1.Theories of Functional Recovery after CNS Injuries
Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice 1996;2(1):1-5
In previous section,the theories and promoting factors for functional recovery of the CNSfollowing injury,as well as the development and concept of the brain plasticity theory are intreduced.This section will discuss the anatomy and physiology underlying the brain plasticity theory and thepositive evidence for the theory in both animal and human studies. Internal and external factors which af-fect the brain plasticity will be illustrated as well,based on the Luria’s functional reorgnization theory.
2.Theories of Functional Recovery after CNS Injuries (6)
Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice 1997;3(2):49-56
This section will continue to introduce external factors of recovery. Sorne promoting internal factors for functional recovery in later stage will be discussed.
3.Theories of functional recovery after central nervous system (CNS) injury (III)
Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice 1996;2(2):49-55
This section will introduce the free radicals damages following brain injury and their pre-vention.In addition,certain factors which contribute to recovery of function from brain injury in the acutestage are discussed
4.Theories of Functional Recovery after CNS Injuries (8)
Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice 1997;3(3):97-109
this section continues to introduce internal factors for functional recovery in later stage,as well as external factors of functional recovery.
5.Theories of Functional Recovery after CNS Injuries
Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice 1996;2(3):97-102
This section will introduce some of the factors which contribute to recovery of function inearly stage after injuries.internal factors relating to spontaneous recovery.
6.Theories of Functional Recovery after CNS Injuries(5)
Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice 1996;2(4):145-150
This section will continue to introduce internal factors of spontaneous recovery. Some exter-nal factors will be discussed.
7.Comprehensive Functional Evaluation (CFE):Ⅰ The Design (2)
Hongshi MIAO ; Weijin ZHOU ; Jianpeng XU ; Gang WANG ; Hongjun ZHOU ; Zhuoying QIU ; Shengli LI ; Lihua CUI ; Genlin LIU ; Jimin XU ; Pengxu WEI ; Ying ZHENG ; Chunhua PIAO ; Lijia CHEN ; Huilan LI ; Jiazong WANG ; Zuoqing HUANG
Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice 1999;5(1):1-5
: Rehabilitation medicine is a medical branch which focused on functional recovery. Function Evaluation is very important in assessing the function of patients, the effect of treatment and the efficiency of rehabilitation. Comprehensive Function Evaluation includes evaluation of physical, psychological, speech and society. Vocal, mental and social evaluation have deep cultural and national background. Therefore every country must have its own Function Evaluation Method. Now we present our design for Comprehensive Evaluation. Based on the cooperation of Department of Rehabilitation, Department of Neurology, Department of Spinal Cord Injury, Department of Speech Therapy and Department of Psychology. The advantages of this method are as follows: 1. The style of ADL, speech and thinking are suitable for the condition of our country. 2. The evaluation result adopts hundred work system, it is easy for medical staff, patients and their family to understand and communicate the result. 3. We make it more accurate, comprehensive and reliable by some simple tests on speech pathology and psychology. 4. We overcome some disadvantages of evaluation indexes because it is not correct and is difficult to be understood before. Now every evaluation index has quantity standard. 5. It is simple and practical. Each subtest takes 20 minutes or more. 6. It has been tested by normal people. The norm and severity grade had been developed. 7. The reliability is tested and is proved to be dependable.
8.Correlation of isokinetic thigh muscle asymmetry with gait asymmetry at one year after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
Shuang REN ; Zixuan LIANG ; Si ZHANG ; Yuanyuan YU ; Dai LI ; Xin MIAO ; Hongshi HUANG ; Yingfang AO
Chinese Journal of Trauma 2022;38(7):592-599
Objective:To investigate the correlation of isokinetic thigh muscle asymmetry with gait asymmetry at one year after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.Methods:A retrospective case series analysis was made on 25 patients treated by ACL reconstruction in Third Hospital of Peking University from January 2014 to January 2019. All the subjects were male, aged 17-47 years [(29.4±5.2)years]. Standard rehabilitation treatment procedures were conducted after surgery. The isokinetic muscle strength of the thigh was collected at one year after operation to evaluate knee extensor and flexor concentric strength at 60°/s, 180°/s and 300°/s, and knee extensor and flexor eccentric strength at 60°/s. The maximum concentric and eccentric strength of the knee extensor and flexor were analysed between the injured and intact side. The three-dimensional motion information and ground reaction force was collected during the stance phase of gait, and knee kinematic and kinetic parameters were calculated by inverse dynamics analysis, including the peak flexion moment, peak extension moment, first and second peak adduction moment, peak external and internal rotation moment, peak flexion angle, peak extension angle during the terminal stance phase, flexion angle at heel strike, peak abduction angle, and peak external rotation angle during terminal stance phase. Spearman correlation analysis was used to study the correlation between limb symmetry index (LSI) of isokinetic muscle strength and LSI of gait parameters.Results:One year after ACL reconstruction, the maximum concentric strength of the knee extensor and flexor at 60°/s, 180°/s and 300°/s and maximum eccentric strength of the knee flexor and extensor at 60°/s on the injured side were significantly lower than those on the normal side (all P<0.01). Compared with the intact side, the peak knee extension moment on the injured side was significantly lower during the stance phase of gait ( P<0.01), and the extension angle was insufficient during the terminal stance phase ( P<0.01). There were no significant differences between the injured and intact side in terms of peak flexion moment, first and second peak adduction moment, peak external and internal rotation moment, peak flexion angle, flexion angle at heel strike, peak abduction angle, and peak external rotation angle during terminal stance phase (all P>0.05). One year after ACL reconstruction, Spearman correlation analysis during gait stance phase showed that the LSI of 60°/s concentric strength of the isokinetic knee extensor was significantly related to LSI of peak internal rotation moment ( R=0.42, P<0.05), the LSI of 180°/s concentric strength of the isokinetic knee extensor was significantly related to LSI of peak flexion moment ( R=0.45, P<0.05), the LSI of 180°/s concentric strength of the isokinetic knee flexor was significantly correlated with LSI of peak flexion angle ( R=0.46, P<0.05), the LSI of 300°/s concentric strength of the isokinetic knee extensor was significantly correlated with LSI of peak knee flexion angle ( R=0.42, P<0.05), and the LSI of 60°/s eccentric strength of the isokinetic flexor was significantly correlated with LSI of peak knee flexion angle ( R=0.54, P<0.01). Conclusions:For patients following ACL reconstruction at one year postoperatively, a significant correlation of isokinetic thigh extensor strength asymmetry with peak knee flexion and rotation moment and peak knee flexion angle, and that of isokinetic thigh flexor strength asymmetry with peak knee flexion angle are observed during the stance phase of gait, which suggests that patients with ACL reconstruction still need systematic rehabilitation training one year postoperatively to improve muscle strength and motor function so as to reduce the risk of ACL reinjury and secondary injury.