1.Endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm with common iliac artery aneurysm using bellbottom technique in 17 patients
Huangxing CAI ; Xiaoming ZHANG ; Qingle LI ; Chenyang SHEN ; Wei LI ; Xuemin ZHANG ; Jingjun JIANG
Chinese Journal of General Surgery 2016;31(3):189-192
Objective To summarize our experiences of endovascular treatment for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) with common iliac artery aneurysm (CIAA) by using bell-bottom technique (BBT).Methods From February 2009 to June 2014,endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) was performed on 17patients with AAA with CIAA using BBT,including 16 patients with bilateral and 1 patient with unilateral CIAA.Among them,patients with common iliac artery (CIA) of less than 25 mm in diameter without involvement of the internal iliac artery and external iliac artery aneurvsm were treated with BBT.Results All procedures were successfully completed.There were 3 bilateral and 14 unilateral BBT.Type Ⅰa endoleak was noticed intraoperatively in 3 cases and balloon dilation were applied,the endoleak disappeared after dilation in 2 cases and in 1 case the diminished endoleak disappeared during the follow-up period.The median follow-up of the 17 cases was 28 months (ranging,4-68 months).During follow-up no AAA or CIAA rupture and no endoleak occurred,and no dilation of the CIAA was observed.None of them had BBT graft occlusion or buttock claudication.Conclusion AAA with CIAA can be successfully treated with EVAR and BBT,which can preserve internal iliac artery patency.
2.Study on the effect of peer support education on family function of breast reconstruction patients after breast cancer surgery
Cuie PENG ; Zan LI ; Bo ZHOU ; Chunliu LYU ; Huangxing MAO ; Peng WU ; Dajiang SONG ; Qingxia WANG ; Wen PENG ; Xin CAI
Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing 2021;37(6):410-416
Objective:To investigate the effect of peer support education on family function of breast cancer patients with breast reconstruction.Methods:Totally 146 patients who received surgical treatment in the department of plastic surgery for breast cancer from June 2017 to June 2019 were randomly divided into the experimental group and the control group by the method of random number table, 73 cases each. The control group received routine education. Patients in the observation group received regular education and peer support education. The intervention time was from admission to 6 months after discharge, and the control group received routine nursing care. Quality of life questionnaire was used to evaluate the quality of life of the patients at six months after operation, family care index questionnaire was used to evaluate the family function of the patients, and comprehend social support scale was used to evaluate the level of social support, then various indicators of the two groups of patients were compared.Results:6 months after operation, the scores of quality of life function and symptom dimension of the intervention group were 6.43±1.54. 5.83±1.47, while control group were 6.02±1.59; 6.39±1.63. There were statistically significant differences between the two groups ( t values were 4.30, 5.01, P < 0.05); family care scores of the two groups were compared, the intervention group was 8.78±2.04. The control group was 8.43±2.05. There were statistically significant differences between the two groups ( t value was 2.02, P < 0.05); the comprehension support score of the two groups was compared, and that of the intervention group was 62.24±14.81. The control group was 55.74±13.58. There were statistically significant differences between the two groups ( t value was 4.26, P < 0.05). Conclusion:Peer support education can improve the quality of life and family care of breast cancer patients with breast reconstruction.