration of 8 months (range, 2–23 months) and 7 months (range, 1–32 months), respectively. The three-year overall survival of patients with dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma was 18%, and 10 patients died due to disease progression. CONCLUSION: Dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma developed lung metastases in the early period of the clinical courses and the prognosis was dismal.
Chondrosarcoma ; Cohort Studies ; Curettage ; Diagnosis ; Disease Progression ; Female ; Femur ; Fibrosarcoma ; Follow-Up Studies ; Fractures, Spontaneous ; Humans ; Lung ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Metatarsal Bones ; Neoplasm Metastasis ; Osteosarcoma ; Pathology ; Pelvis ; Prognosis ; Recurrence ; Sarcoma

PURPOSE: This study assessed the treatment outcomes of myxoid liposarcoma in the extremities and investigate the prognostic factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 91 patients with myxoid liposarcoma (83 primary, 8 recurrent) between 2001 and 2015 were reviewed retrospectively. The local recurrence and metastasis after treatment were examined. The survival rates and prognostic factors affecting the survival were investigated. The mean follow-up was 84 months (range, 5–196 months). RESULTS: The overall survival rates at 5-yr and 10-yr were 82% and 74%, respectively. The tumor size (p=0.04), round cell component (p<0.0001), grade (p=0.0002), and local recurrence (p=0.006) affected survival in primary patients. Extrapulmonary metastases were observed in 75.0% (18/24) of metastatic patients and the mean post metastasis survival was 26 months (range, 2–72 months). CONCLUSION: Myxoid liposarcoma developed mainly at the lower extremities. The tumor size, grade, component of round cells, and local recurrence were associated with the prognosis. The unique feature of extrapulmonary metastasis in myxoid liposarcoma should be noted in the treatment and follow-up.
Cellular Structures ; Extremities ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Liposarcoma ; Liposarcoma, Myxoid ; Lower Extremity ; Neoplasm Metastasis ; Prognosis ; Recurrence ; Retrospective Studies ; Survival Rate