Objective To investigate the clinical features of bilateral medial medullary infarction (BMMI)in elderly patients.Methods Clinical and imaging data of 8 elderly BMMI patients with different morphology on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI-MR) were retrospectively analyzed.All patients were diagnosed by MRI,while 4 patients received CTA and vascular ultrasound testing,and the other 4 patients received vascular ultrasound testing.Results All 8 cases(100.0％) had acute-onset BMMI.Patients showed varying degrees of acroparalysis(7/8,87.5 ％),dizziness (5/8,62.5 ％),dysarthria(6/8,80.0 ％),dysphagia(3/8,37.5 ％),deep or superficial sensory dysfunction(5/8,62.5 ％),consciousness disorders (2/8,25.0 ％),dyspnea (2/8,25.0 ％),and tinnitus(1/8,12.5 ％).Lesions in most patients were located in the upper part of medulla oblongata(7/8,87.5 ％).In the transverse direction of DWI,the lesions as the inverted V shape were seen in 3 cases (37.5％),the V shape(12.5％)in 1 case,the Y shape(37.5％)in 3 cases,and the heart shape(12.5％) in 1 case.All 8 patients were complicated with posterior cerebral artery stenosis or occlusion,of whom patients with heart-or Y-shaped lesions showed progressive exacerbation.After treatment,4 cases (50.0 ％) recovered,3 cases (37.5 ％) improved,and 1 case (12.5 ％) unrecovered before discharge from the hospital.Conclusions Most elderly BMMI patients have concurrent posterior circulation artery stenosis,and patients with heart-or Y-shaped lesions on MR-DWI show rapid progression and have a poor prognosis.Cranial examination with MR-DWI is helpful for early clinical diagnosis of BMMI,prediction of disease progression and effective prevention of complications.

Objective: To investigate the differences of clinicopathological features, diagnosis, treatment and prognosis between patients with extra-gastrointestinal stromal tumors (EGIST) and duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (DGIST). Methods: A retrospective case - control study was performed. Case inclusion criteria: (1) tumor confirmed by histology and pathology; (2) primary tumor locating in the extra - gastrointestinal tract or duodenum; (3) without other synchronous tumors; (4) complete clinical and pathological data. Clinical data of 20 EGIST patients and 32 DGIST patients from March 2011 to September 2016 at Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine were retrospectively collected and analyzed. The observational parameters included clinicopathological characteristics, treatment and prognosis conditions. Continuous data of abnormal distribution were expressed as median (range) and compared using the Mann-Whitney U-test. Survival curves were drawn by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the Log-rank test. Results: Of the 20 EGIST patients, 8 were males and 12 were females with age of 61.0 (30.0 to 86.0) years and of the 32 DGIST patients, 12 were males and 20 were females with age of 55.5 (27.0 to 70.0) years. Compared with DGIST patients, EGIST patients were older (U=188.000, P=0.012], had larger tumor size [10.0 (3.0 to 29.0) cm vs. 4.0 (1.5 to 10.0) cm, U=98.500, P<0.001] and higher ratio of high risk classification [85.0% (17/20) vs. 12.5% (4/32), χ²=26.870, P<0.001]. Among the 20 EGIST patients, 5 were diagnosed with distal metastasis and received imatinib (400 mg/d), and the other 15 patients underwent radical resection who were included in survival analysis. All the 32 DGIST patients underwent radical resection. The median follow-up of whole group was 43 (14 to 76) months. The 3-year recurrence/metastasis-free survival rate of 15 cases undergoing radical resection in the EGIST group was 85.6%, which was lower than that of the DGIST group (88.6%), and the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.745). There was no significant difference in the 3-year overall survival rate between the EGIST group (92.9%) and the DGIST group (100%) (P=0.271). Conclusions As compared to DGIST, EGIST mostly occurs in those with older age, larger tumor size and higher risk grade. The prognosis of EGIST patients after radical resection is similar to that of DGIST patients.