Objective To evaluate the efficacy of endovascular aortouniiliac repair (EVAR) combined with cross-femoral bypass grafting (CFBG) for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Methods From May 1997 to February 2007, 8 patients with AAA, in whom bifurcated stent-graft could not be used because of complex iliac anatomy, were treated with EVAR using AUI stent-graft combined with CFBG. The endoleak, ischemic syndromes,patency of the bypasses, and blood supply of the lower limbs were observed after the operation. Results There were no perioperative mortalities in this series. One patient died of myocardial infarction 15 months after the operation. Three patients developed primary endoleak, and was cure spontaneously 1, 3, and 6 months postoperation. The 8 patients were followed up for a mean of 24 months (3-72 months), during which the patency rate of cross-femoral bypass was 100%. One year after the operation, 1 patient developed mild anastomotic stoma stenosis without ischemia of the lower limbs, but no limb ischemia. Conclusion In patients with complex iliac anatomy unfavorable for bifurcated endografting, EVAR using AUI combined with CFBG is safe and effective.

Objective To compare the therapeutic effect of endovascular repair (EVAR) and open surgical repair(OSR) of abdominal aortic aneurysm in high-risk patients. Methods The clinical data of 55 patients from 1998 to 2008 with infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm who received surgical treatment were analyzed by using the customized probability index. The perioperative and short term advantages and disadvantages of OSR group (n=20) were compared with EVAR group (n=35). Results All patients in OSR group were followed up, 94% patients in EVAR group were followed up, the mean follow up time were 75 and 70 months respectively. (1) Compared to OSR group, the EVAR group had shorter operation time [(3.1±0.6) h vs (4.9±0.9) h, P<0.05], (2) EVAR group had shorter ICU and hospital stay after operation and less blood loss (P<0.01), (3) Compared to OSR group, the EVAR group had lower mortality within 30 d(2.86% vs 15%), (4)the EVAR group had lower peri-operative complications(17% vs 40%), (5) The main complications of EVAR were endoleak (8.57%), (6) The main complications of OSR was cadiovascular incidence(25%). Conclusions Endovascular treatment, indicated for AAA in high-risk patients, can cut down the perioperative incidence of cadiovascular events, mortality and complications. CPI is useful to estimate the perioperative incidence of cadiovascular events, mortality and complications, and can be used to guide the therapeutic method.

Objective To probe into the reasons for and results of remedial surgical therapy in thoracic aortic dissection patients after first endovascalar repair.Methods From July 2000 to December 2012,12 cases received second interventional surgery.The average time from second therapy to first surgery was ( 14 ± 11 ) months.Main reasons for second endovascular therapy were sustained type Ⅰ endoleak at proximal landing zone and type A dissection caused by retrograde tear.Therapies included hybrid operations in 8 cases and absnlute endovascular therapy in 4 cases.Results The 30 day mortality after the second intervention was 5.6％ ( 1/12),total mortality rate was 16.7％ (2/12).In 7 cases with endoleak,small endoleak remained after remedial therapy (57.1％ ) in 4 cases.Among 4 cases with secondary type A aortic dissection,successful staged hybrid operation with mid-sternal thoracotomy was adopted in 3 cases,one died of pulmonary emtbolism during follow-up period,1 case with Bebcet disease still had proximal type Ⅰ endoleak after second hybrid operation,and died from tear of aorta.Conclusions Endoleak and secondary type A aortic dissection are the main cause necessitating second intervention after primary endovascular therapy for thoracic aortic dissection.Hybrid operation remains the best choice to treat postoperative complications after endovascular therapy for thoracic aortic dissection.

