1.Acute respiratory failure accompanied with eosinophilia.
Hyeon Seok UM ; Jie Jung JANG ; Suk Young LEE ; Chi Hong KIM ; Soon Seog KWON ; Young Kyoon KIM ; Kwan Hyoung KIM ; Hwa Sik MOON ; Jeong Sup SONG ; Sung Hak PARK ; Kyo Young LEE
Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases 1993;40(3):314-318
No abstract available.
Eosinophilia*
;
Respiratory Insufficiency*
2.Preoperative chemoradiotherapy versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for stage II–III resectable rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Jin Ho SONG ; Jae Uk JEONG ; Jong Hoon LEE ; Sung Hwan KIM ; Hyeon Min CHO ; Jun Won UM ; Hong Seok JANG
Radiation Oncology Journal 2017;35(3):198-207
PURPOSE: Whether preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is better than postoperative CRT in oncologic outcome and toxicity is contentious in prospective randomized clinical trials. We systematically analyze and compare the treatment result, toxicity, and sphincter preservation rate between preoperative CRT and postoperative CRT in stage II–III rectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library from 1990 to 2014 for relevant trials. Only phase III randomized studies performing CRT and curative surgery were selected and the data were extracted. Meta-analysis was used to pool oncologic outcome and toxicity data across studies. RESULTS: Three randomized phase III trials were finally identified. The meta-analysis results showed significantly lower 5-year locoregional recurrence rate in the preoperative-CRT group than in the postoperative-CRT group (hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.41–0.84; p = 0.004). The 5-year distant recurrence rate (p = 0.55), relapse-free survival (p = 0.14), and overall survival (p = 0.22) showed no significant difference between two groups. Acute toxicity was significantly lower in the preoperativeCRT group than in the postoperative-CRT group (p < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference between two groups in perioperative and chronic complications (p = 0.53). The sphincter-saving rate was not significantly different between two groups (p = 0.24). The conversion rate from abdominoperineal resection to low anterior resection in low rectal cancer was significantly higher in the preoperative-CRT group than in the postoperative-CRT group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: As compared to postoperative CRT, preoperative CRT improves only locoregional control, not distant control and survival, with similar chronic toxicity and sphincter preservation rate in rectal cancer patients.
Chemoradiotherapy*
;
Humans
;
Prospective Studies
;
Rectal Neoplasms*
;
Recurrence
3.Preoperative chemoradiotherapy versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for stage II–III resectable rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Jin Ho SONG ; Jae Uk JEONG ; Jong Hoon LEE ; Sung Hwan KIM ; Hyeon Min CHO ; Jun Won UM ; Hong Seok JANG
Radiation Oncology Journal 2017;35(3):198-207
PURPOSE: Whether preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is better than postoperative CRT in oncologic outcome and toxicity is contentious in prospective randomized clinical trials. We systematically analyze and compare the treatment result, toxicity, and sphincter preservation rate between preoperative CRT and postoperative CRT in stage II–III rectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library from 1990 to 2014 for relevant trials. Only phase III randomized studies performing CRT and curative surgery were selected and the data were extracted. Meta-analysis was used to pool oncologic outcome and toxicity data across studies. RESULTS: Three randomized phase III trials were finally identified. The meta-analysis results showed significantly lower 5-year locoregional recurrence rate in the preoperative-CRT group than in the postoperative-CRT group (hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.41–0.84; p = 0.004). The 5-year distant recurrence rate (p = 0.55), relapse-free survival (p = 0.14), and overall survival (p = 0.22) showed no significant difference between two groups. Acute toxicity was significantly lower in the preoperativeCRT group than in the postoperative-CRT group (p < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference between two groups in perioperative and chronic complications (p = 0.53). The sphincter-saving rate was not significantly different between two groups (p = 0.24). The conversion rate from abdominoperineal resection to low anterior resection in low rectal cancer was significantly higher in the preoperative-CRT group than in the postoperative-CRT group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: As compared to postoperative CRT, preoperative CRT improves only locoregional control, not distant control and survival, with similar chronic toxicity and sphincter preservation rate in rectal cancer patients.
Chemoradiotherapy*
;
Humans
;
Prospective Studies
;
Rectal Neoplasms*
;
Recurrence
4.Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Due to Gastric Ectopic Pancreas in a Young Aged Person.
Jung Won YUN ; Young Bum PARK ; Um Seok LEE ; Choong Hyeon LEE ; Dal Yeon WON ; Ji Hoon KIM ; Jae Min SONG
Korean Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2006;32(2):132-135
An ectopic pancreas is the presence of pancreatic tissue outside of its usual location. This condition rarely causes clinical symptoms, and the most commonly reported sites of these lesions are the stomach, the duodenum and jejunum. The presence of this ectopic tissue is not a rare condition, but its unusual locations, clinical symptoms, and complications are of clinical interest. We report a case of a gastric ectopic pancreas with recurrent upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a 20-year-old man.
Choristoma
;
Duodenum
;
Hemorrhage*
;
Humans
;
Jejunum
;
Pancreas*
;
Stomach
;
Young Adult