No abstract available.
Humeral Fractures

Introduction: Supracondylar fracture of the humerus is the most common fracture around the elbow in children. Pinning with Kirschner wires (K-wires) after open or closed reduction is generally accepted as the primary treatment modality. However, it comes with the risk of persistent instability and if the K-wire is not inserted properly, it may cause displacement and varus deformity. We present our two-year experience with a new technique of lateral external fixation and K-wiring of the humeral supracondylar fracture. Materials and Methods: A total of seven children with irreducible Gartland Type III supracondylar humeral fracture were treated with closed reduction and lateral external fixation and lateral Kirschner wiring. Patients with ipsilateral radial or ulnar fracture, open fracture and presence of neurovascular impairment pre-operatively were excluded. All the patients were followed up at one, three and six weeks and three and six months. The final outcomes were assessed based on Flynn's criteria. Results: All the patients achieved satisfactory outcomes in terms of cosmetic and functional aspects. All patients except one (85.5%) regained excellent and good cosmetic and functional status. One patient (14.3%) sustained pin site infection which resolved with oral antibiotic (CheckettsOtterburn grade 2). There was no neurological deficit involving the ulnar nerve and radial nerve. Conclusion: The introduction of lateral external fixation and lateral percutaneous pinning provide a promising alternative method for the treatment of humeral supracondylar fracture. This study demonstrates that it has satisfactory cosmetic and functional outcomes with no increased risk of complications compared to percutaneous pinning.
Humeral Fractures

This is a report of a study on the long term results of PHILOS plating and percutaneous K-wire fixation in a prospective series of proximal humerus fractures in elderly patients. We reviewed a total of 60 patients with proximal humerus fractures in 30 patients (Group 1), who were treated by open reduction and internal fixation with Proximal Humeral Internal Locking System (PHILOS) plate and 30 patients(Group 2) who were treated with percutaneous K-wire fixation. Functional outcome was assessed using Visual Analogue Scale(VAS) and Constant-Murley Score. Mean Constant-Murley score was 84.6 points (range: 61-100) in Group 1 and - 76.4 points(range:56-100) in Group2 at final follow up. Values varied depending upon the fracture type with worst in 4-part fractures. Mean VAS Score was 2.6(range:0-10) in Group 1 and 3.8(range:0-10) in Group 2. We obtained satisfactory results in both the groups, with each procedure having its advantages and shortcomings. We found that PHILOS plate fixation provided stable fixation with minimal implant problems and enabled early range-ofmotionexercises to achieve acceptable functional results. Fixation with percutaneous K-wires presented an efficient treatment option with the advantages of minimal invasiveness and soft tissue dissection.
Humeral Fractures

The aim of this study was to evaluate our experience with regard to the outcome of displaced two-part fractures of the humeral neck in elderly patients that were treated conservatively. Between July 2008 and June 2010, 53 consecutive patients (42 females and 11 males; mean age = 74; range = 60-92) with an acute, displaced, two-part fracture of the humeral neck were treated conservatively using a sling and swathe for two weeks, followed by a standard rehabilitation protocol. The inclusion criteria were a displacement of the shaft >50% of its width and/or angulation of the shaft >45 degrees on standard radiographs. The exclusion criteria were patients younger than 60 years of age and those with cognitive or systemic impairment that would preclude the recommended physiotherapy. Patients were followed-up for one year, and were assessed at 3, 6, and 12 months using the ConstantMurley Score (CMS) and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (DASH). Patients were divided into two groups, those below 70 years of age and those above 70-. Two-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine if there were significant differences between the results at 3, 6 and 12 months for both groups, and if the results were significantly different between the two groups. Forty-eight out of 53 patients (91%) were able to complete the follow-up schedule, while five patients died. The mean CMS improved progressively at three (51.3), six (60.4), and 12 (61.3) months. The mean DASH also improved progressively at three (38.8), six (34.8), and 12 (32.6) months. For both groups, the CSS and DASH improved significantly from three to six months and from three to 12 months. However, the improvements were not significant from just six to 12 months. Between the two groups, the results at three, six, and 12 months were not significantly different from each other. On final follow-up, 42 out of 48 patients (88%) were satisfied with their outcome and reported that they would choose to undergo the same treatment if they had to do everything all over again. Conservative management of displaced two-part fractures of the humeral neck in elderly patients is a safe, efficacious, and acceptable treatment.
Humeral Fractures

