2.Qualitative analysis of direction of public hospital reforms in China.
Frontiers of Medicine 2018;12(2):218-223
Reforms in public hospitals are among the most important improvements in China's health care system over the last two decades. However, the reforms that should be implemented in public hospitals are unclear. Thus, a feasible direction of reforms in Chinese public hospitals is suggested and reliable policy suggestions are provided for the government to reform public hospitals. The data used in this study were mainly derived from a qualitative study. Focus group discussions and in-depth interviews were conducted in Shanghai, Guangdong, and Gansu between May and December 2014. Government funding accounted for approximately eight percent of the total annual revenue of public hospitals in China, and the insufficient government subsidy considerably affects the operation mechanism of public hospitals. However, solely increasing this subsidy cannot address the inappropriate incentives of public hospitals in China. The most crucial step in setting the direction of reforms in public hospitals in China is transforming inappropriate incentives by implementing a new evaluation index system for directors and physicians in public hospitals.
China
;
Focus Groups
;
Health Care Reform
;
organization & administration
;
Health Personnel
;
economics
;
Hospitals, Public
;
classification
;
economics
;
trends
;
Humans
;
Qualitative Research
3.Mortality, Length of Stay, and Inpatient Charges for Heart Failure Patients at Public versus Private Hospitals in South Korea.
Sun Jung KIM ; Eun Cheol PARK ; Tae Hyun KIM ; Ji Won YOO ; Sang Gyu LEE
Yonsei Medical Journal 2015;56(3):853-861
PURPOSE: This study compared in-hospital mortality within 30 days of admission, lengths of stay, and inpatient charges among patients with heart failure admitted to public and private hospitals in South Korea. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We obtained health insurance claims data for all heart failure inpatients nationwide between November 1, 2011 and May 31, 2012. These data were then matched with hospital-level data, and multi-level regression models were examined. A total of 8406 patients from 253 hospitals, including 31 public hospitals, were analyzed. RESULTS: The in-hospital mortality rate within 30 days of admission was 0.92% greater and the mean length of stay was 1.94 days longer at public hospitals than at private hospitals (mortality: 5.18% and 4.26%, respectively; LOS: 12.08 and 10.14 days, respectively). The inpatient charges were 11.4% lower per case and 24.5% lower per day at public hospitals than at private hospitals. After adjusting for patient- and hospital-level confounders, public hospitals had a 1.62-fold higher in-hospital mortality rate, a 16.5% longer length of stay, and an 11.7% higher inpatient charge per case than private hospitals, although the charges of private hospitals were greater in univariate analysis. CONCLUSION: We recommend that government agencies and policy makers continue to monitor quality of care, lengths of stay in the hospital, and expenditures according to type of hospital ownership to improve healthcare outcomes and reduce spending.
Aged
;
Female
;
Heart Failure/economics/*mortality/therapy
;
Hospital Charges/*statistics & numerical data
;
Hospital Mortality
;
Hospitalization/economics
;
Hospitals, Private/*economics
;
Hospitals, Public/*economics
;
Humans
;
Inpatients/*statistics & numerical data
;
Length of Stay/economics/*statistics & numerical data
;
Logistic Models
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Multivariate Analysis
;
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)/economics
;
Patient Discharge/economics/statistics & numerical data
;
Republic of Korea/epidemiology
;
Survival Analysis
;
Time Factors
4.Mortality, Length of Stay, and Inpatient Charges for Heart Failure Patients at Public versus Private Hospitals in South Korea.
Sun Jung KIM ; Eun Cheol PARK ; Tae Hyun KIM ; Ji Won YOO ; Sang Gyu LEE
Yonsei Medical Journal 2015;56(3):853-861
PURPOSE: This study compared in-hospital mortality within 30 days of admission, lengths of stay, and inpatient charges among patients with heart failure admitted to public and private hospitals in South Korea. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We obtained health insurance claims data for all heart failure inpatients nationwide between November 1, 2011 and May 31, 2012. These data were then matched with hospital-level data, and multi-level regression models were examined. A total of 8406 patients from 253 hospitals, including 31 public hospitals, were analyzed. RESULTS: The in-hospital mortality rate within 30 days of admission was 0.92% greater and the mean length of stay was 1.94 days longer at public hospitals than at private hospitals (mortality: 5.18% and 4.26%, respectively; LOS: 12.08 and 10.14 days, respectively). The inpatient charges were 11.4% lower per case and 24.5% lower per day at public hospitals than at private hospitals. After adjusting for patient- and hospital-level confounders, public hospitals had a 1.62-fold higher in-hospital mortality rate, a 16.5% longer length of stay, and an 11.7% higher inpatient charge per case than private hospitals, although the charges of private hospitals were greater in univariate analysis. CONCLUSION: We recommend that government agencies and policy makers continue to monitor quality of care, lengths of stay in the hospital, and expenditures according to type of hospital ownership to improve healthcare outcomes and reduce spending.
Aged
;
Female
;
Heart Failure/economics/*mortality/therapy
;
Hospital Charges/*statistics & numerical data
;
Hospital Mortality
;
Hospitalization/economics
;
Hospitals, Private/*economics
;
Hospitals, Public/*economics
;
Humans
;
Inpatients/*statistics & numerical data
;
Length of Stay/economics/*statistics & numerical data
;
Logistic Models
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Multivariate Analysis
;
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)/economics
;
Patient Discharge/economics/statistics & numerical data
;
Republic of Korea/epidemiology
;
Survival Analysis
;
Time Factors
5.Consequences of right siting of endocrinology patients--a financial and caseload simulation.
Jeremy F Y LIM ; Darren M H TAN ; Andrew L LEE
Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore 2008;37(2):109-113
INTRODUCTIONRight siting has been actively advocated to mitigate rising healthcare costs as well as to free up tertiary resources for the provision of care to more complex patients, research and education. There are, however, concerns that in a block budget setting right siting will reduce patient volumes, thus impacting on subsequent funding allocations and also patient revenues. We sought to determine through modelling and simulation the financial and volume impacts of right siting of endocrinology outpatients in a large tertiary hospital in Singapore.
MATERIALS AND METHODSData were collected prospectively on patient casemix including complexity (complex defined as requiring specialist care), time required for consultations and revenues garnered. The data were used to simulate 2 scenarios: right siting of all simple cases with freed up resources directed to research and teaching (research scenario) and right siting of all simple cases with replacement by complex cases (service scenario).
RESULTSThe department sees an estimated 33,000 outpatients per year with a total annual outpatient revenue of $8.6 million. The research scenario would see a decline in patient volume to 11,880 cases per year which would result in a corresponding decrease in revenue of $5 million and freeing up of 2.8 hours/ week for each staff. The service scenario yields a drop in patient volume of 9500 per annum and a drop in revenue of $1.9 million.
CONCLUSIONRight siting reduces tertiary care patient volumes and revenues and may discourage right siting efforts. A viable business model for the tertiary institutions is needed to facilitate support for right siting.
Cost Control ; methods ; Diagnosis-Related Groups ; Endocrinology ; Health Expenditures ; Hospitals, Urban ; Humans ; Outpatient Clinics, Hospital ; economics ; utilization ; Program Evaluation ; Prospective Studies ; Public Policy ; Referral and Consultation ; economics ; standards