Objective:To compare the clinical efficacy and toxicity of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) in radical radiotherapy for cervical cancer.Methods:Clinical data of 1002 patients with cervical cancer treated with radical radiotherapy at Zhejiang Cancer Hospital from September 2013 to December 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were divided into the IMRT group and 3D-CRT group according to the technology of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). After 1∶1 propensity score matching (PSM), clinical prognosis of patients receiving IMRT or 3D-CRT was compared. Continuous data were expressed as Mean ± SD or median . Categorical data were described by case number (percentage). Quantitative data were compared by t-test. Qualitative data were compared by chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. Survival rates in two groups were calculated by Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Results:The percentage of patients who received pelvic and para-aortic radiotherapy in the IMRT group was significantly higher than that in the 3D-CRT group (14.9% vs. 1.2%, P<0.001). The percentage of patients whose positive lymph nodes dose reached 55 Gy or more in the IMRT group was significantly higher than that in the 3D-CRT group (26.6% vs. 15.5%, P=0.002). In the IMRT group, the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate (74.6% vs. 68.9%, P=0.084) and overall survival (OS) rate (79.4% vs. 74.9%, P=0.270) were slightly higher than those in the 3D-CRT group, but there were no significant differences between two groups. In the IMRT group, the local recurrence (3.0% vs. 6.9%, P=0.020) and distant lymph node metastasis rates (4.2% vs. 9.0%, P=0.013) were significantly lower compared with those in the 3D-CRT group. In terms of acute radiotherapy toxicities, grade 3-4 leukopenia (46.3% vs. 37.9%, P=0.028) and anemia (18.8% vs. 14.0%, P<0.001) occurred significantly more frequently in the IMRT group than in the 3D-CRT group. Conclusions:Both IMRT and 3D-CRT could achieve good therapeutic outcomes in radical radiotherapy of cervical cancer. IMRT can boost the radiation dose of metastatic lymph nodes and has significant advantages in reducing local recurrence and distant lymph node metastasis.

Objective:To explore the recurrence pattern and prognosis of cervical cancer after radical chemoradiotherapy.Methods:Clinical and follow-up data of 1 359 patients with stage Ⅰ-ⅣA (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2009 staging) who received radical radiotherapy in Zhejiang Cancer Hospital from August 2011 to December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. The survival and prognostic factors of 249 patients with recurrence / metastasis with detailed data were analyzed. The primary endpoint was post-recurrence / metastasis survival time. Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the survival rate, log-rank test was used for single factor analysis, and Cox model was used for multi-factor analysis.Results:The distant metastasis rate of 249 patients was 77.5%, and the local recurrence rate was 36.9%. According to the location of metastasis and recurrence, 56 cases with recurrence in the field of radiotherapy alone were assigned into group A, 157 cases with recurrence outside the radiation field alone were allocated into group B (56 cases with lymph node recurrence in group B1, 78 cases with blood metastasis in group B2, and 23 cases with lymph node and blood metastasis simultaneously in group B3), and 36 cases with combined recurrence and metastasis in and out of the field of radiotherapy were assigned into group C. The median survival time of patients in groups A, B1, B2, B3 and C was 13, 24, 13, 11 and 9 months, respectively (all P<0.001). According to the interval from initial diagnosis to recurrence / metastasis, 110 cases were classified in ≤1 year group, 74 cases in >1-2 years group, and 65 cases in >2 years group. The median survival time of patients in the three groups was 11, 14, and 22 months, respectively (all P<0.001). According to the management of recurrence / metastasis, 138 cases received palliative treatment, 15 cases received local treatment, 45 cases received systemic treatment, and 51 cases received combined treatment. The median survival time of patients among four groups was 9, 37, 20 and 32 months, respectively (all P<0.001). The results of multi-factor analysis showed that age, recurrence / metastatic site, retreatment methods, time interval between initial treatment and recurrence /metastasis were the independent prognostic factors affecting the survival (all P<0.05). Conclusions:Distant metastasis is the main failure pattern after radical radiotherapy. Patients with metastasis out of irradiated regions, especially those with only lymph node metastasis, have good prognosis. Active retreatment and time interval between initial diagnosis and recurrence / metastasis are important prognostic factors.