INTRODUCTION

Melasma, characterized by dark patches on the skin, predominantly affects individuals with Fitzpatrick skin types III-V and is more common among women. Hydroquinone 4% is traditionally the gold standard for melasma treatment due to its efficacy in reducing pigmentation, but alternatives like β-White™, Tyrostat™, and Melanostatine-5™ or a combination of all are being explored for their potentially better safety profiles.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to determine the efficacy and safety of β-White + Tyrostat, + Melanostatine-5™ creams versus hydroquinone 4% in the treatment of melasma.

METHODOLOGY

A randomized, double-blind clinical trial compared β-White, Tyrostat, and Melanostatine-5 cream to hydroquinone 4% cream in 40 melasma patients. The intervention consisted of 12-week split-face (left-right) application of the said topical medications. Efficacy was measured using modified Melasma Area and Severity Index (mMASI) Score and the Physician’s and Patient’s Global Assessments (PGA). Safety was used by assessing side effects noted during the application. ANOVA and Post hoc tests were used to measure differences in scores.

RESULTS

Forty out of 42 patients were included in the analysis. The trial found that both treatment regimens were effective, with no significant difference in the reduction of melasma severity over 12 weeks. Initially, the experimental group showed more rapid improvement, but by the third month, both groups reported similar outcomes. The experimental group reported no side effects, making it a potentially safer option for long-term management of melasma.

CONCLUSION

Overall, while hydroquinone remains effective, β-White + Tyrostat + Melanostatine-5 cream offers a viable alternative with potentially fewer side effects, making it an attractive option for patients seeking long-term melasma management.

Melasma ; Melanosis ; Hydroquinone