No abstract available.
Cerebral Infarction* ; Myoclonus* ; Stents*

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of abdominal aortic graft infection (AGI) treated with removal of the graft vs. graft preservation. Methods: The electronic databases PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for studies that reported on AGI were searched. Observational studies and case series of at least 10 cases that reporting on the prevalence, microbiology, and outcomes of AGI were included. Results: Our search identified 23 studies that met our inclusion criteria, reporting on a total of 873 patients who underwent open surgical repair (OSR) or endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Of these patients, 833 received graft removal, and 40 received graft preservation. The prevalence of AGI was reported to be 1.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.5%–1.8%) after OSR and 0.4% (95% CI, 0%–1.1%) after EVAR. The pooled estimates of 1-year, 2-year, and 5-year mortality were 28.7% (95% CI, 19.4%–38.8%), 36.6% (95% CI, 24.6%–49.5%), and 51.8% (95% CI, 38.4%–65.1%) in the graft removal group and 16.1% (95% CI, 4.1%–32.2%), 18.5% (95% CI, 5.7%–35.1%), and 50.0% (95% CI, 31.6%–68.4%) in the graft preservation group.The 30-day mortality rate’s risk ratio (RR) for graft removal vs. preservation was 0.98 (95% CI, 0.40–2.38), while the 1-year mortality rate’s RR was 3.44 (95% CI, 1.60–7.42). Conclusion The 30-day mortality rate of AGI treatment was found to be high, whether using graft removal or preservation.In selected patients, implementing antibiotics with graft preservation as an initial management may be helpful in reducing the mortality rate.

Purpose: Arterial stiffness and steno-occlusion of the lower-extremity can result from many vascular lesions, including acute thromboembolisms, soft plaques, calcified plaques, or inflammatory disease. Ultrasound (US) elastography measures the tissue deformation response to compression and displays tissue stiffness. This study aimed to evaluate the characteristics of arterial lesions in the lower extremities using US elastography. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 20 patients who visited our institute for arterial disease treatment between May 2016 and November 2017. An US examination with B-mode and strain elastography (SE) was performed of four different lesion types at 45 sites: acute and subacute thromboembolisms, soft plaques, calcified plaques, and thromboangiitis obliterans lesions (TAOs). During SE, stress was externally applied by the operator using the transducer. Strain ratio (SR) was calculated as the fraction of the average strain in the reference area divided by the average strain in the lesion. The SR was compared among different lesion types, with the accompanying vein as the reference region of interest. Results: The strain was highest in the soft plaques (0.63%±0.23%), followed by the TAOs (0.45%±0.11%), calcified plaques (0.44%±0.13%), and acute thromboembolisms (0.34%±0.23%), which were statistically significant (P=0.026). However, the mean SR was highest for the calcified plaques (2.33%±0.80%), followed by the TAOs (1.63%±0.40%), acute thromboembolisms (1.60%±0.48%), and soft plaques (1.51±0.39), and which were statistically significant (P=0.013). Conclusion Despite several limitations, vascular elastography may be useful for differentiating between lesion types in peripheral arterial disease.

Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service’s (HIRA) claims data have been used in studies of hemodialysis patients even though information about mortality is not provided in this database. Mortality analysis using HIRA data has been conducted using various operational definitions that have not been validated. This study aimed to validate operational definitions of mortality for maintenance hemodialysis patients that have been used when analyzing the Korean HIRA database. Methods: This study utilized claims data of the Korean National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) between January 2008 and December 2019. We estimated mortality based on operational definitions applied in previous studies using the HIRA database and compared it with NHIS mortality information to validate accuracy. Results: A total of 128,876 patients who started maintenance hemodialysis between January 2009 and December 2019 were analyzed. The accuracy of estimated mortality was the highest at 96% in the group where mortality was defined as an absence of claims data for 150 days. If the period of no claims data was set to 90 days or less, there was a risk of overestimating the mortality for the entire study period. When it was set to 180 days or more, there was a risk of underestimating the mortality, as the follow-up time was close to the end of the study period. Conclusion: When mortality analysis of maintenance hemodialysis patients is performed using HIRA data, it is most accurate to set the operational definition period as the absence of claims data for 150 days.

