Purpose: Several studies have evaluated the impact of sarcopenic obesity (SO) on postoperative complications, including postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). Previous studies have shown that SO increases POPF, but it remains unclear whether SO increases postoperative complications. In this study, we aimed to determine the relationship between SO and immediate postoperative complications. Methods: From January 2005 to December 2019, the medical records of patients who underwent PD for periampullary cancer were retrospectively reviewed. Skeletal muscle index (SMI) and visceral fat area (VFA) were calculated from preoperative computed tomography images. Patients with high VFA were classified as obese, while those with low SMI were classified as sarcopenic. Patients were divided into 4 groups: normal group, sarcopenia only group, obesity only group, and SO group. Postoperative outcomes were compared between groups, and factors affecting postoperative complications were analyzed by multivariate analysis. Results: Normal group (n = 176), sarcopenia only group (n = 130), obesity only group (n = 207), and SO group (n = 117) were analyzed retrospectively. SO group had significantly more frequent major complications compared to the normal group (P = 0.006), as well as a significantly more frequent clinically relevant POPF compared to the other groups (P = 0.002). In multivariate analysis, SO was an independent risk factor for major complications (P = 0.008) and clinically relevant POPF (P = 0.003). Conclusion SO is a factor associated with poor immediate postoperative outcomes after PD for periampullary cancer.

Background: Corrective osteotomy is an effective surgery for correcting posture in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Despite satisfactory correction, some patients experience re-stooping during follow-up. However, there have been no studies on restooping in AS. We aimed to analyze the factors that affect re-stooping. Methods: Fifty patients (50 cases) who underwent thoracolumbar corrective osteotomy for AS from March 2006 to April 2018 were analyzed. We defined re-stooping as global kyphosis that recurs after corrective osteotomy. The patients were divided into two groups based on the ratio of correction loss: non-re-stooping group (N group) and re-stooping group (R group). We analyzed the demographic data and radiological parameters, such as modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score (mSASSS), sagittal vertical axis, and various angles. We also investigated the factors affecting re-stooping by analyzing the correlation between the ratio of correction loss and various factors. Results: A significant difference was seen in the change in the mSASSS from before surgery to the last follow-up between the N group (2.87 ± 3.08) and the R group (9.20 ± 5.44). In multivariate analysis, only the change in the mSASSS from before surgery to the last follow-up was significantly correlated with the ratio of correction loss. Conclusions Thoracolumbar corrective osteotomy seems to provide high satisfaction among patients with AS but can lead to re-stooping during follow-up. The change in mSASSS was related with re-stooping in the current study. We recommend active rehabilitative exercises and appropriate medication depending on the patient’s condition, which may help delay the postoperative progression of AS.

Background/Aims: The study investigated the incidence of thromboembolic events (TEE) in head and neck (H&N) cancer patients who received concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with cisplatin, and analyzed the factors affecting TEE occurrence Methods: Two hundred and fifty-seven patients who started CCRT with cisplatin for H&N cancer from January 2005 to December 2019 were analyzed. Results: TEE occurred in five patients, an incidence rate of 1.9%. The 2-, 4-, and 6-month cumulative incidences of TEE were 0.8%, 1.6%, and 1.9%, respectively. Khorana score was the only factor associated with TEE occurrence (p = 0.010). Conclusions The incidence of TEE in H&N cancer patients who underwent CCRT with cisplatin was relatively low when compared to other types of cancer. However, patients with a high Khorana score require more careful surveillance for possible TEE occurrence.

