No abstract available.
Encephalitis, Arbovirus*

BACKGROUND: Medical dispute is increasing and its effect on society is serious, but reasonable settlement system is absent. Nevertheless patients and families choose medical dispute. But there is little research on patients and their families who choose to settle by medical dispute. Therefore this study examines the impact of medical malpractice to patients and their families and their reasons for choosing medical dispute after mishap. METHODS: Data were collected from 234 subjects who inquired of Medical Malpractice Family Association about malpractice suit. Questionnaire was composed of demographic characteristics, characteristics of hospital, characteristics of medical malpractice, degree of satisfaction with explanation and attitude of the treating doctor, effect of medical malpractice on patients' life and reasons patients and their families choose to settle by medical dispute. Factor analysis with varimax rotation was carried out to reduce the reasons to a smaller number of clearly interpretable factors. Multiple regression analysis was carried out to identify the variables relevant to these main themes. RESULTS: Degree of satisfaction with doctor's explanation and attitude was less than 10%. Over 60% of respondents stated that medical malpractice seriously affected their lives. Four main themes emerged from the factor analysis of reasons for dispute which includes dissatisfaction with doctor's attitude, wanting to prevent similar incident in the future, call t? account, and compensation. The relative importance in the order of frequency was wanting to prevent similar incident in the future, dissatisfaction with doctor's attitude, call to account, followed by compensation. Multiple regression analysis was used to identify the variables relevant to these four main themes. Clinical speciality group and degree of satisfaction on attitude were signi(icantly associated with the dissatisfaction with doctor's attitude. Clinical speciality group, patient's condition, effect of medical malpractiee on life and degree of satisfaction on attitude were significantly associated with the call to account. Academic carrier, clinical speciality group, patient's condition, effect of medical malpractice on life and degree of satisfaction on attitude were significantly associated with the compensation. CONCLUSIONS: From the above results, the reasons patients and their families cheese to settle by medical dispute were diverse and associated with demographic characteristics, doctor's attitude, effect of mishap on life, et. at.
Cheese ; Compensation and Redress ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Dissent and Disputes* ; Humans ; Malpractice ; Social Responsibility

OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to determine, by reviewing the literature, whether treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia affects symptoms. METHODS: We retrieved the literature using MEDLINE search, with nonulcer dyspepsia and Hericobacter pylori and treatment as key words, which were reported from 1984 to 1998, and manual literature search. The criteria for inclusion was as follows; 1) The paper should have confirmed nonulcer dyspepsia as case definition. 2) The paper should have performed a randomized, blind trial. 3) Confirmation of Helicobacter pylori eradication should be done 4 weeks after treatment. 4) studies with no information on measurement of symptoms after treatment were not accepted. The percentage of patients with symptom improvement after eradication therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection was calculated. Cumulative odds ratio was compared by fixed effect model and random effect model as sensitivity and funnel plot was used to evaluate publication bias. RESULTS: The overall effect size of symptom improvement was calculated by cumulative odds ratio. Cumulative odds ratio of random effect model was 4.16(95% CI: 1.55-11.19). Before integrating each effect sizes into common effect size, the homogeneity test was conducted and random effect model was selected(Cochran's Q=41.08 (d.f=10, p<0.001)). The heterogeneity across studies was evaluated and the different methodological aspects of studies led to differences between study results. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the eradication of Helicobacter pylori in patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia results more symptom improvement. In studies that shows the opposite results there are methodological aspects explaining the heterogeneity.
Dyspepsia* ; Helicobacter pylori* ; Helicobacter* ; Humans ; Odds Ratio ; Population Characteristics ; Publication Bias