Objective To determine the influence of hostile neck anatomy on type Ⅰ a endoleak development after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysmal disease.Methods From July 2008 to July 2011,195 consecutive patients with non-ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) were treated with EVAR.There were 150 males and 45 females,aging from 52 to 95 years with a mean of 69 years.Forty-three patients were with hostile neck anatomy ( HNA ).High-resolution computed tomography was abtained in all patients,with detailed measurement of proximal neck parameters.Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to compare Ⅰ a endoleak and HNA.Follow-up protocol consisted of computed tomography (CT) angiograms or ultrasound at 3,6,and 12 months,and annually thereafter.Results Twenty-three patients had intraoperative type Ⅰ a endoleaks.The adjunctive measures,such as repeated balloon angioplasty,cuff extension,Palmaz stent placement and chimney technique were used for treating type Ⅰ a endoleak.Small endoleak remained in only one patient.The technical success rate was 98.5％ (192/195).The association between type Ⅰ a endoleak development and magnitude of the infrarenal angle was statistically significant.The mean follow-up time was ( 18 ± 3 )months.The survival rates at 1- and 3-year were 97.4％ and 89.2％ respectively.Conclusions The proximal neck angle is related to intraoperative type Ⅰ a endoleak occurrence,but other factors often thought to be indicative of adverse neck anatomy are not significant predictors.Most type Ⅰ a endoleaks in this study were uccessfully eliminated intraoperatively with a satisfactory mid to long term results.

Objective To evaluate early results of Endurant stent-graft in the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs).Methods From July 2010 to June 2011,68 patients (57 men,11 women; mean age 74.3 years) were treated with Endurant stent-graft at our center.26 cases had hostile proximal neck in the anatomy.According to ASA classification,15 cases were class Ⅱ ; 32 cases were class Ⅲ and 21 cases were class Ⅳ.Results Intraoperative immediate technical success was achieved in all cases.At completion angiography,a type Ⅱ endoleak was detected in 18 (26％) of the 68 patients.The mean operation time was (96 ± 29) min,the mean blood loss was (99 ± 68 ) ml,and the mean contrast usage was (122 ± 65) ml.No intraoperative conversion to open surgery,stent migration,types Ⅰ/Ⅲ endoleak,other major complications,or death was encountered.49 patients (72％) had a postimplantation syndrome with fever,leukocytosis,and increase of C-reactive protein levels,which completely resolved within two weeks.The mean follow-up time was (8 ± 5) months.Conclusions Endurant stent-graft seems to be safe and effective in endovascular aneurysm repair,even in patients with hostile aortoiliac anatomy.

Objective To compare selective coverage and chimney technology of the left subclavian artery (LSA) in thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR).Methods Eighty-one cases were retrospectively reviewed from January 2005 to January 2013 with two different management of the LSA during TEVAR:selective coverage (SC) vs chimney (C).Technical success rates,operating time,endoleaks,and perioperative cerebrovascular accidents,spinal cord ischemia (SCI),left arm ischemic symptoms and mortality were analyzed.The survival rate was also evaluated.Statistical analysis was performed using the x2 test,t-test and Kaplan-Meier survival curve.Results There were 37 patients in group SC and 34 in group C.Operating time was (61 ± 22) min for SC,and (101 ± 20) min for C (P =0.000) ; left arm ischemic symptoms occurred in 23.4％ in group SC,and 2.9％ in group C (P =0.011).Technical success rates were 100％ and SCI were 0 for both SC and C.Endoleaks,perioperative cerebrovascular accidents,and mortality were similar between the two groups.Conclusions During TEVAR,selective coverage of the left subclavian artery is safe,effective; meanwhile,chimney technology is safe,effective for patients whose left subclavian arteries need revascularization.

Objective To evaluate aneurysm sac pressure monitoring during endovascular repair (EVAR)of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Methods From April 2006 to May 2007,12 patients with abdominal aorta aneurysm underwent endovascular aneurysm repair.The average max-diameter of the aneurysm WR8(5.83±0.95)cm.The sac pressure was monitored during the whole process of the operation.The correlation between the pressure and endoleaks and long-term outcomes was observed during follow-up.Results Before the stentgraft was delivered.sac pressure was equal to the systemic blood pressure in all the 12 cases.After the EVAR wag finished,the sac systolic pressure dropped by＞40% in 11 cases,among which sac blood pressure bropped by ≥50% in 7 cases.sac pressure did not change in 1 case.In all the 12 cases,pulse pressure diminished by＞30%,and＞75%in 6 cages.During the follow-up,there were no endoleaks and death.In 5 Cases.with sac systolic pressure drop＞50%,the max-diameter of the aneurysm decreased by 1.6～3.1 mm,while in one c88e,in which sac pressure had no change the postoperative maxdiameter of the aneurysm has increased by 3.2 nma. Conclusion Abdominal aorta aneurysm sac pressure monitoring during EVAR helps to predict the change of the sac pressure after EVAR,and to detect the endoleaks.

