Objective To investigate the risk factors for non-curative resection after endoscopic submucosal dissection ( ESD ) for early esophageal cancer and high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia .Methods The clinicopathological data of 427 cases of early esophageal cancer and high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia who underwent ESD was performed from January 2013 to December 2016 in the Department of Gastroenterology , First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University were retrospectively analyzed .According to the results of postoperative pathology and immunohistochemistry ,339 patients were defined as curative resection group and 88 patients were defined as non-curative resection group .Chi-square test , univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used for statistical analysis .Results A total of 427 patients were enrolled in this study, with an average age of (63.2 ±7.7) years, including 96 cases of early esophageal cancer and 331 cases of high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia .The enbloc resection rate of ESD was 94.8％(405/427), 88 of them were non-curative resected, and the non-curative resection rate was 20.6％.Univariate analysis showed that early esophageal cancer (odds ratio (OR)=3.682, 95％confidence interval (CI) 2.216 to 6.118, P<0.01), submucosal infiltration (OR=10.220, 95％CI 4.861 to 21.481, P<0.01), ESD indications (OR=6.005, 95％CI 3.545 to 10.172, P<0.01) and lifting sign after injecting at the base of lesions (OR=2.508, 95％CI 1.005 to 6.255, P=0.042) were statistically significant between non-curative resection group and curative resection group . Multivariate unconditional logistic regression analysis revealed that submucosal infiltration (OR =4.329, 95％CI 1.758 to 10.661,P =0.001), not absolute indications of ESD (OR =6.484, 95％CI 2.205 to 19.068, P=0.001) and negative lifting sign (OR=3.182, 95％CI 1.171 to 8.651, P=0.023) were independent risk factors for non-curative resection.Conclusions Patients with early esophageal cancer , submucosal infiltration , not absolute indications for ESD and negative lifting signs are prone to non-curative resection .Moreover , submucosal infiltration , not absolute indications for ESD , and negative lifting signs are the independent risk factors for non-curative resection .

To evaluate the therapeutic effectiveness and safety of a novel gastrointestinal occluder device for gastrobronchial fistula. Data of 5 patients diagnosed as having gastrobronchial fistula who received treatment by a novel gastrointestinal occluder device at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from July to August 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The total operation time, occluding time, intraoperative and postoperative complications, postoperative hospital stay and patients′ satisfaction were reviewed. Regular follow-up was conducted, and the short-term curative effect of occluding was evaluated 1 month after operation.All patients were males with age of 58-69 years. The course of fistula ranged 3-16 months and the diameter ranged 0.3-1.0 cm. All 5 patients achieved technical success with operation time of 38-88 minutes and occluding time of 8-24 minutes. The postoperative hospital stay ranged 3-5 days and the patients′ satisfaction score was 10. No severe complications occurred during or after operation. One month after endoscopic therapy, fistula was completely occluded in 4 patients. One patient died due to severe pulmonary infection and multiple organ failure although the bucking symptom after drinking and eating recovered before. Endoscopic closure of gastrointestinal fistula by means of the novel gastrointestinal occluder device is safe and effective.

Objective:To evaluate the safety and clinical efficacy of the novel double disc-shaped gastrointestinal occluder (hereinafter referred to as occluder) in treatment of refractory tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF).Methods:From July 1, 2020 to January 31, 2021, 10 patients with refractory TEF treated with occluder at Department of Gastroenterology, the First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University were collected. The patients′ clinical data such as gender, age, body mass index and fistula diameter were recorded. The success rate of operation, intraoperative and postoperative complications, operation time, postoperative hospital stay, efficacy of fistula closure and postoperative recovery were analyzed. The Karnofsky score and body mass index of patients 1 month and 3 months after operation were compared with those before operation for curative effect evaluation. Paired t test was used for statistical analysis. Results:Among the 10 TEF patients, there were 7 males and 3 females, the median age was 64.5 years old (ranged from 49.0 to 78.0 years old), the body mass index was (18.0±2.5) kg/m 2 and the diameter of the fistula was (1.2±0.6) cm. Occluder placement was successful in all patients. The operation time was (17.6±7.8) min (ranged from 7.0 to 30.0 min). Two cases had little bleeding during the operation, and there was no bleeding after the operation. The postoperative hospital stay was (5.9±4.0) d (ranged from 1.0 to 12.0 d). Among the 10 TEF patients, fistula of 5 patients were completely blocked, 4 cases were partially blocked and 1 case was ineffectively blocked, the effective rate of blocking was 9/10. One month follow-up after operation showed that the symptoms of choking and coughing during eating were significantly improved in 9 patients, and the symptoms of choking and coughing during eating were significantly improved in 1 patient after waist diameter of 12 mm occluder was replaced with the occluder of 15 mm. The 3-month follow-up after operation showed that the occluders were in the right place in 8 patients, the occluder was displaced in 1 patient and the occluder was removed and treated with enteral nutrition. One patient died due to the recurrence of esophageal cancer. The Karnofsky score of TEF patients 3 months after operation and the body mass index of TEF patients 1 month and 3 months after operation were higher than those before operation (70.0±34.0 vs. 46.0±10.7, (19.32±2.59) and (19.73±2.92) kg/m 2 vs. (18.03±2.50) kg/m 2), and the differences were statistically significant ( t=-3.09, -2.37 and -2.82, all P<0.05). Conclusions:Gastrointestinal occluder is safe and effective in the treatment of refractory TEF.