Diagnostic methods for drug allergy include the patient's history, in vivo skin test, in vitro laboratory test, and provocation test. However, the history is often not reliable, procedures for in vivo and in vitro tests are not standardized, and provocation tests are sometimes harmful to patients. Generally, skin prick and intradermal tests are useful for immediate reactions; in contrast, patch test and delayed reading of both skin prick and intradermal tests are helpful for delayed reactions. A drug provocation test is the gold standard for both responses, and it is necessary to be aware of exact indications and contraindications with appropriate drugs, doses, and intervals. To date, several methods have been developed to detect culprit agents for drug hypersensitivity reactions, but they are neither completely well validated nor standardized. Based on this awareness and necessity, the Korean Academy of Asthma, Allergy and Clinical Immunology launched the Standardization Committee to review the international guidelines and the literature, and then developed the consensus report on the procedures and applications of diagnostic tests for drug allergy.
Allergy and Immunology ; Asthma ; Consensus ; Diagnostic Tests, Routine* ; Drug Hypersensitivity* ; Humans ; Hypersensitivity ; In Vitro Techniques ; Intradermal Tests ; Patch Tests ; Skin ; Skin Tests

Eosinophilic gastroenteritis is an uncommon disease of unknown etiology that is characterized by massive tissue infiltration of eosinophils in the tissue layers of various areas of the gastrointestinal tract. An accurate diagnosis is difficult as clinical presentations, symptoms, endoscopic and radiologic findings are nonspecific. A 51-year-old man visited our hospital presenting with abdominal pain. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed diffuse hyperemic mucosal lesions at the stomach, duodenum. Symptoms and endoscopic findings deteriorated rapidly after three days. Small amounts of eosinophilic infiltration without malignant cells was confirmed from biopsy. However, we could not exclude malignancy and performed a subtotal gastrectomy. Stomach specimen showed eosinophilic infiltrations, and the patient was finally diagnosed as eosinophilic gastroenteritis. We report a case of atypical eosinophilic gastritis with rapid deterioration mimicking Borrmann type 4 advanced gastric cancer.
Abdominal Pain ; Biopsy ; Diagnosis ; Duodenum ; Endoscopy, Digestive System ; Eosinophils* ; Gastrectomy ; Gastritis ; Gastroenteritis* ; Gastrointestinal Tract ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Stomach ; Stomach Neoplasms*

This paper aims to introduce, summarize, and emphasize the importance of the 'Evidence-Based, Pharmacological Treatment Guideline for Depression in Korea, Revised Edition'. The guideline broadly covers most aspects of the pharmacological treatment of patients in Korea diagnosed with moderate to severe major depression according to the DSM-IV TR. The guideline establishment process involved determining and answering a number of key questions, searching and selecting publications, evaluating recommendations, preparing guideline drafts, undergoing external expert reviews, and obtaining approval. A guideline adaptation process was conducted for the revised edition. The guideline strongly recommends pharmacological treatment considered appropriate to the current clinical situation in Korea, and should be considered helpful when selecting the appropriate pharmacological treatment of patients diagnosed with major depressive disorder. Therefore, the wide distribution of this guideline is recommended.
Antidepressive Agents/*therapeutic use ; Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use ; Databases, Factual ; Depression/complications/diagnosis/*drug therapy ; Drug Tolerance ; Evidence-Based Practice ; Humans ; Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors/therapeutic use ; Neurotransmitter Uptake Inhibitors/therapeutic use ; Placebo Effect ; Psychotic Disorders/complications/drug therapy ; Republic of Korea ; Severity of Illness Index

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to establish Korean pharmacological treatment guidelines for the initial choice of antidepressant for treatment of moderate or severe depression. METHODS: The process for establishment of guidelines involved determination of important key questions, selection of 12 international and domestic clinical practice guidelines for depression, drawing of recommendation drafts, and peer review. RESULTS: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), norepinephrine-dopamine reuptake inhibitors (NDRI), and noradrenergic and specific serotonergic antidepressants (NaSSA) were strongly recommended as the first-line antidepressants for treatment of moderate or severe depression. SSRIs were weakly recommended for patients who had problems with tolerability. Consideration of not only efficacy but also provisional adverse effects, drug-drug interactions, history of treatment response, preference, acceptability, cost, comorbid illnesses, and other factors in the choice of first-line antidepressants was strongly recommended. The treatment recommendations for specific clinical features of depression were as follows. SSRIs were weakly recommended for atypical depression. Augmented use of antipsychotics to antidepressants was strongly recommended for psychotic depression. Bupropion and SSRIs were weakly recommended for seasonal depression. CONCLUSION: The results of this study may contribute toward improving the quality of depression treatment by providing clear and definite recommendations for the initial choice of antidepressant for treatment of moderate or severe depression.
Antidepressive Agents ; Antipsychotic Agents ; Bupropion ; Depression ; Humans ; Seasons ; Serotonin Uptake Inhibitors