Objective To evaluate endovascular management for isolated iliac artery aneurysm (IIAA). Methods From May 1997 to Jan 2006, 15 IIAA cases underwent endovascular treatment, including 12 true aneurysms and 3 psudoaneurysms. There were 9 common iliac artery aneurysms (CIAA), 3 internal iliac artery aneurysms (IIAA) , and 3 external iliac artery aneurysms (EIAA). The average diameter was (5. 97?1. 49) cm (3. 5-9. 0 cm). IIAA was treated with metallic coils and CIAA/EIAA by stent-grafts. Results Unilateral internal iliac artery was preserved in 14 cases, and bilateral internal arteries were preserved in one case. Postoperative endoleak was found in 2 cases. There was no other major complications nor mortality. One case suffered buttock claudication because of internal iliac artery exclusion. The operation time was 1. 9?1. 1 h, blood loss was 126. 7?70. 1 ml. Patients were up and about after 2. 1?1. 1 d, hospital stay was 5.5?4.7 d. Conclusions Endovascular treatment is safe and effective for isolated iliac artery aneurysm. Internal iliac artery preservation and prevention of endoleak is of great importance.

Objective To evaluate the feasibility of chimney technique during thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair(TEVAR) in aortic arch lesions. Methods The stent-graft was deployed covering super arch branch artery in arch lesions in case there was not enough landing zone. A chimney stent was put in the super arch branch artery. We retrospectively analyzed the data of this group, aiming at summarizing the indications, methods, results and complications of chimney technique. Results From August 2004 to August 2009, 27 aortic arch lesions were treated by TEVAR with chimney stent, male/female ratio was 25/2, average age was 67. 2 ±3. 8 years, including3 chimney stents for innominate artery, 11 chimney stents for left common carotid artery and 13 chimney stent for left subclavian artery. Type I endoleaks were encountered in 18. 5% (5/27) of this group by final angiogram. Left common carotid artery dissection was caused by puncture in one case. One patient died of respiratory failure. There was no postoperative stroke nor bleeding. Discharged patients were followed up from 3 to 60 months, averaging at 16. 8 months. There was one death from MI 4 years later. There was minor stroke and left subclavian artery chimney stent occlusion in one each cases during the follow-up. All endoleaks were sealed without stent migration. Conclusion Chimney technique improves the length of landing zone and decreases effectively the endoleak rate.

Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of endovascular repair(EVR)for type B acute aortic dissection(AAD). Methods Between Feb 2002 and May 2008.39 consecutively admitted patients with the confirmed diagnosis of acute type B aortic dissection were studied.All patients were treated bv EVR.Left comnlon carotid artery were covered after bypass in 2 cases.of which fenestrated stent graft (SG)at innominate artery was used in one;1 case underwent left lower extrernity amputation:13 left subclavian artery(LSA)and 1 aberrant risht subclavian artery were completely covered without bypass.5 LSA were pattially covered.All cases were followed by CTA after EVR.the porfusion status of the false lumen were monitored in the aorta at the level of the stented segment(L1)and distal to the stent graft (L2).Results The procedure Was technically successful in all cases;30-day mortality rate was 10.3%.At the 1-month follow-up,false lumen in L1 thrombosed in 100%,a complete thrombosis of the false lumen Was observed in 21 patients(77.8%).partial thrombosis in 6(22.2%).with complete reabsorption of the thrombus and remodelling of the true lumen in 5(18.5%);False lumen in L2 thrombosed only in 7 patients(28%),complete thrombosis in 2(8%)and partial thrombosis in 5(20%).Conclusions The results of endovascular repair of acute type B dissection Was satisfactory.30-day mortalitv rate was related to severe complications before EVR.