A 65-year-old male patient was referred to our hospital for postprandial abdominal pain. Computed tomography and angiography revealed 2 aneurysms of the right gastroepiploic artery, which were measured 0.8x1.3 cm and 1.9x3.4 cm. Excision of 2 saccular and fusiform aneurysms by laparotomy was performed. His hospital course was uneventful and symptoms disappeared after surgery. A gastroepiploic artery aneurysm can cause recurrent abdominal pain and surgical resection is warranted in symptomatic aneurysms.
Abdominal Pain ; Aged ; Aneurysm ; Angiography ; Gastroepiploic Artery ; Humans ; Laparotomy ; Male

During endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), interruption of the internal iliac arteries (IIAs) or the inferior mesenteric artery by stents or embolization is thought to cause colon ischemia. To minimize this risk, attempts have been made to preserve the IIAs using iliac branch devices or IIA revascularization. Here we present our experience of colon ischemia after EVAR in a patient with bilaterally patent IIAs without evidence of embolism. A 70-year-old man had abdominal pain and a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm was found. We performed EVAR with custom-made tube grafts preserving the bilateral IIAs. On postoperative day 2, the patient complained of abdominal pain, a sigmoidoscopy was performed revealing colon ischemia. On laparotomy, transmural infarction of the sigmoid colon was found and resected. Because IIA preservation cannot guarantee protection against colon ischemia, surgeons should maintain a high level of suspicion and use surveillance liberally after EVAR for early diagnosis of colon ischemia, even if both IIAs are preserved.
Abdominal Pain ; Aged ; Aneurysm ; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal ; Colitis, Ischemic ; Colon ; Colon, Sigmoid ; Early Diagnosis ; Embolism ; Humans ; Iliac Artery ; Infarction ; Ischemia ; Laparotomy ; Mesenteric Artery, Inferior ; Sigmoidoscopy ; Stents ; Transplants

PURPOSE: We sought to evaluate the relationship between distal runoff and long-term graft patency in aorto-iliac occlusive disease. METHOD: A retrospective review was performed on 192 patients with aorto-iliac occlusive disease who underwent surgery between September 1995 and November 2005. Patients who underwent percutaneous angioplasty or stent placement were excluded. Preoperative angiograms were scored according to the SVS/ISVS Ad Hoc Committee guidelines. RESULT: The mean duration of follow-up was 50 months. Procedure indications consisted of claudication in 68 patients and critical limb ischemia in 124 patients. Procedures included 176 bypasses (50 aorto-iliac/aorto-femoral, 32 ilio-femoral, 46 axillo-femoral, and 48 femoro-femoral) and 16 endarterectomies with patch angioplasty. Overall 5-year patency rate was 84.1%. Higher primary patency was observed when the occlusion score of the superficial femoral artery (SFA) or deep femoral artery (DFA) was lower than 2 (P<0.05). Cox proportional hazard model showed run-off resistance values to be significant determinants of graft patency (p=0.000, Exp(B)=1.236). The group that underwent profundoplasty had significantly better long-term patency (P=0.009). CONCLUSION: Poor distal runoff score was related to lower primary patency. In patients with aorto-iliac occlusive disease and poor distal outflow, profundoplasty can improve primary patency.
Angioplasty ; Endarterectomy ; Extremities ; Femoral Artery ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Ischemia ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Retrospective Studies ; Stents ; Transplants