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to demonstrate the recommendations for antidepressant treatment strategy of dose increment, switching, combination, and augmentation therapy derived from Evidence-Based Korean Pharmacological Treatment Guideline for Depression, Revised Edition. METHODS: The guideline was developed through adaptation of 12 domestic and foreign clinical guidelines for depression, with key questions concerning pharmacotherapy of depression, and drawing of recommendations. RESULTS: The guideline strongly recommended dose increment, switching, and combination and augmentation therapy of antidepressant when patients with depression showed inadequate treatment outcomes from initial antidepressant treatment. The dose increment was strongly recommended when the patients had insufficient response from treatment with tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), monoamine oxidase inhibitors, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), and serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs). Switching from SSRI to non-SSRI was also strongly recommended. The combination of initial medication and other classes of antidepressants could benefit from treatment with TCAs, SSRIs, SNRIs, and noradrenergic and specific serotonergic antidepressants. Combination with norepinephrine and dopamine reuptake inhibitors or serotonin-2 antagonist/reuptake inhibitors was weakly recommended. The guideline strongly recommended use of the augmentation strategy of adding lithium or benzodiazepine to initial antidepressants. Augmentation of lamotrigine, T3, methylphenidate, and modafinil was weakly recommended. CONCLUSION: If the initial outcomes of antidepressant therapy are unsatisfactory to the patients the next-step strategies of dose increment, switching, combination and augmentation of antidepressants should be considered after rechecking the patients' drug compliance, dose, and diagnosis.
Antidepressive Agents ; Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic ; Benzhydryl Compounds ; Benzodiazepines ; Compliance ; Depression* ; Depressive Disorder, Major ; Dopamine Uptake Inhibitors ; Drug Therapy ; Humans ; Lithium ; Methylphenidate ; Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors ; Norepinephrine ; Serotonin ; Serotonin Uptake Inhibitors ; Triazines

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to suggest recommendations of antidepressant efficacy compared with placebo, difference in efficacy of antidepressants, and appropriate time of efficacy judgment in antidepressant therapy. METHODS: Using recommendations from 12 international and domestic clinical practice guidelines for depression, drawing of recommendation drafts, and peer review, the executive committee developed the guideline. RESULTS: Tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOI), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI), serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), norepinephrine and specific serotonergic antidepressants (NaSSAs), norepinephrine and dopamine reuptake inhibitors (NDRIs), and serotonin antagonist and reuptake inhibitors (SARIs) were strongly recommended as having antidepressant efficacy compared with placebo. Difference in efficacy of antidepressants was as follows. TCAs, MAOI, SSRI, SNRIs, and NaSSAs were strongly recommended, however, NDRIs, SARIs were weakly recommended. If there was no or minimal improvement with treatment, appropriate time of efficacy judgment in antidepressant therapy was estimated to be after two to four weeks. CONCLUSION: We hope that the results of this study will be helpful in encouraging the optimal treatment by understanding antidepressant efficacy compared with placebo, difference in efficacy of antidepressants, and appropriate time of efficacy judgment in antidepressant therapy.
Antidepressive Agents* ; Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic ; Depression* ; Depressive Disorder, Major ; Dopamine Uptake Inhibitors ; Judgment* ; Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors ; Norepinephrine ; Peer Review ; Serotonin ; Serotonin Uptake Inhibitors