1.Creep characteristics of cancellous bone at 45°between normal and necrotic femoral head
Tao YU ; Changjiang SUN ; Hongshun MA
Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research 2010;14(17):3131-3134
BACKGROUND:The creep characteristics of cancellous bone from necrotic femoral head are important for clinical artificial joint replacement.Therefore,it is necessary to study mechanical properties of cancellous bone at 45°direction.OBJECTIVE:To compare creep properties of normal femoral head and necrotic femoral head at 45°direction based on three-parameter model established creep equation METHODS:A total Of 8 normal and 8 necrotic femoral heads were used.The cancellous bone was harvested at 45° and subjected to creep test on electronic universal testing machine.With simulated temperature field of human body temperature at36.5℃.stress was imposed on the samples by an increase of 5%/s for 7 200 seconds.100 experimental data were collected,and stress relaxation equation was calculated using three-parameter model.RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:The creep curve of the femoral head of normal and necrotic changes was exponential relation.Changes were fast in the first 600 seconds,and strain increased slowly with time,finally entered into balance stage.7 200 s creep of cancellous,bone from necrotic femoral head was less than normal femoral head cancellous bone.Three-parameter model calculation is simple and can well fit the creep of changes in the femoral head.The establishment of such idealized equation quantitatively shows poor visco-elasticity of the necrotic femoral head.
2.Clinical observation of the ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract in the treatment of simple anal fistula.
Ying TIAN ; Zhongtao ZHANG ; Shaoxiong AN ; Shan JIA ; Liancheng LIU ; Hongshun YU
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2015;18(12):1211-1214
OBJECTIVETo investigate the clinical efficacy of ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) in the treatment of simple anal fistula, including transphincteric anal fistula and insphincteric anal fistula.
METHODSClinical data of 52 patients with anal fistula receiving surgery treatment in Beijing Anorectal Hospital from January to October 2014 were analyzed retrospectively. Adoption of surgical procedure was based on rectal endoluminal ultrasound and patients' decision. Patients were divided into LIFT group and seton group. The two groups were compared in terms of operation time, blood loss, postoperative pain score, incidence of urinary retention, wound healing time, cure rate, recurrence, and the anal incontinence score.
RESULTSThere were 52 patients in the entire cohort including 28 cases of transphincteric anal fistula (14 cases of LIFT and seton placement groups) and 24 cases of intersphincteric anal fistula (12 case of LIFT and seton placement). The operation time was shorter in seton placement group in patients with two simple anal fistula [(23.9±5.0) min vs. (46.3±7.7) min, P<0.05]. LIFT postoperative pain score [(1.6±0.6) vs. (6.1±1.3)], wound healing time [(7.9±2.0) days vs. (30.0±5.1) days], postoperative hospital stay [(10.3±3.1) days vs. (20.7±7.1) days], and anal incontinence scores [(1.1±0.4) vs. (4.9±1.1)] were better than that of anal fistula seton (all P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in intraoperatie blood loss [(23.1±4.7) ml vs. (23.3±4.7) ml, P>0.05]. The cure rate of intersphincteric anal fistula was 83.3%(10/12) in LIFT group, and 100%(12/12) in the seton group. The cure rate of transphincteric anal fistula was 78.6% (11/14) in LIFT and 92.9%(13/14) in anal fistula seton group. There was no statistically significant difference (P>0.05).
CONCLUSIONIn the treatment of transphincteric fistula tract and intersphincteric fistula tract, LIFT procedures should be considered.
