Objective:To explore the effect of narrative medicine course on the empathy ability and comprehensive ability training of residents in the standardized residency training in municipal hospitals.Methods:A narrative medicine group was set up in a municipal hospital, and a anarrative medical course of 2 months of narrative theory teaching and 4 months of clinical practice education was carried out among 42 residents. The Chinese version of the Interpersonal Response Index Scale (IRI-C) was used to measure the empathy ability at 4 time points (before intervention, 2 months after theory education, 2 months after practice, and 4 months after practice). The effect of narrative medicine courses was evaluated through the satisfaction questionnaire survey, parallel medical record writing and the first-time pass rate of Medical Practitioner Qualification Examination. SPSS 25.0 was used to analyze the variance of one-way repeated measurement.Results:The empathy ability of 42 residents was significantly improved. The empathy score after 2 months after practice was higher than that before intervention and after the theoretical course ( P < 0.05), while the empathy score after 4 months of practice was higher than that before intervention and after the theoretical course ( P < 0.05). The most popular theoretical teaching forms among residents were interactive theoretical teaching (64.29%, 27/42), video viewing (59.52%, 25/42), and situational simulation (52.38%, 22/42). The comprehensive abilities of parallel medical record writing and podium performance among residents were improved. Passing the Medical Practitioner Qualification Examination is a necessary condition for passing the residency training program. The first-time pass rate of the Qualification Examination for the residents was 72.00% (18/25), which was higher than that of the residents who were not recruited during the same period (64.71%, 11/17). Conclusion:Carrying out narrative medicine education is helpful to improve the empathy ability and comprehensive ability of training residents in municipal hospitals.

【Objective】 To explore the reasons for wrong connection between anticoagulant and normal saline solution during apheresis platelet donation, as well as the preventive measures, so as to ensure the safety of apheresis platelet donors. 【Methods】 Manual checking in the first phase (December 2008 to September 2016) was compared with double checking (manual checking plus information system) in the second phase (October 2016 to October 2020) via bilateral testing using Fisher's Exact Test to study pre-post-improvement differences. 【Results】 The incidence of solution connection errors during apheresis platelet donation in the first phase was 1.02/10 000, and the error incidence between Amicus and Trima + Mcs^®+ blood cell separator was statistically significant (P<0.05). The total incidence of errors between the first and second phases was not statistically significant (P>0.05). After the performance of double checking in the second phase, no wrong connection of anticoagulant and saline solution occurred. 【Conclusion】 The double checking method assisted by manual and information system can effectively prevent the wrong connection between anticoagulant and normal saline solution.