1.Clinical survey of recurrent acute pancreatitis
Di ZHANG ; Yaping LIU ; Hao ZHANG ; Yawei BI ; Dan WANG ; Honglei GUO ; Xiangpeng ZENG ; Teng WANG ; Lei XIN ; Lianghao HU ; Maojin XU ; Zhaoshen LI
Chinese Journal of Pancreatology 2017;17(2):88-92
Objective To analyze the clinical features of recurrent acute pancreatitis (RAP).Methods The clinical data of patients diagnosed as RAP were collected in Changhai Hospital, the Second Military Medical University between January 2016 to July 2016, and chronic pancreatitis(CP) patients and RAP patients to matching, as control group.A prospective cohort study about the clinical features of RAP and CP was set.The survival analysis model was established by Kaplan-Meier′s method, to calculate the cumulative rate of RAP which progressed into CP.Results The morbidity of male patients was 69.0% in the RAP group(n=100) and 60% in the CP group(n=100).The average first onset age of RAP and CP was 38 and 21 years old, respectively;and the teenagers accounted for 12% and 38.6%.The incidence of diabetes was 49.5% and 9%;and the incidence of fatty diarrhea was 46.6% and 19% of the two groups.The cumulative incidence of CP was 2% within 1 year, 4.6% in 3 years, and 12.4% in 5 years.Conclusions Men has higher morbidity in both RAP group and CP group.RAP patients′ first onset age was older than that of CP.Teenagers had a low incidence in RAP group.The risk of diabetes and fatty diarrhea was lower in RAP group than CP group.A certain proportion of RAP patients can progress to CP.
2. Application of intelligent real-time monitoring in infusion safety
Ying YE ; Bijun YAO ; Jingjun YING ; Yongfei HE ; Hong WAN ; Honglei BI
Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing 2019;35(23):1815-1818
Objective:
To explore the application of intelligent real-time monitoring in infusion safety.
Methods:
Totally 1 200 patients who received intravenous infusion from November 2017 to June 2018 in the Department of gastroenterology were selected as the study subjects. With system sampling method, 600 patients were selected as observation group who using Intelligent infusion system to monitor the infusion process. Another 600 patients were selected as control group without using the system. The current use rate of infusion fluid, the severity of local exudation during intravenous infusion, the blocking rate of intravenous pathway, the number of nurses dealing with dripping empty infusion of two groups and the rate of erroneous running caused by patients′ wrong ringing or false alarm of intelligent infusion system were compared between the two groups.
Results:
The current use rate of infusion fluid in the observation group was 91.33% (548/600) higher than 80.00% (480/600) in the control group (