Purpose: Aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) is widely prevalent and leads to severe claudication or chronic limb-threatening ischemia. Stent placement for AIOD demonstrated excellent outcomes in terms of long-term patency. However, iliac artery rupture is the most fearful complication during the aortoiliac stenting (AIS). This study aimed to evaluate the incidence and risk factors of iliac artery rupture during AIS. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review of consecutive patients with AIOD treated with AIS from 2009 to 2021 was completed. We excluded patients with instent restenosis. All types of stents, including self-expanding stent (SES), balloonexpandable stent (BES), or balloon-expandable covered stent (CS), were used.Angiographic characteristics and procedural outcomes were analyzed. Procedural success was defined as the residual stenosis <30%. Results: A total of 242 patients (86.8% male; mean age 68.8±10.0 years) with de novo AIOD were treated with AIS. The procedural success rate was 100%. Rupture occurred in six patients (2.5%) and all ruptures were occurred in the external iliac artery (EIA). Stenting of the EIA and less calcified lesion were risk factors for iliac rupture (P=0.028). All cases of iliac artery rupture were successfully treated with the CSs. Overall primary patency rates were 98.0% and 93.4% at 12 and 36 months, respectively. Primary patency rates of SES, BES, and CS were 87.7%, 88.4%, and 100% at 36 months, respectively. Conclusion The incidence of iliac artery rupture during AIS was 2.5%. Stent placement in the less calcified lesion and EIA was a risk factor for rupture during AIS. Placement of the CS can be the straightforward solution in case of iliac artery rupture during AIS.

Purpose: Although endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has been shown to be superior to open surgical repair (OSR) for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) treatment, no large-scale studies in the Korean population have compared outcomes and costs. Methods: The National Health Insurance Service database in Korea was screened to identify AAA patients treated with EVAR or OSR from 2008 to 2019. Perioperative, early postoperative, and long-term survival were compared, as were reinterventions and complications. Patients were followed-up through 2020. Results: Of the 13,631 patients identified, 2,935 underwent OSR and 10,696 underwent EVAR. Perioperative mortality rate was lower in the EVAR group (4.2% vs. 8.0%, P < 0.001) even after excluding patients with ruptured AAA (2.7% vs.3.3%, P = 0.003). However, long-term mortality rate per 100 person-years was significantly higher in the EVAR than in the OSR group (9.0 vs. 6.4, P < 0.001), and all-cause mortality was lower in the OSR group (hazard ratio, 0.9; 95% confidence interval, 0.87–0.97, P = 0.008). EVAR had a higher AAA-related reintervention rate per 100 person-years (1.75 vs. 0.52), and AAA-related reintervention costs were almost 10-fold higher with EVAR (US dollar [USD] 6,153,463) than with OSR (USD 624,216). Conclusion While EVAR may have short-term advantages, OSR may provide better long-term outcomes and costeffectiveness for AAA treatment in the Korean population, under the medical expense system in Korea.

Background: Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) is a serious complication of abdominal aortic aneurysm associated with high operative mortality and morbidity rates. The present study evaluated the perioperative and long-term outcomes of Korean patients with rAAA based on national health insurance claims data. Methods: The National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) database was searched retrospectively to identify patients with rAAA who underwent endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and open surgical repair (OSR) from 2009 to 2018. Perioperative (≤ 30 days), early postoperative (≤ 3 month), and long-term (> 3 month) survival, reinterventions, and complications were assessed. Results: The search identified 1,034 patients with rAAA, including 594 who underwent EVAR and 440 who underwent OSR. When the study period was divided into two, the total numbers of patients with rAAA, patients who underwent EVAR, and octogenarians were higher during the second half. The perioperative mortality rate was 29.8% in the EVAR and 35.0% in the OSR group (P = 0.028). Hartmann’s procedure for bowel infarction was performed more frequently in the OSR than in the EVAR group (adjusted odds ratio, 6.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.33–21.84; P = 0.001), but other complication rates did not differ significantly. All-cause mortality during the entire observation period did not differ significantly in the EVAR and OSR groups (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.98–1.41; P = 0.087). Abdominal aortic aneurysm-related reintervention rate was significantly lower in the OSR group (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.14–0.70; P = 0.005). Conclusion Although EVAR showed somewhat superior perioperative outcomes for rAAA, the long-term outcomes of EVAR after excluding initial 3 months were significantly worse than OSR. When anatomically feasible for both treatments, the perioperative mortality risk and reasonable prospects of long-term survival should be considered in rAAA.