2.Efficacy of purging the lung and removing phlegm and blood stasis method(泻肺化痰祛瘀法) on rats with pulmonary hypertension
Huiqun PANG ; Xudong XIONG ; Hui ZHAO
Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine in Intensive and Critical Care 2006;0(03):-
Objective: To study the efficacy of purging the lung and removing phlegm and blood stasis method(泻肺化痰祛瘀法) on animal model of pulmonary hypertension induced by monocrotaline and explore its mechanism.Methods: The model of pulmonary hypertension induced by monocrotaline was established in rats.Sixty healthy and clean male Wistar rats were randomly divided into normal control group,model group,low and high dosage of traditional Chinese medicine(TCM) drugs for purging the lung and removing phlegm and blood stasis groups.From the 15 th day after model establishment,two dosage groups were treated with the drugs in the prescription containing the main ingredients as follows: 9 g prepared rhubarb(制大黄),(2 g)(prepared)(euphorbia) kansui(炙甘遂),15 g lepidium apetalum(葶苈子),9 g ligusticum(川芎) and 15 g(scutellaria)(黄芩) infused into the stomach once a day for 7 days.Normal control group and model group were given normal saline infused into the stomach.Mean right ventricular pressure(MRVP) and the mean(pulmonary) artery pressure(MPAP) of rats were measured by right cardiac catheterization,and the(pathological)(changes) of lung tissues were detected by hematoxylin and eosin(HE) stained sections.(Results:) The MRVP and the MPAP in high dosage group((13.37?4.22)mm Hg and(12.26?2.79) mm Hg,(1 mm Hg)=(0.133 kPa)) were lower than that in the model group((16.27?2.27) mm Hg and(14.77?(2.39) mm Hg),P
3.A clinical study on efficacy of gemcitabine and carboplatin versus paclitaxel and carboplatin in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Tao JIANG ; Huiqun XIONG ; Xiaokui TANG ; Zhong LIU
Chinese Journal of Lung Cancer 2003;6(2):135-137
BACKGROUNDTo evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine and carboplatin (GC) versus paclitaxel and carboplatin (TC) in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
METHODSA total of 64 patients with advanced NSCLC diagnosed by pathology were randomly divided into two groups. Gemcitabine and carboplatin were administrated to the patients in GC group (n=30), and paclitaxel and carboplatin in the TC group (n=34), 28 days as a cycle. All patients received at least two cycles.
RESULTSThe overall response rate was 53.3% in the GC group and 58.8% in the TC group (P > 0.05). The main toxicities were well tolerated and consisted of leukopenia, nausea, vomiting and peripheral neuritis, which occurred more frequently in the TC group than in the GC group (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONSBoth of the two regimens of gemcitabine plus carboplatin and paclitaxel plus carboplatin are feasible, well tolerated and effective in the treatment of NSCLC, and the former may be safer than the latter.