Digestive System Surgical Procedures ; Fecal Incontinence ; Humans ; Length of Stay ; Ligation ; Operative Time ; Pain, Postoperative ; Postoperative Period ; Rectal Fistula ; Recurrence ; Retrospective Studies ; Wound Healing
3.The efficacy of intravesical instillation of domestic BCG versus epirubicin in the prevention of recurrence of intermediate-risk or high-risk non-muscular invasive bladder cancer and predictive factors of BCG instillation: a randomized, controlled, multi-center clinical trial with 2 years’ follow-up
Hao YU ; Kaiwen LI ; Hailong HU ; Xiang LI ; Nan LIU ; Jian ZHANG ; Xudong YAO ; Xiaodong ZHANG ; Wei LI ; Liqun ZHOU ; Xiangbo KONG ; Jinjian YANG ; Youhan CAO ; Junli WEI ; Jiacun CHEN ; Zhaoyang WU ; Dongwen WANG ; Xuhui ZHANG ; Jinkai SHAO ; Qingwen LI ; Huiqing ZHANG ; Xiaolin WANG ; Shaozhong WEI ; Ye TIAN ; Tie ZHONG ; Hongshun MA ; Kun LI ; Benkang SHI ; Jin YANG ; Yuhua QIAO ; Hongxing HUANG ; Liming LI ; Zhimin WANG ; Jianhua TIAN ; Tianxin LIN ; Jian HUANG
Chinese Journal of Urology 2020;41(10):724-730
Objective:To investigate the 2 years’ efficacy of intravesical instillation of domestic BCG versus epirubicin in the prevention of recurrence of intermediate-risk or high-risk non-muscular invasive bladder cancer and predictive factors of BCG instillation.Methods:From July 2015 to June 2020, 18-75 years old patients with moderate to high-risk non muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) confirmed by pathological examination were involved. The ECOG score was 0-2. Exclusion criteria included ①immune deficiency or impairment (such as AIDS), using immunosuppressive drugs or radiotherapy, suspected allergic to BCG or epirubicin or excipients of the two drugs, fever or acute infectious diseases including active tuberculosis or receiving anti tuberculosis treatment, with severe chronic cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases or chronic kidney disease; ②combined with other urogenital system tumors or other organ tumors; ③combined with muscle invasive bladder urothelial carcinoma (≥T 2); ④undergoing chemotherapy, radiotherapy or immunotherapy within 4 weeks (immediate instillation after surgery not included); ⑤ pregnant or lactating women; ⑥ comfirmed or suspected bladder perforation; ⑦gross hematuria; ⑧cystitis with severe bladder irritation that may affect the evaluation; ⑨participat in other clinical trials within 3 months; ⑩alcohol or drug addiction; ?any risk factors that may increasing the risk of patients. Epirubicin 50 mg was irrigated immediately after the operation(TURBT or laser resection). The patients were randomly divided into BCG15 group, BCG19 group and epirubicin group by the ratio of 2∶2∶1, and the patients were maintained intravescical instillation for 1 year. The recurrence and adverse events of the three groups were compared. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed to predict the risk factors of BCG irrigated therapy failure. Result:By June 15, 2020, the median follow-up duration was 22.1 months(12.1, 32.3), and there was no statistical difference between the groups ( P=0.9024). There were 274 patients enrolled in BCG19 group, 277 patients enrolled in BCG15 group and 130 patients enrolled in the epirubicin group. The drop-off rate was 16.6%(113 cases)and made no difference between groups( P=0.6222). There were no significant difference in age, gender, BMI, or ECOG score( P>0.05). During the follow-up, 116 cases was detected recurrence or progression. The recurrence rate of the three groups was 14.2% and 14.8% in BCG19 group and BCG15 group, and 27.7% in the epirubicin group. There was no difference in recurrence rate between BCG19 and BCG15 group( P=0.9464). The recurrence rate of BCG19 group was lower than that of the epirubicin group ( P=0.0017). The recurrence rate of BCG15 group was lower than that of the epirubicin group ( P=0.0020). There was no difference in the cumulative recurrence free survival rate between BCG19 and BCG15 group (95% CI0.57-1.46, P=0.7173). The cumulative recurrence free survival rate of BCG 19 group was better than that of the epirubicin group( HR=0.439, 95% CI0.26-0.74, P=0.0006), and the cumulative recurrence free survival rate of BCG15 group was better than that of the epirubicin group ( HR=0.448, 95% CI0.29-0.80, P=0.0021). The total incidence of adverse events in 19 BCG19, BCG15 and epirubicin group were 74.5%, 72.6% and 69.8% respectively. There was no difference in the incidence of adverse events between BCG19 and BCG15 group( P=0.6153). The incidence of adverse events in epirubicin group was lower than that of BCG19( P=0.0051) and BCG15( P=0.0167) groups.There was no significant difference in the incidence of serious adverse events (SAE) among the three groups ( P=0.5064). Log rank test univariate analysis and Cox risk regression model multivariate analysis showed that the history of bladder cancer recurrence( HR=6.397, 95% CI1.95-20.94, P=0.0001)was independent risk factor for BCG irrigation failure. Conclusions:The 2 years’ efficacy of intravesical instillation of domestic BCG is better than than of epirubicin with good tolerance and safety. There is no difference between BCG19 and BCG15 group. BCG doesn’t increase SAE compared with epirubicin. Recurrence status was an independent prognostic factor regarding recurrence-free survival.