No abstract available.
Humeral Fractures ; Nails

135 children aged 7-15, with fracture in the brachial condylus treated by continous stretching using Kirchner needle on Ponliquen frame and Crame lath during 2 weeks, then fixed by 2 bamboo laths. The procedure showed a 100% conservative recovery. Very good result reached in 86.8%, good 7.5% and bad 5.7%. No case needed surgical intervention
Humerus ; Child ; Humeral Fractures

Although studies on malrotation of the humerus possibly leading to dysfunction of the shoulder have been reported, studies on its causes are inadequate. The authors encountered a patient complaining of malrotation accompanied by dysfunction of the shoulder which occurred during treatment of a distal humeral fracture. The patient recovered the shoulder function by only correcting malrotation of the humerus without direct treatment on the shoulder, and we report it herein with a review of the literature.
Humans ; Humeral Fractures ; Humerus* ; Shoulder*

Since the introduction of shoulder arthroplasty by Neer in 1974, the design of not only the glenoid component but also the humeral component used in shoulder arthroplasty has continually evolved. Changes to the design of the humeral component include a gradually disappearing proximal fin; diversified surface finishes (such as smooth, grit-blasted, and porous coating); a more contoured stem from the originally straight and cylindrical shape; and the use of press-fit uncemented fixation as opposed to cemented fixation. Despite the evolution of the humeral component for shoulder arthroplasty, however, stem-related complications are not uncommon. Examples of stem-related complications include intraoperative humeral fractures, stem loosening, periprosthetic fractures, and stress shielding. These become much more common in revision arthroplasty, where patients are associated with further complications such as surgical difficulty in extracting the humeral component, proximal metaphyseal bone loss due to stress shielding, intraoperative humeral shaft fractures, and incomplete cement removal. Physicians have made many attempts to reduce these complications by shortening the stem of the humeral component. In this review, we will discuss some of the limitations of long-stem humeral components, the feasibility of replacing them with short-stem humeral components, and the clinical outcomes associated with short-stemmed humeral components in shoulder arthroplasty.
Arthroplasty ; Humans ; Humeral Fractures ; Periprosthetic Fractures ; Shoulder

PURPOSE: We wanted to evaluate the normal glenoid size of Koreans in their 7th and 8th decades by conducting Computed tomographic (CT) studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The CT images were obtained from the normal scapulae of the patients (mean age: 68.8) who had humeral fracture. A display workstation version 2.0.73.315 was used to measure the scans to determine the maximal superoinferior (SI) and anteroposterior (AP) diameters of the glenoid vault. RESULTS: The average diameters of curvature of the glenoid were 31.2 mm (range: 27 to 34 mm) in the superior-inferior direction and 26.1mm (range: 22 to 31mm) in the anterior-posterior direction. CONCLUSION: This study showed the normal glenoid size of Koreans and it is different from the size that the international literature reported. It should be an important factor for the treatment of fracture or in designing arthroplasty implants.
Arthroplasty ; Humans ; Humeral Fractures ; Scapula ; Shoulder

BACKGROUND: This study compared the clinical and radiological outcomes of the single calcar screw plate and Polarus nail techniques for the treatment of the proximal humerus fractures. METHODS: Seventy-two patients diagnosed with displaced proximal humerus fracture were enrolled for the study. Of these, 50 patients underwent the locking plate surgery with a single calcar screw (plate group), whereas 22 patients underwent the Polarus nail surgery (nail group). The plate group was further divided into plate 1 group (with medial support), and plate 2 group (without medial support). The radiological and functional results of both groups were compared to the nail group. RESULTS: The α angle 1 year after surgery was significantly different between plate 1 and plate 2, and plate 2 and nail groups (p=0.041, p=0.043, respectively). The ratio that does not satisfy the reference value of γ angle was 2.8% in plate 1, 7.1% in plate 2 and 22.7% in nail group (p=0.007); there was a significant difference between plate 1 and nail group, and plate 2 and nail group (p=0.014, p=0.033, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences were observed in the clinical results between locking plate and Polarus nail. However, in the plate 2 group and nail group, the rate of failure to maintain reduction during the 1-year period after surgery was statistically and significantly higher than the plate 1 group (level of evidence: level IV, case series, treatment study).
Humans ; Humeral Fractures ; Humerus* ; Reference Values