1.Clinical application of ExoSealTM vascular closure device in interventional management via retrograde femoral artery access
Huan LIU ; Xinling LI ; Lijun XIAO ; Qingle ZENG ; Huajin PANG ; Yanhao LI ; Xiaofeng HE
Journal of Interventional Radiology 2017;26(6):547-550
Objective To discuss the safety and efficacy of using ExoSealTM vascular closure device to obtain rapid hemostasis of puncture site in interventional procedure via retrograde femoral artery access.Methods The clinical data of 124 patients,who were admitted to authors' hospital during the period from March 2016 to April 2016 to receive interventional procedure via retrograde femoral artery access,were retrospectively analyzed.During the performance of intervention,ExoSealTM vascular closure device (ExoSealTM group,n=52) or manual compression (MC group,n=72) was employed to make femoral artery puncture point hemostasis.The time spent for hemostasis,the manual compression time,the limb immobilization time,the amount of blood loss during compression process,and the procedure-related complications were recorded and the results were compared between the two groups.Results Technical success rate in ExoSealTM group was 98.1%(51/52).In ExoSealTM group and MC group,the time spent for hemostasis was (0.28±0.08) min and (5.83±1.46) min respectively,the manual compression time was (2.65 ±0.57) min and (7.70± 1.88) min respectively,the limb immobilization time was (2.72±0.43) h and (6.15±0.69) h respectively;all the differences between the two groups were statistically significant (P<0.01).In ExoSealTM group subcutaneous hemotoma occurred in one patient,while in MC group subcutaneous hemotoma occurred in 3 patients and pseudoaneurysm in one patient;the complication rates were 1.92% (1/52) and 5.56% (4/72) respectively,but the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05).In MC group the amount of blood loss during compression process was (1.11±0.86) ml,which was remarkably less than (7.83±2.08) ml in ExoSealTM group,the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.01).Conclusion For hemostasis of puncture site in interventional management via retrograde femoral artery access,the use of ExoSealTM vascular closure device is safe and effective.
2.Simple and sensitive determination of sparfloxacin in pharmaceuticals and biological samples by immunoassay
Huajin ZENG ; Ran YANG ; Bing LIU ; Lifang LEI ; Jianjun LI ; Lingbo QU
Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis 2012;02(3):214-219
Plasma quinolone concentrations are not routinely measured in clinical practice.However,in order to optimize quinolone treatment,monitoring of plasma concentrations could sometimes be useful particularly in critically ill patients.In this study,anti-sparfloxacin antibody was obtained by immunizing rabbits with sparfloxacin conjugated with bovine serum albumin using isobutyl chloroformate method.After the assay procedure was optimized,the standard curve of sparfloxacin was established.The practical measuring range of the competitive ELISA extended from 5 ng/mL to 2 μtg/mL.The recovery rates and coefficients of variation for rat plasma,urine and tissues were 87.7-106.2% and 4.8-15.3%,respectively.To demonstrate the potential of the ELISA,a preliminary pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution study of sparfloxacin in rats and quantitative analysis of sparfloxacin in several pharmaceuticals were performed and compared with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).The experimental data indicated that the proposed method would be a valuable tool in therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for sparfloxacin.
3.The preventive transhepatic interventional therapy for primary liver cancer after surgical resection:comparison study between TACE and TAI
Chao FENG ; Jianbo ZHAO ; Yong CHEN ; Xiaofeng HE ; Qingle ZENG ; Quelin MEI ; Jiangyun WANG ; Huajin PANG ; Yanhao LI
Journal of Interventional Radiology 2014;(8):679-682
Objective To compare the therapeutic efficacy of preventive transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) with that of preventive transhepatic arterial infusion (TAI) for patients with primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after hepatectomy. Methods During the period from June 2011 to June 2012 at authors’ hospital, preventive transhepatic interventional therapy was employed in 79 HCC patients within three months after hepatectomy. The followed-up endpoint was in June 2013. The clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into TACE group (n=41) and TAI group (n=38). No significant differences in age, sex, preoperative liver function, Child-Pugh scores, tumor size and AFP level existed between the two groups. During interventional procedure , catheterization of proper hepatic artery was performed first, which was followed by angiography in order to clarify that there were no newly-developed tumor vessels or tumor lesions in the residual liver, then the chemotherapeutic agents were infused through the catheter. The emulsion of iodized oil with chemotherapeutic agent was used in the patients of TACE group, while only chemotherapeutic agent was adopted in the patients of TAI group. By using Chi-square test the one-year recurrence rate was determined. Kaplan-Meier estimation method was used to calculate the disease-free survival time, and t test was adopted to estimate the mean hospitalization days. The results were compared between the two groups. Results Of the 79 patients, postoperative recurrence was confirmed in 11, and the overall one-year recurrence rate was 13.9%. The one-year recurrence rate of TACE group and TAI group was 12.20% and 15.79% respectively , and no significant difference in one- year recurrence rate existed between TACE group and TAI group (χ2= 0.213, P = 0.645). The average disease-free survival time of TACE group and TAI group was (21.60 ± 1.52) months and (17.38 ± 3.01) months respectively, the difference between the two groups was of statistical significance (P = 0.038). The mean hospitalization days of TACE group and TAI group were (6.30 ± 1.84) days and (5.89 ± 2.08) days respectively, and the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (P = 0.522). Conclusion No significant difference in one-year recurrence rate exists between the patients receiving preventive TACE and the patients receiving preventive TAI after hepatectomy for HCC. Nevertheless , preventive TACE can probably improve the disease-free survival time after hepatectomy.